Libyan Radio | Libyan Radio
Libyan TV Broadcast through Ar-Rai (Syria) | The Elder Same for browsers
Libyan Television (now disabled by NATO)
Allibiya TV Facebook blog
Libyan Government
General People’s Congress
Libyan Jamahiriya Broadcasting Corporation
Libyan Embassn in Canada

flagnadmoskvoy DSC00025

International Green Charter http://www.greencharter.com/files/igc.htm
International Green Charter Movement
BASED SOLELY on the GREEN BOOK and all the writings of Brother-Leader, Moammar Gadhafi
~ Human Rights for the Third Millennium ~
Inspired by the Proclamation of the Great Green Charter for Human Rights on 12th June, 1988, the first Human Rights Charter 
to be issued 
by the people gathered in popular congresses, signalling the end of the era of the republics and the dawn of the era of 
the masses, as 
well as a new advancement in the definition of human rights;
Led by the Green Book , guide of humanity for the total deliverance from the power of individuals, classes, clans, tribes 
or parties, 
and the path towards the establishment of a society for all (the Jamahiriya) where all human beings are free and equal 
in the exercise 
of power and in the possession of wealth and arms;
Convinced that the rights of Man, vicegerent of God on earth, cannot be the gift of a person nor exist in societies 
where exploitation 
and tyranny are practised, and can only be achieved by the victory of the popular masses over their oppressors and the 
disappearance of 
regimes which annihilate freedom;
that the establishment of the power of the popular masses will consolidate their existence on earth, when the sovereignty 
of the 
people will be exercised directly through legislative popular congresses and executive people's committees;
that human rights cannot be guaranteed in a world where there exist governors and governed, masters and slaves, 
rich and poor;
Aware that human misery cannot disappear, nor human rights be affirmed, except by building a world where the people 
hold the power, 
the wealth and the arms; a world where governments and armies will disappear, and where communities, peoples and 
nations will 
be rid of all danger of war, a world of peace, respect, agreement and co-operation;
On the basis of the above,
the Green Charter International was formed to link men and women around the world who wish to achieve, promote and 
defend the 
true Human Rights and freedoms of this new age, the era of the masses, which were proclaimed by the free people, gathered in 
popular congresses in the Great Green Charter of Human Rights as the following:
1. Democracy is the power of the people, not only the expression of the people. We declare that power belongs to the people. 
It is exercised directly, without intermediary or representatives in the popular congresses and the people's committees.
2. We consider the life of the individual sacred and protect it. We forbid its alienation. Imprisonment can only be 
exercised a
gainst those for whom liberty constitutes a danger or a contamination of others. The aim of punishment is to renew 
to protect its human values and its interests. We proscribe punishments which attack the dignity and the integrity 
of the human 
being, such as forced labour or long-term imprisonment. We proscribe all attacks, physical or mental, on the 
person of the prisoner. 
We condemn all speculations and experiments of any kind upon prisoners. Punishment is personal and suffered 
by the individual 
following a criminal act on which it is necessarily contingent. The punishment and its consequences cannot 
extend to the family 
nor the persons close to the criminal. "One only commits evil to one's own detriment and nobody will assume 
what he has not committed".
3. We are, in times of peace, free inall our movements and in the choice of our residence.
4. Citizenship is a sacred right. Nobody can be deprived of it or have it removed.
5. We forbid clandestine action and recourse to force in all its forms, violence, terrorism and sabotage. 
These acts constitute 
a betrayal of the values and principles of the Jamahiriya, which affirms the sovereignty of the individual 
in the popular congresses, 
guaranteeing the right to express opinions publicly. We reject and condemn violence as a means of imposing 
ideas and opinions. 
We adopt democratic dialogue as the only method of debate and consider any hostile relation towards the 
Jamahiriya linked to a 
foreign instance, whatever its form, as high treason against it.
6. We are free to form unions, trade unions and leagues to defend our professional interests.
7. We are free in our private acts and our personal relations. Nobody can involve themselves therein, 
except at a complaint from 
one of the partners concerned or if the act and the relation attack or are prejudicial to society, or 
if they are contrary to its values.
8. We consider the life of the human being to be sacred and protect it. Our objective is to abolish 
capital punishment. To this 
end, the death penalty can only be exercised against an individual whose existence constitutes a 
danger or is deleterious to society. 
The person condemned to death may request that his sentence be lightened or, instead of his life, 
offer a personal tribute. The court 
may commute the penalty if this decision is not prejudicial to society or if it is not contrary to 
human values. We condemn the 
application of the execution of capital punishment by repugnant methods, such as the electric chair, 
the use of toxic gas or injections.
9. The Jamahiriya guarantees the right to plead and the independence of the judicial system. Each of 
its members is entitled to a 
fair and complete trial.
10. Our judgments are based on sacred law, religion or custom, the terms of which are stable, 
unchangeable and for which there can 
be no substitute. We declare that religion is an absolute belief in the divinity and a sacred 
spiritual value. It is personal to 
each person and common to everyone. It is a direct relationship with the Creator, without intermediary. 
We proscribe its monopoly 
and its exploitation for purposes of subversion, fanaticism, sectarianism, partisan spirit and fratricidal war.
11. The Jamahiriya guarantees the right to work. It is a right and a duty for everyone, in the limits of 
one's personal effort or 
in association with others. Everybody has the right to exercise the work of their choice. The Jamahiriya 
is one of partners and 
not one of paid employees. Ownership, the fruit of labour, is sacred and protected, it can only be attacked 
in the public interest 
and with fair compensation. The Jamahiriya is free from the slavery of salaries, stating the right of 
everybody over their labour 
and production. Only those who produce consume.
12. We are liberated from any feudalism. The land is nobody's property. Each person has the right to 
exploit it and to benefit from 
it by labour, agriculture or animal-keeping, throughout one's life, that of one's heirs, and within 
the limits of personal effort 
and the satisfaction of needs.
13. We are free from any rent. A house belongs to the person who lives in it. It enjoys a sacred 
immunity in respect of rights of 
neighbourhood: "your close neighbours or distant neighbours". The residence cannot be used to harm society.
14. The Jamahiriya is united. It guarantees everyone a worthy and prosperous life and a developed state 
of health, so as to achieve 
a society of healthy people. It guarantees protection of childhood, motherhood, old age and of invalids. 
The Jamahiriya is the guardian 
of all those who do not have a guardian.
15. Education and knowledge are natural rights for everyone. Any individual has the right to choose the 
education and the knowledge which 
suits them, without imposed constraint or orientation.
16. The Jamahiriya is the society of goodness and of noble values. It considers ideals and human principles 
sacred. Its aim is a humanitarian 
society where aggression, war, exploitation and terrorism will be banished and where there will be no 
difference between great and small. 
All nations, all peoples, and all national communities have the right to live free, according to their 
options and the principles of 
self-determination. They have the right to establish their national entity. Minorities have the right 
to safeguard their entity and 
their heritage. The legitimate aspirations of the latter cannot be repressed. Neither can they be 
assimilated by force into one or 
several different nations or national communities.
17. We affirm the right of each person to profit from the benefits, the advantages, the values and 
the principles which are obtained 
by the harmony, cohesion, union, affinity and the affection of the family, the tribe, the nation and 
humanity. To this end, we work 
to establish the natural national entity of our nation and support all those who fight to achieve 
this aim. We reject any segregation 
between men due to their colour, their race, their religion or their culture.
18. We protect liberty. We defend it everywhere in the world. We support the oppressed, and encourage 
all peoples to confront injustice, 
oppression, exploitation and colonialism. We encourage them to combat imperialism, racism and fascism, 
in accordance with the principle 
of the collective struggle of peoples against the enemies of liberty.
19. The Jamahiriya is a society of splendour and fulfilment. It guarantees each person the right of thought, 
creation and innovation. 
The Jamahiriya works for the development of the sciences, the arts and literature. It guarantees they will be 
disseminated among the 
popular masses so as to prohibit any monopoly on them.
20. We affirm the sacred right to be born into a coherent family, where motherhood, fatherhood and brotherhood 
prevail. Fulfilment of 
the human being is only in compliance with his nature if it is assured by natural motherhood and feeding. The 
child must be brought up by its mother.
21. We are, men or women, equal in everything which is human. The distinction of rights between men and women 
is a flagrant injustice 
which nothing justifies. We proclaim that marriage is a fair association between two equal partners. Nobody 
can conclude a marriage 
contract by constraint, nor divorce in any other way than by mutual consent or by a fair judgement. It is 
unfair to dispossess the 
children of their mother, and the mother of her home.
22. We consider servants as the slaves of modern times, enslaved by their masters. No law governs their 
situation, and they have no 
guarantee nor protection. They live under the arbitrary nature of their masters, and are victims of tyranny. 
They are forced, by 
necessity and in order to survive, to carry out work which ridicules their dignity and human feelings. 
For this reason, we proscribe 
recourse to servants in the home. The house must be maintained by its owners.
23. We are convinced that peace between nations can guarantee them prosperity, abundance and harmony. 
We call for an end to the trade 
of arms and their manufacture for purposes of exploitation. The arms industry constitutes a waste of 
wealth of societies, a burden 
on individual taxpayers, causing the spread of destruction and annihilation in the world.
24. We call for the suppression of nuclear, bacteriological and chemical weapons and any other means 
of massive extermination and 
destruction. We call for elimination of all the existing stocks, for the preservation of humanity from 
the dangers represented by 
the waste from nuclear power stations.
25. We undertake to protect our society and political system based on popular power. We also undertake 
to safeguard its values, 
principles and interests. We regard collective defence as the only means to preserve them. We think 
that the defence of the Jamahiriya 
is the responsibility of every citizen, man or woman. Nobody can have a substitute when confronted 
with death.
26. We commit ourselves to the bases of this charter. We do not allow them to be infringed and forbid 
ourselves any act contrary to 
the principles and rights that it guarantees. Each person has the right to plead under the law for 
the purpose of reparation of any 
attacks on the rights and liberties that it announces.
27. We offer the world The Green Book, the guide and path of emancipation for the acquisition of liberty. 
We announce to the popular 
masses the advent of a new age, when corrupt regimes will be abolished and from which any trace of tyranny 
and exploitation will be removed.

September 1, the 42-th anniversary of the Great Libyan Revolution of Al-Fateh Eurasian Youth Union raised over his

headquarters at Moscow 2nd

Kozhukhovsky passage, 12, p. 2 green flag Jamahiriya. Previously, ECM said that in the case of the descent over

the green flag of Libya in Moscow

representative office, will raise the green flag over his headquarters. The promise is fulfilled. We invite all the faithful

Libya Jamahiriya Embassy

staff to accommodate the headquarters of the ECM.

ECM condemns the recognition by the Russian Foreign Ministry Government of the rebels as a legitimate government

of Libya. Probably the tip

of the overbearing Russia has found something in common with each other and bandits, murderers and scoundrels,

vvergshimi Livi into

chaos. This “elite” and a Ministry of Foreign Affairs are not required. Once again, Russian diplomacy is a disgrace to themselves and their


Eurasian Youth Union, in accordance with the sanction of the Muammar Gaddafi in his address to the people of the world, said the

opening of a

Moscow-based staff of the Movement Coordination Centre in support of Gaddafi and the Libyan people. Coordination Center can act as a

gathering place, the planning of lectures, conferences and other events. We invite all supporters of the Jamahiriya, all opponents of the

NATO aggression to join us. You open the doors of the Coordination Centre, which is now host to offices of Libyan resistance in Moscow.

Make the people’s committees, raise and put up everywhere green flag Jamahiriya flag of resistance to the New World Order! Remember the

words of al-Gaddafi:

“Green flag is yours and belongs to all the masses of the world. With the dawn of popular power and the end of government, we have chosen

the green flag and made it a color and its measurement simple for everyone. Select any green. Cut it 1 to 2 and hang around, carry it with you.

Soon after the green flag will fly around the world, as the collapse of the government, they betrayed their own people, I’m one has done more

than all of them. They served different masters. They are not intended to serve the people than ever before. They belong to others. They do

nothing for you. Ignore them and they leave. Prepare to form committees, openly or secretly, adjust your local centers (“mathabas”) to

meet to share (information). Plan your route ahead. Green flag belongs to all of you! “

flagnadmoskvoy DSC00025

Phone: +7-495-783-68-66. Address: Moscow, 2nd Kozhukhovsky pr-d., 12, p. 2, ECM.



Kaddafi.ru Blog of the Russian Committee of Solidarity with the peoples of Libya and Syria, Facebook “for Gaddafi and his people!” Eurasian Youth Union Archive main page

the Green Charter Movement so that we can all ‘Meet and Talk, Helping All Become Aware’ (Mathaba) to promote, 
achieve and defend our human rights and freedoms in this new age, the era of the masses
Christella Bernardene Krebs Just received this also: " careful before judging, as because JANA is Libyan news 
site, and "official", some people may think they are doing a good thing using it as source, we too have made 
that mistake occasionally. But it is best avoided as it lacks credibility."

We all know our beloved Moammar Gadhafi is not a Communist; but this FALSE (NOT THE REAL) GREEN CHARTER by 
someone called: Sankara Saif-Islam Makaveli X, of Revolutionary Theory & Practice of the International Jamahiriya 
Vth Communist International Revolutionary Theory & Practice / Killuminati Seven Day Theory He is trying to dupe 
people into COMMUNISM, lying deceitfully that our beloved leader is a Communist ! : i.e.: (QUOTE)
Part 1 (10 Point Speech – Rhetorical Question: Why is NATO invading Libya?) 1. The NATO invasion was justified 
because a civil war broke out between Gaddafi’s forces and the Libyan Op… 6. Since the end of the Cold War, 
Gaddafi was one of the few Communist countries which preserved the virtues of Communism. He has been aiming 
to create the United States of Africa which would free Africa from American & European economic & 
political neo-colonial domination and helped to develop Africa’s independent economic infrastructure. This 
absolves Gaddafi as 
a real revolutionary alongside Lenin, Ho Chi Mihn, Fidel Casto & Che Guevera who have all been honored as 
heroes in their 
own countries and throughout the world. 7. Gaddafi’s Green Libya is like a 3rd world Soviet Republic keeping 
the dream alive: it is the living proof that 
Communism worked in the past. Gaddafi is trying to lead Africa back towards Communism and is thus the leader 
of the African revolution. The 
invasion of Libya is a fascist counter revolutionary war initiated to sabotage the World Revolution against 
the dictatorships and debt crisis 
of US neo-colonialism, by eliminating the lifeline of the revolution: Revolutionary ideas and military support. 
————- THIS Document is filled with hundreds of these LIES and twists the GREEN CHARTER of the JAMAHIRIYA into a 
STALINISTIC-COMMUNIST STATE—which it is not. Make sure what you are reading. Moammar Gadhafi would never 
turn you into Communists!

Sankara Saif-Islam Makaveli X, of
Revolutionary Theory & Practice of the International Jamahiriya Vth Communist International
Revolutionary Theory & Practice / Killuminati Seven Day Theory 

Part 1 (10 Point Speech - Rhetorical Question: Why is NATO invading Libya?)
The NATO invasion was justified because a civil war broke out between Gaddafi’s forces and the Libyan Opposition 
who represents the rebellion against his 42 year rule. NATO said Gaddafi ordered his forces to bomb rebels in 
Benghazi and Tripoli, Russian satellites have since proven that no bombing took place. 

The Libyan Opposition was formed as a CIA mercenary Army in 1981 to take down a country which was exporting 
the anti colonial Communist Revolution, alongside Cuba whose assistance to Communist Liberation armies 
destroyed the Portuguese Empire in Africa by 1974.

Gaddafi created the Jamahiriya in 1977, which is a political system of direct democracy, which doesn't require parties 
representing opposing class interests because the people have the ability to elect all administration from the local 
level to the national assembly, and to decide how state money is used to develop the local communities. 

Gaddafi nationalized the economy into the hands of the Jamahiriya, so that all citizens benefit from the country’s 
economic growth: there is no poverty or homelessness, petrol is 14 cents a Litre, housing, medicine, food and 
education are all subsidized by the government. Libya has the highest literacy rate in North Africa and the 
highest Human Development index in the whole of Africa.

Gaddafi gave his people three things. Liberty: freedom from colonialism and a true democratic system (the Jamahiriya). 
Egality: through creation of a state planned economy which benefits all Libyans. And Fraternity, by alligning with 
the anti imperialist forces during the Cold War. 

Since the end of the Cold War, Gaddafi was one of the few Communist countries which preserved the virtues of 
Communism. He has been aiming to create the United States of Africa which would free Africa from American & 
European economic & political neo-colonial domination and helped to develop Africa's independent economic 
infrastructure. This absolves Gaddafi as a real revolutionary alongside Lenin, Ho Chi Mihn, Fidel Casto & 
Che Guevera who have all been honored as heroes in their own countries and throughout the world. 

Gaddafi's Green Libya is like a 3rd world Soviet Republic keeping the dream alive: it is the living proof that 
Communism worked in the past. Gaddafi is trying to lead Africa back towards Communism and is thus the leader of 
the African revolution. The invasion of Libya is a fascist counter revolutionary war initiated to sabotage the 
World Revolution against the dictatorships and debt crisis of US neo-colonialism, by eliminating the lifeline 
of the revolution: Revolutionary ideas and military support. 

The rebels are comprised of hundreds of Libyan prisoners (broken out by the Libyan Opposition), Al Qaeda 
and other non-Libyan mercenaries who were armed with NATO weapons before and after the uprising began. 
Thousands of fake Facebook & Twitter accounts were made to spread a false version of events to the West. 
They said Gaddafi was using non Libyan Black mercenaries to kill rebels. There is video evidence which proves 
it is the Libyan Blacks who have been the most viciously targeted by the Rebels, who have murdered and raped 
countless civilian families, not sparing the childeren. This is because it is the Blacks who love their 
Communist leader Gaddafi the most, and this is a rebellion against Communism as well as the races "in which 
Communism festers", which is how the Slavs were regarded by the Nazis, who used Jews as a scapegoat to wage 
a barabaric war against the Commuminst Soviet Union and the Communist races. 

2000 chiefs representing 850 tribes met with Gaddafi and gave their support to the Gaddafi's Green Al Fateh 
Revolution. Since then, 90% of Libya has heeded the call of their chiefs and protested for Gaddafi. 

The Fourth Reich has come, it included the historically and presently imperialist USA, Canada, Britain, France, 
Italy, Germany, Australia and Saudi Arabia, who have all recognized the Libyan Opposition as the sole legitimate 
Government of Libya. The Libyan People have spoken for Gaddafi, and the imperialists have replied that their 
intention is genocide upon the Libyan people because of their virtues. All virtuous ones unite under the 
manifesto of the International Jamahiriya Vth Communist International to guide the forces of revolutionary 
humanity in the last great war against imperialism.

Part 2 (10 Point Programme: Revolutionary Theory & Practice of the International Jamahiriya Vth Communist 
The Libyan Opposition was formed as a CIA mercenary Army in 1981. Back then, much of the world was still 
directly ruled by French, British and American colonialism. Some countries had liberated themselves from 
colonialism and joined with Russia in the Socialist bloc including North Korea, China, Vietnam and Cuba. 
Cuba sent her armies to Africa to help liberate the African Portuguese colonies from imperialism allowing 
Angola, Mozambique, the Cape Verde and the Sao Tome & Principe islands to join the Russian Socialist bloc. 

Egypt had joined the Russian Socialist bloc under Egypt’s liberator-president Nasser. He promoted regime 
change in the region if any Arab leader was friendly with Israel, or the Western Imperialists who were 
supporting Israel. After Nasser died he was succeeded by Seddat, who after a war with Israel in 1967 made 
peace with Israel, left the Socialist bloc and sided with the USA against the colonial revolution. Gaddafi, 
considering himself the son of Nasser, instantly attacked Egypt to try and overthrow Seddat in 1977, but did 
not succeed. Gaddafi changed the name of Libya to the Great Socialist Arab People’s Libyan Jamahiriya. He 
promoted communist liberation armies in Africa to overthrow pro imperialist dictators, and took up the 
defence of Communism in Africa, helping to defend Communist and pro-Russian Uganda, under the demonized 
Idi Amin, in a war with pro western Tanzania.

Because Egypt was trading with the USA and went into debt. Trade with an imperialist country, whether under direct 
colonial rule or after liberation, is an exploitive relationship that leads to debt. This caught up with Egypt which 
had an economic crisis with sykrocketing unemployment and food prices, causing a revolution this year, which overthrew 
President Mubarak, who had successed Seddat and had $90 billion worth of personal assets. Because Libya stayed with 
the Socialist Bloc until its fall in 1990, it had fewer years trading with imperialists and had a debt-free sate. 
This allowed Libya to become the fastest growing Country in the region, being described as the new Dubai before the 
civil war that began on 23 Feb 2011.

Since the Egyptian revolution, the revolution against the pro American dictatorships has spread throughout the region : 
South into Burkina Faso, North into Armenia and across the whole of North Africa & the Middle East as far East as 
Afghanistan and Kyrgyzstan. The youth of Pakistan, Kenya, Nigeria, Cameroon, Zambia, Spain, France, Greece, Italy 
and Mexico want revolution. The demand for political revolution has already been appeared in Thailand and Indonesia. 
There has been an ongoing People’s War in India between the government and illiterate peasant's communist armies, 
recently these parties united into the Communist Party of India (Maoists) and now control 92,000 square kilometers 
in their strongest area, and have 100,000 members. Communist parties in India and the Philippines have been deemed 
to be terrorist organizations by their governments, which have declared civil war upon the revolution. The Maoist 
Communist Party of Nepal overthrew the King and established democracy in 2008 but they are too far ahead of the 
world revolution to begin transforming society. The Tamil people who have suffered Genocide in the modern age are 
also waiting for the revolution to come to Sri Lanka. A peoples war against the government has now been declared 
by the Maoists of Bhutan. The revolution is expanding to new dimensions as the debt crisis of neo colonialism 
deepens: most of the world is in debt to Britain, France, Germany, Canada, Australia and Japan, all of these 
countries are heavily in debt to the USA and so is the rest of the world. In turn, the USA is heavily in debt 
to both Russia & China which were independent from Colonialism in the past and had state planned Communist economies. 

Communism can be generalized as the opposite of imperialism/colonialism. Russia liberated itself during the 
First Imperialist World War, bringing 14 provinces of the Russian Empire into a Communist union, the Union of 
Soviet Socialist Republics (USSR). The USSR was invaded by the imperialists who assisted the the capitalists’ 
and landlords’ ’White Army’ to fight against the Worker & poor Peasant Communists in the civil war of the 20‘s. 
The Communists won at the cost of their economy being severely destroyed. The capitalist and landlord class had 
been obliterated and the economy had come into the hands of the state through the creation of a state planned 
economy, due to the Communist transformation of society (Cultural Revolution from hereon) carried out before, 
during and after the civil war by the Bolshevik Communist party led by Lenin and Trotsky. But since the economy 
was destroyed there wasn’t enough to go around for everybody. This caused the state workers to start taking off 
more for themselves and become a bureaucracy. After Lenin died in 1924, Stalin allowed the bureaucracy to take 
over the Bolshevik party, he kicked out the true inheritor of Marxist-Leninism; Trotsky, who had led the Red Army 
during the Civil War, and then had ever other major leader of the Revolution exiled or executed. Stalin then used 
his power to control the Communist Parties in other countries through the 3rd Communist International. Communist 
revolutions in Germany, China & Spain were sabotaged by false anti-Marxist-Leninist revolutionary tactics. Stalin 
kept the determining feature of Communism intact: Liberation from colonialism & a state planned economy which 
alowed the economy to grow at a rate of 250% during the First Great Depression of capitalism, but the virtues 
of Communism: Liberty (direct democracy) Egality (fairness and equality) and Fraternity (international brotherhood) 
were dashed. Stalin represented a counter revolution which stopped the USSR from going towards Communism-which is the 
aspiration to achieve human virtues, and instead made it start going away from it, creating a new type of Communism: 
Bureaucratic Socialism. (Socialism from heron). In WWII the USSR was invaded by Europe united behind the Nazis. Jew 
hunting was a scapegoat for the real intention of WWII which was to destory the USSR and colonize it. They attempted 
this by wiping out 636 villages in the Belarusian Soviet Socialist Republic, and starving to death millions of the 
inhabitants of Leningrad & Stalingrad with a constant siege. The USSR defeated them because they began out producing 
Germany during the war, without the help of Britian and the USA. The western 'Allies' only invaded the Western Front, 
which was gaurded by only 10% of the Fascist Forces, when Russia was advanced on Berlin. Paris was already in Revolution 
by the time the Allies arrived. They invaded to prevent the Communist takeover of France and Portugal which would have 
liberated half of the world‘s colonial peoples into the Socialist Bloc and caused the destruction of imperialism over night. 
The victory of Communism over Fascism allowed Eastern Europe to become Communist and the Socialist bloc to be born. Tito, 
the leader of Communist Yugoslavia, didn’t join the Socialist bloc and wanted instead to be able to draw out loans from 
the West. Anyone sympathetic towards the Socialist Bloc was put in a Gulag type island prison. Albania joined the Russian 
Socialist bloc to escape Tito’s Socialist prison. Tito became a new type of Stalinist and betrayed the world Communist 
system by creating the Non Aligned movement. This drew in other third world countries which had liberated themselves 
from colonialism but didn’t join Russia or adopt communism, and were thus converted into neo-colonies. 

Just months after the Second Imperialist World War ended, China went into a civil war between the capitalist 
party which wanted to preserve French, British & American neo-colonialism, and the Communist Party which wanted 
independence and still had guns and an army from the war with the Japanese imperialists. As soon as the Japanese 
had invaded, a peoples war, led by the Communist party, had begun. The Russians had funded the war and had also 
given them claimed territory after they declared war on Japan and liberated North China. the USA dropped the nukes 
on Japan 3 days before the liberation, forcing their surrender to the USA and preventing the planned land invasion 
of Hokkaido by a 1 million stong Soviet Army. The Chinese Communist Party won the civil war and they joined Russia 
in the Socialist bloc. North Vietnam and North Korea also won liberation wars against NATO and joined at the cost 
of millions of deaths. Stalin then died and was succeeded by Khrushchev who forgave Tito for betraying Communism. 
Khrushchev gave more money and arms to capitalist India than he did to China, and didn’t condemn Indias border 
war with China, on top of this he pursued a policy of peaceful coexistence with NATO. All this made Mao Tse Tung 
realize that Russia was not Communist and he feared that the USSR was preparing to let the USA recolonize Asia and 
make Russia turn capitalist. Mao condemned Kruschev for betraying Stalin (as well as Marx, Engels & Lenin), while 
Kruschev condemned both Mao & Stalin as betrayers of Marxism, without admitting that Trotsky was the true Marxist 
who had opposed Stalin. Mao left the Russian Socialist Bloc in 1961, and began the Communist transformation of China 
in 1966: the Cultural Revolution, which lasted until he died in 1976. China needed class collaboration to get China 
back onto its feet after years of war and thus there was a 15 year delay before beging the Cultutral Revolution. 
Trotsky's legacy, upheld by the 4th international after WWII, was the theory of Permanent Revolution: that the 
colonial world would be forced to go into Communist revolution and that the West should join them and not leave t
he poor Third World in the lurch lest they degenerated into Stalinism. Instead of doing this, Trotskists condemned 
Mao Tse Tung as a Stalinist for delaying the Revolution before the Cultural Revolution, and the Cultural Revolution 
as nothing but a fiasco of Mao’s failed economic and political policies. This is a bourgeois (capitalist) perception 
of history. Because Marxist-Leninism had degenerated into this Bourgeois Trotskyism in the West, there was no Marxist 
leadership to tell the people of France, the USA and England that the system of Capitalism they tollerated, upheld 
colonialism, and was causing a perpetual bloodbath in the 3rd World, which aiming for Proletarian dictatorship & 
world Communist unity, was being suppressed from doing so by NATO. In 1968 the French workers had a Revolutionary 
strike, but their demand was for the Chinese and Russian workers to overthrow their bureaucracy and join them in 
the World Revolution. One of the main Trotskyist groups, now the IMT/Marxist.com, condemned Russia’s suppression 
of the Czechoslovakian uprising against Communism in 1968 during the worldwide uprising from Pakistan to Mexico. 
Brezhnev who had succeded Kruschev in 1964 , created a new law which demanded the participation of all Socialist
bloc countries to suppress counter revolution against Communism to uphold the world Communist system. by this time 
the Chinese cultural revolution had started, both Russia and China were helping the Vietnamese fight for Communism, 
and the Russians were helping the Arabs fight against Israel. The undeclared Communist Lumumba had already been 
assassinated in Congo-Kinshasa and Mubuto had made Congo-Kinshasa (Zaire) a pro-West Dictatorship, leading Zaire 
into civil war. Sukarno of Indonesia had aligned with China, North Korea and North Vietnam and tried to unite the 
third world against NATO. This would have created a new world wide Communist organization to oppose Tito’s Non-Aligned 
movement. If the French students & workers had instead demanded to join both China and Russia indiscriminately, they 
would have liberated half of the world from colonialism and expanded the Socialist bloc into a world wide Communist 
block over a week. Because Marxist-Leninism and the Permanent Revolution theory had been lost in the West, the Communist 
movement splintered and failed. The Black Panthers, in the USA, were conscious of the Permanent Revolution in the 3rd 
World, but all their prophets and leaders, including Malcolm X, Huwey P. Newton & Tupac Shakur were assassinated. Tupac 
was raised with a panther mentality and spoke the reality of poverty & revolution, becoming the biggest star of Hip Hop 
before his assassination in 1996.

In 1959, Cuba became Communist under Fidel Castro and Che Guevera. While America and France were fighting Communism in 
South East Asia, Cuba had destroyed the Portuguese colonial empire in Africa by 1974. China upheld the dictatorship of 
the proletariat with the Red Guards and the Peoples Liberation Army, until Deng Xiaoping overthrew the Gang of Four, 
which had included Mao's widow. Deng reversed the cultural revolution towards allowing foreign investment, and turned 
China into a USA ally to destroy Communism throughout the third world. The Chinese funded Pol Pot who carried out 
genocide on Vietnamese citizens, provoking the Vietnamese to invade Cambodia.The Vietnamese installed a pro Russian 
government of Cambodian Communists who had fought beside them against the USA while Pol Pot had been recruiting landlords 
into his terrorist organization.and fighting against the pro North-Vietnamese Cambodian King, whose territory was being 
bombed by the US air force. The Chinese invasion of Vietnam was defeated by the virtuous Vietnamese, who took Laos and 
Cambodia with them into the Russian Socialist bloc, and stopped all trade with China. The USA, Singapore and China 
continued to fund Pol Pots army in parts of Cambodia, through Thailand, and to continue the war against Vietnam 
through the 80‘s. Tanzania and Zambia had both had cultural revolutions creating state planned economies, but 
had chosen to trade with the West as well as pro-West African dictators like Mubuto of Congo-Kinshasa, rather 
than join the Socialist bloc. This caused economic decay and they became client states of the US. In exchange 
for aide relief they housed Chinese-funded mercenary armies to go to war with Uganda, Angola and Mozambique. 
When Uganda’s army breached the Tanzanian border to wipe out the Rebels, Tanzania responded by invading and 
replacing Idi Amin with a pro-Western Ugandan dictator causing a decade long civil war. Somalia, under Sid 
Barre, had a cultural revolution while aligned with Russia, but when Ethiopia joined Russia in 1975 Barre 
betrayed Communism by attacking Ethiopia and leaving the Socialist bloc to side with China and the USA. 
Cuban, South Yemeni, Russian and German soldiers fought for Communism in Ethiopia and defeated Somalia. 
This & the subsequent civil war killed 250,000 people in Ethiopia and caused the fall of the communist 
regime in 1987. The Marxist-Leninist Communist leader Mengistu fled to Zimbabwe. He has been convicted of 
genocide based on the false premise that Communism was against the interests of the people: he has never 
stood trial. In the same year, Thomas Sankara, in Burkino Faso, was assassinated in a French backed coup, 
in its 5th years of pro Cuban Cultural Revolution. Iraq was Communist until Saddam Hussein betrayed 
Communism by accepting US weapons as bribery to invade Islamic and anti imperialist Iran. Shortly after 
the Communist revolution in 1979, civil war broke out in Afghanistan: the Mujahadin, who fought against 
Communism, had been created by teh Pakistani Government, with $500 billion from the USA and Saudi Arabia. 
The USSR and eastern Europeans fought to defend Afghanistan for a whole decade: 2 million people died , 
the Mujahadin took power in 1992 and further civil war ensued. From ut of the Mujahadin, arose the Taliban 
and Al Qaeda. Al Qaedao have caused civil wars in Yugoslavia, Somalia, Afghanistan, Tajikistan, Iraq, Pakistan 
and now Libya & Yemen. Pakistan’s Cultural revolution under the leadership of Bhutto and his Peoples Party of 
Pakistan which combined Islam with Communism, was halted by Bhutto’s trial & execution, after which Pakistan 
became a client state of the USA under a corrupt Fake Muslim dictator. The Cultural Revolution in Indonesia was 
halted by the CIA when Sukarno, the True Muslim and undeclared Communist, was killed. Sukarno was replaced by a 
Fake Muslim anti Communist dictator, Soharto, who killed hundreds of thousands of Communists to stop the cultural 
revolution, and who would later commit untold genocide upon the people of East Timor over several decades. In 
Zimbabwe, Mugabe’s ZANU was Chinese funded while the Cubans & Russians funded ZAPU. ZANU came to power but didn’t 
join Mozambique and Angola in the socialist bloc: under orders from Britain, the whites kept their wealth no 
cultural revolution took place instead for 7 years genocide was committed against ZAPU supporters. In 1987, 
the Cubans defended Angola from a South African invasion and liberated Namibia from their colonial empire. 
This caused the decay of South African capitalism, the legalization of the ANC three years later, and the end 
of apartheid in 1994 one year after world Communism had completely fallen. If Mugabe hadn’t taken over Zimbabwe, 
South Africa would have had a revolution sooner, and South Africa's Diamond wealth accumulated over hundreds of 
years would have been shared with the people of the Socialist bloc throughout the world. The reason Communism 
fell was that only former colonies tried to build communism, and they didnt have sufficient wealth to defend 
them selves from NATO: Russia had been an imperialist empire with 14 colonies in Central Asia and Eastern 
Europe, but it was also being industrialized by British, Belgian & French finance capital and thus semi-colonised.
 Without its own capital Russia was unable to develop towards Communism without degenerating into Beaurocratic Socialism. 

All the war and civil wars in the 3rd world Communist countries caused protests against Communism in Eastern Europe. 
Eastern Europeans chose to side with NATO against Russia, causing the USSR itself to collapse. Belarus and Turkmenistan, 
two of the 15 soviet republics of the USSR kept communism, with full state control over the economy. Turkmenistan 
maintained a one-party state, with the former soviet era Communist party ruling with a new name. Belarus had 
democratic elections. Only 10% of the vote goes to a party which would sell the entire state owned economy to 
the West if they were elected. The president of Belarus Lukashenko, who is non partisan, and represents the 
preservation of the state owned economy always receives 80% of the vote. Communist economy was also preserved 
in Cuba, Libya, North Korea & Syria. Laos and Vietnam allowed private enterprise alongside the state plan, 
making it a mixed economy. The Communist Party kept control of the state making Vietnam & Laos Socialist 
countries with Communist elements. 4 million deaths, fighting for half a century against French, Japanese 
and Yankee imperialism, can't be undone without crossing the behest of Ho Chi Mihn not to mention Marx, 
Engels & Lenin! Brazzaville, the African Cape Verde and Sao Tome & Principle Islands, Mozambique & Angola 
have sold their economies to the west and abandoned Marxist-Leninism. The civil war continued in Angola 
until 2002, lasting 28 years in total, killing 1 million people; the old Communist Liberation Army, MPLA, 
received 80% of the vote in 2008. The Mozambican Communist Liberation army FRELIMO, SWAPO of Namibia and 
the ANC of South Africa are all former Communist Black Liberation armies which dominate the politics of 
Southern Africa. in 1996 Angola helped to overthrow their long time imperialist puppet enemy Mubuto, and 
bring Kabilia to power in Congo-Kinshasa, a Marxist who had fought alongside Che Guevera against Mubuto in 
1965. A year later Angola returned Nguesso, the leader of Congo-Brazzaville duing the communist era to power, 
ending the civil war there. 

Latin America had communism tightly suppressed by the USA and the upper-class of Latin America : Peru's 
communist military government of 8 years was overthrown in 1975, Chile's democratically elected Marxist 
Communist president Allende was assassinated by a Fascist coup d’etat in 1973, and Grenada, a tiny island, 
had its government overthrown as soon as it became pro Cuban in 1983. The USA funded the Contras, a 
mercenary army, to wage a decade long civil war against Communist Nicaragua which killed 100,000 people. 
In 1992 the Nicaraguan Communist military allowed democratic elections in which the non Communist parties 
united into one massive party for change: this party won, and sold the state planned economy to the 
imperialists. El Salvador also had a civil war between the capitalists and the Communist Workers and 
Peasants. Hugo Chavez led a section of the Venezuelan army to try and overthrow the capitalist government 
in 1994; he became a hero of the people, formed his own 'United Socialist Party’ and won the elections 
in 1998. In 2002 the USA tried to have him overthrown, but his people came to rescue him and the army 
joined the people against the mercenaries. The same year he made a Military & Political alliance with 
Cuba, ALBA: Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas. ALBA has enabled other countries to pursue a ‘Socialist’ 
path: Nicaragua, Honduras, Bolivia, and Ecuador are beginning their Communist cultural revolutions (heading 
towards communism economically & politically) before victory in a civil war. This has resulted in many coup 
attempts in Bolivia, a coup attempt in Ecuador in 2009 and a victorious coup in Honduras in 2010. Former 
Military Officer Ollanta Humala created a new Socialist Party in 2005 and has defeated defeated the old 
non-ALBA Socialist Party in Peru this year, now Peru will also be joining ALBA and heading for Communism. 
ALBA and all pro ALBA forces represent a New Force of Communism in the world. Gbagbo, the president of Ivory 
Coast, represented a New force of Communism in Africa before he was overthrown this year. He refused to stand 
down claiming electoral fraud, when he lost the third round after winning the first two by a significant 
majority. France invaded Ivory Coast, and repalced Gbagbo with Alassane Ouattara who was a former employee 
of the IMF. Gbagbo was portayed by the West as an ‘Undemocratic Socialist‘. This is what they have also 
been calling Hugo Chavez ever since they tried to overthrow him in 2002. Lukashenko is described as the 
last dictator of Europe: if he isn’t rigging elections it proves a state planned economy is the only 
practical way to run a society in this barbaric state of world wide imperialist decay, and is what the 
people would chose democratically to keep if they had the option to keep it or remove it.
Syria, led by the Ba’ath (Arab Socialist) party, carried out a cultural revolution creating a state 
planned economy, was pro-Russian during the cold war, condemned Baathist Iraq’s invasion of Iran, and 
fought against Israel regularary. recently Syria has sided with ALBA, Iran, Russia and China, against the USA and Europe.

During the cold war, revolutions which halted cultural revolutions like China did, or which left the Socialist 
bloc, beacame Stalinist, or Socialist, this is because the governments, while preserving the state planned 
economy became a force against the interests of the people and thus not applying Liberty, Egality & Fraternity. 
Revolutions which applied Liberty, Egality & Fraternity by implementing a cultural revolution as well as assisting 
the liberation struggle of other countries to build the world communist system were Communist. By the time 
Communism had spread through the world, Socialist USSR had to join the fight to defend Communism, making 
them a politically Communist force under the reign of Breznhev. Libya came to Communism through Islam, 
applying Liberty (independence from Colonialism & the Jamahiriya), Egality (state control over the economy) 
and fraternity (helping liberation struggle and helping to Africa’s economic independence by calling for 
the United States of Africa). Communist means a Revolution moving towards Communism or preserving the 
level of Communist reached by years of cultural revolution after the collapse of the Socialist Bloc. 
Socialism means moving away, or staying away, from Communism. Of the Central Asian republics, Kazakhstan 
was wealthy enough to sell its industry in exchange for capital, but the smaller republics were not able 
to sell everything. Thus Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan are all semi-Socialist states: they 
have single parties dominating government and some elements of a state planned economy. Burma began a 
cultural revolution in 1962, it did not join the Russian socialist bloc, chosing to trade with China 
as well as Russia, and had not benifited from Russian assistance as Vietnam had. Tanzania, Zambia, 
Somalia, Iraq and Yugoslavia were the Cold War era forms of Decaying Socialism. The imperialists 
cleared $3 Billion of Tanzania's debt in 2001 and $4 billion of Zambia's debt in 2011. Somalia, 
Yugoslavia & Iraq were invaded by NATO to prevent the overthrow of government and the takeover of 
the state & state planned economy by the people which would have resparked Socialism into Communism. 
Because all of the sparks of the world revolution were snuffed out by NATO, imperialism was preserved 
til the present. Now that the second great depression has arrived, decaying Socialist countries will spiral 
downwards to the point of revolution and civil war, which will justify a NATO invasion to ‘help the revolution’ 
against dictatorships, opening up the potential to wage war on Socialism & Communism worldwide. Thus many 
decaying Socialist countries which were formerly sparks of the world revolution have been turned into 
ticking time bombs which will ease mankind into World War III. Kyrgyzstan has already had a revolution 
against its Socialist government, after which it nearly degenerated into ethnic civil war. The Socialist 
governments of today can all be resparked into cultural revolution towards Communism to save the world 
from WWIII. Vietnam, Laos & Nepal are the most Communist of the Socialist countries, South Africa is 
sliding into this position now that Jacob Zuma, the president of South Africa, has condemned Mugabe as 
a traitor, and NATO for invading Libya. Since Gaddafi is a true Revolutionary & Libya is a Communist 
state, the moral & physical attack on it by the historically & currently imperialist Britian, France, 
the USA, Italy, Canada, Australia & Saudi Arabia is an act of Fascist aggression intended to sabotage 
the world revolution to prevent the world uniting with Libya and adopting its Communist system, an 
attack on Syria, Cuba, Belarus, Turkmenistan, or North Korea during a revolution against capitalism 
in their region, would mean the same thing: The Fourth Reich has come. 

Part 3 (6 Tactics to safeguard the world revolution from fascism)
People of South & East Asia should aim to unite with Socialist/Communist Syria, Iran, Turkmenistan, Nepal, 
North Korea, Veitnam & Laos in the aim to unite all of Asia under Communism to defend Libya from the 4th 
Reich. They must also aim to unite with Socialist Myanmar. Myanmar is a poor country which will collapse 
soon due to the debt crisis, when this happens a revolution against the single party state government 
will be provoked into a civil war by NATO, to justify an invasion to 'save the revolution' which will 
be used to bring the fascist World War against Socialism & Communism to Asia again. The best way to 
help Burmese people is to save Burma and it’s government from the threat of Civil war and imperialist 
invasion, by uniting with it and implementing the Soviet/Jamahiriya, the highest stage of Communism: 
Direct Democracy. The Communist Party of India (Marxists) has more than 1 million members, if this 
party accepts this theory then all Communists in South & East Asia will unite, and the Vth Communist 
International will be formed, assuring the victory of the World Revolution.

All Socialist governments of Latin America must unite with ALBA creating the Latin American Soviet Union. 
Countries which don’t join should go into revolution to force the Communist unity of Latin America to defend 
ALBA: the head of the world revolution, a delicate union of Old and New Communism, from being snuffed out by 
the Fourth Reich blitzkrieg. It is not up to ALBA to show the way forward anymore, it is up to the Vth 
Communist International to be created to defend its achievements.

The Ba’athist Syrian government must create a workers’ Commune (Jamahiriya) and put in it's control the state 
power and the state planned economy, taking the Ba’athist Syrian revolution to its next level of Communism: 
Direct democracy, which has only ever been achieved during the time of Lenin using Soviets, and by Gaddafi 
who used the Jamahiriya, all other Communist & Socialist governements have been held up by a Party and a 
party controlled military (which does not diminish the integrity of these lesser forms of Communism because 
they were for the good of their people). This would prevent a civil war between the youth and the government 
which would draw in Iran, Israel, the USA, China, Russia & ALBA and would give the USA the chance to destroy 
ALBA: Bolivarian Alliance for the Americas. When Syria implements the next level of Communism: Sovietism, 
mankind will know to fight for the creation of an International Soviet and the success of the world 
revolution will be assured.

The Socialist governments of South Africa, Mozambique, Angola and Namibia must demand Mugabe steps down 
and Communism be implemented to prevent a civil war in Zimbabwe. The global debt crisis will cause Zimbabwe 
to collapse and lead to a revolution which the imperialists will manipulate into civil war, to justify their 
invasion which will be used to expand the World War against Socialism & Communism into Southern Africa. Your 
governments must also support the Communist forces loyal to Gbagbo in the inevitable civil war in Ivory Coast: 
a war which will draw in both the Socialist Congos, making all Socialist countries in Africa turn Communist. 
Revolutionary Kenyans, Zambians, Nigerians & Cameroonians & other Revolutionary forces must unite into the 
party of the International Jamahiriya Vth Communist International, to prepare for the Revolution to Unite 
Africa to defend Libya from NATO. If the Young Communist League united under this theory, then the South 
Africans Communist Party, the ANC Youth League, and the ANC itself would also unite under it, this will 
cause the Vth Communist International will be created and will ensure the success of the World Revolution.

The people of Europe should aim for a revolution to unite with Communist Belarus and adopt Communism and 
unite Europe to defend Libya. Russia should aim to reform the Soviet Union by uniting with Communist Belarus, 
Turkmenistan and North Korea, Socialist Mongolia, Nepal and the Central Asian Republics, and throwing the 
capitalist Caucuses and Europe an escape rope from the debt crisis of neo colonialism by offering them to 
cancel their debts owed to the western imperialists in exchange for Communist military solidarity. Citizens 
under the Fourth Reich: Germany, Britain, Italy, France, Canada, the USA and Australia should aim to 
overthrow their governments to prevent WWIII being waged against Communism & Socialism, to clear the trillions 
of dollars of world debt making all nations equal, and abolish money making all poor people in the world 500 
times richer, because 1% of the population owns 50% of the wealth and 50% of the population owns 1% between them. 

If WWIII begins before the Vth Communist International is created and there is thus no world wide effort to expose 
fascism and its attack on Communist Libya, then we will be dragged into an unending peoples war against a drugged 
up NATO military, Al Qaeda and BlackWater USA mercenaries, which will end with the destruction of the world's 
environment as climate change, flips into its next deadly phase.
1. Unite people to your country's section of the International Jamahiriya Vth Communist using this manifesto.
2. Create the foundation for town/city workers councils (commune/Jamahiriya/soviet).
3. Create a national commune, and then demand the army joins the commune/arm the commune by any means necessary.
4. Replace the government with the National Commune and nationalize all means of production (Banks, capitalist 
farms, Shops, Industries) into the hands of the commune.
5. Unite the world against NATO armies, Blackwater USA & Al-Queda until the Fascist governments of the World 
have been overthrown, establishing world peace through worldwide communism: the world united under the 
international dictatorship of the working class (prolateriat) and other low classes, who democratically own 
& develop civilization (the means of production, science & culture).

What do you make of this? ://www.jana-news.ly/en/
Tripoli, 02.07.2011 (JANA) Look at the masses, these are waves like the Atlantic Ocean, the Atlantic Alliance 
is not Atlantic, the ocean is here with us, here is the SATO masses, have you ever seen such masses, only if 
it was against you, your masses are against you in the streets, we, look at the m..

Mathaba has told us not to trust JANA (as you reported it is communist, run out of Sibera); so what concerning 
the news today:
jana-news.ly/en/        Tripoli,02.07.2011. NEED RESPONSE NOW!!

WARNING!! This info linked on this group is not the REAL GREEN CHARTER---this is the COMMUNIST JANA held Consul 
from SIBERIA---PEOPLE BEWARE!!! THERE IS A TRAITOR AMONST US!!: Revolutionary Theory & Practice of the 
International Jamahiriya Vth COMMUNIST International

2011 "HAPPY BIRTHDAY COLONEL Muammar al Gaddafi" 07 June 1942.
Christella Bernardene Krebs
 Today when I went to the 2011 Happy Birthday site, on top was a group calling from someone by the name of: 
Sankara Saif-Islam Makaveli X, of
Revolutionary Theory & Practice of the International Jamahiriya Vth Communist International
Revolutionary Theory & Practice / Killuminati Seven Day Theory
Part 1 (10 Point Speech - Rhetorical Question: Why is NATO invading Libya?)
The NATO invasion was justified because a civil war broke out between Gaddafi’s forces and the Libyan Op...
Since the end of the Cold War, Gaddafi was one of the few Communist countries which preserved the virtues of 
Communism. He has been aiming to create the United States of Africa which would free Africa from American & 
European economic & political neo-colonial domination and helped to develop Africa's independent economic 
infrastructure. This absolves Gaddafi as a real revolutionary alongside Lenin, Ho Chi Mihn, Fidel Casto & 
Che Guevera who have all been honored as heroes in their own countries and throughout the world.
Gaddafi's Green Libya is like a 3rd world Soviet Republic keeping the dream alive: it is the living proof 
that Communism worked in the past. Gaddafi is trying to lead Africa back towards Communism and is thus the 
leader of the African revolution. The invasion of Libya is a fascist counter revolutionary war initiated to 
sabotage the World Revolution against the dictatorships and debt crisis of US neo-colonialism, by eliminating 
the lifeline of the revolution: Revolutionary ideas and military support.
Moammar Gadhafi, and turn Libya into a COMMUNIST-STALINISTIC STATE.
‎ Muammar Al-Qathafi

"Qaddafi discarded the false divide between religion and political science, the secular and the sacred, 
faith and reason, and was thereby able to articulate a paradigm that is holistic/ integralist, reflecting 
a total reality – an African reality. Quite simply, secular European discourse is unable to comprehend 
and advance ideology such as the Third Universal Theory, precisely because this ideology acknowledges 
the transcendental and metaphysical dimension of human civilization and existence. As such, this ideology 
provides us with an alternative model for social and political reconstruction and transformation, in synergy 
with our culture and traditions. It invites us to finally reject and move beyond the vulgar economism and 
materialism of the Eurocentric ideologies of Marxism and liberal capitalism, which were thrust upon Africa 
and the 'Third World' as part of the imperialist project." (DENNIS SOUTH)


This is the 100% truth. We live in a non-believing, secular age. God is forgotten; 
but not by Muammar al-Gadhafi. He honors God with every breath he takes. He never 
wanted any power for himself. NEVER.--It was always FOR THE PEOPLE, and utilised by 
the people, all for God's glory and purposes, and for the happiness of humanity to benefit of all men.





There are currently 14 users and 102 guests online.



Summary for September 8, 2011

 Thu, 08.09.2011 – 11:57 |  admin

Tripoli: the fighting in the city, in north-western suburbs with artillery. Thus, in the Salah Edden destroyed three rebel jeeps with 6. There is information about the progress of a heavily armed team of Khamis al-Gaddafi in Tripoli, the southern suburbs area Az zawiya.

Bani Walid: sheikhs and tribal elders Rafla decided not to take the city, the defenders are confident in their abilities and are determined to fight against the colonial coalition to end. There have been conflicting reports about the number of bands, the besiegers Bani Walid (7-fold difference). Yesterday also was informed of the unsuccessful attack coalition forces in the city, in which the defenders were destroyed hundreds of tribes of the attackers.

In the area of coalition convoy Tarragon ambushed – 14 rebels killed. Do not stop the bombing of Sirte. Fighting in Az zawiya, ITAR-TASS reported on the atrocities the rebels in this city. Against colonial factions of the coalition, based in the area of tactical missiles used Misurata “Scud” (big explosions September 5).

It is worth to highlight what is happening in Benghazi: social entropy in the relations between the four centers of power Cyrenaica (Obeid tribe and Haruba, Islamist gangs of Benghazi and Middle Eastern mercenaries), it seems, has reached critical mass. There have been reports of clashes between different factions of rebels, and even the use of NATO air power against the rebels of Benghazi. Perhaps, the tribes of Cyrenaica, hlebnuv full freedom and the wind of change, decided to join the union of tribes that support the government Jamahiriya. Information about this already started to arrive and now verified.

Algeria is going to send humanitarian aid to Libya. The Syrian and Algerian hackers made a DDoS attack on the website of Al-Jazeera television.Confirmed by information from previous reports on the spread of guerrilla warfare in parts of Central Africa: Governments of Mali and Niger do not hide the concern in connection with the appearance of armed men that would destabilize the country’s Saharan inside in case of supporting the rebels by the authorities of the PNS.

In the last 72 hours loyalists killed at least 128 rebels, 25 vehicles, including 2 tanks. According to various estimates, from 70 to 80 percent of Libya Libyan territory controlled by the army and the tribes loyal to Colonel Qaddafi.

Eugene Gajvoronsky

 To comment log in or register |  Tags: news , reports from the front

The most offensive that we have

Submitted by Serg xxx at Thu, 08/09/2011 – 16:34.

The most offensive that we have such a smell prezident.Slabovat it to resist the wickedness. It will be very sad if the Duma again choose one Edro (and our people often one cattle, as Yeltsin’s cursed, and was elected to a second term). Most would choose another president. Would survive without yet another idiotic innovations before the election.

our president?

Published Rozario_Agro at Thu, 08/09/2011 – 16:54.

Another President? Do not choose Edro?

This is a spell? Does not work.

chtoli forgotten already: “The Russians vote and then lose! if you choose me your new president, I will obey your will, and if you do not choose, then the president will be old!”.

If our people are trash as you write, you are someone that will? Anyone who calls the people of Russia have cattle – he was a scoundrel and a bastard.

Re: deal with Russia

Submitted by Aquarius at Thu, 08/09/2011 – 13:40.

Plan for contracts with Russia, frozen when the offset. In 2008, Libya has asked Russia to offset and cancel her debt. Then Russia, Libya had $ 3.6 billion, but Russia and Libya was to just under a billion (on advance payments):
Negotiations led Storchak (Deputy Kudrin)

The contract with the Russian Federation

Published Rozario_Agro at Thu, 08/09/2011 – 13:52.

is not about who was negotiating, but how it ended. Libya debt was written off in front of the Russian Federation Vladimir Putin, under the promise of new contracts.

But the main question was not even in this, and if the colonel knew or guessed about the possibility of this outrage, why did not he put a modern air defense made in the country?
Agree, if I am afraid that I might come to the bandits to rob my belongings and to kill me and my family, for my part would make sense to buy a “gun”, to place land mines, etc.

news? more events

Published Rozario_Agro at Thu, 08/09/2011 – 13:11.

The fact that gangs are beginning to bite each other’s good for the Loyalists in the current situatsii.Pravda life is that all the ghouls do not shoot and do not cajole. Where do we have the “revolt” that has arisen? Ben-Ghazi? and why? there that, at Colonel GDP per capita was less than a dollar or more apartments?
“Housing problem” according to official data, the welfare of Libyans could not spoil.
A couple of dollars that were bought with government officials (leaders) are not able to convince his “boys” go to die, if “kids” are actually all of which left heel wants to eat. Just crazy to be biting the hand that dayuschego.Stranno.
Next .. if the colonel was issued as a black mark write here a long time, why he did not have a normal air-defense system? The contract with the Russian Federation on the S-300 froze when it was already clear what will happen next.

Good news!

Published Elle.Bond at Thu, 09/08/2011 – 12:54.

May God grant victory to the Libyan people to brave the holy war against the NATO rats!


More than two months after The Wall Street Journalwrote about what amounted to ethnic cleansing of Black people in Misurata, The New York Times in today’s edition finally writes another piece about the racist attacks against Black people by the NATO-backed “rebels” from Benghazi, now installed in power. The article appears under the sanitized headline “Libyans Turn Wrath on Dark-Skinned Migrants.”

Yet The New York Times, as is the case with other major media organizations, including CNN and the BBC, have had several correspondents in Libya since the insurrection started in February, including in Benghazi, where Black people were first lynched. Videos of the grizzly killings, which even the K.K.K. in the the Old South would envy, are still available for viewing, as Benghazi posted them on YouTube.

Surely the Times’ reporters in Libya must have been aware of the atrocities. They must also read The Wall Street Journal. Could it be possible that editors shelved the reporters’ stories, or discouraged the reporters from pursuing the stories that would have been damning to the “rebels”? 

The Times’ feigns surprise, when it today writes: “Human rights advocates say the rebels’ scapegoating of blacks here follows a similar campaign that ultimately included lynchings after rebels took control of the eastern city of Benghazi more than six months ago.”

The Times, in a clever way, focuses on the plight ofmigrant workers, when in fact, as The Journalreported on Misurata, many Black Libyans were targeted for extermination.

The Black Star News, without a single correspondent in Libya, has been writing about the ethnic cleansing of Black people in Libya since February, when thelynchings and beheadings started. The information is widely available from online news outlets as well as on YouTube. Up to date, The White House and the State Department have yet to utter a single word of condemnation against this ethnic cleansing or to call for prosecutions.

If the case were reversed and non-Black people had been subjected to similar atrocities, there would be a global outcry and the perpetrators would be sought and punished. NATO, which supposedly was authorized to intervene in Libya, under United Nations Security Council 1973, didn’t do a thing to prevent the massacres and have yet to issue a single statement of condemnation or to hold Benghazi responsible.

No wonder the African Union has yet to recognize the regime installed in Tripoli: some African countries had considered some intervention, on behalf of migrant workers in Libya.

The New York Times compromised itself because its editorial pages shamefully published several commentaries calling on NATO to escalate bombings of Libya. This probably explains why it became difficult for this newspaper to publish major articles about the ethnic cleansing of Black people. The Timeswas aware of the disastrous public relations consequences the revelations of ethnic cleansing would have on the “rebels” claims that they offered a superior alternative to Maummar al-Quathafi. 

So The New York Times found a solution; it pretended the ethnic cleansing was not happening.

What’s more, if the NATO-backed “rebels” true colors had been exposed –that they were engaging in systemic K.K.K.-type racist lynchings, and indeed, in ethnic cleansing in Misurata, as The Wall Street Journal reported, then the Obama Administration might have been compelled to review its support for Benghazi.

So, it’s not a coincidence that it’s only after the NATO-backed “rebels” were installed in power, after the assault on Tripoli that included soldiers from Qatar, that The Times now deems it fit to write about Benghazi’s atrocities, which clearly meets the threshold to be characterized as war crimes and crimes against humanity.

NATO has remained mute. This is because NATO, rather than carrying out the task of saving civilians in Libya, as tasked by the U.N. under Resolution 1973, was promptly hijacked by the mercurial French President, Nicolas Sarkozy; the organization instead became the Air Forces of Benghazi. What’s more, France even dropped weapons into Western Libya, violating U.N. Resolution 1970 against arms shipments to the country.

Rather than saving lives, NATO in fact caused deaths of civilians.  It’s unclear how many civilians were killed by NATO bombardments over the six-months period. It’s been reported that in the city of Zlitan alone, possibly 85 Libyan civilians, including children, were killed. No wonder Rep. Dennis Kucinich has written to the ICC asking for an investigation of NATO commanders on possible war crimes.

As for The White House, there’s an unavoidable ugly symbolism–that a Black president of the United States remains silent even when a people are targeted for lynching in Libya simply because of the color of their Black skin. Major organizations such as the NAACP and the Urban League, both of which profess to protect the rights of Black people, also have a stake in ensuring that their voices are heard denouncing the premeditated lynchings of Black people in Libya. 

In The Wall Street Journal’s account of the atrocities in Misurata, we learn that one neighborhood that once had a 4/5ths Black population was depopulated of its Black citizens. They were victims of a “rebel” unit, according to The Wall Street Journal article, called “The Brigade for Purging Slaves, black skin.”

Why hasn’t the International Criminal Court (ICC) under it’s publicity seeking Prosecutor Luis Loreno Ocampo issued a single statement? Why hasn’t the ICC called for sending an investigative team to Misurata to explore if there are mass graves there before evidence is destroyed? Is it because the White House or State Department has not given the ICC approval?

The primary motive for the NATO intervention wasn’t about saving civilian lives. A Wall Street Journalreport last week says France,  Britain and Italy are already scrambling for favorable oil deals; these countries are salivating over Libya’s 44 billion barrels of proven reserves. 

Many lives could have been saved in Libya had President Barack Obama instructed Secretary Hillary Clinton to support the African Union Peace plan. Instead, the U.S. and NATO treated the plan with utter contempt. For the record, al-Quathafi had accepted the proposal after the two visits by South African President Jacob Zuma.

The plan called for: a ceasefire that would be verified by the International community; the creation of a humanitarian corridoor for victims of the war; negotiations to create a constitution, and; democratic elections, in which all Libyans would be eligible to compete, which would also be monitored by the International community.

The AU plan was also dismissed by some editorial pages, supposedly because the African Union was not a “neutral” party; as if NATO, the U.N., France, Britain, and the U.S., which were actually all engaged in the fighting, were “neutral” parties. Without a doubt, there was an element of racist contempt in dismissing the AU plan; it was, after all, “just” an “African” proposal. It could be ignored without any consequences.

We live in a dangerous world today when major media organizations abdicate their responsibility, not only to check the excesses and abuse of power by governments, but also their duty to report the news without prejudice or favor. 

There is no better explanation as to why The New York Times did not report the ethnic cleansing of Black people in Libya since it started in February; for this, the newspaper bears some culpability.  The Times did not want to discredit the “rebels”; when, in fact, in retrospect, the “rebels” who have significant numbers of Al Qaeda-affiliatedcommanders, deserved to be discredited.

Newspapers must avoid the business of political favoritism–especially when the lives of many innocent people are at stake. The New York Timesshould apologize for its shameful conduct in Libya.

“Speaking Truth To Empower.”


On the botany …
I serve or served (a) in the Russian (Soviet) army or law enforcement agencies
I have not served in the Army asgraduated from university with a military department
I have not served in the Army asseverely ill (plz, be honest)
I repose of the army (for whatever reason – religious, pacifist, disrespect for the Russian army or the Soviet Union out of fear, etc.)
I – a representative of the beautiful half of humanity
Total votes: 936

My Notebook: Muammar Al-Gadhafi In My Opinion Part III ( In English ).

Walter Fauntroy, Feared Dead in Libya, Returns Home—Guess Who He Saw Doing the Killing

Posted on 2011/09/09 by Karen Marlow



It wasn’t the Libyans!

by Valencia Mohammed

Former U.S. Congressman Walter Fauntroy, who recently returned from a self-sanctioned peace mission to Libya, said he went into hiding for about a month in Libya after witnessing horrifying events in Libya’s bloody civil war — a war that Fauntroy claims is backed by European forces.

Fauntroy’s sudden disappearance prompted rumors and news reports that he had been killed.

In an interview inside his Northwest D.C. home last week, the noted civil rights leader, told the Afro that he watched French and Danish troops storm small villages late at night beheading, maiming and killing rebels and loyalists to show them who was in control.

“‘What the hell’ I’m thinking to myself. I’m getting out of here. So I went in hiding,” Fauntroy said.

The rebels told Fauntroy they had been told by the European forces to stay inside. According to Fauntroy, the European forces would tell the rebels, “‘Look at what you did.’ In other words, the French and Danish were ordering the bombings and killings, and giving credit to the rebels.

“The truth about all this will come out later,” Fauntroy said.

While in Libya, The former congressman also said he sat down with Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi for a one-on-one conversation. Gaddafi has ruled Libya since 1969, when he seized power in a military coup.

Fauntroy said he spoke with Gaddafi in person and that Gaddafi assured him that if he survived these attacks, the mission to unite African countries would continue.

“Contrary to what is being reported in the press, from what I heard and observed, more than 90 percent of the Libyan people love Gaddafi,” Fauntroy said. “We believe the true mission of the attacks on Gaddafi is to prevent all efforts by African leaders to stop the recolonization of Africa.”

Several months ago, Gaddafi’s leadership faced its biggest challenge. In February, a radical protest movement called the Arab Spring spread across Libya. When Gaddafi responded by dispatching military and plainclothes paramilitary to the streets to attack demonstrators, it turned into a civil war with the assistance of NATO and the United Nations.

Fauntroy’s account could not be immediately verified by the Afro and the U.S. State Department has not substantiated Fauntroy’s version of events. Fauntroy was not acting as an official representative of the U.S. in Libya. He returned to Washington, D.C. on Aug. 31.

When rumors spread about Fauntroy being killed he went underground, he told the Afro in an interview. Fauntroy said for more than a month he decided not to contact his family but to continue the mission to speak with African spiritual leaders about a movement to unify Africa despite the Arab uprisings.

“I’m still here,” Fauntroy said, pointing to several parts of his body. “I’ve got all my fingers and toes. I’m extremely lucky to be here.”

After blogs and rumors reported Fauntroy had been killed, the congressional office of Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) announced on Aug. 24, that she had been in touch with authorities who confirmed Fauntroy was safely in the care of the International Committee of the Red Cross.

Inside his home, Fauntroy pulled out several memoirs and notebooks to explain why he traveled to Libya at a time when it was going through civil unrest.

“This recent trip to Libya was part of a continuous mission that started under Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. when he gave me orders to join four African countries on the continent with four in the African Diaspora to restore the continent to its pre-colonial status,” Fauntroy said.

“We want Africa to be the breadbasket of the world,” he said. “Currently, all the major roads in every country throughout Africa lead to ports that take its natural resources and wealth outside the continent to be sold to the European markets.”

Meanwhile reports from Tripoli are coming in.

It seems in the last two weeks, rebel fighters have fired more bullets into the air to express their excitement than were shot during the assault on Tripoli earlier in August. But away from “jubilant” crowds we meet those who are not so pleased.

Abdulrakham lives in Tripoli’s Abu Slim district, which has historically been pro-Gaddafi. When the rebels arrived, his sister was badly injured. She is still in hospital in Tunisia.

Abdulrakham does not want to show his face on camera and insists on a hidden location for the interview. He says the revolution has brought much fear in its wake.

“There is no peace. There is no safety in the city. We do not let our children outside when it’s dark. We are afraid. We always wait for something bad,” he tells RT. “When Gaddafi was here, at least we didn’t have to sleep awake, like we do now.

Abdulrakham says he also wanted change and a brighter future for his country, but not this way.

“People are dying on both sides,” he continues. “The city’s been destroyed – and no one cares! Do they seriously think they changed it for the better? Don’t lie to yourself – just look around! Is this what you wanted?”

And what is around is a scene of widespread destruction and social chaos. The badly damaged buildings matched by the rising stench of garbage and decomposing bodies. Armed youngsters roam the streets, barely old enough to understand that what they carry are weapons, not toys.

Many shops, schools, and hospitals are closed, while the city’s cemeteries are growing bigger.

This entry was posted in AfricaAnalysisDemocracyEuropeLibyaNATOOpinionPeaceQadhafiUK,USA and tagged ,. Bookmark the permalink.

One Response to Walter Fauntroy, Feared Dead in Libya, Returns Home—Guess Who He Saw Doing the Killing

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.






Journalist ( Political Writer ).

All main articles in this website have been completed,  and  now the articles are being equipped with a variety of press-photos.  Invasion by the Rebels backed by Zionist terrorists ( N.A.T.O. ) into the capital Tripoli on August 20, 2011,  has successfully driven by the Jamahiriya troops. The  Zionist mass-media lies increasingly revealed. This issue will be reviewed later after the Writer  received complete information from Brothers and Sisters in Tripoli.

Muammargadhafi’s Blog,  “My Notebook: Muammar Al-Gadhafi  In My Opinion Part  III”  in English is dedicated to my Muslim Brothers  and Sisters, my Companieros and my Comrades all over the world, especially Brother Leader, Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi and I am sure he will read it.  All of these articles are my opinion specifically analyzing the news and various events of Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi including the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya  especially in terms of politics.  The articles will be continued unlimited and written on the same page in the Muammargadhafi’s Blog.  The goal is to deflect all the writings  of others both within country ( Indonesia ) and abroad who are often offensive Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi because he dared against the evil actions that have been done by the international Zionists – imperialism led by the United States. Moreover, before the Rebellion events, the Indonesian mass-media rarely conveys  the news of Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi and Jamahiriya, so the most Indonesian people do not know about the role of Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi in the world like in the Arab World, Africa,  Latin America, especially in the Muslim world.

Photo: The Role of Brother Leader in the world.

For those of us who have bothered to find out what is going on in the Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, let us see what the Western corporate media is not saying.  Libya today is resisting the new colonialism. The colonialists assign noble names  such as “protecting civilians”  to their military  mission. But who are “civilians” ?   In their eyes, the  “civilians“  are the Robbers, the Rapers and the Killers who led by the Zionist puppets, Mr. Mustafa Abdul Jalil cooperate with the terrorist  organization created by C.I.A. ,  Al-Qaeda. All of them are “civilians” who must be protected by the international Zionist troops ( N.A.T.O. ) led by  the United States,  France  and Britain.  The Zionist troops  ( N.A.T.O. ) casually attacked Libya with reason is unreasonable that defend “civilians”,  although they each  day attacking Libyan civilians especially in Tripoli,  old-men, children and even infants,  a cruel and barbaric so corpses scattered in many places. Until July 2011, there are more than 2000 Libyan civilians   killed by them since the Zionist troops ( N.A.T.O. ) took control of the skies over Libya. Where are you Mr. Ban Ki-moon (U.N. Secretary General). And where are you Mr. Luis Ocampo ( I.C.C. ) ? They all pretend not to know about the result of the Zionist terrorists   (N.A.T.O.) airstrike. They also pretend not to know about the barbaric Rebels forces led by the evil Mustafa Abdul Jalil who considered by the Zionists ( N.A.T.O. ) as “civilians”,  capturing the suspected of being pro-Gadhafi and their girls raped first before they were slaughtered in presence of their parents. Most of them are Black Africans. Mustafa Abdul Jalil and his bandits are devils not Muslims,  even not human. 

Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi only can be removed by Libyan people themselves, not by the international Zionist conspiracy ( N.A.T.O. ). At the first supporters  the Rebels ( The National Transitional Council ) only 2 %  of six million  Libyan people = 120,000 people and now diminishing because of the Libyan people getting sick, hate and angry about their cruelty. On the contrary, Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi received sympathy of the Libyan people and the international communities. Colonel Gadhafi has widespread support,  and some estimate that support at between 90%  to 98% of  Libyans. But the international public,  including Indonesian people have been  mesmerized by the Zionists propaganda via their mass-media portraying Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi as “bloodthirsty” ogre whose only desire is to “kill his own people.” Since most people in the West, Asia, including Indonesia know absolutely nothing about Libya, anything. Even the T.V. media in Indonesia during the month of February 2011, every day there  is always news about the “demonstration” in Libya. The news cornered  Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi, including insult with humor and parody are sourced from the Western press and Al-Jazeera  ( Al-Qaeda trumpets ). But when the international Zionist terrorist forces ( N.A.T.O. ) led by the United States, France, and Britain each day of massacring civilians in Libya, all local T.V. media in Indonesia except TVRI, silent as if nothing has happened .  It’s very disappointing, because broadcast news is not balanced. So that most Indonesian people do not know about the despicable act of the international Zionist terrorist forces ( N.A.T.O. ) against civilians in Libya.  

The Zionists clowns in Washington, Paris and London  are trying hard to fool people all over the world, including the people of U.S. and Europe using the power of their mass-media.  There is something not funny, absurd, political lies and evil of the announcement of U.S. President Barack Obama and Secretary of State,  Hillary Rodham Clinton. They are always talking about no more legitimacy for the Jamahiriya, led by Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi.  They pretended to forget that Libya does not belong to the United States or Europe. Libya belongs to the Libyan Arab people. Therefore, only the majority of Libyans who determine that Jamahiriya led by Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi has any legitimacy or not. 

Why the international Zionists ( N.A.T.O. )  increasingly desperate want to kill Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi and will colonized Libya? For creating “democracy” and uphold “human rights”. Is it true?  LIAR!!!

The Zionist devils in Washington, Paris, London and Rome   would rob oil, gas and Libya’s natural wealth. For their interests in Libya, they used the Rebels and the terrorists  Al-Qaeda created by C.I.A.    All the evil plans and the scenario have long made by them before February 15, 2011.  Only the fools who believe in the evil propaganda of the Zionist terrorists (N.A.T.O.). People in the United States and Europe have been humiliated by these Zionist clowns.—–

Permanent title and Insya Allah, if possible this website will be published as a book, “My Notebook: Muammar Al-Gadhafi In My Opinion.”  This “My Notebook” was last modification on August 23, 2011.  Part I  page ( article )  = 100 pages   Press-photo= 183 photos. Part II page ( article ) = 43 pages  Press photo = 120 photos. Part  III page ( article ) = 72 pages  Press photo = ……….  Comments Part I, Part II and Part III = 192 comments. Blog stats ( visitor ) Part I, Part II, and Part III = 22,605 hits.  I am a Writer most grateful to WordPress.com ;  Google;  Blogger;  Facebook; NetworkedBlogs on Facebook;  Facepinch and Twitter.  Thanks to them, Muammargadhafi’s Blog can be read by people all over the world and published by another websites . Among others: 1. “Indian Today” 2.  “London Beat Blog”  3. “blogtopsites” 4. Books Publisher and Distributor Amazon.com   5.  Australia Planet Australia’s search engine  6.  Unsere Neue Erde  ( Germany ) 7.  “123 people.co.uk “




Entering the beginning of  2011 the people of the Arab world divided by wave of protesters who can not dammed. Starting these  demonstrators wave swept Tunisia requested that President Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali soon stepped down. In response to the Tunisian protests, Ben Ali declared a state of emergency in the country, dissolved the government on 14 January 2011 and  promised new legislative elections within six months. However, events moved quickly and it appears the armed forces and key members of the legislative had lost confidence in the president and had decided to take steps of their own.

Photo: President  Zine el-Abidine Ben Ali.

With power slipping from his grasp Ben Ali resigned the presidency at about 4 p.m. local time and delegated Prime Minister Mohamed Ghannouchi to act as Head of State during his temporary absence. With the army surrounding the Presidential Palace in Tunis  and perhaps in fear of retribution, Ben Ali and close members of his family hastily fled in four helicopters bound for Malta. From Malta, Ben Ali initially headed to exile in France but his plane was prevented from landing in Paris by the French authorities. It was reported by “Le Monde” that a plane carrying some members of his family did land at Paris. It appears that Ben Ali was forced to reconsider his options mid air and amid conflicting rumors that he was heading for eider Doha ( Qatar ) or   Dubai   (U.A.E.)  he eventually arrived in Jeddah, Saudi Arabia early on Saturday 15 January, 2011, where he was welcomed by the authorities. President Ben Ali was U.S. partner in the effort to fight global terrorism through the Trans-Saharan Counter-terrorism initiative. But Western countries particularly the United States and France in the last minute they leave Ben Ali. (more…)

4 comments August 23, 2011



Foreign Affairs Observer

Muammargadhafi’s  Blog   “My Notebook: Muammar Al-Gadhafi In My Opinion ( Part II ) In English” is   dedicated   to my Muslim  Brothers   and   Sisters ,  my   friends    all   over  the  world ,    especially   Brother   Leader,   Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi  and   I am  sure he  will  read  it.    All  of  these  articles  are my opinion    specifically analyzing    the   news    and   various   events     of     Colonel   Muammar     Al-Gadhafi,      including     Libyan Arab  Jamahiriya    especially   in    terms  of    politics.   The   articles    will    be  continued    unlimited    and  written   on    the  same  page  in this Muammargadhafi’s    Blog.  The  goal  is  to  deflect   all      the   writings  of    others both    within country    ( Indonesia )    and    abroad      who   are   often       offensive       Colonel Muammar  Al-Gadhafi   because    he  dared  against    the    evil     actions   that  have       been   done  by  the international   Zionists-imperialism.   Moreover, before the  rebellion events,  the   Indonesian    mass-media   rarely convey  the   news   of  Colonel   Gadhafi and  Jamahiriya,   so  the most    Indonesian    people    do not   know about   the  role  of  Colonel     Muammar Al-Gadhafi    in   the   world    like    in      the   Arab   World,  Africa ,  Latin America  and especially in the  Muslim World.

The world community, especially the Muslims today have forgotten the crimes of  Human Rights by the United States, Great Britain, and the other Zionist countries  against Muslims  in Afghanistan and Iraq. According to John J. Kruzel, American Forces Press Service, March 10, 2010, about  98,000 U.S. military forces remain in Iraq.  Until 2010, more than 22 NATO Nations deploy over 100,000 troops in Afghanistan as a part of the I.S.A.F.   Another sources said that Afghanistan  and Iraq occupied by NATO’s  troops, their people oppressed,  plundered  state wealth-out, not up there , beside torture they also raped Muslim women are not helpless. According to the statement  of  Mr. William Ramsey Clark,  American lawyer on January 29,  2004,  at least 40, 000 defenseless people  in Iraq have been killed by U.S. violence since the latest aggression began in March 2003.  According to Wikileaks on October 22,  2010, the report detail of the war document  and occupation in Iraq, from 1st January 2004  to  31 December 2009,  109,032 deaths in Iraq, comprised  of 66,081 civilians,  23, 984  ”enemy”,  15,196 host nation  Iraqi  government forces ) and 3,777 friendly ( coalition forces ). The majority of the deaths  ( 66,000, over 60% ) of these are civilian deaths. That is 31 civilians, including children everyday during the six year period killed by U.S. troops  and until now their crime is still ongoing, moreover the U.S. government under the leadership  of President Barack Obama to further improve  the number of U.S. troops dispatch to Iraq and Afghanistan. The number of Muslims in Iraq  and Afghanistan who were killed by NATO troops , especially by American troops are not counted.     Do not have a sense of  shame  President Barack Obama  and  officials in Washington  who bloodied their hands of the Muslim people in Iraq and Afghanistan storytelling about DEMOCRACY and HUMAN RIGHTS  in Libyan Arab Jamahiriya ?   Their claims are to distract and deceive the international community. They  have humiliated the U.S. people who are often deceived by them especially about 9/11 attacks. Today all international community know that “WAR ON TERRORISM”  is a bad tactics of the U.S. Government  to attack and  occupy the Muslim countries and their enemies.
Why there is no courage of the United Nations  Security Council  to impose sanctions  for crimes and barbaric  acts of NATO troops led by U.S.  in Iraq and Afghanistan ?   While on the Libyan Arab  Jamahiriya which has been  accused of  killing his  “people”  ( the rebels), the U.N. Security Council directly and immediately provides a variety of sanctions. Why the  U.N. Security Council is very difficult to take action against the Israeli Zionist  crimes that have killed Palestinian Arab people  in Gaza ?  The U.S. warship and marine troops on March 2, 2011  are ready located  in the waters of  Mediterranean   Sea near the coast of Jamahiriya with a reason to give humanitarian aid.  Is providing humanitarian assistance should be through  military force ?  In fact  the real purpose of the U.S.  which will be followed by the international Zionist conspiracy  (NATO  ) troops are  want to help the rebels through the invasion as in Iraq, so that they can immediately get rid  of Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi and at once  they will  occupy  the centers of  OIL refineries across the region Libyan Arab Jamahiriya.

The other crimes , in addition to the rebels in Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, led by the descendants of King Idriss as Sanusi , who infiltrated the town of  Benghazi from the Great Britain and Sweden, as well provoked by the terrorist Al-Qaeda  by handling out liquor, drug / cocaine  to  the youths for daring against the army of the Jamahiriya.  Many people of the Muslim countries duped by  Al-Qaeda terrorists  who run these commands from  the C.I.A. and use  Islam in carry out the terror. Who is actually Osama Bin Laden ?  What is the background of Al-Qaeda ?  President Barack Obama declared on May 2, 2011 that Osama Bin Laden, 54, was killed after a gun-battle with Navy SEALs and C.I.A. paramilitary forces at compound in the city of Abbottabad, Pakistan. But why, suddenly President Barack Obama announced the death of Osama Bin Laden that was broadcast by the mass-media around the world? The answers you will find on this page.  Also  please read the articles below about crime ,  cruelty  of  human beings savage  that have been done by the international Zionist plot  based in Europe , Australia and  United States.  

In this case a very regrettable, mostly the mass-media and the people in the Muslim countries, including in  Indonesia  pretend blind, deaf and suddenly willing to cooperate with the international Zionist plot to spread malicious propaganda and fake news to humiliate  and discredit  the Muslim leader,  Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi . Embarrassing !

Permanent title and will be published as a book,  “My Notebook :   Muammar Al-Gadhafi In My Opinion”. 

This “My Notebook” was last modified on : August 6, 2011    Page  ( article ) Part I  :   100  pages. Press- photo: 181 photos.  Comments  ( inside )  Part I and Part II : 62  comments, please open and read on RSS  via Opera 11.01 1190.  Blog stats  (visitors) Part I and Part II :    22,151  hits.   Page ( article ) Part II 43 pages. Press photo: 120 photos. I am as a Writer  most grateful to WordPress.com  ,   Google,  Blogger, Facebook,  NetworkedBlogs  on Facebook, Face pinch and Twitter. Thanks to them,  Muammargadhafi’s  Blog – //muammargadhafi.wordpress,com /      can be read  by  people  all over the world and published by another websites.  Among others: 1. “Indian Today”  2. “London Beat Blog”  3.  “blogtopsites”  4.  Books  Publisher and Distributor  Amazon.com. 5. Australian Planet Australia’s search engine. 6. Unsere Neue Erde (Germany).


This chapter is very important because in 1970’s until 1990’s  Libya always accused by the West countries as “The Kingdom of Terrorism” and Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi is “The Godfather of Terrorists”. While we have known that Libya and Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi have been defender of the struggle of oppressed people all over the world for true liberation.  For example when South Africa under apartheid government, the West countries, especially U.K. and U.S. government recognized and supported the inhuman regime. By this analogy, Nelson Mandela who was fighting against apartheid in his country would be a terrorist, but Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi always side with him. Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi said: “We did our historical duty when duty had to be done by arms. Libya fought the United States and shot down its pilots and its aircraft. But now the time has come to reap the fruits of this armed struggle, namely peace, stability and development.”  “Now we are facing new challenges, which are common enemies to all of us. In the past Libya had led a liberation movement in the Third World and Africa”,  he said.  “Now Libya has decided to lead the peace movement all over the world ,” Colonel Gadhafi said to “The Independent” on April 28, 2004 in Brussels.

Many Journalists exposed the facts of hidden stakes of the war on Afghanistan and the secret operations of the “War On Terrorism”. In this chapter according to their analysis will be uncovered the plot in detail how the United States and the United Kingdom double standard policy toward “The War On Terrorism”.  Among others are: “What is a terrorist ?” ;

“It’s a classic Frankenstein’s monster situation. How the C.I.A. created Osama Bin Laden as an icon of the terrorism ?”; “The relationship between Al-Qaeda and C.I.A. is still underway”;  “Libya’s request to INTERPOL to arrest Osama Bin Laden was blocked by West countries” ; “Who is Osama Bin Laden?”; “9/11  Tragedy was a conspiracy.” ; “Is Osama Bin Laden dead or still alive ? ; And “British intelligence paid large sums of money to LIFG ( Libyan Islamic Fighting Group ) a jihad network with  links to Al-Qaeda to assassinate Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi. 

What is a terrorist? “Terrorism  is justified by Western arrogance “, Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi said. Colonel Gadhafi made it known through press agency JANA, August 25, 2003, that “the West still has a policy of double measures resulting from it arrogance and disdain it has for other nations and their public opinion. Terrorism is a phenomenon with a double cause and it finds its justification in these policies”. Several years ago, Libyan Arab Jamahiriya accused of financing the international terrorists by the West. But it was answered by Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi that nuclear weapons are also a form of terrorism. “Military bases in other countries, is a form of terrorism against the people and their neighbors countries. Economic boycott against the party of the people including the form of terrorism. Also provide assistance to countries that are occupying the other country, an act of terror,” Colonel Gadhafi said.  Libyan leader, Colonel Muammar Al Gadhafi  was called to nations of the world to explain what is the meaning of terrorism, ranging from airplane hijackings up to manufacturer nuclear weapons. Colonel Gadhafi  expressed his oddity, why the people of the United States are always screaming about the hijacking of airplanes, but at the same time they forget the operations of their fleets, missiles intercontinental they have made, and the hunger which they have created is a serious sources of terrorism against humanity. “We oppose the hijacking of aircraft to terrorize the innocent people,” Colonel Gadhafi said. Later he added, “but we can not suppress these actions before we can terminate the principal reason. If all countries in the world willing to talk seriously about terrorism in all its aspect in a meeting at the United Nations, then we will come at first to take such talk.” So far, the United States accused another countries carelessly as “terrorist or not terrorist.” They are terrorists!!!  If they are brown or Arabs and Muslims. If they are white and Jewish, then they are freedom fighters. If there are Muslim fighters against American enemies, of course, they are “Mujahideen”.  In 1980′s  Taliban fighters supported by United States against Soviet Union.

What Is A Terrorist ?

According to Jeff Cohen, a media critic and author who wrote an article about the definition of terrorist published on May 01, 2002 by CommonDreams.org  —————-:

Ter-ror-ist   ( ter’er-ist ) n.   1. One who engages in acts or an act of terrorism.


2. One who leads an armed group that kills civilians as a means of political intimidation ————–unless he terrorizes Haitians while on the C.I.A. – payroll, as did 1990’s death squad leader, Emmanuel Constant, in which case the U.S. refuses to extradite him to Haiti, even after September 11, 2001.


3. One who targets civilian airliners and ships ————————  unless he blows up a Cuban civilian airliners, killing 73 people, and fives at a Polish freighter, like Orlando Bosch, in which case he is coddle and paroled by the Bush Justice Department in 1990, and his extradition is blocked.

4. One who leads a group that engages in kidnapping and murder ————————–  unless the victims are Hondurans attacked by C.I.A. – backed death squad Battalion 316, in which case Battalion architect, Gustavo Alvarez, becomes a Pentagon Consultant, while the then-ambassador to Honduras who downplayed the terror, John Negroponte, is ambassador to the United Nations days after September 11, 2001.

5. One who uses rape and murder for political purposes ——————-unless the victims are four U.S. church women sexually assaulted and killed in 1980 by members of El Salvador’s U.S. – backed military, in which case excuses and distortions pour forth from then the U.S.  Ambassador to United Nations, Jeane Kirkpatrick said, “these nuns were not just nuns, they were also political activities”, and Secretary of State, Al Haigh ( Alexander Haigh ) added , “the nuns may have tried to run a roadblock”.

Contra guerrillas trained and armed by  C.I.A.  against  SANDINISTA  government.

6. One who designates civilians as “soft targets” to be attacked in the cause of political transformation —————————unless the targets are Nicaraguans killed by Contra guerrillas armed and directed by the United States who, according to Human Rights Watch, “systematically engage in violent abuses ——- so prevalent that these may be said to be their principal means of waging war.”

More than 900 Arab Palestinians killed by Lebanese Christian militia and Israeli soldiers  in Sabra and Shatila   in  September 16  –  18,  1982.

Ariel  Sharon.

7. One who facilities a massacre of civilians ———– unless the victims are 900 Palestinians shot and backed to death in the Sabra and Shatila camps by Lebanese Christian militia as Israeli soldiers stood guard, in which case Israel’s then Defense Minister, Ariel Sharon remains a U.S. “War On Terrorism” ally after being censured as indirectly responsible for the massacre by an Israeli commission of inquiry.

In addition to Jeff Cohen’s opinions about who are the terrorists, in this case should be augmented by the Writer that drug / cocaine dealers are the most dangerous terrorists in the world and should be eradicated.  During this time the West countries give the term “terrorism” based on their own version. Arabs especially Libyans and Muslims are terrorists. In the legislation of anti-terrorism that exists in every country except Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, the Islamic Republic of Iran, Venezuela and another Socialist countries, is the creation of the United States. Therefore, none of the  sentences stating drug / cocaine dealers are terrorists.  Moreover, drug / cocaine dealers the biggest in the world such as in Columbia, Gold Triangle region in Southeast Asia and Afghanistan controlled by the C.I.A. to finance their political criminal operations. Cocaine dealers mostly come  from Western countries, including the United States and Australia. Also from  Latin America and Nigeria that masquerade as tourists,  all of them controlled by the C.I.A.  The C.I.A. intends to create a crazy generation all over the world especially in Muslim countries. Drug / cocaine dealers should be equated with terrorist. Therefore, they should be hanged, shot or beheaded and there is no forgiveness or light sentences for them.  It must be remembered that they are the most dangerous terrorists!

The Term Phrase Of  “War On Terrorism”

Created By The  Director  of  C.I.A.

George  John Tennet, born January 5, 1953,  Director of Central Intelligence ( D.C.I. ) for the United States Central Intelligence Agency ( C.I.A. ), and is Distinguished  Professor in the Practice of Diplomacy at Georgetown University.  George John Tennet held the position as the DCI from July 1997 to July 2004.  In February 2008, he became a Managing Director at the merchant bank Allen &  Company.  After the September 11 attacks,  many observers criticized  the intelligence community for numerous “intelligence failures” as one of the major reasons why the attacks were not prevented. George J. Tennet  testified before a public hearing of the September 11, 2001 Commission  investigating 9/11, that he did not meet with President George W. Bush in August 2001,  the month before the September 11 attacks.  The same evening after the hearings,  a C.I.A. spokesman corrected Tennet’s  testimony,  stating that Tennet did indeed meet  with President George W. Bush twice  in August.  Tennet  in his memoir writes of his memorable visit to President George W. Bush’s  ranch in Crawford,  Texas, August 2001. In August 2007,  a secret report written by the C.I.A. Inspector General was made public   ( originally written in 2005 but kept secret ).    The   19-page summary states that  G. J.  Tennet  knew dangers of Al-Qaeda well before September 2001, but that the leadership of the C.I.A.  did not do enough to prevent any attacks.  G. J. Tennet  reacted to the publication of this  report by calling it “flat wrong”, citing in particular the planning efforts  of the past  two years.  G. J. Tennet immediately increased  the size and capability of the C.I.A.’s  special operations component  housed in the special Operations  Group of the Special Activities Division.  These Parliamentary Operations Officers were the first to enter both Afghanistan and Iraq.  One in these countries  these officers organized and led the Northern  Alliance against the Taliban in Afghanistan and the Kurds against Ansar Al-Islam and Saddam Hussein’s  forces in Iraq. The rebuilding of this capability and the successful employment of these elite commandos are considered  one of G. J.  Tennet  greatest achievements in the global “War on Terror”. George John Tennet  that his Al-Qaeda plan had placed the C.I.A.  in a better position to respond after the 9/11 attacks. As he put it.  How could ( an intelligence ) community without a strategic plan tell the President of the United States just four days after 9/11 how to attack the Afghan sanctuary and operate against Al-Qaeda in ninety two countries around the world ?  This was at a meeting of the restricted National Security Council or “War Council”  –  Camp David on September  15, 2001.  G. J. Tennet  presented the Worldwide Attack  Matrix, a blueprint for what become known as “The War On Terrorism”.

G.J. Tennet – Bush – Cheney.

G. J. Tennet proposed firstly to send C.I.A. team into Afghanistan to collect intelligence on, and mount covert operations against Al-Qaeda and Taliban. The teams would act jointly  with military special operations units.  P[resident George W. Bush later praised  this proposal, saying it had been a turning point in his thinking. Citing “personal reasons”, George  John  Tennet  submitted his resignation  to President George W. Bush  on June 3, 2004. James Pavitt,  his Deputy Director for Operations at the C.I.A. ,  announced his resignation the following day, leading to speculation that the exit of both senior intelligence  officials  was related to the controversy  over alleged Iraqi  W.M.D. s   and the decision to go to war.  The Writer argues that whatever  the reasons of G. J. Tennet  about the “failure”  to prevent 9/11 attacks, absurd and convoluted.  The Writer believes that G. J. Tenet  has  already known  that there will be events of the 9/11  as well as President George W. Bush,  all of them  involved.  However, President  Bush voiced support for  G. J.  Tennet’s   efforts,  stating :  “George Tennet did a super job for America. It was a high honor to work with him,  and I am sorry he left,”   reported by Reuters, June 5, 2004.

National Strategy For Combating

Terrorism Formed By C.I.A.

The issue of “War on Terrorism” is begun by the world is a violent place and for various political, economic, religious and many reasons, wars and conflicts often erupt. The world was rocked by the story of U.S. government about 9/11 tragedy: “On September 11, 2001, the nineteen Al-Qaeda terrorists hijacked four commercial passenger jet airlines. The hijackers intentionally crashed two of the airliners into the Twin Tower of the World Trade Center in New York City, killing everyone on board and many others working in the buildings. Both buildings collapsed within two hours, destroying at least two nearby buildings and damaging others. In total 2,993 people, including the hijackers, died in the attacks. The hijackers crashed a third airliner into the Pentagon and a fourth plane crashed into a field near Shanksville, Pennsylvania after the passengers and flight crew revolved.

W.T.C.  New York in the 9/11 2001.


In the aftermath of September 11, 2001 Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi was one of the first leaders to issue a strong statement condemning the attacks and declaring that U.S was justified in retaliating. In the months following September 11, Libyan agents delivered three decades of intelligence they had gathered on Al-Qaeda cell and related groups through the Muslim world.  Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi: “Irrespective of the conflict with America, it is a human duty to sympathy with the American people and be with them at these horrifying and awful events which are bound to awaken human conscience. When I was five, my brother was shot by an Israeli soldier, since then I have been dedicated to uniting the Arab countries throughout the Middle East Arab and retain a trade flow with the West.” A few hours after the terrorist attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon, the George W. Bush administration conclude without supporting evidence, that “Osama Bin Laden and his Al-Qaeda organization were prime suspects.”

C.I.A. Director, George Tenet state that Osama Bin Laden has the capacity to plan “multiple attacks with little or warning.” Secretary of State, Colin Powell called the attacks “an act of war” and  President George W. Bush confirmed in an evening televised address to the Nation that he would “make no distinction between the terrorists who committed these acts and those who harbor them.” Former C.I.A. Director, James Woolsey his finger at “state sponsorship,”  implying the complicity an one or more foreign governments. In the words of former U.S National Security, Laurence Eagleburger: “ I think we show when we get attacked like this, we are terrible in our strength and in our retribution.” Immediately after 9/11, 2001 attacks, the U.S. government offered a reward of US$ 25 million for information leading to his capture or death the Leader of Al-Qaeda, Osama Bin Laden. On July 13, 2007 this figure was doubled to US$ 50 million. The Airline Pilots Association and the Air Transport Association are offering an additional US$ 2 million reward. The surprise for the world, President George W. Bush said: “Now for all nations of the world, there only two choice. Either they join America, and if they don’t, they join the terrorism. The George W. Bush administration through C.I.A. in February 2002 formed of strategy known as National Strategy for Combating Terrorism. In this strategy President George W. Bush stressed: “The enemy is not one person. It is not a single political regime. Certainly it is not a religion. The enemy is terrorism premeditated, politically motivated. Violence perfect rated against noncombatant target by sub national groups or clandestine agents. Those who employ terrorism, regardless of their specific secular or religious objectives, strive to the rule of law and effect through violence and fear. These terrorists also here share this-guided belief that killing, kidnapping, extorting, robbing, and wreaking havoc  to terrorize people are legitimate forms of political action.” But these President George W. Bush statements are not supported by all American scientists, especially Robert Jervis from Columbia University.

Jervis said that “this perspective is misleading as an explanation for terrorism or a prescription for dealing with, however. It is difficult to say exactly what the root cause.” The war in Afghanistan begun in 2001 with the American response to the 9/11 terror attacks on the United States. This event  triggered the Coalition invasion / liberation of Afghanistan and continuing  worldwide “WAR ON TERRORISM.” The Taliban government was overthrown, and a new regime installed. The U.S., the new Afghanistan government, and NATO forces are still trying to pacify parts of the country where the Taliban and Al-Qaeda forces operate.

Libya’s Request To INTERPOL

To Arrest Osama Bin Laden Was Blocked

By West Countries.

PHOTO (ABOVE) is Hannibal al-Gadhafi

One group that never supported by Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi was Al-Qaeda. In fact, Colonel Gadhafi issued the first INTERPOL warrant for Osama Bin Laden in 1998 for the killings of two German counter terrorism  agents in Tripoli, three years before the tragedy September 11, 2001 in the United States. In fact, the first international warrant for Osama Bin Laden issued by Libyan Arab Jamahiriya in March 1998 three years ahead of the United States. 

INTERPOL Secretary General, Ronald K. Noble was interviewed on April 16, 2003 by the PBS television network in the United States in connection with the four-part documentary series “Avoiding Armageddon”, which dealt with the threat posed by terrorists who may have access to weapons of mass destruction.

INTERPOL  Secretary-General  Ronald K. Noble. 

PBS: “You are a global law enforcement organization. You are with police forces, law enforcement, all over the world. Some of this terrorism is global in nature, what’s the hardest part about a global law enforcement pursuing a global adversary?” RN: “The hardest part is trusted by one of member countries who knows that another member country, is engaged in wrongdoing. The example I will use this. Its fair to say that the relationship between The United States and Libya is not strong. Libya is a member of INTERPOL, so people will say, from the intelligence community or law enforcement agencies. We can’t work with INTERPOL because Libya’s a member of INTERPOL. And if the analysis stops right there, the United States and other countries are hurt. Why? Because the first country in the world to seek the arrest of Osama Bin Laden was Libya in 1998. So what I say to law enforcement around the world is: Trust us with the names of people you are looking for you don’t need to give us all information. But when we put Osama Bin Laden into our database, and Osama Bin Laden goes into an airport, and the passport is scanned, the U.S. then has the information and can decide: “We contact Libya, or we don’t”.

Who Is Osama Bin Laden?

Osama Bin Laden was born in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia, March 10, 1957. His father Muhammad Awad Bin Laden was a wealthy businessman with close ties to the Saudi royal family. Osama Bin Laden was born the only son of Muhammad Bin Laden’s tenth wife, Hamida Al-Attas. Osama’s parents divorced soon after he was born. Osama’s mother then married Muhammad Al-Attas. All of them, their grandfathers come from Hadramauth, Republic of Yemen. This couple had four children, and Osama live in the new household with three step brothers and one step sister.

Terry Osman/aka.Osama was raised as a devout Wahhabi Muslim. Osama studied economics and business administration at King Abdulaziz University. Osama earned a degree in civil Engineering in 1979 and a degree in public administration in 1981. In 1974, at the age of 17, Osama Bin Laden married his first wife Nazwa Ghanem at Latakia. As of 2002 Osama had married four women and fathered  roughly 26 children. Osama Bin Laden identified himself as an anti-Semitic, and has delivered warnings against alleged Jewish conspiracies: ”These Jews are masters of usury and leaders in treachery. They will leave you nothing, either in this world or the next. Shiah Muslims have been listed along with”. Heretics, ……………..America and Israel, “as the four principal” at ideology classes of Osama Bin Laden’s Al-Qaeda organization. Is it right? But the truth is, he told the world community a lie.

Al-Qaeda Is The Base Of  Terrorists.

Author Laurence Wright in his book “The Looming Tower” writes that Al-Qaeda (The Base) was formed on August 11, 1988 meeting of “with several senior leaders” of Egyptian Islamic Jihad, (Sayyed Imam Al-Sharif, Ayman Al-Zawahiri and others), Abdullah Yusuf Azzam and Osama Bin Laden, where it was agreed to join Bin Laden’s money with the expertise of the Islamist Jihad organization and continue jihad else where after the Soviets withdrew from Afghanistan.

Sayyed Imam Al-Sharif. 

Al-Qaeda operates as a network comprising both a multinational, stateless arm and a fundamentalist Sunni movement for Al-Qaeda al-Sulbah (a vanguard of the strong). Al-Qaeda led by Osama Bin Laden. 250,000 Afghan Mujahideen fought the Soviets and Communist Afghan government. Foreign mujahedeen volunteers came from 43 countries. The Soviet Union finally withdrew from Afghanistan in 1989. Ayman Al-Zawahiri formally merger Egyptian Islamic Jihad into Al-Qaeda.  Ayman Muhammad Rabaie Al-Zawahiri born June 19, 1951 is a prominent leader of Al-Qaeda, and was the second and last “emir” of Egyptian Islamic Jihad. Ayman Al-Zawahiri  is a qualified surgeon, and is an author of works including numerous Al-Qaeda statements.  Al-Qaeda evolved from the Maktab al-Khidamat ( Service Office ), a Muslim organization was established by Abdullah Yusuf Azzam and Osama Bin Laden in Peshawar, Pakistan in 1984.

Abdullah Yusuf Azzam

Abdullah Yusuf Azzam is a Palestinian Islamic scholar and member of the Muslim Brotherhood. After Abdullah Yusuf Azzam was assassinated in 1989, the Maktab al-Khidamat split, with a significant member joining Osama Bin Laden’s organization.  Evidence points to suicide squads led by Al-Qaeda military commander Muhammad Atta as the culprits of the attacks, with Osama Bin Laden, Ayman Al-Zawahiri, Khalid Shaikh Muhammed, and Hambali as the key planners and part of the political and military command. They said will fight the enemy of Islam. But the truth is, they told Muslims all over the world a lie. They put all Muslims down,  especially in the international forum as terrorists.

Osama Bin Laden ( L ) and Dr. Ayman Al- Zawahiri ( R ).

Hambali &  Khalid S. Muhammad.

A Confusing Statements.

There are theories that 9/11 was part of an international Jewish conspiracy. On the contrary, on the internet, Al-Qaeda the second leader Dr. Ayman Muhammad Rabaie al-Zawahiry has attached Shia, Hezbollah and the Islamic Republic of Iran for spreading it, claiming, “the objective behind this lie to deny that the Sunnis have heroes who harm America as no one has harmed it throughout its history and that Iran’s aim to cover up its involvement in the invading of Iraq and Afghanistan.” The statement of Ayman Al-Zawahiri  is more proper come from Israel. So Al-Qaeda’s opinion is the same as Zionists. In the 2004 Osama Bin Laden abandoned his denials without retracting past statements. In it he stated he had personally directed the nineteen hijackers to 9/11, 2001 attacks. This statement goes against Ayman Al-Jawahiri’s statement.

Osama Bin Laden And Al-Qaeda Funded By

The United States In “Operation Cyclone”.

The C.I.A.’s  support of the Islamic Mujahideen  ( Operation Cyclone  1979 – 1992 ).

Mr. Zbigniew Brzezinski,  President  Carter’s  National  Security  Advisor  and

Osama Bin Laden.

The West  should also seek to cultivate secularist governments and ideology, reversing a process which has after seen an unholy alliance between Islamists and Western intelligence agencies. Osama Bin Laden himself got his start as an ally of the C.I.A. in the war against the Soviet occupation of Afghanistan. So was President Saddam Hussein as an ally of the C.I.A. in the war against the Islamic Republic of Iran in 1980’s. According to “The Times” on August 24, 1998, Osama Bin Laden et all were C.I.A. employees, given the best training, arms, facilities, and lots of cash for many years.  According to LiveLeak.com on October 7, 2008 the United States funded Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda in “Operation Cyclone.”  The Operation Cyclone was the code name for the U.S. Central Intelligence Agency ( C.I.A. ) program to arm the Afghan mujahideen  during the Soviet war in Afghanistan, 1979 to 1989.  Operation Cyclone is one of the longest and most expensive covert C.I.A. operations ever undertaken, funding began with US$ 20 – 30 million per year in 1980 and rose to US$ 630 million per year in 1987.

Soviet  troops  withdrawing from  Afghanistan  in  1988.

After the fall of Afghanistan regime pro Moscow, the United States openly supported Osama Bin Laden and friends, they were given a label “resistance fighters” so they were OK. Now they have been given a new label “terrorists” and thus they are transformed. Amazing!!! Meanwhile “The Times” reports that the United States spent more than six billion U.S. dollars to support Al-Qaeda and that is just in Afghnistan. And how many billions dollar have been funneled to similar resistance fighters in other hand? Who is the greater terrorist? The person who pulls the trigger? Or the superpower that recruits him, pay him, trains him, arms him to the teeth and builds him the finest state – of – the – art training camp with room for “terrorists from all over the world?”

“Enemy Number One”

Negotiating With C.I.A. ?

On September 13, 2003 Reuters report quoting Labeviere’s  book “Corridors of Terror” points to alleged “negotiations” between Osama Bin Laden and the C.I.A., which took place two months prior to the September 11, 2001 attacks at the American Hospital in Dubai, U.A.E., while Osama Bin Laden was recovering from a kidney dialysis treatment. The question “Enemy Number One” in hospital recovery from dialysis treatment “negotiating with C.I.A. ?”

American  Hospital in Dubai  ( U.A.E. ). 

According to the Reuters report: “At the time, Osama Bin Laden had a multi-million U.S. dollar price on his head for his suspected role in the 1998 bombings of two U.S. embassies in East Africa.”  So why did the hospital staff, who knew that Osama Bin Laden was at the American Hospital in Dubai, not claim the reward? If the C.I.A. had wanted to arrest Osama Bin Laden prior to September 11, 2001 they could have done it then in Dubai. But they would not have had a the war on terrorism pretext for waging a major military operation in the Middle East and Central Asia. This is “Le Figaro” report which confirmed by several other news reports including the London Times on November 1, 2001: “Dubai was the backdrop of a secret meeting between Osama Bin Laden and the local C.I.A. agents in July 2001. A partner of the Administration of the American Hospital in Dubai claims that “public enemy number one” stayed at this hospital between the 4th and 14th of July 2001.

While he was hospitalized, Osama Bin Laden received visit from many members his family as well prominent Saudi’s and Emirates. During the hospital stay, the local C.I.A. agent, known to many in Dubai, United Arab Emirates, was seen taking the main elevator of the hospital to go  (up) to Osama Bin Laden’s hospital room. A few days later, the C.I.A. man bragged to a few friends about having visited Osama Bin Laden. Authorized sources say that on July 15, 2001 the day after Osama Bin Laden returned to Quetta, Pakistan, the C.I.A. agent was called back to headquarters.


Dr. Terry Calloway

In the pursuit of its investigations, the F.B.I. discovered  ‘financing agreement’ that C.I.A. had been developing with its ‘Arab friends’ for years. The Dubai meetings is, so it would seem, within the logic of a certain American policy. During his 11-day stay in the American hospital, Osama Bin Laden received specialized medical treatment from a Canadian urologist Dr. Terry Calloway. At that time President Bush administration officials admit they  do not  know if  Osama Bin Laden is sick or even dead.”

9/11 Tragedy Was A Conspiracy.

There is a book written seriously by  Thierry Meyssan entitled “9/11 The Big Lie” published on October 2002 by Carnot Editions, U.K.  240 pages. The book claims 9/11 tragedy was a conspiracy rather than a terrorist attack. The controversial 2002 book  by French  Journalist and political activist Thierry Meyssan. The book argues that the terrorist attacks of September 11, 2001 were “false flag” operations directed right-wingers in the U.S. government and the military-industrial complex who sought a “cases belly” for military action in Afghanistan and Iraq. The book, reported to have sustained a number one best seller position in France for six of seven  weeks immediately after its launce, sold 164,400 copies in the first year, and a total of 300,000 up to date. It has since been translated into 28 language until 2006, attracting substantial international media attention. According to Meyssan, the action that provocative the collapse of the Twin Tower in the hearth of New York and damaged part of the Pentagon building had not been the result of attempts by foreign suicide pilots, rather an action organized by a group within the U.S. administration, an international complot aimed at driving opinion and forcing the course of events. “The war on Afghanistan was a response to the September 11 events, since it was prepared long before in coordination with the British government, President George W. Bush found support in evangelical group to launce a crusade against Islam, according to the strategy known as ‘Clash of  Civilizations’. The war on terror war a pretext to cut individual liberties in the United States and later in allied countries in order to impose a military regime.”  Thierry Meyssan stressed in his book: “OSAMA BIN LADEN WAS  A C.I.A. FABRICATION AND HE NEVER STOPPED WORKING FOR THE U.S. SECRET  SERVICE.

Thierry  Meyssan

The Bin Laden and the Bush families join manage their wealth by means of the ‘Carlyle Group’. The U.S. administration was taken over by some industrial group (weapons, oil, pharmaceuticals) whose interest be would defended by the government in detriment of others. The C.I.A. would develop a program of interference at all levels, which would include the resources of torture and political assassination.”  In July 2005, the U.S. State Department published document alleging Thierry Meyssan  and his Voltair Network to be “mayor sources of anti-American misinformation. The U.S. State Department has allegedly declared Thierry Meyssan a persona non grata in the United States. Since the September attacks,  a variety of conspiracy theories regarding the 9/11 attacks have been put forward in websites, books, and films. Many groups and individuals advocating 9/11 conspiracy  theories identify as part of the 9/11 Truth Movement. The first elaborated theories appeared in Europe. They include a block published by Mattias Brocker, an Editor of the German newspaper “Die Tageszeitung” at the time.  The book “The C.I.A. and September 11” by former German State Minister, Andreas Von Bulow and the book “Operation 9/11” written by the German Journalist, Gerhard Wisnewski. All of them claim that September 11 attacks in 2001 were either intentionally allowed to happen or were secretly orchestrated by elements within the United States government. One of the most prominent claims is that the collapse of the World Trade Center war was the result of a controlled demolition. Some 9/11 conspiracy theories contend that the Pentagon was hit by a missile launched by elements from inside the U.S. government or that a commercial airliner was allowed to do so via an effective stand down of the military. The common alleged motives are the use of the attacks as a pretext to justify overseas wars, to facilitate increased military spending and to restrict domestic civil liberties.

Patriot Question 9/11 – Responsible

Criticism Of  The Commission Report.

Apparently the analysts who review the events of 9/11 attacks not only come from European Journalists, but recently many pop from professionals in the United States. The feel confident that the event was not conducted by Al-Qaeda terrorist organization  but by people within the United States for the interest of  their foreign policy.  Some conspiracy theorists question the official claim the World Trade Center did not collapse because of the crashing planes but was instead demolish with explosives.  The 9/11  Truth Movement is  the famous one who has been active both in the United States as well as in other countries. This organization was launched in  June 2004 and has become the central portal for all the 9/11 Truth Movement organizations.  It is run by Janice Mathews ( Executive Director ),  David Kubiah  ( International Campaign Advisor ) and Mike Berger ( Media Coordinator ), among others, and its advisory board includes Steven E. Jones, Barrie Zwicker and a Muslim, Faiz Khan. Another movement is “Scholars for 9/11 Truth &  Justice ( STJ ) who joined Patriots Question 9/11 .  S.T.J.  is  a group of scholars and supporters endeavoring to address the answered  questions of the September 11, 2001 attack with a focus on scientific research. The group is composed of more than 700 members, including Richard Gage, Steven E. Jones, Jim Hoffman, David Ray Griffin, Peter Phillips, former Congressman, Daniel Hamburg, and Kevin Ryan. Most members support the Conspiracy Theory that the World Trade Center Towers and the third Skyscraper,  WTC 7, were destroyed through explosive demolition.

Daniel  Hamburg.

According to patriotsquestions9/11.com the people who joined Patriots Question 9/11 and responsible criticism of the 9/11 Commission Report  are composed of:

1.   More than 400 Medical Professionals.

2.   More than 220 senior Military, Intelligence Service,  Law Enforcement, andGovernment Officials.

3.   More than 1,200 Engineers and Architects.

4.   More than 250    Pilots and Aviation Professionals.

5.   More than 400    Professors Question 9/11.

6.   More than 300    9/11 survivors and Family Members.

7.   More than 200    Artists, Entertainers,  and Media Professionals. The famous figures who expressed their opinion about the events of 9/11 attacks among others:

1. Dr. David Ray Griffin, 71-year old ( 2010 ) is an American retired Professor of Philosophy of Religion and Theology has  published a book entitled “Debunking 9/11 Debunking : An Answer to Popular Mechanics and Other Defender of the Official Conspiracy Theory” published by Olive Branch 2007.  David Griffin’s analysis of the Kean-Zelikow bipartisan report of the events leading up to the hijackings of four aircraft on September 11, 2001, is “must real” for anyone concerned  with the subsequent history of the Bush Administration and the “War on Terror”.  All may not be as we initially were lead to believe: “That fundamental Muslims with the desire to bring down America,  plated  a massive terror event that culminated in the plan crashes into the World Trade Center, the Pentagon and the fields of Pennsylvania.  This conventional wisdom, supported by the media reporting immediately following the catastrophe.”

2. Dr. Tom Tvedten, former Chief of Staff,  Chicot Memorial Hospital 1978 – 1995, founder of the 9/11  DVD Project: “I become convince that  the events  of  9/11 attacks was an inside job used as a false flag operation to justify wars in the Middle East over control of the natural resources in that region as well as the implementation of the striker controls on the people of this nation and the expansion of the “military industrial complex” and its control of our government.

3. Dr. Michael D. Knox,  Distinguished Professor of Psychology and Distinguished Professor of Aging Studies, university of South Florida: “The terror attacks of September 11, 2001 are increasingly used to justify systematic surveillance and the dismantling of constitutional rights.  Even European countries have helped to establish Guantanamo – like secret prisons, where torture in all probability take place. Iraq was attacked based on falsified evidence causing the death of hundreds of thousands of people, widespread  destruction, destabilization and contamination with cancer-causing depleted uranium munitions.  Now plans to attack Islamic Republic of Iran  and the possibility of a new World War have made public,  meeting resistance even from moderate elements within military due to the unforeseeable consequence.”

4. Faiz Khan, MD, Assistant Professor of Emergency Medicine, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, N.Y.   He is a 9/11   first responder: “Who were the hijackers, given that at least six of the 19 suicide hijackers are still alive and had their identities stolen? Why did W.T.C.  building 7 collapse?  This happened long after the strikes,  and in a manner that suggested it was demolished.

5. Statement of Capt.  Gregory M. Zeighler,  PhD., U.S. Army:  “I knew from September 18, 2001, that the official story about 9/11 was false. That was when I realize that the perpetrators had made a colossal blunder in collapsing the South Tower first, rather than the North Tower,  which had been hit more directly and earlier. Other anomalies poured in rapidly: the hijackers names appearing in non of the published flight passenger lists, BBC London reports of stolen identities of the alleged hijackers or the alleged hijackers being found alive, the obvious demolitions of W.T.C. 1 and 2 ( each 1300 +  feed tall, 110 stories ) ,  W.T.C.  7  ( 570 feet tall, 47 stories, and not hit by an airplane )  the lack of identifiable Boing 757  wreckage at the Pentagon,  the impossibility of ordinary cell phone ( as opposed to air phone ) calls being made consistently from passengers aircraft at cruising attitude, etc.

6. Morgan Reynolds, PhD –Chief Economies,  U.S. Department of Labor under George W. Bush 2001 2002 video interview with Alex Jones 6/2/06 : “ I first began to suspect that 9/11 was in inside job when the Bush – Cheney Administration invaded Iraq. We can prove that government’s  story is false.”

7. Horst Ehmke, PhD. , Former Minister of Justice  ( West Germany ) 1966 – 1974:“Terrorist could not have carried out such an operation with four hijacked planes without the support of a secret service ( C.I.A. ).”

8. Gen. Hosni  Mubarak ,  President of Egypt  interviewed  by BBC London on 9/19/2001:  “I didn’t  believe Osama Bin Laden alone was responsible for the attacks on the U.S.  the U.S. 9/11. American experts also believe the operation is beyond Osama Bin Laden.”

9. Mohamed  Hassanein Heikal,  former Foreign Minister of Egypt: “I laugh because I know what is there. Osama Bin Laden has been under surveillance for years: every telephone call was monitored and Al-Qaeda has been penetrated by American  intelligence ( C.I.A. ), Pakistan intelligence  ( I.S.I. ) , Saudi intelligence,  Egyptian intelligence. They could not have kept secret  an operation that required such a degree of organization and sophistication.”

10. Hugo Chavez Frias,  President of Venezuela: “It’s plausible that the U.S. government was involved in the 9/11 attacks. The hypothesis is not absurd that towers could have been dynamited. A building never collapses like that, unless its with an implosion. The hypothesis that is gaining strength ……is that it was the same U.S. imperial power that planned and carried out this terrible terrorist attack or act against its own people and against citizen of all over the world. Why? To justify the aggressions that immediately were unleashed  on Afghanistan, on Iraq.” Both President Hugo Chavez and Venezuelan Foreign Minister, Nicholas Maduro  have referred  times in the park to suspicious that the 9/11 attacks were planned by the Bush administration, and have called for an inquiry.

11. Tun  Dr. Mahathir bin Mohamad, former Prime Minister of Malaysia: “The buildings had collapsed in an orderly manner with such military precision that it all seemed well planned. I can believe that they ( the United States ) would kill 3,000 of their own to have an excuse to kill 650.000 Iraqis ( 2006 ).  These are the kind of people we are dealing with . Please don’t think this is fiction.”

12. Glen Starnish , Commercial airline pilot for American Airlines,  ATA, TWA, and continental. 15,000 + total hours flown. Aircraft flown. Boing 737, Mc Donnel Douglas MD-80. Co-founder, Pilots for 9/11 Truth: “I most certainty and honestly believe, that sometime in the near future, it will become common knowledge that the events of 9/11 were an ‘inside job’ designed, engineered and committed by a very large and ‘in control’ rogue element within our United States federal government, use as a false cause, pretext, a lie, to invade two natural resource rich foreign countries, to further pursue and expand an empire, to change the borders of the Middle East countries, an as part of the war on terror, or more appropriately, the war on freedom, was used to frighten the American people so they would allow the infringement of their civil liberties and constitutional rights, to allow for closer monitoring and further oppression.”

13. William Rodriguez – W.T.C.  survivor An American Building Maintenance employee for twenty years, responsible for inspection and maintenance at the World Trade Center, who held the master key for the stairs: “I know there were explosive placed below the trade center. I helped a man to safety who is living proof, living proof the government story is a lie and a cover-up ——–I disagree 100%  with the government story. I met with the 9/11 Commission behind closed door and they essentially discounted everything I said regarding the use of explosives to bring down the month tower.”

14. Sharon Stone a Hollywood movie star,  Golden Globe and Emmy Award winning and Academy Award Nominated Actress, Producer, and Writer interviewed by Laha Magazine on February 2008: “ I have never believed the story of the destruction of the Twin Towers on 9/11.  I do not think the wars launched  by the United States in Afghanistan and Iraq were the inevitable result of the 9/11 incident. War is not the appropriate reaction to what happened on 9/11. That reaction was made under the influence of anger and hatred.”

15. Ali Mojahid, PhD, PE, SI over 20 years of experience as a structural and forensic engineer. His statement in support of Architects and Engineers petition: “Just another conspiracy against some groups of people for the U.S. administration to beat the war drums. How can a building just collapse onto itself without having controlled explosions inside the building?”

16.   Mark Basil, a Chemical Engineer: “I have independently seen  thermionic activity within two independent samples  of World Trade Center Dust. I would really like to stress that we need a lot more people involved in this work than just the few of us that are doing it right now. My work with this has brought me to feel that this material is too big of an unanswered question and it really brings us to demand a new investigation. This is hard evidence that can not be refused.  Anyone can replicate the work that’s been done and confirm that this material  is there.”   Mark Basile interviewed by 9/11 Truth org.  on October 27, 2010.  “9/11 Explosive Evidence :  Experts speak out”.  Explosive interview  :  Explosives found in World Trade Center Dust. In this interview, chemical Engineer Mark Basil  describes shocking findings. He and other scientist found unimaginative  residues of explosives in different samples of the World Trade Center Dust.  These dust samples come from New York City  individuals as well as a New York Museum which prefers to remain anonymous at this time.  We all remember the thick layer of dust that covered Lower Manhattan on that tragic day.  Scientists  have studied this  dust and Mark Basil is one of them.   Their finding are very important and clearly call for new  independent 9/11   investigation.

Kevin Bracken    and  Australian  P.M.   Julia  Gillard.

17.  Kevin Bracken,  the  Senior  Victorian Unionist ( Australia ) who claims that the 9/11 2001 World Trade Center collapse was not caused by terrorists,  called ABC Melbourne radio morning show host John Faine  again on October 21, 2010  to  demand a right  of reply.  His comments  attracted worldwide attention and earned rebuke from Prime Minister, Julia Gillard  and the Secretary of the Trades Hall Council.  Kevin Bracken’s initial call was in response to the Parliamentary debate on the Afghanistan war.  “What we should be doing is calling for a proper investigation into the events of 9/11,” says Kevin Bracken.  “ I believe that the official story  is a conspiracy  theory, that doesn’t  stand up to scientific scrutiny, “ he says.  His comments were brought up in Federal Parliament during Question Time where the Australian Prime Minister, Julia Gillard calls Unionist’ stupid and wrong over 9/11 views,  Unionist demand right of reply.

18.  Fidel Castro, the Cuban Revolutionary Leader, former President of Cuba: “Al-Qaeda leader, Osama Bin Laden is a  C.I.A.  agent who always peeped up when former President George W. Bush needed to scare the world, arguing this recently WikiLeaks.org document prove it.  Comandante Castro told state media on Saturday August 29, 2010.  “Any time Bush would stir up fear and make a big speech, Osama  Bin Laden  would appear threatening people with a story about what he was going to do. Bush never lacked  for Osama Bin Laden’s support.  He was a  subordinate.”  During a visit with a Lithuanian Author, Daniel Estulin in Havana,  known as a font of intriguing conspiracy theories about plots for world domination, August 27, 2010,  Comandante Fidel Castro said he believes that Osama Bin Laden was working the White House, and that the tens of thousands of military documents recently published by WikiLeaks prove exactly who the Al-Qaeda  leader working for.  Daniel Estulin offered his own views on Osama Bin Laden that the man seen in videos since 9/11 is not him at all but a “bad  actor”.

19. Dr. Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, President of the Islamic Republic of Iran, according to Telegraph.co.uk   also depended his remarks at the U.N. on 9/24/2010 a day earlier in which he claimed most people in the world believe the United States was behind the September 11, 2001 terror attacks and again challenged the United Nations to set up a commission to probe the attacks. According to Associated Press 9/24/2010 in his one a  and a half hour session with reporters, President Ahmadinejad also lashed out at the U.S. wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as an overreaction to the September 11 attacks. “The Americans should not occupy the entire Middle East bomb wedding parties annihilate an entire village just because one terrorists is hiding there.” President Ahmadinejad said a commission should investigate the September 11 attacks rather than have the entire world just accept what the U.S.  government tells them. “The-finding mission can shed light on who the perpetrators were, who is Al-Qaeda …………..where does it  exist?  Who was it backed  by and supported ? All these should come to light,” he said.According to Telegraph.co.uk  on October 14, 2010 in Beirut, Lebanon, President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad fuelled his claims that the U.S. government was behind the September 11 attack on America and demanded to the truth of what happened during his visit to Lebanon. Speaking at a late night rally, he said: “I announce that the formation of an independent and neutral team to examine the facts and discover the truth of the September 11 events is the demand of all peoples of the region and the  world.”

20. Colonel Muammar Al–Gadhafi,  Leader of the Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Leader of the World Islamic People’s Leadership, and King of African kings, interviewed by Larry King from C.N.N. on September 28, 2009. When asked about Osama Bin Laden and his involved in 9/11, Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi speaks the truth of the hijacker being trained in U.S.A.  “The 9/11 terrorists were not from Afghanistan or Iraqi !”  Colonel Gadhafi said.

According to Aftermath News Independent Post – 9/11 News,  former MI-5 intelligence officer and leader of Britain’s 9/11 Truth Movement, Annie Machon 42-year old ( 2010 ) gave a fast-moving synopsis of her experiences in the British Security Service and as a whistleblower  exposing the involvement of the agency’s sister service MI-6 in the attempted assassination of Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi.

Annie  Machon and  David Shayler.

Annie Machon is a former British Security Service ( MI-5 ) intelligence officer who left the service at the same time as David Shayler, her partner at the time.  David Shayler was imprisoned for 6 months for revealing British Intelligence ‘s protection of Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda. David Shayler, who has evidence to prove MI-6 gave 100,000 to Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda. “British intelligence paid large some of money to an Al-Qaeda cell in Libya in a domed attempt to assassin Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi in 1996 and thwarted early attempts to bring Osama Bin Laden to justice,” said David Shayler to  The Guardian. Ministers issue gag orders for MI-5 trial: They appear to be worried that he made further allegations about MI-5 and MI-6 knowledge of  a plot assassin the Libyan leader, Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi in 1996.  A book, “Bin Laden Forbidden Truth” published on November 2001 claims that British intelligence was in contact with Osama Bin Laden’s main allies’ who were opposed to Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi .  The Libyan Islamic Fighting Group ( L.I.F.G. )  was paid to plant a bomb underneath Colonel Gadhafi’s motorcade. The attack happened in March 1996 in the coastal city of Sirte. The bomb was planted under the wrong car and failed to kill Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi but did result in the death’s of several innocent civilians. In November 1999 David Shayler sent a dossier of detailed evidence of this including the names of those involved to the Home Secretary, Jack Straw who state that he was “looking into the matter” as well as Parliament’s Intelligence and Security committee   and the police.

Jack  Straw.

Guillaume Dasquie  and  Jean-Charles Brisard.

In 2005, the L.I.F.G. was banned as a terrorist group in Britain. Due to the book “Bin Laden The Forbidden Truth”  by Brisard and Dasque, in 1994: “Bin Laden was accused by Libya of being behind the killing of two German intelligence agents Silvan Becker and his wife.  Becker was German intelligence’s top Arabist and his murder hampered Germany’s ability to monitor Islamist activity.  The 9/11 was planned, primarily, in Hamburg,” said Brisard in his book.

Bob Woodward: “C.I.A.  Hired

President Karzai Brother Before 9/11.”

Bob Woodward  - Barack  Obama - Ahmed W. Karzai. 

Bob Woodward  Senior Journalist “The Washington Post”,  on September 30, 2010 : “Ahmed Wali Karzai, the half brother of Afghanistan’s president and boss of the strategically important Kandahar province,  Afghanistan,  has been  on the C.I.A. payroll for over a decade.”  By  the fall of 2008, Woodward says,  “Ahmed Wali Karzai had been  on the C.I.A.  pat roll for years,  beginning before 9/11.  He had belonged to the C.I.A.’s   small network of paid agents and informants inside Afghanistan. In addition, the C.I.A. paid him money  through his half-brother the president.  But Woodward’s  account of  the  C.I.A.  is relationship with Karzai who has also been accused repeatedly –  but not charged with protecting the illicit opium trade, is more nuanced.  “Wali Karzai was not in any sense  a controlled agent who always responded to the United States and C.I.A. requests and pressure.  He was his others – the United States the drug dealers, the Taliban and even his brother if necessary,  Bob Woodward writes in his  new  book  “Obama’s War”.

Osama Bin Laden As  A Scapegoat.

Those who dare to speak either through the 9/11 Truth Movement or Patriot Question 9/11 and without hesitation issue opinions are those of healthy mind and not easily deceived by political elites are conspiring to spread slander against Muslims.  Zionist  Jewish clowns in Washington laughed uproariously when most Muslims feel proud and grateful for 9/11 attacks were the work of “Muslim fighters of Al-Qaeda”  led by Osama Bin Laden who was later considered as a “hero.” They do not realize that such allegations are an insult to Muslims, because Islam is a religion of peace. So it is not possible for those devout Muslims against their religion,  and killed about 3000 innocent people in W.T.C.  This cruel and barbaric act can only be done by people who do not believe in God.  This ignorance resulted in catastrophe for Muslims worldwide. What’s more barbaric act that are contrary to Islam, proudly recognized by the traitor Osama Bin Laden. Embarrassing !

Zionist Jewish  clowns  laughed uproariously.
The 9/11  “party”  was a success.

For the Writer argue that 9/11 attacks was the work of conspiracy of the C.I.A. ,  Mossad, the White House, the Pentagon,   the Israeli General Security Apparatus the Shabak, and the World Zionist Organization  (W.Z.O.)  who  utilize terrorist organization  “Al-Qaeda” led by Osama Bin Laden as a scapegoat and it is all controlled by the international Zionist-imperialism led by the United States.

Richard S.Gordon, President of the A.J.C. 

In the United  States there are  many Jewish organizations, including the most famous are the The World Jewish Congress,  its headquaters are in New York ,  U.S.A.  led by Ronald S. Lauder  and  American Jewish Congress  ( A.J.C. ) led by Richard S. Gordon  as a President.  A.J.C. National Headquarters ,  115 East 57 Street, Suite 11 New York , N.Y. 10022, U.S.A.

Ronald S.Lauder, Leader of the World Jewish Congress.

Remember ! There is a claim that  – 4000 Jewish working in the W.T.C. had called in sick or did not showed to work that  9/11 morning.

Yuval Diskin, Head of the Shabak    ( 2005 – ) and the Symbol.

With the announcement of the attacks at the World Trade Center in New York, the international media, particularly the Israeli one, hurried to take advantage of the incident and  started mourning 4000 Israelis who work at the two towers. September 12, 2001 edition of the “Jerusalem Post” stated:“The Foreign Ministry in Jerusalem has so far received the names of 4,000 Israelis believed to have been in the areas of the World Trade Center and the Pentagon at the time of the attacks.  Then suddenly, no one ever mentioned anything about those Israelis and later it became clear that they remarkably did not show up in their jobs the day the incident took place. No one talked about any Israeli being killed or wounded in the attacks.  This means the Jews knew and were pre warned about the accident that the W.T.C. was going to be hit -Why ???  This report came from Al-Manar Television in Beirut, Lebanon on September 17, 2001.

Steven Seagal and Gloria Estefan are my favorite stars. 

The Writer absolutely not anti-Semitic,  but anti-Zionist Jews. Moreover,  the Writer has many friends  in Europe,  Australia,  and the United States about 75%  are Jewish and they are good people.  The Writer is also a fan of Hollywood films and great admiration for the American movie stars who 80% are Jews like my idol action star,  Steven Seagal.  The Writer is a fan  of songs sung by an American Jewish Singer, Gloria Estefan who comes from Cuba.

Avraham Duvdevani, Chairman of the W.Z.O. 

Arab diplomatic sources revealed to the “Jordanian al-Watan” newspaper that those Israelis remained absent that day based on hint from the Israeli General Security Apparatus the Shabak, the fact  which evoked unannounced suspicions on American officials who wanted to know how the Israeli government learned about the incident before it occurred, and the reasons why it refrained from informing the U.S. authorities of the information it had.

From the beginning we have seen that Al-Qaeda to help fully the interest of the United States to get rid of the Communists regime pro-Soviet Union in Kabul, Afghanistan in 1980’s.  In this case Al-Qaeda won praise from Muslims around the world. Communist regime in Afghanistan collapsed and replaced with the Taliban regime led by Sheikh Mullah Mohammad Omar, who is supported by the United States. The Writer believes that Osama Bin Laden deliberately “kept” by the C.I.A. in Kabul, Afghanistan before the events of 9/11. While the Taliban and followers of the lower classes did not know about Osama Bin Laden’s relationship with C.I.A.  So do not be surprised if the followers of Al-Qaeda from the lower classes are subject to the command of their superiors to do the “bomb party” in Muslim countries, although the victims are Muslims. They are the people “lunatic” who believe that their actions were correct and guaranteed to enter heaven, so they do not realize that their actions in Islam are sins.

One of the victims of the Al-Qaeda suicide bomb attack. 

This later proved to militant Islamic organizations that had joined Al-Qaeda almost all resigned after they realized manipulated  by the United States to perform the brutal and cruel to kill their Muslim brothers, including L.I.F.G. (Libyan Islamic Fighting Group) and the Taliban. The Taliban group is different with Al-Qaeda. The Taliban since the 1980’s until now only struggling for power to govern in Afghanistan and do not need to deploy its members to conduct “ a party of suicide bombing “ in Muslim countries as practiced by Al-Qaeda.  After President George W. Bush is no longer at the White House and Osama Bin Laden is dead, it seems that Al-Qaeda is now fragmented and their terror activities was not busy as before because of lack of funds.  The “party of suicide bombing” of Al-Qaeda is now diverted from Muslim countries in Southeast Asia to other Muslim countries such as Somalia  and  Yemen to create a civil war there, especially in Yemen the war between Muslim Sunni and  Muslim Shiah.

In his November 2002 “Letter to America”,  Osama Bin Laden described the United States’ support of Israel  as a motivation:  “The creation and continuation  of Israel  is one of the greatest crimes, and you are the leaders of its criminals. And of course there is no need to explain and prove the degree of American support for Israel. The creation of  Israel is a crime which must be erased. Each and every person whose hands have become polluted  in the contribution towards this crime must pay its price, and for it heavily.”  When Osama Bin Laden issued the words “heroic” as a Mujahideen, the majority of Muslims are stupid easy to believe in nonsense words and tales of  Osama Bin Laden.

The majority of Muslims are stupid easy to
believe in nonsense words and tales of
Osama Bin Laden. 

If his motivation because the United States supports Israel, why Al-Qaeda since the past until now have never had an attack or  “feast of suicide bombings” in Israel?  Israel is a country that most free from the threat of  “suicide bombing” by Al-Qaeda terrorist network and it is sure to be valid forever. Israelis do not feel safe just because they always face the threat  of  bombs from a true Muslim fighters such as HAMAS,  Hezbollah or the other of Palestinian Arab people’s  organizations. Not Al-Qaeda! The Palestinian Arab fighters such as HAMAS not only  have to deal with the Israeli army, but also have to deal with the terrorists of Al-Qaeda network.


HAMAS Leader,  Khaled Mashaal ( center ),  Ramadhan Shallah,  Head of   Islamic  Jihad   (right),  and Ahmad Jebril  ( left ), Secretary-General  of the Popular Front For the Liberation  of Palestine.

Who Are The Most Fortunate Of  The Events Of  9/11 ?

The main purpose of the United States creates the events of  9/11 is to obtain the reason and justified by the international community, especially by the people of the United States to invade Afghanistan and Iraq who had been long planned by Washington before the event.

First advantage:

When the United States government asked the Taliban government in Kabul, Afghanistan, to immediately hand over Osama Bin Laden and the Al-Qaeda leaders, but rejected by  the Taliban leader, Sheikh Mullah Mohammad Omar.  So the Taliban government’s decision is in the line with the scenario of  international Zionists in Washington who were highly expect it to happen.

Sheikh Mullah Mohammad Omar. 

On October 7, 2001 the United States, Britain, Canada and the countries that joined in the NATO invaded Afghanistan. In December 2001, after the Taliban government was topple and the new Afghan government under U.S. puppet  Hamid Karzai was formed, the International Security  Assistance Force ( I.S.A.F. ) was established by the United Nations Security Council to  help assist the Karzai administration and provide basic security to the Afghan people. Until now Afghanistan is still colonized by the international Zionist forces led by the United States,  including NATO. They will continue to colonize the country till an indefinite  period.  Today ( 2010 ), more than  22  NATO  nations deploy over 100,000 troops in Afghanistan  as a part of the I.S.A.F.

Afghanistan was invaded by the U.S.  forces on October 7, 2001.

Second advantage:When the United Nations Monitory Verification and Inspection Commission (UNMONIC)  has failed to find evidence that Iraq was developing weapons of mass destruction,  the U.S. Government excuses that make no sense to charge that President Saddam Hussein has been working with Al-Qaeda terrorist organization. This is a charge created by the United States led by George W. Bush, who has long had a diabolical plan to invade Iraq and overthrow President Saddam Hussein. President George W. Bush has a sense of revenge and wanted to get rid of President Saddam Hussein  at the same time to please his father, George  Bush  Sr.  not for the interests of the people of the United States  or Iraqi  nation .   President Saddam Hussein repeatedly denied that he had absolutely nothing to do with Al-Qaeda.  President Saddam Hussein was distrustful of Al-Qaeda and viewed Islamic extremist as a threat to his regime, refusing all request from Al-Qaeda to provide material or operational support. But on March 20, 2003 although there is no the United Nations approval, Iraq was invaded by the U.S. forces backed by troops from N.A.T.O.  and the Kurds traitors ( non-Arab ) in Iraq. They use Kuwaiti territory as their base.

Photo: President Afghanistan, Hamid Karzai.

Iraq was invaded by the U.S. forces backed by troops from N.A.T.O.  and he Kurds traitors.

The Iraqi government and military collapsed within three weeks of the beginning of the U.S. led invasion of Iraq.  President Saddam Hussein disappeared,  but U.S. forces captured him on 13 December 2003 after finding him hiding in a small underground pit on a farm near the town of Tikrit.

Following the invasion, the United States established the coalition Provisional Authority to govern Iraq. Government authority was transferred to an Iraqi Interim Government in June 2004, and a permanent government was elected in October 2005.  Until now  ( 2010 ) the Iraqi government led  by President Jalal Talabani , a Muslim Sunni  from Kurdish tribe . He is the first president of Iraq non-Arab.  Nouri Kamel al-Maliki  as Prime Minister . He is an  Arab Iraqi and Muslim Shia.  The two Iraqi government leaders were Washington’s choice, not the Iraqi people’s choice The population of Iraq is about 32 million people. Based on information from the Encyclopedia Britannica  ( 2009 )  Muslim population consisted of 65 % of  Shia and  35 %  of the Sunnis. While Christians and Jews slightly only 3 % of the total population.  Residents of non-Arab Kurds who all embraced Sunni Islam, but they are a minority in Iraq. So it is not possible the people of Iraq will elect a president of the Kurdish tribes. Moreover,  they are not Arabs  and they are known as the betrayer of the Arab Iraqis. Washington chose Jalal Talabani as a President of Iraq is as a token of gratitude from the United States government to the Kurds in Iraq who are credited for the overthrow of President Saddam Hussein.

Jalal Talabani.

On November 5, 2006 President Saddam Hussein was found guilty of crimes against humanity and sentenced to death by hanging. President Saddam Hussein was tried by the court “slapstick”  created by Washington which consists of  various group of anti-Saddam Hussein. Court decisions that seemingly  have been regulated since President Saddam Hussein  before arrested, many strangely.

P.M. Nouri Kamel al-Maliki shakes hands with U.S. President Barack Obama in Baghdad  4.7.2009.

Imagine ! The international community know clearly that the crimes of President George W. Bush against the Muslim people of Iraq are more barbaric than what were all blamed on President Saddam Hussein. Why President George W. Bush can go around free of responsibility as perpetrators of crime against humanity in Iraq ? That is the performances of a state  champion “democracy” and “defender of Human Rights” which called the United States, where its leaders are as “world policemen” that can not be touched by any court.

The daughter of  Jamahiriya’s  leader Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi  joined President Saddam Hussein’s defence team.  BBC News reported on July 3, 2004, that Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi had publicly defended President Saddam Hussein and berated Arab leaders who he accussed of co-operating with the United States.    Photo: Aisha Al-Gaddafi arrived in Baghdad to join a team of a lawyers from a number of countries.

President Saddam Hussein was tried  by the Court “slapstick” in Baghdad.

President Saddam Hussein’s original leader of the pride of the people of Iraq and most of the Arab World was hanged on the first day of Eid ul-Adha, December 30, 2006. The execution was carried out at Camp Justice, an Iraqi army base in Kadhimiya,  a neighborhood of northeast Baghdad, Iraq. The late Saddam Hussein was buried at his birthplace of Al-Awja in Tikrit, Iraq, 3 Km ( 2 ml ) from his son Uday and Qusay Hussein, on December 31, 2006. Photo: President Saddam Hussein was hanged on the first day of Eid ul-Adha,  12.30.2006.

Now President Saddam Hussein has gone, but his name engraved in the history of the Arab World as a martyr who dared to oppose the international Zionist-imperialism led by the United States . Libyan Arab Jamahiriya declared three days of mourning after Saddam’s death and canceled public celebrations around the Eid ul-Adha holiday. Flag on all government buildings in Jamahiriya flew at half-mast. On the eve of the hanging, the Leader of  Libyan Arab Jamahiriya said: “Saddam Hussein was a prisoner  of war who must be tried by Iraq’s invaders, the United States and Britain ,”  Reuters news agency reported on January 4, 2007.

Photo: In Baghdad the statue of President Saddam Hussein was destroyed, but the Jamahiriya has erected a new statue for Saddam Hussein in Tripoli.

According to the MEMRI Blog  on October 2010,  the Jamahiriya has erected a statue for Saddam Hussein in Tripoli and has recently asked the Secretary-General of the United Nations to place on the U.N. Agenda a Jamahiriya request for an international commission to investigate the invasion  of Iraq and the execution  of Saddam Hussein.  But the Secretary-General has turned down the Jamahiriya request and Iraq has publicly rebuked Jamahiriya for “interfering” in  Iraqi  internal affairs.

According to John J. Kruzel, American Forces  Press Service, March 10, 2010, about 98,000 U.S. military forces remain in Iraq.  The U.S. government said that the full withdrawal of U.S. forces from Iraq is mandated by  December  31, 2011.  But it is impossible because they are big liars and President Barack Obama will not dare to refuse the request of the generals at the Pentagon to increase again U.S. troops in Iraq.

John J. Kruzel

The third advantage:

The events of 9/11 attacks have created resentment among non-Muslims to all Muslims around the world especially in the United States, Europe and Australia. They consider all Arabs and Muslims are the defenders of  Al-Qaeda terrorist organization.

Photo: Anti-Muslims protest in the United States.

The fourth advantage:

Al-Qaeda which is controlled by the C.I.A. not likely to have a “bomb party” in Israel. This is very suspicious and many invited questions from the Muslim community. But Washington’s silence when asked for this issue. Meanwhile, Afghan war veterans who used to be utilized by the United States to get rid of the Communist regime pro-Soviet Union in Kabul, were sent back to their respective home countries, but have been brainwashed to fight against the secular regimes in their respective countries.  All their names are listed  in the C.I.A. documents. They do not realize that Al-Qaeda leadership is controlled by the C.I.A.   Even these crazy people are willing to do the “party of suicide bombing” with the seduction will enter heaven as martyrs. Whereas in Islam suicide is major sin.    Al-Qaeda is more often held a “bomb party” in Asian countries, especially in Muslim countries.  So that those who become victims of the massacre were the majority Muslims. In this case  the objectives of C.I.A. are in order  that the government of Muslim countries will catch all the Afghan war veterans who are not useful anymore and  Muslim  group  leaders who are anti-Zionists and especially anti-United States by using the classic excuse “they involved Al-Qaeda.”  Even Washington would ask the local officials for the people who are arrested can be immediately sent to a special “Hell Jail” for the Muslim people in Guantanamo.

Photo: Abusing Muslim prisoners in “Hell Jail” Guantanamo.

Even crimes against humanity by the United States to Muslims has increased after the international Zionists succeeded in creating the events of 9/11. But absolutely no concern to the United Nations. So the United Nations Security Council is more accurately described as “the Council of Terror” as proposed by Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi because the U.N. Security council will act only against small countries. Meanwhile, against the big countries that commit a crime at all were never sanctioned. 

Colonel Gadhafi: “The U.N. Security Council is the Council of  Terror.”

The  Statements  Of   Mr.  William  Ramsey Clark.

Mr. William Ramsey Clark,  83-year old  ( 2010 ),  is an American lawyer  and former United States Attorney General. He worked for the U.S. Department of Justice, which included service as United States Attorney General from 1967 to 1969, under President Lyndon B. Johnson. Decades later, he was a defense attorney for Slobodan Milosevic and President Saddam Hussein. Mr. Ramsey Clark made a statement addressed to the Secretary-General of the United Nations and published by the international mass-media on September 20,  2002 and January 29, 2004 are summarized as follows:

“George W. Bush in his ‘War On Terrorism’ has asserted his right to attack any country, organization, or people first, without warning in his sole discretion.  He and members of  his administration have proclaimed the old restraints that law sought to impose on aggression  by governments and repression by their people, no longer consistent with  national security.  Terrorism is such a danger, they say, that necessity compels the U.S. to first to destroy the potential for terrorist acts from abroad and to make arbitrary arrests, detentions, interrogations, controls and treatment of people abroad and within the U.S. Law has become the enemy of public safety. ‘Necessity is the argument of tyrants. Necessity never makes a good bargain.’   Heinrich Himler, who instructed the NAZI Gestapo  ‘shoot first, ask questions later, and I will protect you,’  is vindicated by George W. Bush.” 

Heinrich Himler  and  “The Modern Vampire” ,   George  W. Bush. 

“President George W. Bush claim that Iraq is a threat justifying war is false. Eighty percent of Iraq’s military capacity was destroyed in 1991 according to the Pentagon. Ninety percent of materials and equipment required to manufacture weapons of mass destruction was destroyed by U.N. inspectors during more than eight years of inspections. Iraq  was powerful, compared to most of its neighbors, in 1990. Today  (2002) it is weak. The reason of George W. Bush attacks Iraq must be found elsewhere.  His motives may include to save a failing Presidency which has converted a healthy economy and treasury surplus into multi-trillion  Dollar losses, to fulfill  the dream  which will become a nightmare, of a new world order to serve special interests in the U.S., to settle a family grudge against Iraq, to weaken the Arab nation, one people at a time, to strike a Muslim nation to weaken Islam, to protect  Israel, or make its position more dominant in the region; to secure control of Iraq’s oil to enrich U.S. interest, further dominate oil in the region and control oil prices. Aggression against Iraq for any of these purposes is criminal and a violation of a great many international conventions laws including the General Assembly Resolutions on the Definition of Aggression of December 14, 1974.”

Photo:  Mr. William Ramsey Clark,  American lawyer  speaks to the March 20, 2010  anti-war protest in Washington DC.

The second  statement of Mr. William  Ramsey Clark  on January 29, 2004 among others:  “Until January 2004, at least 40,000 defenseless people in Iraq have been killed by U.S. violence since the latest aggression began in earnest in March 2003 stating with its celebrated, high tech, terrorist ‘Shock and Awe’ and continuing until now with 25, or more, U.S. raids daily causing the  Iraqi people went into mourning when their families died and injuries.   The danger of George W. Bush unilateralism is further revealed when he states: “Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi  correctly judged that his country would be better off, and far more secure without weapons of mass murder. Nine months of intense negotiations involving the United States and Great Britain succeeded with Libya, while 12 years of diplomacy with Iraq did not!”  Forget diplomacy, use intense negotiations.  

Photo: The nuclear weapons and the nuclear  bomb explosion.

If President Bush believe it was “diplomacy”, which maintained genocidal sanctions against Iraq for twelve years that failed,  rather than an effort to crush Iraq to submission, then why did not he use “nine month”  of  intense negotiations to avoid a war   of aggression against Iraq?  He was President for nearly twenty seven months before the criminal assault on Iraq,  he apparently intended all along. Iraq was no threat to anyone. If Colonel Gadhafi “correctly” judged his country would be better off, and for more secure, without weapons of mass murder, why would the United States not be better off, and for more secure,  if it eliminated all its vast stores of nuclear weapons? Is not the greatest danger from nuclear proliferation today without question President Bush’s violations of the  N.P.T. ,  A.B.M. and Nuclear Test Band treaties by continuing programs for strategic nuclear weapons,  failing to negotiate in good faith to achieve “nuclear disarmament” after more than thirty years and development of a new generation of nuclear  weapons, small “tactical”  of  mass murder, which he would use in a minute ?  Has he not threatened to use existing strategic nuclear weapons ?  The failure of the “nuclear weapon State Party (s)” to the N.P.T.  to work in good faith to achieve nuclear disarmament there past 36 years is the reason the world is still confronted with the threat of nuclear war  and proliferation. President George W. Bush praises U.S. soldiers ………….skill and their courage in armored changes,  and midnight raids, which terrorized and kill innocent Iraqis, women,  children,  families, nearly everyday and average 180 attacks each week.

Photo: Everywhere in Iraq there are U.S. soldiers  in action.

Failure to condemn the massive U.S. war of aggression and illegal occupation of Iraq and any U.N.  act providing color able legitimacy to the U.S. occupation will open wide the gate to further,  greater  aggression.  The line must be drawn now !

According to WikiLeaks on October 22, 2010 the report detail of the war document and occupation in Iraq, from 1st January 2004 to 31st  December 2009,  109,032  deaths in Iraq,  comprised of 66,081  civilians, 23,984 “enemy”,   15,196 host nation ( Iraqi government forces ) and 3,777   “friendly” ( coalition forces ) .   The majority of the deaths  ( 66,000,  over 60% )  of these are civilian deaths.  That is 31 civilians dying every day during the six year period killed by U.S. troops.

Photo:  There are many Iraqi civilians have been killed by U.S. violence.

Photo:  1. To  use  dogs to intimidate prisoners  in Abu Ghraib,  Iraq.

The United Nations

Is Totally Unfair.

Not only Mr. William Ramsey Clark who is sharply criticized the U.N. for his silence that allowed the United States and N.A.T.O.  troops invaded, control, robbing Iraq’s natural wealth especially oil and the C.I.A have used cocaine field in Afghanistan to finance for operations of their political crimes around the world. The international Zionist terrorist forces led by the United States of oppressing  the people, raping Muslim women, and killing innocent people in both Muslim countries.  But there is no reaction whatsoever from the United Nations despite the international community including the people of the United States itself expressed their anger over their barbaric action.


Photo:  2. Iraqi Muslims were abused by American soldiers.

War of aggression by the United States in the last 26  years ( 2010), deadly enough for their victims, in Granada,  Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Panama, Haiti, Dominican Republic, Sudan, Somalia, Yugoslavia, Cuba, Yemen with many others nations threatened, sanctioned, or attacked, some with U.N. complicity and all without effective United Nations resistance, made major deadly wars of aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq.

Photo:  3. The American soldiers were happy to watch their Iraqi prisoners abused in Abu Ghraib. Photo:

4.  An Iraqi prisoner is packed in a plastic bag.

Photo: 5. An  amoral  American woman soldier tortures Iraqi prisoners.

Photo:  Brigadier-General  Janis Karpinski,  who was responsible for military jails in Iraq meets with his boss  Donald Ramsfeld.

Photo: An Iraqi  Reporter,  Muntadar al-Zeidi  called  visiting U.S. President George W. Bush a “dog”  in Arabic on December 14, 2008  and threw his shoes at him during a news conference with Iraqi Prime Minister, Nuri al-Maliki in Baghdad, Iraq.

Meanwhile in Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, charity led by Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi’s daughter,  Aisha Al-Gaddafi announced it would give Muntadar Al-Zaidi an award for bravery and urged the Iraqi government to free him. “What he  did   represents a victory for human rights across the world,” said the Chairman of Wa Attassimou organization, Madame Aisha Al-Gaddafi. Another comment from Senior Advocate, Supreme Court of Pakistan said that the action showed how much the international community hates George W. Bush.

Photo: Madame Aisha Al-Gaddafi.

Initially,  Muntadar was sentenced to three years  in jail. But he had the term reduced to 12 months on appeal and was released three months early for good behaviour.  Shortly after his release from nine months in Baghdad  prison. On September 15, 2009, Muntadar told Journalists : “I am free again, but my homeland  is still a prison.” He went on to say he had suffered beatings, whippings, electric shocks and simulated drowning at the hands of officials and guards. After leaving prison, Mr. Zaidi when straight to al Baghdadiya, the TV station he was working for at the news conference where he threw the shoes.  Many Iraqi regards Muntadar al-Zaidi  as a national hero. He has reportedly received offers of money, jobs and even marriage from across the Arab World. His relatives say he offered a Golden horse by the Emir Qatar.

Photo: Protestors in U.S. against war.

The United Nations Dominated By

The  International  Zionist Conspiracy.

As noted  by former Prime Minister of Malaysia,  Dr. Mahathir Mohammad, that the world is now ruled by Zionist Jews. The United Nations is a clear example of a controlled and dominated by the international Zionist conspiracy led by the United States.  The Veto Rights are echoed by the United States to defend Israel  in the U.N. Security Council  incalculable.  Despite the victims attack Israel with Gaza, Lebanon and killed thousands of Palestinian Arab civilian, the United Nations can  not do anything against Israel because it is blocked by the veto of international Zionist countries led by the United States.

Photo: Dr. Mahathir Mohammad.

The developing countries should unite to support the idea of Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi to immediately remove the Veto Rights and move the United Nations Headquarters from New York to a neutral country. The countries that joined the Arab League, Organization of Islamic Conference,  the African Union, A.S.E.A.N., and United of South American Countries, all united in a single row of states will come out of the United Nations and if the old U.N. can not be overhauled.

Photo: We must support the idea of  Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi to remove the  U.N. Veto Rights immediately.

Unfortunately the developing countries was never united.  In the history of the United Nations only the one who dared to state emphatically declared out of the United Nations membership, the country was Indonesia under the leadership of President Sukarno on 1st January 1965.  Even Indonesia and the People’s Republic of China have agreed to establish a new U.N. under the name CONEFO ( The Conference of the New  Emerging Forces ).  The idea of President Sukarno was supported by many countries, especially the Third World countries including the Arab World.  Unfortunately President Sukarno was betrayed by his subordinates,  so that his government eliminated in 1966.

Photo: President of the Republic of Indonesia, Dr. Sukarno on the 1st January 1965.

The I.C.C.  Issued An Arrest Warrant For

President Omar Hassan Al-Bashir.

On July 14, the Chief Prosecutor of the International Criminal Court ( I .C. C. ),  Luis Moreno  Ocampo , a Jew  descendant,  alleged that  President Omar Hassan Al-Bashir bore individual criminal responsibility for genocide,  crimes against humanity and war crimes committed since 2003 in Dharfur.  The arrest warrant is supported by N.A.T.O., the Genocide Intervention Network, and Amnesty International.  Here we see that the spirit of I.C.C. to arrest and prosecute the Muslim leaders with  a variety of false allegations that were created by the Zionist,  if their politics are not in line with the West.

Photo: Luis Moreno Ocampo, the Chief  of  I.C.C.

The I.C.C. controlled by the international Zionist- imperialism led by the United States,  issued an arrest warrant  for President Omar Hassan Al-Bashir  on March 4, 2009 by a Pre – Trial chamber composed of judges Akua Kuenyehia of Ghana,  Anita Usacka of Latvia,  and Sylvia Stainer of Brazil  indicting  him on five counts of crimes against humanity as murder, extermination, forcible transfer, torture and rape and two counts of war crimes pill aging and internationally directing attacks  civilians.  All  these allegations of the I.C.C. are lie.  Their accusation is nothing but to get rid of President Omar Al-Bashir  and replace him  with a new president who can be arranged by the West.

Photo: President Omar Al-Bashir  is loved by his people.

Israel  is actively aiding the rebels in Darfur with supply of weapons via Ethiopia. After the Christian rebels in Southern Sudan peace with the central government in Khartoum, now appears rebellion in the Western Sudanese region Darfur  which most populous Muslim people. The pro-government Muslim tribes in Darfur calling for Jihad against the Sudan Liberation Movement ( S.L.M. ) led by Abdul Wahid Al-Nur  who is supported by Israel. Since 2008 S.L.M.  has opened an office in Israel. The S.L.M. leader,  Abdul Wahid Al-Nur since 2007, hiding in Paris, France, and Wahid frequently visited Israel.  The Israeli Zionists  and the West wanted to control the oil in Darfur through the traitors in the country of Sudan. Leader of the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi  said: “The Western countries and America are not busying themselves out of sympathy for the Sudanese people or for Africa. But for oil.”

All this time I.C.C. pretended not to know, and did not want to count how many civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq were killed everyday by terrorist troops created by President George W. Bush and U.S. Secretary of Defense, Donald Rumsfeld ? How many prisoners who were arrested and tortured in special prisons for Muslims in Abu Ghraib ( Iraq ) and Guantanamo ?  How many Muslim women who were raped  by terrorist forces of the United States and N.A.T.O. ?   Whether the Muslims are not human, so they do not have the right to get justice ?   If such questions put to the I.C.C., of course,  they would answer : “It never happened.”  If   I.C.C.  was created to uphold justice, then that must first be arrested and brought to trial is the third American pioneers of terrorism namely George W. Bush,  Donald Rumsfeld,  and former Vice-President,  Richard Bruce Dick Cheney …………………not President Omar Hassan Al-Bashir  to be  arrested.

First,……. these three American pioneers are invaded in the conspiracy to the events of 9/11. As a result of the attack around 3000 innocent Americans died roasted in doors W.T.C., not mention those who were injured and disable. If everything is correct, means the three pioneers of “War On Terrorism” has been killing their own people. Keep in mind, that as many as 4000 people working at the W.T.C. from ethnic among Jewish and Israeli citizen survived the catastrophe because of reasonably “sick” and did not came to work on 9.11 2001.  This is strong evidence that The World Zionist Organization, The Jewish Agency for the U.S., and The Israeli General Security Apparatus the Shabak  involved in this conspiracy.

Second,…..these three men involved in creating political lies “War On Terrorism”  which utilize terrorist organization  “Al-Qaeda” to destroy Islam from within, to divide Muslims, creating fear among Muslims and non-Muslims.  The United States set the governments in Muslim countries,  especially their intelligence service for arresting all the people who are anti-United States charged with the classic “they involved  Al-Qaeda”.

Third……..these tree pioneers who  created  “War On Terrorism”  should  be  responsible for the atrocities of the United States and N.A.T.O. forces on civilians in Afghanistan and Iraq. Their troops more cruel than the Soviet Union’s Communist army who had invaded Afghanistan.  We can not blame the People’s Revolutionary Leader of Venezuela, Hugo Chavez Frias  who has given a nickname to George W. Bush as a drunk and   the devil incarnate who acts  arbitrarily as if the world belong to him.

Propaganda anti-Sudanese government under the leadership of Omar al-Bashir, constantly echoed by the Western press. Even a Hollywood film company in November 2009 has launched a film entitled “Darfur” directed by Uwe Boll and Zen HQ Films Production.  In this film shown false tales about the crime of the Arab tribes of Northern Sudan who were white slaughtering the black Muslim people in Darfur.  The mission of this film is to create hatred of black people across Africa against the Arabs, including Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi. They are expected to serial the nomination of Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi  in the election of President of the African Union for the years 2010 – 2011.  Why the Hollywood film producers are not interested to make movies about the barbarism of the United States and NATO forces in Iraq and Afghanistan ?  The answer is simple: “All mass-media owners in the West and Hollywood movie producers are Jewish. They are in the hands of an international Zionist Conspiracy to create the public opinions all over the world are in line with their politics.”  It seems that idea  of  “War On Terrorism” will continue without end  and even through  residents of the White House turns.  The Al-Qaeda  organization will be maintained as an important asset and can be used as scapegoats for the Unites States to attack countries that are contrary  to Washington’s political.  United States often prides itself  as the state champion of democracy and Human Rights defenders. But it does not deserve to have a  president like George W. Bush  or Richard Bruce Dick Cheney,  because  all of them have been against democracy and violate human rights.  Even the questionable leadership of President Barack Obama  because he is not able to stop the war and withdraw all U.S.  troops from Afghanistan and Iraq.

Bush’s Former Oil Company

Linked To Bin Laden Family.

American Freedom News.Com October 3, 2001 reported that President George W. Bush signed an executive order to freeze the U.S. financial assets of corporations doing business with Osama Bin Laden. He described the order as a strike on the financial foundation of the global terror network. “If you do business with terrorists, if you support or succor then, you will not do business with the United States,” said President George Bush. He  didn’t  say anything about doing business with a terrorist’s brother – or his wealthy financier. When President George W. Bush froze assets connected to Osama Bin Laden, he didn’t tell the American people the terrorist mastermind’s late brother was an investor in the president’s former oil business in Texas. Doing business with the U.S. enemy is nothing new to the Bush family. Much of the Bush family wealth came from supplying needed raw materials and credit to Adolf Hitler’s  Third Reich.  Several business operation manage by Prescott Bush the President George W. Bush’s grandfather – were sized by the U.S. government during World War II under the Trading With Enemy Act. On October 20, 1942, the federal government seized the Union Banking Corporation in New York City as a front operation for the Nazis. Prescott Bush was a Director. Bush E. Roland Harriman, two Bush associates and three Nazi executives owned the bank’s and three Nazi executives owned the bank’s shares. Doing business with the Bin Laden empire, therefore, is only the latest extension  of the Bush family’s financial ties to unsavory individuals and organizations. Now that thousands of American citizen have died in terrorist attacks and the nation is going to war, the American people should know about George W. Bush’s relationship with the family of Osama Bin Laden. Since U.S. government accused Osama Bin Laden and Al-Qaeda who attacked  America on September 11, 2001, the federal government has moved quickly to freeze bank accounts connected to Osama Bin Laden, Khalid Bin Mahfouz and  a host of Islamic charities. Perhaps federal agents should freeze the financial assets of the Bush family too. It would not be the first time Bush family assets were seized by the U.S. government for trading with the enemy.

A Relationship Between

Osama Bin Laden And C.I.A.

Where  was Osama Bin Laden on September 11, 2001 ? President George W. Bush administration knew the where about of Osama Bin Laden. According to Dan Rather from CBS,  Osama Bin Laden was back in Hospital, one day before the September 11, 2001 attacks, on September 10, 2001 this time, courtesy of America’s indefectible ally Pakistan. Pakistan’s military Intelligence (ISI) told CBS that Osama Bin Laden had received dialysis treatment in Rawalpindi, at Pakistan Army’s headquaters.  President George W. Bush and C.I.A. of course, knew where is “the enemy number one” Osama Bin Laden  holed up.  President Saddam Hussein only a few months can be captured by the U.S. troops but Osama Bin Laden until today (2009) is very difficult being captured. Why???…………… When President George W. Bush falls from the political stage, Al-Qaeda No. 2 leader uses racial epithet against Barack Hussein Obama in November 20, 2008 in a video, Ayman Zawahiri says the president elect is the direct opposite of honorable black American’s and says Obama,  Collin Powel and Condoleeza  Rice are “house of Negroes”. There is something oddity of Al-Qaeda attitudes and suspicious. In the time of general election for American president in 2008,  a thinly-sourced “Washington Post Article” suggests that Al-Qaeda wants John Mc Cain in the White House. This prompted an outburst of rage from the Mc Cain campaign which pointed out some obvious holes in the story, not least the fact that much of it based on a single web posting on the extremist site Al-Hesbah state: “Al-Qaeda will have to support John Mc Cain in the coming election.”  John Mc Cain is known as a fanatic Jewish and he is a devoted supporter for Israel. John Mc Cain is the same with George W. Bush, they are starved for war especially in the Muslim countries as Iraq and Afghanistan.  But why and what is the motive of Al-Qaeda supported John Mc Cain ? Only Osama Bin Laden, Ayman Al-Zawahiri, C.I.A., Mossad and the invisible government in Washington who can answer this question. There is another proof that the relationship  between Al-Qaeda and C.I.A. is still underway. For this time their victim is Islamic Republic of Iran. “The C.I.A. is giving arms length support, supplying money and weapons, to an Iranian militant group, Jundullah, which has conducted raids into Islamic Republic of Iran  bases in Pakistan,” the London Telegraph reported May 27, 2007.  “Jundullah is a Sunni Al-Qaeda off shoot organization that was formerly headed by alleged 9/11 mastermind Khalid Sheikh Mohammed. Even if you believe the official story of 9/11 to the letter, the fact that President George W. Bush has personally authorized U.S. support for this group completely dismantles the façade of the war on terror,” the London Telegraph said.

Is Osama Bin Laden Dead Or  Still Alive?

“Osama Bin Laden is dead.” Of course we don’t have a  proof. Also there is no proof for his continuing existence. Just look at the videos or DVD that appear from time to time, including when he delivered his address on September 16, 2009 through TV Al Jazeera he always look younger, never his age. All the videos of Osama Bin Laden’s statements can be created by modern technology. It is not evident that he is still alive.  Osama Bin Laden had serious health problems living in the deserted out-backs  of  Afghanistan with no medical help. No one will report his death because it is better to keep the myth alive of a strong terrorist leader, and to continue the hunt. If Osama Bin Laden is killed or found dead then there will be a turn around in the war and less billions of dollars spent and lives lost to hunt him down. However, Al-Qaeda is a terrorist hand of criminals that don’t need Osama Bin Laden anymore. Al-Qaeda has a life of its own now, the seeds of propaganda and destruction have been passed  on to criminals who are not only just hate the West, but also the Muslims who believed as their enemies and are paid to kill. Osama Bin Laden has laid the foundation of terror and Al-Qaeda will carry on the treats, this is the real situation now. The war on terror now is no longer Osama Bin Laden. Forget the video-tapes they are only fakes, but good propaganda to keep the war alive. The war now is to track down the supporters and the foot soldiers that are paid to kill and cause destruction at mass scale. It is difficult but winnable. Let us focus on Al-Qaeda not Osama Bin Laden who is “dead”.  If he is not dead let him appear in public and prove it.

Libyan “Islamic” Fighting Group ( LIFG ).

LIFG or Al-Jama’a al-Islamyyah al-Muqatilah bi-Libya, is the most powerful radical faction waging “jihad” against Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi.  LIFG was founded in 1995 by Libyans who had fought against Soviet forces in Afghanistan.  LIFG maintains a presence in Asia, Africa and Europe, primarily  in the United Kingdom. Its ideological alliance with Al-Qaeda and other brutal terrorist organizations. LIFG claimed responsibility for a failed assassination attempt against ColonelMuammar Al-Gadhafi  in February 1996.   Ayman Al-Zawahiri the second leader after Osama Bin Laden claims that Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) has joined Al-Qaeda.Headed by Anas Sebay, a key Al-Qaeda leader, the Libyan “Islamic” Fighting Group (LIFG) includes about 2,500 “Libyan Afghans” who fought in the 1979 – 1989 Soviet War in Afghanistan and then returned home to ignite an “Islamic” rebellion. All “Islamist” terrorist groups,  including the LIFG are believed beside to have links with  Al-Qaeda also with neighboring Islamic extremist  groups in Egypt and Algeria. “This has led the LIFG to be recognized as a key component in the global network of militant “Islamic” groups,” the CSIS reported to  The Daily Telegraph, December 24, 2003. David Shayler, a former officer in the  U.K. ’s  MI5  claims that Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi  was the target of a UK intelligence assassination plot in February 1996 using the Libyan “Islamic” Fighting Group, a jihad network with links to Al-Qaeda.  British intelligence paid large sums of money to an Al-Qaeda cell in Libya in a doomed attempt to assassinate Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi. “The observer”, December 25, 2003 had been restrained from printing details of the trial of David Shayer, who was on December 18, 2003 sentenced to six months in prison for disclosing documents obtained during his time as an MI5 officer. David Shayler is a British Journalist, former MI5 (Security Service) officer and self-proclaimed Messiah. Shayler earned notoriety after being prosecuted under the Official Secret documents to the “Mail on Sunday” in August 1997 the alleged that MI5 was paranoid about socialist, and that it had previously investigated Labor Party ministers Peter Mandelson, Jack Straw and Harriet Harman. David Shayler was not allowed to argue that he made the revelations in the public interest. During his closing speech on that time, David Shayler repeated claims that he was gagged from talking about “a crime so heinous” that he had no chose but to go to the press with his story. The crime was the alleged MI5 involvement in the plot to assassinate Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi, hatched in late 1995.  The assassination attempt on Colonel Gadhafi was planned for early 1996 in the Libyan coastal city of Sirte. It is thought that an operation by the Libyan “Islamic” Fighting Group (LIFG) in the city was foiled in March 1996 and the gun battle that followed several militant’s were killed. In 1998, the Libyans released TV footage of a 1996 grenade attack on Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi that they claimed had been carried out by a British agent. It was strong evidence that the Western intelligence using “the resistance fighters” Al-Qaeda network  or what they called the terrorists or their “enemies number one” to overthrow the leaders who have opposite views. It is contradiction between their words and their actions. They have told the people all over the world a lie. After Jamahiriya made a decision to give up its effort to acquire weapons of mass destruction (WMD), Prime Minister of the United Kingdom, Tony Blair praised Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi’s recent act, and stated that he hoped Libya could now be a strong ally in the international war on terrorism. “I was particularly struck at our earlier meeting with Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi by his insistence met only of Libya’s determination to carry on down this path of cooperation but also his recognition that Libya’s own future is best secured by a new relationship with the outside world and a recognition also of a common cause with us in the fight against Al-Qaeda, extremism  and terrorism which threatens not just the Western world but the Arab World also,” Prime Minister Tony Blair said, reported by Scottish news on March 25, 2004.

There Is No Assistance Anymore

From The West Countries To L. I. F. G.

One of the causes of the crackdown was the return to Jamahiriya of Libyan citizens from Afghanistan. Some of them return home with hopes of overthrowing Colonel  Muammar Al-Gadhafi and installing a government based on “Sharia” (Islamic law) but according to their way as ex-government of Taliban in Afghanistan oppressed the women and returned to the time of “Jahiliah” (foolishness). They are terrible and gave all Muslims a bad name. In exchange for the compromise between the Jamahiriya and the West, there is no assistance anymore from the United Kingdom and the United States to the Libyan “Islamic” Fighting Group  ( L. I. F. G. ) and their allies in North Africa. On October 10, 2005 the United Kingdom’s Home Office banned L. I. F. G.  and fourteen other militant groups from operating in the United Kingdom. Under the United Kingdom’s Terrorism Act 2000, being a member of a LIFG is punished by a 10-year prison term. The Financial Sanctions Unit of the Bank of England acting on behalf of H.M. Treasury issued the orders to freeze all their assets. According to Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia 2009, there are a number of political groups opposed to Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi: “National Conference of the Libyan opposition”, “National Front for the Salvation of Libya”, and “Committee for Libyan National Action in Europe”. They feel threatened wherever they are and maybe their political  group will be dispersed by themselves.  On February 7, 2006 the United Nations embargoed five specific LIFG members and four corporations, all of whom had continued to operated in England until  October 2005. According to Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks as “horrific” and gruesome. In the article written by Ronald Bruce St. John entitled “A New U.S. Relationship with Libya?” carried by Foreign Policy In Focus, March 27, 2009, “the Jamahiriya has taken steps to improve U.S. – Libyan counterterrorism cooperation and intelligence sharing since 2001. The Libyan Arab Jamahiriya has long  perceived Al-Qaeda as a threat because members of Libya’s Islamist opposition have been linked to Al-Qaeda and other foreign jihadist organization. This contributed to Libya’s willingness to expand counterterrorism cooperation with U.S. authorities.” Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi has characterized member of Al-Qaeda as “heretics” in prominent public statements and has described the Jamahiriya’s intelligence and counterterrorism cooperation with the United States as “irrevocable”. U.S. Department of State’s most recent “Country Report on Terrorism” for Libya, the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya has continued to cooperate closely with the U.S. and the international community on counterterrorism initiatives against the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group ( L. I. F. G. ) and Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM, formerly known as the Salafist Group for call and combat, or G. S. P. C.   The U.S. official reportedly hope to extend counter-terrorism assistance to Libya in the future, possibly under the framework of the inter-agency Trans-Sahara Counter Terrorism Initiative  ( T. S. C. T. I. ), which involves all of Libya’s  neighbors, except Sudan and Egypt. In December 2004 the U.S. State Department placed the L. I. F. G.  on its list of terrorist groups. The State Department later elevated the LIFG to an Al-Qaeda affiliate. In return, officials of Jamahiriya have provided the United States and other countries with valuable intelligence about Libyans who had fought in Afghanistan and then followed Osama Bin Laden to Sudan. The chief of Jamahiriya’s External Security Agency, Mr. Musa Kusa, reportedly provided a list of Libyans who had trained with Al-Qaeda. In 2005,  the  C.I.A.  reportedly agreed to offer counter-terrorism training to Libyan security personnel. The United States also has reportedly delivered into Libyan custody some anti Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi Libyan had captured in its global campaign against terrorism, as well as allow Libyan agents to interrogate Libyans held at the U.S. detention facility at Guantanamo Bay.

Ayman Al-Zawahiri Speaks At Random:

“Colonel Gadhafi Is Enemy Of  Islam”.

Al–Qaeda’s No.2 Ayman al-Zawahiri harshly criticized Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi  in a new audio tape on November 3, 2007, accusing him of being an “enemy of Islam” and threatening a wake of attacks against the North African country because it improved relations with the United States. In the 28-minute audiotape called “Unity of the Ranks”, Ayman al-Zawahiri also announced that the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group was joining rank with Al-Qaeda. In the audio recording, Ayman al-Zawahiri also calls on followers to defeat other North African leaders including Tunisian President Zine El-Abidine Ben Ali, Moroccan King Mohammed VI and Algerian President Abdelaziz Bouteflica as well as Colonel Gadhafi, reported by Fox News.Com on November 3, 2007. A Canadian Security Intelligence Service report shows that Al-Qaeda backed militants in Libya want to assassinate Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi, providing a possible explanation for the Jamahiriya recent attempts to improve relations with the West. This idea came from crazy people who used “Islam” as a label, while Al-Qaeda’s had the same operation with the West before against Jamahiriya.. They are “munafik” (hypocrite). Why Al-Qaeda and their plot did not fight against Israel? They are coward and without doubt, their leaders are international Zionists plot. Another strong evidence that Al-Qaeda group to weaken the Palestinian fighters against Israel. On Friday August 14, 2009 “Islamic” radicals from an Al-Qaeda inspired group battle HAMAS security in the Gaza Strip. The fighting began when HAMAS forces surrounded a mosque in the Southern Gaza town of Rafah where about 100 members of “Jund Ansar Allah” or “the Soldiers of the Companion of God”, were holed up, including some armed with suicide belt, according to residents of the area. The head of the Al-Qaeda inspired group in the Gaza Strip, Abdel Latif Moussa, was killed when fighting resume after dawn Saturday 15th August 2009, Ihab Ghussein, a HAMAS Interior Ministry spokesman, told The Associated Press. Dr. Moaiya Hassanain of the Palestinian Health Ministry in Gaza said a total of 24 people, including six HAMAS police officers and 11-year-old girl, where killed in the violence that also wounded 150. HAMAS also confirmed the death in the fighting one of its high level commanders, Abu Jibril, whom Israel said orchestrated the capture three years ago of Sgt. Gilad Schalit, an Israeli soldier who is still being held by HAMAS. The confrontation was triggered when the leader of the Al-Qaeda group defied Gaza’s HAMAS rulers by declaring in a Friday prayer sermon August 14, 2009, that the territory was an “Islamic emirate”. Radical splinter groups such as “Jund Ansar Allah” call for a global jihad against the entire Western world, while HAMAS the true Islamic fighters maintains its struggle is only against the Israeli occupation. Until today HAMAS is free of Al-Qaeda influence. Of course, the Jew clowns in Israel and Washington broke up when they heard that “good news”.

Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi :

“Give Osama Bin Laden A Chance”.

Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi has advised President Barack Obama to give Osama Bin Laden a chance to reform, telling the new president, America’s most wanted man was looking for “dialogue”.  Colonel Gadhafi hailed what he called “positive-signal” so far from the new Barack Obama administration, including plans to close the U.S. prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. Speaking to students at Georgetown University via a satellite link-up from Libya, Colonel Gadhafi said Washington must review its approach to Osama Bin Laden, who is blamed for the September 11, 2001 attacks and tops the U.S. Most Wanted List. “Terrorism is dwarf not a giant. Osama Bin Laden is a person who can be given a chance to reform”, Colonel Gadhafi said through an interpreter. “Maybe we can have a dialogue with him and find out the reason that led him in this direction,” he added.  “Moreover,  he said the Taliban, which the United States  helped oust in Afghanistan, was not as it has been portrayed and Washington should review its views on that group too,” reported by ABC News, January 22, 2009. It seems that is a diplomatic comments from Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi. He actually hinted President Barack Obama because Colonel Gadhafi knew that only the United States which would be able to make solution with Al-Qaeda, especially with their leaders. Many reasons for C.I.A. to keep out of the public eye, why there is no a serious attempt from the U.S.  to capture the Al-Qaeda top-leaders such as Ayman al Zawahiri or Osama Bin Laden  and the others. Even if Osama Bin Laden is still alive or dead, C.I.A. to keep quiet about it. The real U.S. enemies in Afghanistan and Pakistan are the Taliban groups. Therefore, their air-forces pounded suspected the Taliban positions and do not care about the civil population who would be victims of their target. Meanwhile, it seems the U.S. attitude toward Al-Qaeda more focused on the Al-Qaeda’s members who believe in their Islam fighting but uncontrollable. They were captured or killed because they are not of benefit anymore to the Washington and to put the international Zionists in danger. But how about Ayman al-Zawahiri or Osama Bin Laden if he is still alive and the other Al-Qaeda leaders who control the strategy of their network? Of course, this is the U.S. double standard in “The War On Terrorism”. The Washington regime have to consider a lot of things to capture or kill the Al-Qaeda top-leaders.Libyan leader, Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi said in an interview with American television on August 3, 2003,  that the United States  made Osama Bin Laden a saint and prophet, and that fugitive Al-Qaeda leader “has become a symbol for depending the Islamic World”.  Colonel Gadhafi said , “in Southern Africa, there are pictures of Osama Bin Laden everywhere.”  And  he has seen children wearing T-shirts with pictures of Osama Bin Laden.  “We say Osama Bin Laden is a criminal. We say Osama Bin Laden is a terrorist. But they say, Osama Bin Laden, may God protect and save him. They are not Muslims,” Colonel Gadhafi added.  Colonel Gadhafi said Jamahiriya was doing its part to fight terrorism. “Terrorism is a common enemy,” he said to Andrea Kappel from CNN, adding that Jamahiriya had arrested terrorists who had traveled to Libya from Afghanistan seeking medical care. But he had added, it is not clear whether the United States can defeat Al-Qaeda, which he likened to a cancer that has a chance to grow. It was detected late – or at late stages. That is why it is dangerous. Only at a later stage, you find out that you are affected,“ Colonel Gadhafi said. Until October 2009 there are already 62,000 U.S. troops and even larger number of quasi-military contractors – in that war-torn country. U.S. military officials are endorsing an assessment by NATO’s commander in Afghanistan Gen. Stanley Mc Chrystal  that says the mission in the war-torn country will fail without an increase in troops and resources. But the truth is that these troops are sent to Afghanistan to kill more innocent Muslims children and women who never been on a European or American soil or even know where they are located. The war in Afghanistan is become uglier by the day and war crimes against poor Muslims are committed everywhere in Afghanistan. Iraq and Afghanistan had been brought under “military occupation in the name of fighting against terrorism,” charging that, as a result, “illicit drugs (production) has multiplied,” and thousands of innocent people have been killed. Gen. Stanley Mc Chrystal is expected to submit a detailed request for more troops. A request that will reportedly ask for 40,000 more troops, U.S President Barack Obama has already ordered 21,000 additional U.S. troops to Afghanistan in 2009. If the Washington wants to make a solution seriously, it is better for President Barack Obama gives American forces in Afghanistan a single, clearly states mission: “Get Ayman al-Zawahiri, Osama Bin Laden if he is still alive and his top-aids then come home”.

Libyan “Islamic” Fighting Group Back Away

From Al-Qaeda Merger In Reconciliation With

The Great Jamahiriya.

On January 20, 2009 President of the United States, George W. Bush descended from political stage and Barack Hussein Obama had been elected as his successor.

President Barack Obama had a difference of policy with a new label “U.S. is not enemy of Muslim.” The new policy suggests that the old label “Terrorism and a crusade against Islam”  launched by President George W. Bush on September 2001, failed and ended in disaster. Such a new policy had caused a weaken rift in the circle of Al-Qaeda and its network all over the world. Their terror activities outside of Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iraq are on the decline because their fund feel to its lowest point. The real Islamic fighters of  Al-Qaeda until today never ordered by their leaders to launce on attack against Israel.  Most of them are young men, poor education, a little knowledge of Islam but “fanatic”, come from the village of Muslim countries and destitute family. The fighters have realized that they are only pawns of C.I.A. and now they must be ready killed  by the U.S. troops, but their top leaders are usually safe from attack except they do not needed anymore. This realization begun by the Libyan “Islamic” Fighting Group ( L. I. F. G. ) completely severed their relation with Al-Qaeda organization and joined forces with The Great Jamahiriya. On July 10, 2009 The Telegraph reported that senior Al-Qaeda members Abu Yahya al-Libi and Abu Laith al Libi were LIFG members. Abu Laith al-Libi has been a trusted helpmate Al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden, but he was reported kill in February 2008 by U.S. troops  attack on a tribal region in west Pakistan which borders Afghanistan.It has more than two years since talks started between the Jamahiriya authorities and the imprisoned leaders of the Libyan “Islamic” Fighting Group (LIFG). As both sides acknowledge past mistakes, there are finally signs that the longtime antagonist may be getting closer to reconciliation, a process that will rely in past on the L.I.F.G ’s  renunciation of its merger with Al-Qaeda  Dr. Ali Sallabi, a Qatar-based Libyan Islamist and the main mediator between the imprisoned L.I.F.G. leaders and the authorities,  has been quoted as saying the talks “are very encouraging” after meeting the six Shura Council members of the L. I. F. G.  in their Tripoli prison (“Dar al-Hayat”, June 15, 2009).  The six leaders have for some time been allowed by the Security Services to meet freely with the rest of the Islamists  in prison so they could consult with them regarding a review of L.I.F.G.  policies and principles. This positive news coincided with the announcement by another former leader of the L.I.F.G. outside Libya that he now supports peace talks with the Jamahiriya. Abdullah Mansour, who was described in his 2008 terrorist designation by the U.S. Department of the Treasury as “One of the most important L.I.F.G. members working on LIFG finances in the United Kingdom, where the greatest amount of funding for the LIFG originated,” has written a letter published by Dar al-Hayat in which he commented publicly for the first time on the reconciliation talks.  The Jamahiriya itself is changing,  according to Abdullah Mansour, with Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi  saying publicly that mistakes have been made. “So, if Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi  is changing, why not L.I.F.G. ?”  Mansour says to the members and leaders of the L.I.F.G. , inside and outside Libya, that they should not shy away from correcting their mistakes too: : “Revision is a religious  need, whether the L.I.F.G.  stay in prison or are set free. Changing policies and aims does not mean a retreat from the religion itself.” L.I.F.G. servers ties with Al-Qaeda over “indiscriminate violence”. What may be seen as a severe blow to Al-Qaeda, one of its ally, the L.I.F.G. has decided to severe its ties with Osama Bin Laden and Ayman al Zawahiri saying that the “Indiscriminate bombing” and the “the targeting of civilians” was not in accordance to its objectives. This serving of L.I.F.G.  from Al-Qaeda would benefit is supporters in the West in particular, who are being squeezed by security services that fear the L.I.F.G.  leaders are part of an Al-Qaeda sleeper network.

The Jamahiriya itself and Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi would also benefit from this L.I.F.G. ‘s decision, which would send a clear warning to youth who may be thinking of joining Al-Qaeda’s jihad. Since the year 2006, the Great Jamahiriya has initiated some important reforms, such as the release of some political prisoners, improved prison conditions, and expanded human rights training for police. According to AFP March 12, 2009 The Great Jamahiriya has freed 136 members of L.I.F.G. In the last two years, Gadhafi Foundation led by the son of Libyan leader Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi, Eng. Saif al-Islam Al-Gadhafi has released 136 members of the group. On April 2008 The Foundation announced the exemption of members of the group in the Abu Salim prison in Tripoli and will be forwarded to free another group of 170 remaining members. As the Great Green Charter for Human Rights state: “Democracy means popular power, not popular expression”.

U.S. Forces Kill Osama Bin Laden In Pakistan.

Osama Bin Laden is still a mystery to us. We think it is amazing that the United States has the ingenious to travel to the moon, to build satellite tracking devices, yet can not find one sick and aging terrorist. The war in Afghanistan and Iraq has gone on entirely too long.  It seems for the United States,  Osama Bin Laden is more valuable if he still a live, because he can be used as “scapegoat”  to  attack  the Washington enemies. But why, suddenly President Barack Obama announced the death of Osama Bin Laden that was broadcast by the mass-media around  the world? msnbc.com May 2, 2011, Osama Bin Laden was slain Sunday, May 1, 2011, in his luxury hideout in Pakistan in a firefight with U.S. forces, ending a manhunt that spanned a frustrating  decade. “Justice has been done,”  President Barack Obama declared late Sunday as crowds formed outside the White House to celebrated.  Many sang: “The Star – spangled Banner” and “We are the champion.”   The announcement of Bin Laden’s death sparked jubilant celebrations in America, with crowds gathering outside the White House and at Ground Zero where the Twin Towers had stood in New York.  Osama Bin Laden,  54, was killed after a gun-battle with Navy SEALs and C.I.A.  paramilitary forces at a compound in the city of Abbottabad, Pakistan.  He was shot in the left eye, NBC News’s Savanah Guthrie reported citing an unnamed U.S. official.  The team returned to Afghanistan  with Bin Laden’s body, U.S. official said.  The terrorist’s body was buried at sea, after being given an Islamic funeral, preventing his grave being turned into a shrine for extremists.  His home country,  Saudi Arabia, refused to take his remains. 

The discovery that Osama Bin Laden was living in army town in Pakistan raises pointed questions about how he managed to evade capture and even whether Pakistan’s military  and intelligence leadership knew of his whereabouts and sheltered him. Questions were raised over the swiftness of the 40-minute operation and why the U.S. offered the terror Chief’s remains to his Saudi Arabian homeland before burying Osama Bin Laden swiftly   at sea within hours. A result for the U.S.A. but it seems a little bit strange that they were able to do it so quickly,  even burying Osama Bin Laden at sea despite the fact that they were 1000 miles inland and were in helicopters which would have taken about 5 hours to reach the sea. The New York Times May 4, 2011, President Barack Obama decided not to released graphic  photographs Osama Bin Laden’s corpse, as new details emerged about the raid on Bin Laden’s fortified compound that differed from the administration’s initial account of the nearly 40-minute operation.

If we want to talk honestly, who most deserve to feel happy for the death of  Osama Bin Laden?  Of course, Muslims around the world who have been slandered by Al-Qaeda terrorists.  All of us already know that the actions of Osama Bin Laden is for the benefit of the C.I.A.  Since the events of 9/11 no more “bomb party” in the United States, but the bomb terror is always happening in Muslim countries. Those Muslims in Asia and Africa who have become victim of   injuries and death due to suicide bombings are not counted. Al-Qaeda members comprised of zealot and do not understand Al-Qur’an. They do not deserve to be called as Muslims, because they have killed innocent people, especially Muslims with the means of suicide. They are more accurately described as crazy people are sinful. The assassination  of Osama Bin Laden going very fast, there is absolutely no explanation in this case, why the reporters were not informed of his corpse? Why the team hastily dispose the corpse of Osama Bin Laden to the sea? This event was not witnessed by reporters. Even the corpse of Osama Bin Laden’s photograph was not published for reasons that make no sense. If indeed Osama Bin Laden is an important asset for the C.I.A.,  why  suddenly he should be killed.  

It appears that the announcement of President Barack Obama on the death of Osama Bin Laden is just a myth and a farce from the White House.  But why has  this happened?  Because there is the relationship with the United States which has been collaborating with the Rebels,  The National Transitional Council  ( N.T.C. ) in Libya. They were mostly members of Al-Qaeda.  From the beginning had a lot of evidence that the Rebels ( N.T.C.) in Libyan Arab Jamahiriya is controlled by Al-Qaeda and defended by the international Zionist Conspiracy ( N.A.T.O. )  led by the United States.  This fact is very disturbing political situation within the United States. Therefore, President Barack Obama wants to prove to Americans and the international community, it is not entirely true that the United States government in cooperation with Al-Qaeda to get rid of Libyan leader Muammar Al-Gadhafi. President Barack Obama  can deceive the U.S. public only at ground Zero, but it is not possible to deceive the world community. FoxNews.com August 6, 2011, Helicopter crash in Afghanistan reportedly kills members of SEAL Team six. One current and one former U.S. official said that the dead included 25 Navy SEALs from Team six, the unit that carried out the raid in Pakistan in May 1, 2011, that killed Osama Bin Laden. This event has invited suspicion,  because those who die are the Navy SEALs Team six. If all of Team six Navy SEALs dead, it is no longer living witness who can prove that the person has been shot dead was not Osama Bin Laden.  Likewise there were no witnesses, that the corpse thrown into the sea was not a corpse of Osama Bin Laden. In this case, it appears that the living witness of the death of Osama Bin Laden only Zionist clowns  in the White House who know exactly. They are ready to give tales to the American people and the international community in accordance with their version. So what exactly happened to Osama Bin Laden?  In September 23, 2006, the French newspaper “L’Est Republican”  quoted a report from the French secret service stating that Osama Bin Laden had died in Pakistan on August 23, 2006, after contacting a case of  typhoid fever that paralyzed his lower limbs. ——————–

Breaking News: “Bin Laden” Heroes Probably Murderered to Keep Them Quiet

Some Possibly Killed in Abbottabad Helicopter Crash Months Before

By Gordon Duff, Senior Editor

Today 31 NATO troops, 20 of them Navy Seals from the Osama bin Laden operation died in what is reported as a helicopter crash in Afghanistan. 

The chances of this story being true is almost nil.  The chances of this being a staged coverup is over 80%.  We believe these people were murdered to silence them.  This is why.

We have solid information on two areas:

  1. Osama bin Laden died in 2001 as an active CIA employee and his body was recovered in Afghanistan and taken to “the sand box.”  We were told it was frozen.  We have so much verification from this, CIA, ISI, US military and top officials.  I have a direct confirmation from Bin Laden’s CIA handler who I grilled mercilessly on this.
  2. The Abbottabad operation involved numerous American deaths, witnessed, bodies all over, a helicopter crash.  These bodies were recovered by land vehicle from Islamabad and there was NO “successful” bin Laden operation of any kind.  There was and has been a CIA safe house in Abbotabad where terror suspects were stored for years.

This gave the US several areas of severe vulnerability.  Generally, Navy Seals are the best people in the world at keeping their mouths shut, these are real team players, as the term “Seal Team” belies.

We at VT were informed that the bin Laden operation was staged at this time, a theatrical farce, to cover the exit of Secretary Gates, the move by former CIA Director Leon Panetta into the DOD as Secretary of Defense and to stem any heroic claims by new CIA Director Petraeus of killing the long dead Osama bin Laden, the long frozen CIA operative.

Petraeus is a possible presidential contender and had to be denied this “gift from heaven,” a fast track to the oval office for sure.

Again, I remind you, I went over specific meetings on bin Laden with his handlers, getting every last detail.  I have watched what has gone on, the continuing need to vilify a long dead top CIA operative to provide residual cover for the Bush administration….

The reason?  Bush and his cronies are all facing charges of war crimes, not just in minor jurisdictions but heading for the ICC, putting them on the dock with Gaddafi ( a far less harmful character).

As for the timing of this incident?  This we will work on.  What we can easily surmise is that some of the dead have been dead since their bodies were taken away from the helicopter crash site in Abbotabad.

Who would order such a thing?  We are going to have to wait but we are going to find out.  However, we expected this, the timing is exactly as predicted.


When the phony Abbotbad operation came out, I immediately understood what happened.  I also saw much potential good from it other than the tragedy of the dead Americans from the crash.  I wrote of this and see their deaths as more heroic than many recognize.

They died to erase for all time remnants of the Bush era fairly tale of badguy and evildoer Osama bin Laden.  Enough good men had died chasing a ghost who lived only in phony video and audio tapes by “Bin Laden Studios” in Tel Aviv and in the continual “boogeyman” rhetoric of professional fearmongers.

Not long afterward, Secretary of Defense Leon Panetta, another able public servant announced the near defeat of Al Qaeda, another Bush fairly tale.

Al Qaeda has never existed, there are no magic worldwide terror conspiracies other than those run by governments.  There are several of those and I have written extensively on these.  Google will help you with this if you are curious.

When VT saw why the government staged this, we saw we could accomplish two things:

  1. We could simply report the truth for those willing to believe it, something we believe is the right thing to do.
  2. We could also support the United States in a very real way, knowing Pakistan would weather this crisis, timed, in some ways, as a face saving move in response to the embarrassing Raymond Davis affair.  I believed if the truth came out, clear enough for insiders, intel and miliary for sure, to understand that we knew and other insiders knew, there would be no reason to “clean house” afterward, to stage a coverup and get rid of any involved.

I had felt that we had provided cover for the Seal Team, we hadn’t trashed them, we acknowledged the dead at Abbotabad where no one else bothered, this is our job as fellow members of America’s military forces (current and former).

More importantly, we got out word, I certainly did enough radio and TV on this, enough that, for anyone who care, the “truth was out there.”

This is all we could do but I hoped it would stem a need for covering tracks.  After all, anyone leaking real information on the operation would only seem like they had gotten it from me and I put it out there in such a manner that I allowed room to be “debunked.”

I do this to protect myself but I really was thinking of them.  These are great guys, Seals are among the best people on earth.  The Seal and Special Forces communities are, of the military groups in the US, some of the finest people I know.

They also help cover my “behind,” which I appreciate.

This is just too obvious, too brazen.  I can’t imagine it started at the White House or even cabinet level but maybe I am deluding myself.  Bin Laden was all about the election.

After the bond collapse and credit disaster yesterday, anything threatening President Obama’s reelection is seen, by some, as a threat to America’s financial survival.  This debt crisis is a bigger threat to the US than a Japanese invasion in 1942 would have been.

You may not see it that way and you certainly cant get out your hunting rifle to fix it. (Don’t be a sap, kill a Jap!)

Someone had gotten to someone.  My best guess and this is a guess…an expose’ by the mainstream media, perhaps Murdoch, another guess, conjecture I admit, regarding the farce at Abbottabad, information possibly gotten through spying, bribery and blackmail, threatened to take down Obama.

With Murdoch’s good friend and “monkeyboy,” Netanyahu ‘on the ropes,” with crowds marching in Israel’s streets demanding his ouster, we have more timing to factor in.

The bin Laden killing, the third rate drama of capturing an unarmed frozen dead guy and throwing him into the ocean had probably become an albatross around certain high ranking necks.

Norway was no accident, it was a warning too.  It has been containerized, just as the Murdoch espionage issue is now “poor Rupert and the pie thrower.”

These Americans are casualties in a game, one like 9/11, sacrificial pawns, like Britain’s 7/7, all lies, all theatre, all evil.

This is not for public consumption.  There are those who know exactly who I am talking to.

There are many of us here who still keep our mouths shut about so many things.  There are too many who don’t even care, most of us at VT do.  Yes, I am aware I can be jailed, I am aware my passport can be pulled, I already see the damned surveillance.


We aren’t anti-American.  I am simply sick of seeing solutions that go one direction, stealing everything that isn’t nailed down.  I am also sick of the fact that Washington can’t visit the “head’ without Israel’s permission.

This…today, this is too much. It is unforgivable.  We are not going to allow this to stand.

We have a long standing history of “cleaning house” after operations of this kind.  Usually its dead senators in plane crashes, heart attacks, car wrecks, like the Minot Barksdale or 9/11 incidents.  I could name a dozen more.  Does the name Wheeler meaning anything to you?  Anyone remember Pat Tillman?

But this many?



Deep Background, The Raymond Davis Affair


All articles mentioned above will be updated and continued in accordance with the development of news that will happen.

Videos: Obama Lied About Troops on the Ground in Libya

Ben Johnson, The White House Watch

This author has observed, “If the media wanted to conserve resources, they could simply fuse the words ‘The Obama administration lied’ to the opening line of each day’s edition and fill in the blank appropriately.” Today proved no exception. Despite President Barack Obama’s assurances that no ground troops would ever be sent to Libya, the Pentagon confirmed Monday that U.S. soldiers are on the ground.

Four servicemen landed in Tripoli over the weekend. The newly elected commander of the Tripoli Military Council, Abdel Hakim Belhaj (aka Abu Abdullah al-Sadiq), is an al-Qaeda assetand founder of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) who twice met with Osama bin Laden. Belhaj has claimed U.S. agents tortured him for days, but he does “not want revenge.”

Pentagon spokesman Capt. John Kirby refused to answer whether Obama would send additional troops to the region.

This contrasts with Obama’s pledge on March 18, as he launched his war-by-decree, when hestated, “The United States is not going to deploy ground troops into Libya.” A few days later, Obama reaffirmed, “I said that America’s role would be limited, that we would not put ground troops into Libya…Tonight, we are fulfilling that pledge.”

White House officials have insisted this weekend’s deployment in no way constitutes a violation of Obama’s no-troops promise, because these soldiers are only assigned to determine whether it is safe for U.S. diplomats to return to the country. However, they are armed and may defend themselves if attacked.

State Department spokeswoman Victoria Nuland asserted, “When the president made his commitment to ‘no boots on ground’…obviously that had to do with entering into the fray between the Qaddafi forces and the Libyan freedom fighters” — many of whom are al-Qaeda members — “and that’s not what these guys are engaged in.”

In fact, it appears Obama broke his promise before he ever made it. CIA agents were on the ground in Libya before the United States engaged in hostilities kinetic actions in the six-month-long war, which he vowed would last “weeks, not months.” American intelligence operatives worked alongside British MI6 and French special forces.

The foreign reinforcements have proven unable to assure victory for the Libyan “rebels.” Despite repeatedly claiming they had Muammar Qaddafi surrounded or on the brink of surrender, as of this writing the Libyan leader remains free and at large.

Obama is reportedly considering breaking his campaign promise to withdraw all U.S. troops from Iraq by his original deadline, as well.


This website is non-profit. All articles are written by an idealist. The Writer has been self-funded up to this point in time, but now need a financial assistance from all my Brothers and Sisters, my Companieros and my Comrades all over the world who love and support Brother Leader, Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi and the Libyan people against the international Zionists ( N.A.T.O. ) , especially donation from The  Great Jamahiriya. Please contact the Writer: E-mail:  lardiab@gmail.com

37 comments August 8, 2011

The War on Terror is a Fraud

Posted: 2011/09/15
From: Source    http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628656
A decade of war started, and both fueled and fought by the same corporate-financier interests.

By Tony Cartalucci

From the beginning, even for those wanting to believe the fairy tale that 9/11 was carried out by cave dwellers carrying box cutters directed by Osama Bin Laden, who by all accounts was dying or already dead from kidney failure in 2001 – “unfortunate blunders” in US foreign policy can still be blamed for the creation and perpetuation of the ubiquitous, unceasing terror organization known as Al Qaeda. However, in light of recent events in Libya, Syria, Iran, and Algeria, there is exposed a truth, many have known for over 10 years, and many more are catching onto now – that the “War on Terror” is an absolute fraud, started, fuelled and simultaneously fought against by the same handful of corporate-financier interests for the sole purpose of spreading Wall Street and London’s hegemony across the globe.

Inception: Al Qaeda Made in USA

By all accounts, including admissions by former Secretary of Defence Robert Gates and former National Security Adviser Zbigniew Brzezinski, Osama Bin Laden’s organization that would become Al Qaeda was created during the Soviet-Afghan war in in the late 70’s and throughout the 80’s. The funding of these militants did not begin after the Soviet invasion, but actually several years before the invasion. US intervention in Afghanistan by training and arming Afghanistan’s Mujahidin, along with Osama Bin Laden’s Arab fighters, is one of the leading factors that led to the murderous and protracted decade-long war, according to the Nation in an article titled, “Blowback, the Prequel.”

Bin Laden’s Al Qaeda would continue to fight after the Soviets were expelled from Afghanistan, this time in Kosovo’s bid for independence from Serbia in the late 1990’s. Al Qaeda-trained Kosovo Liberation Army (KLA) militants garnered a Serbian response which was then used by NATO as a pretext for intervention. NATO’s entry into the war led to the eventual carving up of the nation. Again, the CIA was found to be propping up Bin Laden’s terrorist legionaries. Serbia’s president, Slobodan Milošević would later be removed from power by yet another arm of American interventionism, the National Endowment for Democracy via Optor, now known as the infamous CANVAS organizationwhich, with US funding, trained activists ahead of the now admittedly US-engineered “Arab Spring.”

Despite Al Qaeda quickly becoming America’s arch enemy, filling the void left by a collapsed Soviet Union, and justifying America’s continued absurd defence spending as well as its enormous tactical holdings overseas throughout the 90’s, it appears the organization was still very much a vehicle carrying forward US foreign policy. And despite accusations that it was a terrorist organization, it continued receiving covert support from US and British intelligence agencies, as did many other extremist groups which eventually were integrated with Al Qaeda after September 11, 2001.

From Heroes to Villains, and Back Again

In the 80’s when the CIA was fuelling Afghanistan’s decade-long war with the Soviet Union, in part provoked by US meddling in the region years before the invasion even took place, the Mujahidin were portrayed as heroes and freedom fighters quite publicly. No better example can be cited of how this image was nurtured by the West’s massive propaganda machine than Hollywood’s Rambo III, an entire movie literally dedicated to the “gallant people of Afghanistan.” Many of those that fought in Afghanistan, particularly foreign fighters armed, trained, and brought in by the CIA, would go on to become some of the world’s most notorious terrorist groups, many of which are listed to this day on the US and UK foreign terrorist organization lists.

These CIA-fostered terrorist groups include the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG), which was created in Afghanistan with Libyan militants previously armed and trained by the CIA to overthrow Qaddafi in the early 1980’s. After Afghanistan, and several failed attempts to seize Libya by force, these fighters would filter back into Afghanistan to fight US troops who were now invading the “gallant people of Afghanistan.” This time, the Afghans were no longer “gallant,” but rather medieval savages in need of Western democracy and UN sanctioned nation-building. The Libyans for their part would continue fighting the US in Afghanistan, and when the US invaded Iraq in 2003, they would begin fighting US troops there as well. This is of course, all according to a report from the West Point Combating Terror Centre.

And even as US forces occupy Afghanistan for their tenth year, with fighting reaching unprecedented levels of violence, Afghanistan’s LIFG Libyan cohorts are receiving US and British air support, French and Qatari arms, billions in aid, NATO special forces assistance, and full diplomatic recognition by the US State Department and the UK Foreign and Commonwealth Office, as they rise up against Qaddafi in Libya. It must be noted that these Libyan rebels, who like the Afghan Mujahedin were portrayed as “freedom fighters,” are in fact led and consist almost entirely of LIFG militants, many of whom have spent time in Iraq and Afghanistan killing US troops. It should be noted that LIFG is listed by the US Stated Department (#26) and the UK Home Office as a foreign terrorist organization.

This is a narrative that first saw these militants as heroes, then the world’s most scorned villains for nearly a decade of war, before emerging out the other side once again as heroes. For the thousands of US troops who have died in Iraq and Afghanistan, the tens of thousands maimed, and the hundreds of millions of Americans facing a bankrupted nation that has paid trillions for this “War on Terror” to un-proportionately wealthy mega-corporations and banks, it is becoming clear that they were taken for a ride by a shadowy elite with an obscure agenda masked in a now unravelling veil of lies.

The War on Terror is Actively Kept Alive by the West

In Libya, Qaddafi has fought for nearly three decades to crush the extremist militants of Libya’s eastern region, cantered on the cities of Darnah and the current epicentre of the NATO-backed rebellion, Benghazi. This eastern region is considered, according to West Point’s CTC report, as one of the highest concentrations of terrorists in the world. It is also a region the CIA and MI6 have helped fund, arm, and train over the same 30 years.

At one point, Qaddafi had almost entirely extinguished the movement, in particular LIFG, most of whose leadership fled, and ironically sought refuge in London, Langley, and Washington. Qaddafi would attempt to re-approach the West by abandoning his WMD programs and inviting Western intelligence agencies in to help counter the remnants of LIFG and other regional terror organizations. The CIA and MI6 instead, rearmed, reorganized, and redirected these terrorist organizations back at the Qaddafi regime culminating in the February 17, 2011 “Day of Rage” and the subsequent NATO intervention. Indeed, the US, UK, France, Qatar, and other NATO member states are overtly deposing Qaddafi in favour for a regime made up of hard-core terrorists.

In other words, a terrorist organization on its death bed, was intentionally brought back to life by NATO. Having done so, LIFG is already shipping weapons to another notorious terrorist organization in the region, Algeria’s Al Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb (AQIM) (#37 on US State Department’s list of foreign terrorist organizations). Algeria, like Libya, has fought a long battle against terrorism at the cost of protracted unrest now known as the “lost decade.” After a failed attempt at stirring regime change in Algeria through Egyptian-style street protests and internal defections, it appears the US through NATO is attempting to revive AQIM and initiate a violent revolution.

Already, Bruce Riedel, a Brookings Institution policy wonk and co-author of the “Which Path to Persia?” report engineering the use of terrorism to destabilize Iran, is licking his chops over the prospects of Algeria “being next.” In a report, aptly titled, “Algeria will be next to fall,” Riedel sets the rhetorical stage, just as he helped to do with Libya, for another “spontaneous” “indigenous” uprising, with the prospect of NATO, and more specifically, French intervention looming over them. In reality, as we can clearly see, AQIM would not be in any position were it not for NATO arming and handing a neighbouring nation to their allies amongst Libya’s LIFG.

Similarly in Syria, the Muslim Brotherhood was all but routed by Bashar al-Assad’s father, Hafez al-Assad. Now, these militants are receiving covert arms, the full support of the Western media’s selective journalism, and both political and financial support by the US, UK, and EU. Should the West succeed, yet another extremist organization will be reanimated and unleashed on a population that has sacrificed much trying to burying it.

Iran has been fighting a battle against another State Department listed terrorist organization (list as #28), Mujahedin-e Khalq (MEK.) US policy makers, after admitting MEK has the blood of US soldiers and civilians on its hands and that it has “undeniably” conducted terrorist attacks, shockingly wants to remove it from the US foreign terrorist organization list so that it can be worked with more closely in toppling the Iranian government. This is revealed in the Brookings Institution’s “Which Path to Persia?” report.

Potential Ethnic Proxies,” page 117-118: “Perhaps the most prominent (and certainly the most controversial) opposition group that has attracted attention as a potential U.S. proxy is the NCRI (National Council of Resistance of Iran), the political movement established by the MEK (Mujahedin-e Khalq). Critics believe the group to be undemocratic and unpopular, and indeed anti-American.

In contrast, the group’s champions contend that the movement’s long-standing opposition to the Iranian regime and record of successful attacks on and intelligence-gathering operations against the regime make it worthy of U.S. support. They also argue that the group is no longer anti-American and question the merit of earlier accusations. Raymond Tanter, one of the group’s supporters in the United States, contends that the MEK and the NCRI are allies for regime change in Tehran and also act as a useful proxy for gathering intelligence. The MEK’s greatest intelligence coup was the provision of intelligence in 2002 that led to the discovery of a secret site in Iran for enriching uranium.

Despite its defenders’ claims, the MEK remains on the U.S. government list of foreign terrorist organizations. In the 1970s, the group killed three U.S. officers and three civilian contractors in Iran. During the 1979-1980 hostage crises, the group praised the decision to take America hostages and Elaine Sciolino reported that while group leaders publicly condemned the 9/11 attacks, within the group celebrations were widespread.

Undeniably, the group has conducted terrorist attacks—often excused by the MEK’s advocates because they are directed against the Iranian government. For example, in 1981, the group bombed the headquarters of the Islamic Republic Party, which was then the clerical leadership’s main political organization, killing an estimated 70 senior officials. More recently, the group has claimed credit for over a dozen mortar attacks, assassinations, and other assaults on Iranian civilian and military targets between 1998 and 2001. At the very least, to work more closely with the group (at least in an overt manner), Washington would need to remove it from the list of foreign terrorist organizations.”

It turns out that MEK is already receiving US funding, weapons, and other assistance to conduct a militant campaign against the government of Iran. This was revealed in Seymour Hersh’s New Yorker article “Preparing the Battlefield,” which stated:

“The M.E.K. has been on the State Department’s terrorist list for more than a decade, yet in recent years the group has received arms and intelligence, directly or indirectly, from the United States. Some of the newly authorized covert funds, the Pentagon consultant told me, may well end up in M.E.K. coffers. “The new task force will work with the M.E.K. The Administration is desperate for results.” He added, “The M.E.K. has no C.P.A. auditing the books, and its leaders are thought to have been lining their pockets for years. If people only knew what the M.E.K. is getting, and how much is going to its bank accounts—and yet it is almost useless for the purposes the Administration intends.”

Moves have also been made to get MEK de-listed as a terrorist organization by the US State Department so that even more aid can be rendered to this admitted terrorist organization. Seymore Hersh in an NPR interview, also claims that select MEK members have received training in the US. Also implicated by Hersh in his article, were Kurdish militants straddling the Iranian, Syrian, and Iraqi borders and now wreaking havoc against Syria’s Assad regime, and Baluchi militants based along the Iranian-Pakistani border. The Baluchi militants arealso being directed toward the Pakistani governmentwith US assistance.

In each instance, whether it is in Libya, Algeria, Syria, Iran, or Pakistan, immense efforts have been made by these governments to destroy entirely these organizations. In each case, the US purposely arms, trains, and shelters these organizations, with troupes of dissent leaders populating London, Washington, and Langley, Virginia, creating a “rouge’s UN” of sorts. Careful observers who check the backgrounds of “experts” brought onto the duplicitous BBC, CNN, or Al Jazeera networks for interviews can see sometimes 2-3 of these exiled extremist leaders at a time being given airtime and dressed up as “freedom fighters.” The threat of militant extremism is one the United States government and its allies have been purposefully perpetuating as a pretext for expanding military and economic power into sovereign nation-states disinterested in their Wall Street and London centric “globalization.”

War on Terror: President X’s War

While many may say the “War on Terror” was Bush’s war, a legacy Obama has inherited, it is clear through Obama’s “actions” that the war has continued on in earnest, even expanded, following the same path with all but superficial rhetoric affixed to give it a more “progressive’ look. The current conflagration in the Middle East and North Africa was planned all the way back in the early 90’s with each president since then, rubber stamping the steps necessary to push the plan for a “new Middle East” forward.

It was Bush Sr. who ravaged Iraq and left US troops permanently stationed in the Middle East. Clinton oversaw Al Qaeda’s ushering in of NATO intervention in the Kosovo conflict. Bush Jr. of course was in office when Afghanistan and Iraq were invaded and occupied. Now, Obama is overseeing the “Arab Spring” for which activists were trained and bankrolled by the US State Department before he even came into office. He is also overseeing the destruction of Libya, and the destabilization of Syria (for more information, seeGlobalists Coming Full Circle).

As the 2012 US election nears, we are confronted with the obvious establishment candidate of choice, Rick Perry, facing off against another 4 years of Obama’s servile obedience to the corporate-financier agenda driving American policy. Rick Perry assures us that he will bring change, stating that America “cannot afford four more years of this rudderless leadership.” However, in reality, the same US policy makers that have engineered the last 10 years of the global “War on Terror” are already lined up behind Perry to ensure that indeed we do get “four more years of this rudderless leadership.”

Foreign Policy recently reported that warmongering Neo-Conservatives including Douglas Feith, William Luti, Andrew McCarthy, Charles Stimson, and Daniel Fata, with the help of certified warmonger and corporate fascist Donald Rumsfeld, had been introduced to Rick Perry to help him “brush up” on foreign policy. Also meeting with Perry was Dan Blumenthal of the Neo-Con, Fortune 500-funded AEI, Peter Brookes of the Fortune 500-funded Heritage Foundation (page 35), and Zalmay Khalizad, a fellow Neo-Conservative warmonger, PNAC signatory, and a member of the extraterritorial meddling National Endowment for Democracy’s board of directors, to help Perry define his “hawk internationalist” foreign policy stance.

By “hawk internationalist,” Foreign Policy indicates that it means, “embracing American exceptionalism and the unique role we must play in confronting the many threats we face.” In actual terms it means embracing more wars, more meddling abroad, and more corporate driven agendas to expand Wall Street and London’s financial, military, and economic hegemony worldwide. Perry will simply take what both Bush and Obama have done, affix the appropriate spin, rhetoric, and propaganda, and continue spilling American blood and wasting American treasure. Perry is merely a public relations officer ready to take the heat for the next four years while the real policy makers continue operating out of the sight and mind of the American public.

The “War on Terror” is a Fraud

If Bush, Obama, and Perry are not making decisions, who is? Who are the chief proponents of this “War on Terror,” who are the architects behind the policy and who is bankrolling them? More importantly, how can they have spent the last 10 years sending American kids to fight Al Qaeda and now are overtly handing them the nation of Libya?

The Foundation for Defence of Democracies (FDD) is a corporate and US State Department-fundedpolicy institute that claims to be dedicated to promoting “pluralism, defending democratic values, and fighting the ideologies that threaten democracy.” It is decidedly “Neo-Conservative” and focuses almost exclusively on starting and maintaining wars at America’s expense.

FDD’s “executive team” includes James Woolsey and Clifford May, while its “leadership council” includes Bill Kristol – all signatories of a recent Foreign Policy Initiative letter addressed to House Republicans asking them to discard the UN mandate for NATO’s Libyan intervention and commit more support specifically for regime change. Acting Senator Joseph Lieberman also can be found on FDD’s “leadership council” and has been a chief proponent of war with Libya, as well as Syria and Iran, alongside John McCain. FDD has a myriad of publications expressing the elation of the “Neo-Conservative” establishment over current operations against Libya and the possible springboard the Libyan war serves toward US intervention in Syria and Iran. FDD’s only criticism of Obama is that more should be done, faster, and at a greater expense to America. Michael Ledeen, a “freedom scholar,” expresses this well in his article titled, “Lessons of Libya (and Syria, and, Some Day, Iran),” where he throws in his organization’s collective desire to intervene in both Syria and Iran, for good measure.

The Atlantic article, “Al-Qaeda Is Winning,” written by FDD “senior fellow” Daveed Gartenstein-Ross, expresses the true contempt these individuals have toward their audience. In this piece reflecting on the last 10 years of the “War on Terror,” Gartenstein-Ross claims that Al Qaeda’s ability to use cheap means to provoke the United States into a multi-billion dollar defence is rendering an Al Qaeda victory through a “strategy of a thousand cuts.” Of course, the x-ray machines and other security apparatuses being installed across the United States and the tremendous amount of money being used to sustain combat operations around the world “hunting terrorists,” doesn’t go into a black hole. Instead, it goes into the pockets of the very people funding the work of Mr. Daveed Gartenstein-Ross and his peers throughout his and other US and British think-tanks.

Other notorious think-tanks promoting the “War on Terror” as well as literally engineering the latest war in Libya, and with extensive blueprints for destabilizing and overthrowing Syria and Iran, include the Brookings Institution mentioned above, the International Institute for Strategic Studies (IISS), and the Atlantic Council covered in depth in “Atlantic Council: Is Libya a “Global Con?” All three are predictably funded, chaired, and directed by the largest banks, oil companies, and defence contractors on earth, as well as their representatives in the corporate-owned media, public relations and law firms, as well as acting corporate board members themselves.

The Brookings Institute who wrote the definitive blueprint for covert destabilization within a foreign sovereign nation, “Which Path to Persia?” is funded by, among many others, Bank of America, Goldman Sachs, the Rothschilds, Citi, Exxon, Chevron, Shell, Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, Boeing, General Electric, Raytheon (makers of the Tomahawk cruise missile used extensively throughout NATO’s Libya campaign), and Google (who has already renamed Libya’s Green Square to the contrived “Martyr’s Square” on Google Maps). One would assume those at Brookings would carry forward with shame and fear with such obvious conflicts of interest muddling their “policy making,” instead they are beyond arrogant, bolstered by the ignorance and apathy of the masses. A full list of their corporate sponsors can be found in their 2010 annual report, starting on page 19.

Likewise the IISS was instrumental in analysing, promoting, and guiding NATO’s military intervention in Libya as well as maintaining the myth of “global terrorism” and the necessity of continuing the “War on Terror.” They too are representatives of some of the largest corporate-financier interests on earth, all of whom have enriched themselves with their self-promoted, unending war, with their board of trusteescontaining current and former representatives from Rothschild, DeBeers, the Anglo American Corporation, Merrill Lynch, Smith Barney and Bankers, Rolls-Royce, Thales, the notorious Council on Foreign Relations, and ABC News.

We have seen how in nearly every case, national governments have attempted to crush Al Qaeda, and in every case the US and UK have propped them up again. We see how each war is explicitly engineered and promoted by the same corporate-financier interests capitalizing on them at everyone else’s expense. In the 1930’s United States Marine Corps General Smedley Butler stated, “war is a racket,” and explained that a racket is best described “as something that is not what it seems to the majority of the people. Only a small “inside” group knows what it is about. It is conducted for the benefit of the very few, at the expense of the very many. Out of war a few people make huge fortunes.”

Clearly today, this “racket” has become so advanced, so elaborate, so pervasive in politics and culture, that the label of “racket” doesn’t quite suit it. A better term could be a, “scientific dictatorship” where teams of highly trained propagandists, in tandem with the corporate-owned media, including Hollywood, the music industry, publishing houses, and PR firms, all work to manage the public’s perception on a global scale. It is both terrifying as it is perhaps overreaching. The “War on Terror” is a fraud, and one that is now unravelling. For every lie that is told, a vast amount of resources must be spent to sell it and continue propping it up. No matter how much is spent, if a mind wakes up to the fraud, it does so permanently. However vast the fraudulent “War on Terror” is, those speaking the truth face a downhill battle now reaching critical mass. Libya is being handed over to terrorists by the same exact people who told our sons and daughters to lay down their lives to fight these very same people. No amount of propaganda, however scientifically formulated, can obfuscate the treason that has taken place.

The next step of course, after speaking out about the truth, is to review the above mentioned corporate-financier interests, represented by corporations and banks we depend on daily, driving this treasonous agenda, and put each one out of business by boycotting and replacing themsystematically. The “War on Terror” is an absolute fraud, fabricated in whole, and it is only our apathy and inaction coupled with our unwitting patronization of these corporate-financier interests that allows this fraud to continue on.


Berlusconi says Libyans love Qaddafi: as Italians protest against NATO

Posted: 2011/09/10
From: Source    http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628608?rss
Italians protesting against the current NATO massacre in Sirte, Bani Walid, Sebha and other Libyan cities.

Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi hasn’t been the victim of a popular uprising. That is the conviction of Italian Prime Minister Silvio Berlusconi, who has been a friend of Gaddafi till Italy became one of the leading countries behind NATO’s war against Libya in March.

“This has nothing to do with a popular uprising. The Libyan people love Gaddafi, as I was able to see when I went to Libya”, Berlusconi said on Friday during a party meeting in Rome.

He said he suspects there was a plot against Gaddafi.

“Powerful people decided to give life to a new era by trying to oust Gaddafi,” Berlusconi said, according to Italian news agency ANSA.

In July Berlusconi already said he was against NATO intervention in Libya but “had to go along with it”, therewith exposing the fragility of the alliance trying to murder Gaddafi.

He added: “What choice did I have considering America’s pressure, President Georgio Napolitano’s stance, and the Parliament’s decision?”

Meanwhile these Italian people protested against NATO’s war on Libya and its current relentless terror bombing during a strike for better work conditions in Rome on September 6, saying: “There is a silent massacre going on in Libya!” and “Don’t let Sirte, Bani Walid and Sebha become the new Fallujah or the new Guernica”:

Another protest in front of the Parliament in Rome: “We welcome the African refugees from Libya” and “NATO get out of Libya!” on September 8:


My Notebook: MUAMMAR AL-GADHAFI IN MY OPINION (Part I) Edisi Bahasa Indonesia.



Pengamat Masalah Luar Negeri

These articles written on  December  12,  2010. “My Notebook” is   dedicated    to   my   Muslim    Brothers    and      Sisters ,    my    friends   all   over   the world ,  especially   Brother Leader,   Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi   and   I am  sure   he   will   read it.    All  of  these      articles    are    my   opinion     specifically     analyzing      the     news        and various     events   of  Colonel     Muammar  Al-Gadhafi,    including   Libyan Arab Jamahiriya    especially   in terms of    politics.   The  articles   will   be   continued  unlimited  and  written   on  the  same  page  in this Muammargadhafi’s    Blog.  The  goal  is   to  deflect   all    the   writings     of    others      both    within  country  ( Indonesia )   and  abroad who    are      often          offensive      Colonel    Muammar  Al-Gadhafi   because   he   dared   against    the    evil actions   that  have  been  done  by  the   international   Zionists-imperialism.    Moreover,    the    Indonesian  mass-media  rarely convey the news  of   Colonel  Gadhafi and Jamahiriya, so the most Indonesian    people do not  know about   the  role  of  Colonel Muammar Al-Gadhafi  in the world like in  the Arab World, Africa , Latin America and especially in the Muslim World.  Most of these  articles   will  be   written  in    Indonesian language.     The    translation     in  English   can      be   read    on GOOGLE  ( Google  Chrome ), but    NOT    PERFECT .     This    translation       via     Google   is         only  60%  CORRECT ,      the  remaining  40%  WRONG.    Some   articles   are   written   in   English ,  please   read    the original   text   directly because  I hope 100%   is correct.   Thank you.(more…)

39 comments December 12, 2010


 Feedback Copyright © 2011 for Gaddafi and his people!

libya.msk.ru = liviya.rf

E-mail: safir@libya.msk.ru

This site was created with the consent of HE Dr. Amir al-Arabi Ghareb, Secretary Extraordinary and Plenipotentiary of the People’s Bureau of

Great Socialist People’s Libyan Arab Jamahiriya in Russian Federation.

Yandex citation Rambler's Top100 Reyting@Mail.ru

المصداقية في الخبر 24/24 انظموا لنا وأنشرو صفحتنا
علي الفيس بوك






المصداقية في الخبر 24/24 انظموا لنا وأنشرو صفحتنا
علي الفيس بوك

Allibiya TV / قناة الليبية

  • Am I not sweet? Gaddafi’s home videos uncovered

    Previously unseen personal video footage of Muammar Gaddafi has emerged which shows him playing with his grandchildren in his Bab al-Aziziya compound in Tripoli in 2005.

    John Bingham

    4:09PM BST 07  Sept 2011

    “Am I not sweet?” he asks, as the little girl laughs in feigned disgust while her ageing grandfather sidles up for a hug.

    “No,” she squeals, tweaking his nose and wriggling away, prompting him to burst into mock tears.

    It is not the kind of display of defiance usually seen in front of  Muammar Gaddafi.

    But this is Muammar al-Gadhafi as we have never seen him before: in playful mode as he relaxes inside his trademark tent.

    A startling series of home videos showing the softer side of Gaddafi have been recovered from the his Bab al-Aziziya compound in Tripoli.

    They show life inside Gaddafi’s tent, as the Leader plays host to his son Saadi, a former footballer, his wife and two children.

    While the patterned backdrop is identical to that seen in his “deal in the desert” summit with Tony Blair in 2007, the setting could not be less formal.

    Gaddafi is seen lolling on a sofa, dressed in a black and white shell suit, with electric heaters, cables and plastic camping chairs dotted around.

    The footage, acquired by the Reuters news agency, is thought to have been shot in 2005.

    In another short clip, the children climb over Gaddafi playing a game of ghosts.

    Pointing an imaginary pistol at the little girl, the Colonel jokes: “We will kill you if you are the ghost.”

  • Home
  • News
  • Gaddafi
  • Rebels
  • NATO
  • ICC
  • S.O.S.
  • Tribunal
  • Links
  • Contact
Memories from SEPT. 2011, compiled by Marek Glogoczowski :


Our brother Mussa Ibrahim, spokesman for the Libyan leadership, said by phone that day to Reuters he was for his part in a suburb south of Tripoli. “I travel a lot and I have no internet connection at the moment,” he added, referring the situation.

About Seif al-Islam Gaddafi, he says he was with him yesterday. “I accompanied him on a tour around Tripoli from the south,” he said, citing a series of meetings with tribal leaders and supporters of Muammar Gaddafi.

“The transitional Council and the armed gangs do not control our country. Our army still controls large parts of Libya. We will be able to take back Tripoli and other cities in the near future,” assured Ibrahim Mussa. “The fight is very, very far from over.”

In a audio broadcast statement on Syrian television Al-Rai, Seif al-Islam, Gaddafi’s son, said he was speaking from the “outskirts of Tripoli” and insisted that his father was fine. . “We are going to die in our land,” he said, claiming he was speaking for loyalist leaders who had met in the Gadhafi bastion of Bani Walid. “No one is going to surrender.”

“We must wage a campaign of attrition day and night until these lands are cleansed from these gangs and traitors,” he said in a statement broadcast on the Syrian-based TV channel. “We assure people that we are standing fast and the commander is in good condition,” Saif said, adding that there were 20,000 loyalist soldiers ready to defend Sirte.”
Mu’ammar al-Qathafi Speech on 08 September 2011
“To our brave Libyan people that are resisting; the land of Libya is your property and your right from the days of your grandfathers and great grandfathers.

Those that attempt to revoke it from you; are the insiders , foreign backed mercenaries and stray dogs, those foreigners that have resided in Libya for a long time that attempt to take the land of your grandfathers away from you.

This is impossible we will never leaver the land of our grandfathers, their families back then where spies for Italy, and nowadays are spies for France and Britain the same sons are following in the footsteps of their fathers and grandfathers; the steps of dishonor.

These rats and armed scum; are examples of their grandfathers. Each one of them is a clone and a mock-up of traitor-ship, they aren’t Libyan, ask about any of those that are backed by NATO; that destroys Libyan infrastructure and kills Libyan children; you’ll find that his grandfather and his dad where traitors. They carry the genes of traitors.

Do you think those who carry the genes of traitors from their grandparents and great grandparents are going to decide the fate of the Libyan people? These people when they realize that the Libyan people have turned up the ratchet and have refused to accept them they revert to the dirty tricks of the villainous Arab TV channels and the gulf donkeys.”

2. The very recent report from Libya that the city of Bani Wald (roughly 50 thousands of inhabitants, 100 km south-east of Tripoli) is not yet ready for surrender to NATO dictate:


3. “Refugie from Tripoli” Thierry Meyssan longer text documenting up to which point “US (‘God’) created al-Kaida” forms the “cheep mercenary army” fighting for NATO colonizers.


4. the message of ELAC sent by my colleague Michel Luc, who insist that the real enemy of “Green Libya”, wishing its disappearance, is not only NATO, the US created Al Kaida but also Iran.

I wondered why Iran is also interested in re-colonization, by members of NATO Pact (+ Israel) of Libya and of Africa. From interesting discussions of Libyan problems athttp://www.youtube.com/user/108morris108 , between “Morris” and “Leonor” I learned that Iranian “democratic theocracy” considers Khaddafi’s “socialist Jamahurdyia” to be a heretic regime.

Moreover, from an article of Joseph Stiglitz “Of the 1%, by the 1%, for the 1%” published in “Vanity Fair” (http://www.vanityfair.com/society/features/2011/05/top-one-percent-201105 ) I learned that “In terms of income equality, America lags behind any country in the old, ossified Europe that President George W. Bush used to deride. Among our closest counterparts are Russia with its oligarchs and Iran.”

Hence, I do suspect that this “theocratic heresy” of Muammar Khaddafi regime resides in its attachment to the socialist ideal of a society, where all citizens enjoy relatively equal possibilities of education, of health care, of well paid employment/unemployment and so on. And of course this is the reason why New Russian oligarchic government (which should be called “Zionist democracy”, like this one in USA) in fact has “sold” Libya (and Africa) to its traditional, 19th century colonizers.

Such conclusion suggests that subsequent targets of NATO Global Attacks will be all regimes which retain traces of “godless socialism”, in particular Syria, Venezuela, and in Europe Belarus. As Iran is considered, both “Leonor” and “Morris” agreed that its social organization is more “flexible’ than the one of Libya, which ­ like Carthago of the past ­ delenda est. (See http://www.aporrea.org/internacionales/a120324.html in Spanish andhttp://ekonomiapolityczna.nowyekran.pl/post/25573,libia-delenda-est-dlaczego in Polish.)

So it seems that it will take quite a time to realize this “God’s plan” of purification of the Earth from all godless, non-Abra(ha)mic regimes: as the press of Sept 7th observed, Libyan gold reserves were recently removed from this endangered country, in a convoy of more than 100 armored vehicles, towards friendly Niger Which means that followers of New Cartagina “dictator” still have means to continue their “mission” began 42 years ago-


Plundering of Gaddafi’s privacy backfires!

[update  13. Sept. 2011]
      As I usually avoid watching TV News for I can’t stand more than five minutes of it without raising a blood pressure, I was just about to turn the TV set off when my eyes caught the scenes from Gaddafi’s tent.
    I am always wary of what other idiotic statement the speaker is going to make about someone I respect so much, so my finger was still on the switch. Something stopped me though…
     Although I quickly understood that what I am seeing are somebody’s private moments and that I am violating their privacy by watching it, just like the News are violating it by broadcasting such material without their consent, I remained glued to the TV…
I guess what I experienced was a mixture of anger, sadness, disgust at what the media will do to sell a war, but there was also a feeling like something has clicked to it’s place, a growing compassion, love and respect for Gaddafi the man.
It’s as if everything I was saying to my friends and the readers of this blog these 6 months, is embodied in that simple picture of Gaddafi the family man, living in a tent, his small piece of desert in much hated city.

 “The city is a fad, a shouting, a bedazzlement, stupid imitation, damned consumerism. making demands while not giving anything in return, a meaningless existence.” ‘THE CITY’  Muammar al Gaddafi

      You can see the sparse furniture, plastic chairs, heaters, a couch no European or American official would sit his ‘respectable” behind on, and an office space with computer and a printer- in a tent.
    You can see him playing with his grandchildren and letting them walk all over him.
    You can see him feeding them at dinner, again in a tent, at what looks like rather cold evening, because children and all the adults, except Gaddafi, are wearing winter jackets and look rather cold. He seams used to it.
Again, we see plastic table and chairs, no fancy tablewareno crystal glasses, no alcohol, no caviar or salmon, just a simple meal shared with family.
I wonder what does the family meal between the Sarkozy couple looks like. Plastic furniture is out of the question for the first lady of France, I suppose…Not to mention the Emir of Qatari,Prime Minister Cameron or the easy target – Berlusconi.
I was thinking of actually comparing photos of Gaddafi family leisure time and those who are so loud in campaigning against them, but I don’t want to lower myself to that level and soil this blog with photos of Berlusconi’s parties or Sarkozy’s romantic dinners with his heiress wife.
This is not about yellow press, and it seams to me everyone is forgetting that people are killed in Libya every day by the NATO, while we discuss Gaddafi’s dressing style, or his son’s relationships. There is a vicious campaign to make this a one man hunt, painting him in thedarkest colorrevealing his private moments so that they can be publicly dissected and widely commented.
   However, it seams to me that this latest media empire attempt of humiliation has backfired at them, despite their intentions. Luckily  for us, it looks like when waging between the potential to sell the exclusive video and possibly provoking sympathy for Gaddafi the man, the media mogulshave risked the deliberately designed anti-Gaddafi campaign for the sake of profit and exclusivity.
    Now, even those who never read anything written by the man himself, who never questioned the mainstream media attacks on his personality, who were raised on the ‘dictator’ caramel, can have a glimpse of the man behind it and maybe, just maybe, ask themselves, is thishow a ‘tyrant’ and a ‘ruthless dictator’ would behave, is this how he would have lived if he could have anything he wished for?
 “I began to melt within myself, as myself also began to melt within me. Each of us protected the other and we became one for the first time. Not because myself was not a part of me before, but because the hell on earth never gave me the time to spend time with myself, contemplate it, and commune with it. For we-I mean me and myself – were like dangerous criminals in your city, subjected to searches and surveillance. Even after our innocence was proven, and our identity became known, we were placed in prison guarded closely. Your purpose was always to prevent me and myself from coming together, so that you could sleep easily and contentedly. How beautiful hell is compared to your city! Why did you bring me back? I want to return to hell, and live in it. I would travel there without any passport, just give me myself so that I may go. The self I discovered had been disfigured by you, as you tried to corrupt its innocence. “
‘ESCAPE TO HELL’ Muammar al Gaddafi

© Zoomin

Ein kürzlich entdecktes Video zeigt den libyschen Ex-Machthaber beim Beten und Herumalbern mit zwei kleinen Jungen, bei denen es sich wahrscheinlich um seine Enkel handelt.


weiter lesen: http://web.de/magazine/nachrichten/aufruhr-arabien/13673994.html#.A1000145

Libyan Mujaheddin: beware of the dog food, crusaders use it to smuggle weapons!

Posted: 2011/09/01
From: Source   http://mathaba.net/news/?x=628443
A general view shows the empty street of Omar EL Moukhtar in Tripoli, Libya, 28 AUGUST 20211

From the crusader colonial war of aggressionagainst Libya there just came in a report, that a ship from thecrusader fortresses of Malta came to Tripoli with lot’s of dogfood on board without an easy to view destination.

When asked about the destination of the shipment, men representing the Libyan rebels failed to respond.

In Tripoli there are few dogs though, meanwhile people in Tripoli have to stand in long queues outside the city to get some food as all shops and markets are still closed in Libya`s capital.

So, what’s up with dog food? Some time ago, it was made public that dog food is one of the preferred ways for crusader terrorist organization Blackwater to smuggle weapons.

Mujaheddin of the Great Libyan Jamahiriya, beware of dog food. Inspect dog food well!



  1. Why do not you like Muammar Gadhafi? Do you know him personally? You would be quite surprised how really fine of a person with a devoted good heart he really is. Do not believe the Western Press lies about him. He is extremely moral, religious, and concerned. And now he has lost almost everything; and many of his family have been murdered; and all are displaced.
    A person who has direct contact to sources says that a group of well-trained professionals will try to “finish off” all members of the family of the leader. According to this person who does not wish to give his name, this group of mercenaries has orders to leave no family member alive, including the children.
    I would not think ANY NATO person really believes in God, or they would not be murdering. Hardly anyone believes in the 10 Commandments anymore. OBAMA scoffs at the Sermon on the Mount…. Not so, our brother-leader. In 2009, to a group of Church and religious leaders, al-Gadhafi expounded on Jesus’ sermon very beautifully. He considers Rev Farrakhan his special American deputy. The Quaran is the focal-point of the JAMAHIRIYA (his reasoning as to why Libya does not have a written constitution). To be religious does not necessarily mean to be a fanatic. Our Brother Leader has wonderfully shown this to us. al-Gadhafi is basicly a man of peace. He did not ask for this war. It was imposed upon the Libyan people. Now he must defend God’s principles before they totally destruct the glorious JAMAHIRIYA (the only nation upon this earth which really IS under the priciples and LOVE of God).
    al-Gadhafi is defending LIFE; not death.
    Yes, the Truth can be so easily wiped-off the pages of history, as if it never existed. It happened in the past, and it will happen again IF we are not vigilante and preservationists.
    The reports and you too,keep saying “palace of Gadhafi” “palaces of Gadhafi”!! Gadhafi NEVER had a palace!! Even his house ((when the kids were teens) was small and rather humble dwelling for a family with 11 children (3 adoptees) and Saifya and himself, etc. And before that he lived strictly IN A TENT!! He waited until all other Libyans over 18 could have a home FIRST!…and after they bombed his residence. He returned to a TENT!


    ‎”The last thing from them was that we saw Qaddafi’s convey enter Niger; what nonsense this isn’t the first time conveys have been seen in the area, from Mali, Chad & Algeria entering and exiting the Sahara desert. It’s as if it’s the first convey ever to enter Niger, be careful and look here and stay determined against these lies and false propaganda. They should be rubbed to dust.”


  2. Libyan Leader Muammar Qaddafi Speech on 08 September 2011
    Posted: 2011/09/08
    From: Mathaba http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628579

    ” These rats and cowards carry the genes of traitor-ship from their fathers and grandfathers…”

    In a speech early this morning, 8th of September aired as per usual on Syrian Arrai (Opinion) TV. Brother Leader Muammar Qaddafi addressed the Libyan people and a summary of his speech is as follows:-

    To our brave Libyan people that are resisting; the land of Libya is your property and your right from the days of your grandfathers and great grandfathers.

    Those that attempt to revoke it from you; are the insiders , foreign backed mercenaries and stray dogs, those foreigners that have resided in Libya for a long time that attempt to take the land of your grandfathers away from you.

    This is impossible we will never leaver the land of our grandfathers, their families back then where spies for Italy, and nowadays are spies for France and Britain the same sons are following in the footsteps of their fathers and grandfathers; the steps of dishonor.

    These rats and armed scum; are examples of their grandfathers. Each one of them is a clone and a mock-up of traitor-ship, they aren’t Libyan, ask about any of those that are backed by NATO; that destroys Libyan infrastructure and kills Libyan children; you’ll find that his grandfather and his dad where traitors. They carry the genes of traitors.

    Do you think those who carry the genes of traitors from their grandparents and great grandparents are going to decide the fate of the Libyan people? These people when they realize that the Libyan people have turned up the ratchet and have refused to accept them they revert to the dirty tricks of the villainous Arab TV channels and the gulf donkeys.

    They ask them to come up with any lie to save them, they tell them we feel the earth tremble under our feet; and we feel the masses advances towards us, and that we will lose the ground that we have gained, please save us with a lie or a rumor that will destroy the morale of the resistive Libyan people. That will destroy the morale of the sons of the Al-Fatah revolution.

    They ask the villainous horns of lies to save them with a lie or two, a rumor or two here and there. At the beginning they said he’s gone to Venezuela; it turned out to be a lie now they’re fed up and they’ve said he’s gone to Niger. To destroy your morale and make your surrender; this is an indication that they know that your morale and spirits are high.

    The people in Tripoli are getting ready to destroy the rats and capture the mercenaries which are like a pack of weasels with no agreeance amongst themselves. Their masters will abandon them soon, even their bomb supplies have been depleted nor do they have aircraft to fight with.

    They think that NATO will stay forever in the skies; NATO will return defeated, weather it likes it or not, because it’s financial position doesn’t allow it to continue with its air bombardments. They feel that they are on the battlefield alone.

    They bring the horns of lies to rescue them; by spreading rumors and lies such as Qaddafi has been injured, Qaddafi has fled, such and such has happened to Qaddafi. This means that they are facing a bottleneck and that their masters are going to desert them. That they will flip on one another.

    The Libyan people in its “Million Man Marches” indicated its position to the world, these people are still alive; they have nothing to resort to now but psychological warfare to influence you, do not be influenced by these psychological advertisements or lies. This should make you be able to mock the weak enemy that’s in front of you, a bunch of traitors and drunkards and a bunch of Islamists that have strayed from law and order; that have no objective but to destroy the country.

    They don’t even have a diplomatic or economic plan. They want to destroy the country; you saw what that the armed rebels did when they entered Tripoli, they looted it. They looted homes and stole the gold that belonged to the women.

    Each individual ran back to his tribe with the stolen booty (loot) , laid down his weapons and claimed that he is victorious. The Libyan people shouldn’t be silenced by such individuals and his great past. We shouldn’t leave our land to such menial cowards to steal the land of our grandfathers that are backed by the crusaders; that are now looking back at their failed colonialist plot and are repeating their calculations. They will be left on the battlefield alone, to resort to things that affect your morale the most.

    The last thing from them was that we saw Qaddafi’s convey enter Niger; what nonsense this isn’t the first time conveys have been seen in the area, from Mali, Chad & Algeria entering and exiting the Sahara desert. It’s as if it’s the first convey ever to enter Niger, be careful and look here and stay determined against these lies and false propaganda. They should be rubbed to dust.

    Allahu Akbar (God Is Great) – To the front !


    • MEDIA LIES!!! which our brother leader was referring to in his speech on 08 SEPT 2011:
      World news
      Muammar Gaddafi
      Libyan leaders fear Gaddafi may flee south across the border into Niger

      Niger’s foreign minister warns that the country does not have the means to close the border
      Niger border

      Lizzy Davies
      guardian.co.uk, Wednesday 07 September 2011 20.24 BST
      Article history

      A Libyan rebel soldier fires a machine gun into the air at the last outpost before Bani Walid from the Northern road towards Misrata. Photograph: Daniel Berehulak/Getty Images
      Libya’s new leaders were urgently trying to stop Muammar Gaddafi fleeing south as neighbouring Niger said it would be impossible to close its border, and evidence emerged suggesting the fugitive dictator was last seen in the very southern-most part of Libya.

      As the National Transitional Council (NTC) announced it had sent a delegation to Niamey to discuss how to stop “any kind of infiltration” by Gaddafi or his family, Niger’s foreign minister said the former ruler had neither crossed nor asked to cross the border.

      However, a day after it emerged that Gaddafi’s personal security chief had been admitted to the country, Niger’s foreign minister Mohamed Bazoum told the BBC that it had not decided whether it would accept Gaddafi himself or hand him over to the International Criminal Court (ICC). “We have no means to close the border … It is too big and we have very, very small means for that,” he said.

      Fathi Baja, the head of political affairs for the NTC, said the group was determined to try to prevent the dictator fleeing to Niger or Algeria. “I think he’s near one of these borders … and he’s looking for a chance to leave. We’re asking every country not to accept him. We want these people for justice,” Baja told Reuters.

      The leader of the interim government’s manhunt, who said late on Tuesday that Gaddafi had last been seen three days before near the village of Ghwat, around 200 miles from the border with Niger. Hisham Buhagiar told Reuters: “We have it from many sources that he’s trying to go further south, towards Chad or Niger.”

      It was not possible to confirm whether this supported another claim made on Wednesdayby a spokesman for Tripoli’s new military council, according to which Libyan fighters had located Gaddafi at an undisclosed location in Libya and had surrounded him on all sides. Anis Sharif said authorities were waiting to decide whether to capture or kill him. “He can’t get out,” Sharif told the Associated Press, without giving any more detail of the presumed location. “We are just playing games with him.”

      In a signal of just how mired in contradiction and confusion the manhunt is, Libya’s new deputy defence minister Mohammad Tanaz said the NTC did not know where Gaddafi was. Finding him, he added, was not a “priority”.

      As fresh detail emerged of the convoys reported to have crossed the Niger-Libya border in recent days, the government in capital Niamey acknowledged that Gaddafi’s former aide Mansour Dhao had been allowed in to the country “for humanitarian reasons”.

      Bazoum said that at least three convoys had come in to Niger containing, he claimed, several pro-Gaddafi businessmen, as well as Agaly ag Alambo, a Tuareg rebel leader. There were fewer than 20 of them, he added, and they would be free to stay in Niger. The US said it believed senior Gaddafi regime figures had also crossed over the border, but not Gaddafi himself.

      In Ougadougou, Burkina Faso, president Blaise Compaoré denied reports it had offered asylum to the former Libyan despot. As the search for Gaddafi continued, lead rebel negotiator Abdullah Kanshil said his son Saif al-Islam had been spotted in the town of Bani Walid on Monday and was probably still there. “Saif was sighted two days ago,” he said on Wednesday in Boshtata, about 50km from the town. “He’s coming in and out.” Kanshil said that Bani Walid was made up of 52 villages, three of which were still occupied by pro-Gaddafi gunmen. It was also possible that Saif could be hiding in its numerous caves. Another “big fish” might also be in the town, Kanshil added. Pressed for details, he replied: “Another of the sons. The ugly one.”

      Peace talks appeared to break down on Tuesday. But Kanshil insisted: “There is a lot of progress today in the conference with the clan leaders in Bani Walid. They are safe and sound. A few people waved their guns and cursed at them [after talks yesterday] but the people of Bani Walid made they got home to their families.”

      Asked if would be necessary to take Bani Walid by force, Kanshil said: “No, we hope not. The people of Bani Walid are with the revolution. But there are 80 snipers there, that’s our worry. Some in caves, some on roofs of buildings, some walking in places.” Any decision on an attack rested with the National Transitional Council, he said. “They are the leadership.”

  3. Muammar Kaddafi 08 Sept 2011:

    Libye ancestrale:
    Vous, brave peuple libyen qui résiste, la terre de Libye est votre propriété et votre droit ancestral, celui de vos ancêtres et de vos arrières grands-parents.
    Ceux qui tentent de piller votre terre, sont des initiés, des mercenaires étrangers, soutenus par des chiens errants, ces étrangers qui ont résidé en Libye pendant longtemps, et qui tentent maintenant de spolier vos terres.
    De la lutte de l’indépendance à aujourd’hui:
    Ceci est impossible. Nous ne sortiront jamais de la terre de nos ancêtres. Auparavant, il y a eu les espions de l’Italie. Aujourd’hui, ce sont des espions venus de France et de Grande-Bretagne. Ce sont les deux faces d’une même médaille, des grands-pères aux pères, en passant par les fils, toujours dans la même posture du déshonneur.
    Des renégats de Benghazi:
    Ces rats et ces déchets de nos armées sont à l’exemple de leurs grands-pères. Chacun d’eux est un clone, un symbole de la traîtrise, comme des maquettes de bateaux. Ils ne sont pas des Libyens. Informez-vous sur ceux qui sont soutenus par l’OTAN; ceux qui détruisent les infrastructures libyennes, tuent des enfants Libyens, vous verrez que leurs grands-pères et leurs pères, ont été des traîtres. Ils portent les gènes des traîtrises.
    Pensez-vous que ceux qui portent les gènes de traîtrises hérités de leurs grands-parents et arrières grands-parents peuvent décider du sort du peuple libyen ? Ces gens, quand ils réalisent que le peuple libyen refuse de leur accorder leur confiance, ils reviennent à la charge, avec des coups frauduleux des chaînes de télévision arabes des crapules et des ânes du Golfe.
    Ils leur demandent de venir avec n’importe quel mensonge pour les sauver. Ils leur disent qu’ils sentent la terre se dérober sous leurs pieds. Ils présentent que les masses viennent vers eux, et qu’ils vont perdre du terrain. Ils pleurnichent: « s’il vous plaît sauvez-nous, inventez n’importe quel mensonge créez une rumeur qui va détruire le moral du peuple irrésistible libyen. Cela va détruire le moral des fils de la révolution d’Al-Fatah. »
    Galvaniser le vrai peuple libyen:
    Ils redoublent de mensonges ces crapules. D’un mensonge à l’autre, d’une rumeur à l’autre, ils gigotent. Au début ils avaient annoncé que j’étais parti au Venezuela. Ceci s’est avéré être un mensonge. Maintenant, empêtrés dans leur déni, ils disent maintenant que je suis allé au Niger. Ceci, simplement pour vous détruire moralement et d’avoir votre reddition. C’est une indication. Ils savent que votre moral est haut. Votre côté spirituel élevé.
    Un mot pour Tripoli:
    Le peuple de Tripoli se prépare à détruire les rats. A capturer les mercenaires, cette petite meute de belettes sans consistance. Leurs maîtres les abandonnent déjà, leurs approvisionnements en bombe s’épuise, et ils n’auront plus à se battre avec des avions.
    Ils pensent que l’OTAN restera éternellement dans le ciel; l’OTAN repartira vaincu. Les conditions météorologiques, qu’elle les aime ou pas, c’est la situation financière qui ne lui permettra pas de poursuivre ses bombardements aériens. Elle sent même qu’elle est sur le champ de bataille toute seule.
    Elle apporte encore sa cohorte de propagande pour les sauver, en répandant des rumeurs et des mensonges tels que Kadhafi a été blessé, Kadhafi a fui, telle chose est arrivée à Kadhafi. Cela signifie qu’ils sont confrontés à un goulot d’étranglement et que leurs maîtres vont bientôt déserter.
    Vaillant peuple libyen:
    Le peuple libyen, dans sa « Grande Marche» qui avait regroupé un million d’âmes, avait indiqué sa position au monde. Ces gens sont encore vivants. Ils n’ont pas besoin, aujourd’hui, de recourir à la guerre psychologique pour vous influencer. Ils ne peuvent être influencés par ces publicités psychologiques et ces mensonges. Ces derniers devraient se moquer de la faiblesse de l’ennemi qui est en face. C’est un aréopage de traîtres d’ivrognes et d’islamistes, qui ont dévié de la loi et l’ordre; qui n’ont comme objectif que de détruire le pays.
    Qui sont les renégats ?
    Ils n’ont aucun programme, ni diplomatique ni économique. Ils veulent détruire simplement le pays. Vous avez vu quand ces rebelles armés sont entrés dans Tripoli ? Ils ont pillé des maisons et volé l’or des femmes. Après leurs forfaits, chaque individu a couru vers sa tribu avec le butin volé et prétendu qu’il était victorieux. Le peuple libyen ne doit pas être réduit au silence par ces individus au passé tortueux. Nous ne devons pas quitter notre terre ou les laisser à ces lâches, ces ingrats qui veulent voler la terre de nos aïeux et qui sont soutenus par les croisés. Hélas, leur complot colonialiste a échoué et revisitent leurs calculs. Ils seront laissés seuls, sur le champ de bataille.
    La dernière chose qu’ils viennent d’inventer: »nous avons vu passer Kadhafi aller vers le Niger ». Quelle absurdité, ce n’est pas la première fois que j’ai été vu dans la région, au Mali, au Tchad, et même en Algérie entrant et sortant du désert. C’est comme si c’était les premiers véhicules à entrer au Niger. Soyez prudents, et regardez attentivement, soyez déterminés contre ces mensonges et propagande grossière. Ils vont bientôt mordre la poussière.
    Dieu est grand, en avant…

  4. http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628556?rss
    ليبيا : رسالة من عائشة القذافي
    Posted: 2011/09/08
    From: Mathaba
    ” دم البطولة من أبي يجري في عروقي وأنا لا أعرف الاستسلام ”

    “حتى لو استشهد والدي وإخوتي ، سأواصل كفاحي ضد الارهابيين الاسلاميين في ليبيا.
    قريبا ، سوف أظهر في وسائل الإعلام لأعلن الحرب ضد الارهابيين و القاعدة في ليبيا ودول أخرى في العالم.
    خلي الغرب و مرتزقته ينتبه : عائشة القذافي لن نستسلم لتآمرات الشر.
    دم البطولة من أبي يجري في عروقي وأنا لا أعرف الاستسلام.
    حلف شمال الاطلسي والقتلة الغربين قتلوا زوجي وطفلتي ولكن يجب أن يعرفو الآن أن عائشة القذافي هي جندية.
    حتى على حساب حياتي الشخصية ، سأحرر بلادي من اثر الأرهابيين و القاعدة “.
    * * * *
    عائشة القذافي فتاة أنيقة ، متعلمة ، ذكية لدرجة الكفائة للتعامل مع أي مجتمع دولي. ولدت في عام 1976 ، أنجزت الكثير على الساحة الدولية وبما في ذلك شجاعته في الآونة الأخيرة رغم الأيام السلبية بسبب محبته لولده. عائشة القذافي حقا تستحق الإعجاب من
    الجميع ، ولا سيما النساء ، وأنها وقفت وقاتلت و لزالت تقاتل حتى الآن.
    حصلت عائشة على ترقية بعد تدريبه في الجيش الليبي ، الى رتبة جنرال ، والتي بحوزته حتى الآن. وقد كانت سفيرة السلام للأمم المتحدة ، إنسانية ومحامية من حيث المهنة. كما عينت سفيرة السلام للامم المتحدة في برنامج التنمية الوطنية في 24 يوليو 2009 ، لأجاد حلول إلى معالجة قضايا فيروس نقص المناعة البشرية / الإيدز ، والفقر وحقوق المرأة في ليبيا ، وكلها مواضيع حساسة في المجتمع الليبي.

    في فبراير 2011 قامت الأمم المتحدة بتجريد عائشة من دوره كسفيرة للسلام. ووضعت تحت حظرالسفر في 26 فبراير 2011 ، وذالك تحت قرار مجلس الأمن 1970 التابع للأمم المتحدة. وكان هذا القرار من قبل مجلس الأمن الدولي و تجريديه من منصب سفيرة سلام ورائه دوافع سياسية ، لأنه الوليات المتحدة وحلف شمال الاطلسي يدعمان المتمردين معا في ليبيا وكانوا يبحثون للأطاحة بالرئيس الليبي معمر القذافي من القيادة في ليبيا.

    في عام 2000 بعد فرض العقوبات على العراق ، وصلت عائشة القذافي الى بغداد مع وفد من 69 شص مسؤول. قبل وقت قصير من غزو العراق في عام 2003 ، قد التقت مع صدام حسين.
    في عام 2011 ، قيل انها احتجت بشدة على سياسات وزيرة الخارجية الامريكية هيلاري كلينتون والرئيس الأمريكي باراك أوباما ، داعيا إلى وساطة في الحرب الأهلية في ليبيا عن طريق منظمة دولية. انها عارضت بشدة الهجمات المعادية لصدام من الرئيس جورج دبليو بوش في العراق ، وعائشة كانت من المؤيدين لحزب الديمقراطيين في الولايات المتحدة.

    بعد هجوم الناتو مؤخرا على مجمع الزعيم الليبي معمر القذافي باب العزيزية ، قامت عائشة دعوى قضائية ضد حلف شمال الاطلسي لقصف مبنى في المجمع الذي قتل شقيقها ، سيف العرب معمر القذافي ، وابنتها الرضع الخاصة نت بين أحفاد ابيه الثلاثة الذين
    قتلو. حيث دعت ان الهجوم كان غير قنوني ، لأنه مبنى مدني.

    تقدم محامو السيدة عائشة القذافي برفع دعوة في بروكسل وباريس في يونيو 2011. و في 27 يوليو أفيد بأن أعضاء النيابة العامة البلجيكية رفضت التحقيق في شكوى جرائم الحرب التي رفعهت من القذافي ضد حلف شمال الأطلسي الذي يقع مقره الرئيسي في بلجيكا ، قائلا ان القانون في بلادهم يتطلب وجود علاقة بين الطاعن وبلجيكا و أنه لا ينطبق هذا الأمر في هذه القضية.
    كما قتل زوج عائشة القذافي ، أحمد القذافي القحصي ، الذي تزوجته في عام 2006 ، من قبل المتمردين في 26 يوليو 2011.

    عندما احتل مجمع معمر القذافي مجمع باب العزيزية في ليبيا من قبل المتمردين ، أصبح منزل عائشة القذافي أيضا هدفا للصطو والنهب. نهبت ممتلكاته الشخصية وأشياء ثمينة لعائشة من قبل المتمردين. وكانت هناك أقلية من المتمردين تسكر و ترقص في صالة الجلوس في المنزل و بعضهم قام بممارسة الجنس مع البنات النيجيرات الذين اتو بهم من بنغازي. حيث تم القبص على 90 بنت نيجيرية من منازل الذعارة في بنغازي ، و أرغموا على ممارسة الجنس في وقت لاحق مع المتمردين. #
    Arab News
    “The blood of the tournament from my father being in my veins and I do not know surrender.”

    HeyU Quality Ads
    “Even if you killed my father and my brothers, I will continue my fight against Islamic terrorists in Libya.
    Soon, I will show in the media to declare war against terrorists and al-Qaeda in Libya and other countries in the world.
    Khala West and his scant notice: Aisha Gaddafi Tamrat will not surrender to evil.
    The blood of the tournament from my father being in my veins and I do not know surrender.
    NATO and a Western killers killed my husband and my child, but should now be Aarafo Aisha Gaddafi is a soldier.
    Even at the expense of my personal life, liberate my country from terrorists, and after Al Qaeda. ”
    * * * *
    Aisha Gaddafi, elegant girl, educated, intelligent to the degree of efficiency to deal with any international community. I was born in 1976, accomplished much in the international arena and in the courage in recent days, despite the negative because of his love for his son. Aisha Gaddafi really deserves the admiration of
    Everyone, especially women, and they stood and fought and still fighting for now.
    Aisha got a promotion after his training in the Libyan army, to the rank of general, and in his possession so far. The Ambassador of the United Nations peacekeeping, humanitarian, and a lawyer by profession. Also appointed Ambassador of Peace for the United Nations in the national development agenda in the July 24, 2009, to shred solutions to address the issues of HIV / AIDS, poverty and women’s rights in Libya, which are all sensitive subjects in the Libyan society.

    In February 2011, the United Nations stripping of Aisha, his role as ambassador for peace. And placed under Hzerambassr in the February 26, 2011, and the piece under Security Council Resolution 1970’s the United Nations. This was a decision by the UN Security Council and abstract from the post of Ambassador of Peace and politically motivated, because the U.S. and NATO support the rebels together in Libya and were looking to overthrow the Libyan President Muammar Gaddafi of Libya’s leadership.

    In 2000, after the imposition of sanctions on Iraq, and Aisha Gaddafi arrived in Baghdad with a delegation of 69 hamulus administrator. Shortly before the invasion of Iraq in 2003, had met with Saddam Hussein.
    In 2011, is said to have strongly protested against the policies of Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, calling for mediation in the civil war in Libya through an international organization. It strongly opposed the anti-Saddam attacks from President George W. Bush in Iraq, and Aisha was one of the supporters of the Democrats in the United States.

    After NATO’s recent attack on the compound of Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi door Aziziyah, Aisha has filed a lawsuit against the NATO bombing of a building in the compound, which killed her brother, Muammar Gaddafi, Saif al-Arab, and her own infant Forum between the descendants of his father, the three
    Qthelo. , Where she called the attack was not Qnona, because a civilian building.

    Ms. Aisha’s lawyers filed a Gaddafi in Brussels and Paris in June 2011. And on July 27 it was reported that prosecutors Belgian refused to investigate a complaint of war crimes Rfht from Gaddafi against NATO, which is headquartered in Belgium, saying that the law in their country requires the existence of a relationship between the appellant and Belgium and that it does not apply to this matter in this case.
    The husband was killed Aisha Gaddafi, Gaddafi Qahsa Ahmed, whom she married in 2006, by the rebels in the 26 July 2011.

    When it occupied the complex compound Muammar Gaddafi door Azizia in Libya by the rebels, the home of Aisha Gaddafi also a target for looting and Sto. Looted personal belongings and valuables to Aisha by the rebels. There was a minority of rebels drunk and dancing in the living room in the house and some of them had sex with the girls, who Alnijerat Ato them from Benghazi. Where catch the 90 houses of the Nigerian girl Alzarh in Benghazi, and forced to have sex at a later time with the rebels. #
    Arab News

    Muammar Qadhafi: A family man
    Posted: 2011/09/10
    From: Mathaba

    Aisha Qadhafi: “My father gives me a lot of time, sometimes I feel that he is my compassionate friend…”
    young Aicha with daddy

    By Marie Edwards

    Muammar al-Qadhafi has always been a kind, wonderful, generous, loving and caring person, not only to Libya and to his family, but in general. This is a great video with him devotedly playing with his grandchildren. Muammar al-Qadhafi has more character and grace then anyone in the West and knows the true meaning of being a leader and a human being.

    Aisha al-Qadhafi says about her father: “My father gives me a lot of time, sometimes I feel that he is my compassionate friend. In any case, he is my remedy against pain and my fortress against grief.”

    Please enjoy watching this video.


    LOOTING of Muammar al-Gadhafi’s house. 27 AUG 2011 by “Rebels” :


    SAIF’s house looted, Kadhafi in White House:


    This is when NATO bombed the Library and children’s clinic in July, Libyans lost a cultural landmark as well:

  5. Information Warfare
    The “revolution” Jamahiriya Made In France followed by the “revolution” Syrian Made In Paris III.
    In an article entitled “Why Gaddafi if is taken A red cardboard” Pepe Escobar explains why Sarkozy has planned and executed this “revolution” by his troops on the ground the terrorists of al Qaeda/CNT led by special forces. Another “revolution” the Syrian times is prepared with the same type of ground troops already active and their new representative, Burhan Ghalioun, of “Syrian transitional national Council”, a protest Arab intellectual – the Mr clean of the Syrian opposition in exile in Paris III and therefore paid for by our tax – just to return his jacket to destabilize his country from the colonial France of the UMPS/EELV *.

    “Revolution” Made In France (made in France)

    Pepe Escobar explains in the chapter of this article to the title above and published on atimes.com 01/09/2011, why Gaddafi caught a red card. Following the translation of this chapter.

    « …There are enough red lines crossed by the Big G – and enough red cards – to transform this screen of PC red blood.

    Let’s start with the Basic. The frogs have done. It is always useful to repeat it: it is a French war. The Americans would call it even not a war but a “kinetic action” something of this kind. The “Council National de Transition” “rebels” is a French invention.

    And yes – it is above all the war of the new President Nicolas Sarkozy Napoleon. It is the George Clooney character in the film (poor Clooney). All other Cameron the David of Saudi until the Nobel Prize for peace and developer of multiple wars Barack Obama, all are the supporting.

    As already reported in Asia Times Online, this war began in October, 2010 when the Chief of Protocol of Gaddafi, Nuri Mesmari, defected to Paris, approached by the French secret services with concrete objective to concoct a military coup involving defections in Cyrenaïque.

    Sarko had a bag full of reasons to take revenge against the Big G.

    French banks told that Kadhafi was about to transfer his billions of euros in Chinese banks. Therefore Gaddafi could in no case become a model to be followed by other Arab nations or sovereign wealth funds.

    Of the French multinational told Sarko that Gaddafi had decided not to buy the Rafale combat aircraft and not to appeal to the French to build a nuclear power he was more concerned to invest in social services.

    The Total energy giant wanted a bigger share of the cake – that on the European side was widely eaten by ENI Italy, cause of Berlusconi, Bunga Bunga, a close friend of Gaddafi had made a deal complicated with him.

    Therefore the military coup was perfected in Paris December: the first popular events in Cyrenaïque in February – instigated mainly by the conspirators – have been diverted. The auto philosopher proclaimed Bernard Henri Levy flew his white jacket open on his torso to Benghazi to meet the “rebels” and telephoned Sarkozy, ordering him outright to recognize early March as being legitimate (not that Sarkozy had need of encouragement).

    The CNT was invented in Paris but the United Nations has also supported him as the “legitimate Government” of Libya – and NATO had no mandate to move from a “humanitarian” indiscriminate bombardment air exclusion zone culminating with the current seat of Surt.

    The French and the British developed what became the 1973 resolution of the United Nations. Washington simply join them. The US State Department has concluded an agreement with the House of Saud that it guarantees a vote of the Arab League as a prelude to a resolution of the United Nations and in Exchange it leave them quiet to suppress the pro democracy demonstrations in the Persian Gulf as they have done savagely to the Bahrain.

    The cooperation Council of the Gulf (GCC then become the Gulf Club against Revolutionary) also had tons of reason to hunt al-Gaddafi. The Saud would like to see to move a friend Emirate in North Africa especially by ending the bloody combat between Kadhafi and King Abdullah. The Emirates seek new places to invest and to “develop”. The very friendly Qatar with Sarko wanted to make the money – in dealing with new sales of oil of the rebels “legitimate.”

    The Secretary of State US, Hillary Clinton, is can be very close to the House of Saud or that of the al Khalifa to the Bahrain murderers. But the State Department took violently to Kadhafi for his “policies more nationalist in the energy sector” and to “libyaniser” the economy.

    The Big G, a fine player, would see what would happen. Since the Prime Minister Mohammad Mossadegh was overthrown mainly by the CIA in Iran in 1953, the rule is not to defeat Big oil. Not to mention the international financial system and banker – promotion of ideas such make that your economy is for the benefit of the local population.

    If you are pro your country you automatically against those who lead: Western banks, multinational Megas, the “investors” shadow.”seeking to take advantage of everything your country produces”

    Gaddafi has not only crossed the red lines but he also tried out in the Petro dollar quatimini, he tried to sell the idea of a single currency, the dinar to Africa or (most of the African countries supported) it invested billions of dollars in projects – La Grande Rivière, built by the men, a network of pipelines pumping fresh water from the desert to the Mediterranean coast – without genuflection before the altar of the World BankIt has invested in social programs for the poor South Saharan countries, it has funded the African Bank, allowing a large number of nations around once again, the World Bank and especially the IMF; It has funded a wide Western network independent African telecommunications system; He raised the standard of living in Libya. The list is not valid… »

    Full article in English

    Translation Mireille Delamarre

    La « Révolution » Libyenne Made In France Suivie De La « Révolution » Syrienne Made In Paris III.
    Dans un article intitulé «Pourquoi Kadhafi S’est Pris Un Carton Rouge» Pepe Escobar explique pourquoi Sarkozy a planifié et fait exécuter cette «révolution» par ses troupes au sol les terroristes d’al Qaeda/CNT dirigé par ses forces spéciales. Une autre «révolution» cette fois syrienne est en préparation avec le même type de troupes au sol déjà actives et leur tout nouveau représentant, Burhan Ghalioun, du”conseil national de transition syrien”, un intellectuel arabe contestataire – Le Mr Propre de l’opposition syrienne en exil enseignant à Paris III et donc payé par nos impôts – qui vient de retourner sa veste pour déstabiliser son pays à partir de la France coloniale de l’UMPS/EELV*.


    « Révolution »Made In France (Fabriquée En France)

    Pepe Escobar explique dans le chapitre de cet article à l’intitulé ci-dessus et publié sur atimes.com le 01/09/2011, pourquoi Kadhafi s’est pris un carton rouge. Ci-dessous la traduction de ce chapitre.

    « …Il y a suffisamment de lignes rouges franchies par le Big G – et suffisamment de cartons rouges – pour transformer cet écran de PC en rouge sang.

    Commençons par les basiques. Les Grenouilles l’ont fait. C’est toujours utile de le répéter : c’est une guerre française. Les Américains ne l’appellent même pas une guerre mais une « action kinétique » quelque chose de ce genre. Le « Conseil National de Transition » des « rebelles » est une invention française.

    Et oui – c’est avant tout la guerre du président néo Napoléon Nicolas Sarkozy. Il est le personnage de George Clooney dans le film (pauvre Clooney). Tous les autres de Cameron le David d’Arabie jusqu’au prix Nobel de la Paix et développeur de multiples guerres Barack Obama, tous sont des acteurs le soutenant.

    Comme il a été déjà rapporté dans Asia Times Online, cette guerre a commencé en Octobre 2010 quand le chef du protocole de Kadhafi, Nuri Mesmari, a fait défection à Paris, approché par les services secrets français avec pour objectif concret celui de concocter un coup d’état militaire impliquant des défections en Cyrenaïque.

    Sarko avait un sac plein de raisons pour se venger du Big G.

    Des banques françaises lui avaient dit que Kadhafi était sur le point de transférer ses milliards d’euros dans les banques chinoises. Donc Kadhafi ne pouvait en aucun cas devenir un modèle à suivre par d’autres nations arabes ou fonds souverains.

    Des multinationales françaises ont dit à Sarko que Kadhafi avait décidé de ne plus acheter les avions de combat Rafale et de ne pas faire appel aux Français pour construire une centrale nucléaire il était plus préoccupé d’investir dans des services sociaux.

    Le géant de l’énergie Total voulait une plus grosse part du gâteau – qui côté européen était largement mangé par ENI d’Italie, à cause du fait que Berlusconi, Bunga Bunga, un proche ami de Kadhafi avait passé un accord compliqué avec lui.

    Donc le coup militaire a été perfectionné à Paris jusqu’en Décembre : les premières manifestations populaires en Cyrenaïque en Février – à l’instigation principalement des comploteurs – ont été détournées. Le philosophe auto proclamé Bernard Henri Levy s’est envolé sa veste blanche ouverte sur son torse à Benghazi pour rencontrer les « rebelles » et a téléphoné à Sarkozy, lui ordonnant carrément de les reconnaître début Mars comme étant légitimes (non que Sarkozy eut besoin d’encouragement).

    Le CNT a été inventé à Paris mais l’ONU l’a aussi soutenu comme étant le gouvernement « légitime » de Libye – de même que l’OTAN n’avait pas de mandat de passer d’une zone d’exclusion aérienne à des bombardements indiscriminés « humanitaires » culminant avec l’actuel siège de Syrte.

    Les Français et les Britanniques ont rédigé ce qui est devenu la Résolution 1973 de l’ONU. Washington s’est contenté de se joindre à eux. Le département d’état US a conclu un accord avec la Maison des Saoud pour qu’elle garantisse un vote de la Ligue Arabe comme prélude à une résolution de l’ONU et en échange on les laisserait tranquille pour réprimer les manifestations pro démocratie dans le Golfe Persique comme ils l’ont fait sauvagement au Bahreïn.

    Le Conseil de Coopération du Golfe (CCG alors devenu le Club Contre Révolutionnaire du Golfe) avait également des tonnes de raison de chasser Kadhafi. Les Saoud aimeraient voir s’installer un émirat ami en Afrique du Nord tout spécialement en mettant fin au combat sanguinaire entre Kadhafi et le roi Abdallah. Les Emirats cherchent de nouveaux endroits pour investir et à « développer ». Le Qatar très ami avec Sarko voulait se faire du fric – en s’occupant des nouvelles ventes de pétrole des rebelles « légitimes ».

    La secrétaire d’état US, Hillary Clinton, est peut être très proche de la Maison des Saoud ou celle des meurtriers al Khalifa au Bahreïn. Mais le département d’état s’en est pris violemment à Kadhafi pour ses « politiques de plus en plus nationalistes dans le secteur de l’énergie » et aussi pour « libyaniser » l’économie.

    Le Big G, un fin joueur, aurait du voir ce qui allait se passer. Depuis que le premier ministre Mohammad Mossadegh a été renversé principalement par la CIA en Iran en 1953, la règle c’est de ne pas contrarier Big Pétrole. Sans mentionner le système international financier et banquier – en faisant la promotion d’idées telles faire que votre économie soit pour le bénéfice de la population locale.

    Si vous êtes pro votre pays vous êtes automatiquement contre ceux qui dirigent : les banques occidentales, les mégas multinationales, les « investisseurs « de l’ombre qui cherchent à profiter de tout ce que votre pays produit.

    Kadhafi n’a pas seulement franchi ces lignes rouges mais il a aussi essayé de sortir en quatimini du pétro dollar, il a essayé de vendre à l’Afrique l’idée d’une monnaie unique, le dinar or (la plupart des pays africains la soutenaient) il a investi des milliards de dollars dans des projets – La Grande Rivière construite par les hommes, un réseau de pipelines pompant de l’eau fraîche du désert jusqu’à la côte méditerranéenne – sans génuflexion devant l’autel de la Banque Mondiale, il a investi dans des programmes sociaux pour les pauvres pays sud sahariens, il a financé la Banque Africaine, permettant ainsi à un grand nombre de nations de contourner une nouvelle fois la Banque Mondiale et surtout le FMI ; il a financé un large système de télécommunications africain indépendant des réseau occidentaux ; il a élevé le niveau de vie en Libye. La liste est sans fin… »

    Article intégral en anglais

    Traduction Mireille Delamarre

    Mireille Delamarre writes on 27 AUGUST 201116:22 :

    Information Warfare
    Libya new lie: The leaders of CNT do are step A Tripoli – made immediately stop this bloody racist orgy facing across the elected representatives and candidates for the Elections
    Propagandistic mass media would like to believe that the leaders of the CNT presented as the only representative of the Libyan people have settled in Tripoli. It is false false archi BBC inadvertently revealed. Tripoli ethnic cleansing massacres of civilians by the terrorists of the CNT continue and town of Gaddafi, Surt is an ethnic cleansing / crime against humanity of large-scale led by NATO bombers. Must be that this bloody orgy racist ceases immediately. Speak out against these war crimes and humanity in Libya everywhere where those who ordered them, commit, or support them show in public. Engage elected officials and candidates in the upcoming elections.


    Racist liquidation by the CNT of African migrants

    According to the propagandistic mass media Tripoli was “released”. Le Figaro, this propaganda of Dassault/Sarkozy/complex military industrial and financial body pushed the ignominy yesterday in grading:

    A Tripoli, worthy of the liberation of Paris scenes. “.

    Such abject comparison: French resistance compared to a band of terrorists including 1/3 belong to Al Qaeda and seeks to impose an extremist Islamist regime in Libya with military help from NATO type monarchy of Saudi Arabia, stirring most of the time the flag of the Libyan monarchy, aroused no reaction it seems are “outraged” to very selective indignation it seems particularly in Mr Hessel who – with all the respect of the – a peated a “”. lead in supporting Mrs Aubry.

    Mr Hessel knows that Mrs. Aubry congratulated Mr Sarkozy for the massacres on behalf of the R2P – responsibility to protect – become concretely on the ground: responsibility of Piller. For the record this is the exact words of Mrs. Aubry who Struts it and its PS in La Rochelle avatars this weekend about the massacres of NATO and their terrorist back-up troops of the CNT:

    “I am delighted that the France was on the initiative (…)”. ” “the French army gave a beautiful image of the France who had a little damaged by the visit to Gaddafi in Paris”

    DSK is re – enjoyed there is little in violating a woman of the House of the Sofitel New York, Aubry welcomed as NATO / La France de Sarkozy violates the sovereignty of the Libya to the plunder.

    Is this the image of the France you want to give to the world Mr Hessel you who have participated in the drafting of the Declaration of human rights?!

    Today, mass propaganda continues. Tripoli would have been released and secure – even if these media to prepare massive intervention on the ground of NATO soldiers Jordanian, Qatari and the UEA and C ° bearing the blue helmets of the United Nations are fighting sporadic on-site – to the point that the leaders of the CNT have installed their Office.

    Falsehood, one more!

    Despite the saying that the terrorists of Benghazi transferred their branch in Tripoli which would be in the hands of the rebels after a week of hard fighting – the CNT had said a week ago that it would take 24 or 48 h – the BBC has revealed inadvertently that this was a pure lie.

    In the middle of a section of the 26/08/2011 entitled “Horror scenes at Tripoli hospital” chronicling the macabre discovery has witnessed a corresponding BBC Abu Salim hospital deemed neighbourhood pro kafdhafi article in which the BBC engages in shameless propaganda West on what is happening in Libya, information on this alleged transfer of the leaders of the CNT in Tripoli are provided :

    «… During this time the rebel administration, the CNT, said that half of these leaders moved the city of Benghazi to Tripoli East.

    “Officials have said that they went by air on a makeshift airfield on a broad road in the Nafusa mountains to the West.” Reported that they remain outside the capital and arrive only in the day.

    But the President of the CNT Mustafa Ab dul Jalil, and other key leaders remain in the East because of the lack of security in Tripoli and the stream of foreign dignitaries who want the rencontrer… »

    In other words some leaders of the CNT are stationed on a makeshift airport in the Nafusa mountains to the West and make a few fairways returns to Tripoli for the photo that rush to publish the propagandistic media.

    Key leaders including friend agent of the CIA Jalil Sarkozy and BH Levy, they are in Benghazi where they wait for the parade of leaders including Sarkozy which is soon to go to Libya to like his idol G.W. Bush to declare “Mission accomplished”. They will come to claim their share of the spoils (contracts for oil, gas, ready reimbursed in gold bars).

    Meanwhile the Libyan civilian massacres continue in Tripoli but also in Sirte from which is originally Qaddafi bombed by NATO. Surt being mostly pro Gaddafi population bombardment intended to sow terror as did NATO to tripoli and are the prelude to ethnic cleansing bloody that the terrorists of the CNT will run when the track will be free.

    The Libya war is a war for NATO with the endorsement of the United Nations. These institutions and their leaders whose leaders of NATO member countries will have accountability for war crimes and crimes against humanity committed on behalf of the abject liability protection R2P practical converted into liability of Piller.

    Pending a court type Nuremberg to be for this bloody racist orgy in Libya to stop immediately.

    You to act!

    Is it not Mr Hessel?

    Speak out against these war crimes and humanity in Libya everywhere where those who ordered them, commit, or support them show in public.

    Push dice now elected officials and candidates in the upcoming elections: election Senate, presidential, parliamentary with a single question: are making you dice now for the Afghanistan, the Libya, the Middle East? Require the facts nothing that facts.

    Wars have cost – extremely heavy human for those undergoing, financial and social for those who leave do their bloodthirsty leaders – they must be one of the key issues of the upcoming elections.

    Not in our name or for our country the France sold by clique of criminals UMPS to the industrial military complex banker and financier.

    A rally September 3 at 14: 00 provided Republic square in Paris against war

    PS: The absurd in all this is that in France Marine Le Pen daughter of a colonialist who practiced the gégène in Algeria is the only shout high and strong opposition to the war in Afghanistan and Libya while even the far left to the best was the worst approves, is it not Mr Mélanchon?

    Photo above site of Michel Collon Investig’action

    La « Révolution » Libyenne Made In France Suivie De La « Révolution » Syrienne Made In Paris III.

    Dans un article intitulé «Pourquoi Kadhafi S’est Pris Un Carton Rouge» Pepe Escobar explique pourquoi Sarkozy a planifié et fait exécuter cette «révolution» par ses troupes au sol les terroristes d’al Qaeda/CNT dirigé par ses forces spéciales. Une autre «révolution» cette fois syrienne est en préparation avec le même type de troupes au sol déjà actives et leur tout nouveau représentant, Burhan Ghalioun, du”conseil national de transition syrien”, un intellectuel arabe contestataire – Le Mr Propre de l’opposition syrienne en exil enseignant à Paris III et donc payé par nos impôts – qui vient de retourner sa veste pour déstabiliser son pays à partir de la France coloniale de l’UMPS/EELV*.
    Accueil > Guerre De L’Information
    Guerre De L’Information
    Libye Nouveau Mensonge: Les Dirigeants du CNT Ne Sont Pas A Tripoli – Faites Cesser Immédiatement Cette Orgie Sanguinaire Raciste En Interpellant Partout Les Elus Et Candidats Aux Elections
    Les médias de masse propagandistes voudraient faire croire que les dirigeants du CNT présenté comme le seul représentant du peuple libyen se sont installés à Tripoli. C’est faux archi faux la BBC par inadvertance l’a révélé. A Tripoli les massacres/nettoyage ethnique des civils par les terroristes du CNT continuent et la ville d’origine de Kadhafi, Syrte fait l’objet d’un nettoyage ethnique/crime contre l’humanité de grande ampleur mené par les bombardiers de l’OTAN. Il faut que cette orgie sanguinaire raciste cesse de suite. Manifestez contre ces crimes de guerre et contre l’humanité en Libye partout où ceux qui les ordonnent, les commettent ou les soutiennent se montrent en public. Interpellez les élus et les candidats aux prochaines élections.

    Liquidation raciste par le CNT de travailleurs immigrés africains

    Selon les médias de masse propagandistes Tripoli aurait été « libéré ». Le Figaro, cet organe de propagande de Dassault/Sarkozy/complexe militaro industriel et financier a poussé l’ignominie hier en titrant :

    « A Tripoli, des scènes dignes de la libération de Paris ».

    Une telle comparaison abjecte: résistance française comparée à une bande de terroristes dont 1/3 appartiennent à Al Qaeda et cherche à imposer en Libye grâce à l’aide militaire de l’OTAN un régime islamiste extrémiste type Monarchie d’Arabie Saoudite, agitant la plupart du temps le drapeau de la monarchie libyenne , n’a suscité aucune réaction semble-t-il des « indignés « à l’indignation très sélective on dirait surtout celle de Mr Hessel qui – avec tout le respect qui lui est du – a pété un plomb en soutenant Mme Aubry.

    Mr Hessel sait-il que Mme Aubry a félicité Mr Sarkozy pour les massacres commis au nom de la R2P -Responsabilité de Protéger- devenue concrètement sur le terrain : Responsabilité de Piller. Pour mémoire voilà les paroles exactes de Mme Aubry qui se pavane elle et ses avatars PS à La Rochelle ce weekend à propos des massacres de l’OTAN et leurs supplétifs terroristes du CNT :

    « “Je me réjouis que la France ait été à l’initiative (…) l’armée française a donné une belle image de la France qui avait été un peu abîmée par la visite de Kadhafi à Paris”

    DSK se ré -jouissait il y a peu en violant une femme de chambre du Sofitel à New York, Aubry se réjouit que l’OTAN/ La France de Sarkozy viole la souveraineté de la Libye pour la piller.

    Est -ce là l’ image de la France que vous voulez donner au monde entier Mr Hessel vous qui avez participé à la rédaction de la Déclaration des Droits de l’Homme ???????!!!!!!!!!!!!!

    Aujourd’hui, la propagande de masse continue. Tripoli aurait été libéré et sécurisé -même si ces médias pour préparer une intervention massive au sol de l’OTAN ou de soldats jordaniens, qataris et de l’UEA et C° portant les casques bleus de l’ONU font état de combats sporadiques sur place – au point que les dirigeants du CNT y auraient installé leur bureau.

    Mensonge, un de plus !

    Malgré les unes affirmant que les terroristes de Benghazi ont transféré leur direction à Tripoli qui serait aux mains des rebelles après une semaine de durs combats – le CNT avait affirmé il y a une semaine que cela prendrait 24 ou 48h – la BBC a révélé par inadvertance que cette affirmation était un pur mensonge.

    Au beau milieu d’un article du 26/08/2011 intitulé « Horror scenes at Tripoli hospital » relatant la découverte macabre dont a été témoin un correspondant de la BBC à l’hôpital d’Abu Salim un quartier réputé pro kafdhafi article dans lequel la BBC se livre à la propagande éhontée occidentale sur ce qui se passe en Libye, des informations sur ce prétendu transfert des dirigeants du CNT à Tripoli sont fournies :

    «… Pendant ce temps l’administration rebelle, le CNT, a dit que la moitié de ces dirigeants se sont déplacés de la ville de Benghazi à l’Est à Tripoli.

    « Des responsables ont dit qu’ils s’étaient rendus par avion sur un aérodrome de fortune sur une large route dans les montagnes Nafusa à l’Ouest. On rapporte qu’ils restent en dehors de la capitale et s’y rendent seulement dans la journée.

    Mais le président du CNT Mustafa Ab dul Jalil, et d’autres principaux leaders restent à l’Est à cause du manque de sécurité dans Tripoli et à cause du flux de dignitaires étrangers qui veulent les rencontrer… »

    Autrement dit certains dirigeants du CNT sont stationnés sur un aéroport de fortune dans les montagnes de Nafusa à l’Ouest et font quelques allées retours à Tripoli pour la photo que s’empressent de publier les medias propagandistes.

    Quant aux principaux dirigeants dont l’agent de la CIA Jalil ami de Sarkozy et de BH Levy, ils sont à Benghazi où ils attendent le défilé des dirigeants dont Sarkozy qui compte bientôt se rendre en Libye pour à l’instar de son idole G.W. Bush y déclarer « Mission Accomplie ». Ils viendront y réclamer leur part du butin (contrats pour le pétrole, le gaz, prêts remboursés en lingots d’or).

    Pendant ce temps les massacres de civils libyens continuent à Tripoli mais aussi à Syrte d’où est originaire Kadhafi bombardée par l’OTAN. La population de Syrte étant majoritairement pro Kadhafi ces bombardements visent à semer la terreur comme l’a fait l’OTAN à tripoli et sont le prélude à un nettoyage ethnique sanglant que les terroristes du CNT exécuteront dés que la voie sera libre.

    La guerre contre la Libye est une guerre menée par l’OTAN avec l’aval de l’ONU. Ces institutions et leurs dirigeants dont les dirigeants des pays membres de l’OTAN devront rendre des comptes pour les crimes de guerre et crimes contre l’humanité commis au nom de l’abjecte R2P Responsabilité de Protéger concrètement transformée en Responsabilité de Piller.

    En attendant un Tribunal type Nuremberg pour se faire il faut que cette orgie sanguinaire raciste en Libye cesse tout de suite.

    A vous d’agir !

    N’est ce pas Mr Hessel ?!

    Manifestez contre ces crimes de guerre et contre l’humanité en Libye partout où ceux qui les ordonnent, les commettent ou les soutiennent se montrent en public.

    Interpellez dés maintenant les élus et les candidats aux prochaines élections : élection sénatoriale, présidentielle, parlementaire avec une seule question : que comptez vous faire dés aujourd’hui pour l’Afghanistan, la Libye, le Moyen Orient ? Exigez des faits rien que des faits.

    Les guerres ont un coût – humain extrêmement lourd pour ceux qui les subissent, financier et social pour ceux qui laissent faire leurs dirigeants sanguinaires – elles doivent être l’un des principaux enjeux de ces élections à venir.

    Pas en notre nom ni au nom de notre pays La France vendue par la clique de criminels UMPS au complexe militaro industriel banquier et financier.

    Un Rassemblement le 3 septembre à 14h00 est prévu place de la République à Paris contre cette guerre

    PS : L’absurde dans tout cela c’est qu’en France Marine Le Pen fille d’un colonialiste ayant pratiqué la gégène en Algérie est la seule à clamer haut et fort son opposition à la guerre en Afghanistan et en Libye alors que même l’extrême gauche au mieux se tait au pire approuve, n’est ce pas Mr Mélanchon ?!

    Photo ci-dessus site de Michel Collon Investig’action

    Samedi 27 Août 2011
    Mireille Delamarre
    Lire l’article
    Plan De Gouvernorat Colonial Post Kadhafi De Ban Ki Moon : Le Britannique Ian Martin Sera Gouverneur.

    Un document interne du secrétariat de Ban Ki Moon dont une copie a été obtenue par le site Inner City Press a planifié en détails l’après Kadhafi avant même l’attaque contre Tripoli. Ce document auquel les états membres de l’ONU n’ont pas eu accès – ce qui en dit long sur la dictature onusienne du secrétaire marionnette des US – prévoit un gouverneur britannique pour la Libye, Ian Martin. Les mesures prises pour recoloniser la Libye se feront sous la 1973, pas de nouveau vote. Tous ceux qui se sont abstenus, Russes Chinois en tête, apprécierons !

    un1libya1vandewalle.pdf (3.2 Mo)
    martin1unlibya1icp.pdf (603.85 Ko)

  6. Dennis South

    As I witnesss the murderous, genocidal attrocities carried out by the followers of the so-called National Transitional Council (known to lovers of Gaddafi and the Jamahiriya as “the rats”), I think of the infamous
    Reign of Terror that occurred between 1793 and 1794 during the French Revolution. History claims that about 16,594 people were excuted under the guillotine, charged with counter-revolutionary activities. Another 40,000 prisoners, also accused of counter-revolutionary activites, were summarily excuted, without trial. or died awaiting trial.

    Although the indiscriminate murder of any human being is wrong,

    the Reign of Terror of the French Revolution was nonsense because King Louis XVI already abducated himself from all powers three years prior to the Estates Generale.

    “Our Lord’s Eldest Daughter”:

    the importance of King Louis XVI:

    In 1773, finally surrendering to an unjust 20 year campaign of intrigues and calumny, Pope Clement ordered the Order of the Society of Jesus, formerly the bulwurk of the Church (its official right-hand and its most highly regarded) the arm of missionary might and yeald, severed! The driving force behind this were the writers and thinkers of the new “French Enlightenment” movement, agnostics and athiests. Voltaire wrote:

    Once we have destroyed the Jesuits, we should have easy work with the Church.

    …Things were made worse when Louis XVI answered the request of Benjamin Franklin, America’s ambassador to France, to help intervene in the American War for Independence. France gave America monies, troops, and a young Marquis deLafayette. The cost of maintaining fleets and armies in the Western Hemisphere for more than three years bankrupted the French government. Baron deMontesquieu[1689-1755] is famous for his theory of the separation of powers, in order to prevent the absolute supremacy of the majority (expressed as it normally would be through the people’s representatives inthe legislature.
    deMontesquieu despised despotic government in all forms, whether of the few, or of the masses. Montesquieu’s principles were incorporated into the first of the French Governments under Louis XVI (set-up during this prephase to the French Revolution)…finding its way (with very few changes) eventually into the American Constitution of the United States. Stirring passions up in Strasbourg, Jean-Frederick Oberlin wrote: “Patrioticsm, Revolution and Liberation”.

    In 1777, the general director of France, Necker, undertook to restore public credit in France by ignaugerating a taxation policy which placed the burdens upon the poor and the rich alike. He likewise instituted various internal reforms, improved the administration of justice and sought the abolition of surfdom. These reforms were heartedly supported by King Louis XVI.
    Louis was a man of fine physique and skilled in both the manual arts and sciences. Louis grew up with a sincere regard for the loftier elements which enoble man.
    Even though the people of France were in strong sympathy with the American Independence movement (giving also moral support as well as financial support) discontent grew in France where the economy grew weaker and weaker.

    In 1787, Louis XVI summoned an assembly of Nobles in the hope that the chief magnates of the realm might consent to bearing a sphere of physical burden. The Noble’s and Bishopric’s voluntary participation unfortunately was not enough: many would not give-up their tax-exempt status. It was then that the demand arose for convocation of the Estates Generale. (This body was composed-of representatives of the three great Estates or classes of the nation.) The Summer of 1788 saw Louis zield to the popular clamor by summoning a meeting of the Estates in May, the following year. [The three orders should not sit together and vote by head.]
    Since the Commoners had already been granted a number of representatives equal to that of the two other classes comined, it was plain that the Third Estate, by drawing occasional support from the Nobles and Clergy, would be able to control the whole body!

    After a month of wrangling, the Third Estate of 17 JUNE, boldly proclaimed itself: “The National Assembly”; and, invited the members of the privileged orders to join in its work. Many of them actually did! So, within two days, a majority of the Clergy went over, as well as a sprinkling of the Nobles. The Commoners and their allies were of such a vast number under the leadership of Mirabeau and the Abb Sieyes, that they went to the tennis court and bound themselves by a solemn oath…on the 20th June 1789…not to separate until they had drafted a Constitution for France. By proclaiming the authority to remake the government in the name of the people, the Estates Generale asserted its right to act as the highest sovereign power in the nation.

    On the 27th of June, King Louis XVI, virtually conceded his right, by ordering the remaining delegates of the privileged
    classes to meet with the Third Estate as members of a National Assembly.
    Three years passed-on; and on the 20th of June, commemorating “The Oath of the Tennis Court” Versailles was attaked. King Louis fled to the National Assembly (believing that the representative body which he helped to institute, would keep him safe from the mob-masses of Paris).

    Instead of safety, in Church assylum, they placed Louis under arrest on charges of “conspiracy against national freedom”!!! (They said that his attempt to escape France
    at Varennes in 1791 proved his “disloyalty to France”!) In a mockery of a trial, in such similitude as that of Our Savior, on the 16th of January he was voted “guilty” [supposedly by a count of 690 out-of 719]. Louis was condemned to the guillotine….IN REALITY, it was Louis XVI’s abolitionist brother [the so-called Louis XVIII] residing in Belgium who damaged his reputation…making the populace totally forget that Louis XVI had already relinquished all surviving powers he may have had THREE-YEARS PRIOR to the Estates Generale! Louis XVI’s last words before his execution were:

    I die innocent, I pray that my blood come not upon France.

    How noble and selfless this last statement of Louis XVI (so in-tune with Our Savior)….
    And thus began the great bloodbath, and the horrible (un-heard-of prior) persecution of the Holy Roman-Catholic Church in France: Christ’s Eldest daughter….

    1: http://api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&drKey=1117&loc=http%3A%2F%2Ftheratzingerforum.yuku.com%2Ftopic%2F1090%2FLouis-XVI-and-France&v=1&libid=1315493667176&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.weltchronik.de%2Fws%2Fbio%2Fl%2Flouis16%2Flk01793a-Louis16KoenigVonFrankreich-17540823b-17930121d.htm&ref=http%3A%2F%2Ftheratzingerforum.yuku.com%2Fforums%2F12%3Fpage%3D2&title=Louis%20XVI%20and%20France%20in%20History%20Forum&txt=Bio%20of%20King%20Louis%20XVI&jsonp=vglnk_jsonp_13154938548731

    2: http://api.viglink.com/api/click?format=go&drKey=1117&loc=http%3A%2F%2Ftheratzingerforum.yuku.com%2Ftopic%2F1090%2FLouis-XVI-and-France&v=1&libid=1315493667176&out=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.univie.ac.at%2Figl.geschichte%2Feuropa%2FFR%2FPetz%2FStartseite.htm&ref=http%3A%2F%2Ftheratzingerforum.yuku.com%2Fforums%2F12%3Fpage%3D2&title=Louis%20XVI%20and%20France%20in%20History%20Forum&txt=Das%20Leid%20in%20der%20franzischen%20%20Revolution&jsonp=vglnk_jsonp_13154939001002
    It is painfully ironic that the rats, called “democracy lovers,” who are counter-revolutionaries, have launched a Reign of Terror
    of their own that has nothing whatsoever to do with the uprooting of a deeply entrenched, oppressive system. To the contrary, their Reign of Terror is once again designed not to bring liberty to the people, but to enslave the people; to place them under the ruling monarchies and systems of the Europeans and their brothers in the U.S.

    In thinking about The Leader, and his continued ability to elude his enemies, I liken him the heroic Scarlet Pimpernel, although I also note, of course, the irony of the reversal of roles. Instead of being an aristocrat, he is being chased by the global aristocrisy. Instead of being in support of kingship and privilege, as the Scarlet Pimpernel was, he fights against kingship and privilege.

    Instead of being a counter-revolutionary, he is the world’s greatest revolutionary, perhaps in all of human history. And, instead of being chased by the new revolutionary government of a liberated France, he is chased by a counter-revolutionary government of an oppressive France, as well as their paid lackies, the rats.

    So, while there can be no direct comparsion of Muammar Gaddafi to The Scarlet Pimpernel, in all aspects, I find it personally satisfying to know that, on some level, there is a direct comparison, and it stems from a fundamental Attribute of The Divine: justice. It is well-known that the Reign of Terror in France wrongly sent thousands of innocent aristocrats to their deaths. Even The French Revolution was not for a just cause, and certainlythe killing of innocents was not.

    Today, Muammar is our Scarlet Pimpernel, but not for the aristocrats. He works to save the suffering masses of the world from the economic, political, social, spiritual and “religious” guillotenes of the the Euro-American aristocracy–a complete reversal of roles. And, just as was the case with original Scarlet Pimpernel,

    They seek him here.
    They seek him there.
    Those Frenchies seek him everywhere.



    Résumé pour Septembre 8, 2011

    Thu, 08/09/2011 – 11:57 | administrateur
    Tripoli: les combats dans la ville, en banlieue nord-ouest avec de l’artillerie. Ainsi, dans le Edden Salah détruit trois jeeps rebelle avec 6. Il ya des informations sur les progrès d’une équipe lourdement armés de Khamis al-Kadhafi, à Tripoli, le sud de banlieue espace Az Zawiya.

    Bani Walid: cheikhs et chefs tribaux Rafla décidé de ne pas prendre la ville, les défenseurs sont confiants dans leurs capacités et sont déterminés à lutter contre la coalition coloniale à la fin. Il ya eu des conflits des rapports sur le nombre de bandes, les assiégeants Bani Walid (7 fois la différence). Hier également été informé des forces de la coalition d’attaque infructueuse dans la ville, dans laquelle les défenseurs ont détruit des centaines de tribus des attaquants.

    Dans le domaine de la coalition convoi estragon embuscade – 14 rebelles tués. Ne pas arrêter le bombardement de Syrte. Les combats dans Az Zawiya, ITAR-TASS sur les atrocités des rebelles dans cette ville. Contre les factions de la coalition coloniale, basée dans la région de missiles tactiques utilisées Misurata “Scud” (grosses explosions Septembre 5).

    Il est intéressant de mettre en évidence ce qui se passe à Benghazi: l’entropie sociale dans les relations entre les quatre centres de pouvoir Cyrénaïque (Obeid tribu et Haruba, les gangs islamiste de Benghazi et au Moyen-Orient mercenaires), il semble, a atteint une masse critique. Il a été rapporté des affrontements entre différentes factions des rebelles, et même l’utilisation de la puissance aérienne de l’OTAN contre les rebelles de Benghazi. Peut-être, les tribus de la Cyrénaïque, hlebnuv pleine liberté et le vent du changement, a décidé d’adhérer au syndicat de tribus qui soutiennent la Jamahiriya gouvernement. Informations sur ce déjà commencé à arriver et maintenant vérifiée.

    Algérie va envoyer une aide humanitaire à la Libye. Les pirates syrienne et algérienne a fait une attaque DDoS sur le site de télévision Al-Jazira. Confirmé par les informations des rapports précédents sur la propagation de la guérilla dans certaines parties de l’Afrique centrale: Les gouvernements du Mali et le Niger ne cachent pas l’inquiétude en rapport avec l’apparence d’hommes armés qui déstabilisent l’intérieur du Sahara dans le pays en cas de soutenir les rebelles par les autorités de la SNP.

    Dans les loyalistes dernières 72 heures ont tué au moins 128 rebelles, 25 véhicules, dont deux réservoirs. Selon diverses estimations, de 70 à 80 pour cent de la Libye sur le territoire libyen contrôlé par l’armée et les tribus fidèles au colonel Kadhafi.

    Eugène Gajvoronsky

    Summary for 08 September 2011

    Thu, 08.09.2011 – 11:57 | admin
    Tripoli: the fighting in the city, in north-western suburbs with artillery. Thus, in the Salah Edden destroyed three rebel jeeps with 6. There is information about the progress of a heavily armed team of Khamis al-Gaddafi in Tripoli, the southern suburbs area Az zawiya.

    Bani Walid: sheikhs and tribal elders Rafla decided not to take the city, the defenders are confident in their abilities and are determined to fight against the colonial coalition to end. There have been conflicting reports about the number of bands, the besiegers Bani Walid (7-fold difference). Yesterday also was informed of the unsuccessful attack coalition forces in the city, in which the defenders were destroyed hundreds of tribes of the attackers.

    In the area of coalition convoy Tarragon ambushed – 14 rebels killed. Do not stop the bombing of Sirte. Fighting in Az zawiya, ITAR-TASS reported on the atrocities the rebels in this city. Against colonial factions of the coalition, based in the area of ​​tactical missiles used Misurata “Scud” (big explosions September 5).

    It is worth to highlight what is happening in Benghazi: social entropy in the relations between the four centers of power Cyrenaica (Obeid tribe and Haruba, Islamist gangs of Benghazi and Middle Eastern mercenaries), it seems, has reached critical mass. There have been reports of clashes between different factions of rebels, and even the use of NATO air power against the rebels of Benghazi. Perhaps, the tribes of Cyrenaica, hlebnuv full freedom and the wind of change, decided to join the union of tribes that support the government Jamahiriya. Information about this already started to arrive and now verified.

    Algeria is going to send humanitarian aid to Libya. The Syrian and Algerian hackers made a DDoS attack on the website of Al-Jazeera television. Confirmed by information from previous reports on the spread of guerrilla warfare in parts of Central Africa: Governments of Mali and Niger do not hide the concern in connection with the appearance of armed men that would destabilize the country’s Saharan inside in case of supporting the rebels by the authorities of the PNS.

    In the last 72 hours loyalists killed at least 128 rebels, 25 vehicles, including 2 tanks. According to various estimates, from 70 to 80 percent of Libya Libyan territory controlled by the army and the tribes loyal to Colonel Qaddafi.

    Eugene Gajvoronsky

    Oasis, Sahara
    DEBKAfileExclusive Report September 7, 2011, 12:14 PM (GMT+02:00)

    DEBKAfile Exclusive: Qaddafi is hiding in Targan Oasis, Sahara
    Gadhafi with his Guardian Angels

    In a world exclusive, debkafile’s intelligence sources reveal that Muammar Qaddafi, two of his sons and several thousand fighters have gone to ground at Targan. This dot on the vast Saharan map lies several hundred kilometers southwest of the remote desert town of Jiffra which, too, is more than 1,500 kilometers from rebel-held Tripoli and Sirte, where his loyalists are holding out against Libyan rebels.

    Western intelligence sources believe that if Qaddafi feels threatened there too, he will use a prepared escape route to Burkina Faso, whose president Blaise Compaoré and prime minister Luc Adolphe Tiao, despite their official denials, have promised him sanctuary. Burkina Faso is a member of the CEN-SAD (Community of Sahel-Saharan States) which still acknowledges Qaddafi as ruler of Libya and refuses to recognize the rebel regime.

    Targan is a vast oasis covering hundreds of square kilometers with lakes and connecting streams wreathed in densely-growing palm trees and papyrus rushes. This hideout has so far eluded US spy and aerial satellite searches for the fugitive Libyan ruler. In case he is run to ground, he is believed to have prepared more than once escape route, some of them burrowed underground in places hidden by vegetation.

    With him almost certainly are two of his sons, Saif al Islam and Moatassem-Billah and a part of the 32nd Khamis Brigade.

    Two long, heavily-guarded Libyan convoys were sighted crossing the Libyan border into Niger this week, some said to be carrying large sums of money and gold from the Libyan state bank. debkafile’s intelligence sources deny this.

    NATO and rebel forces have two major problems before they can catch Qaddafi:

    1. Getting to the remote and vast Targan area is one. Another is controlling it. A very large military force would be required, inured to combat in the extreme climatic conditions of the Sahara which neither NATO nor the rebels have available. They would also need to find out which of the dozens of nomadic tribes in the region have given their allegiance to the Libyan ruler, because without the cooperation of some of those tribes no military operation has a chance of succeeding.

    2. NATO and rebel spokesmen now say that once Bani Walid falls and the way is clear to capturing Qaddafi’s home town of Sirte the war will be won.

    debkafile’s military sources say that even if the elders of those towns can be persuaded to let the rebel forces in without a fight, a third formidable obstacle remains: There is a large enclave between Sirte running up to a point east of Tripoli populated by large tribes which are the hard core of diehard Qaddafi support. They will hold out fiercely against opening the door to the rebels from the east,

    • He is in the southern desert. But why reveal where our brother leader actually is.? Is not that prokoving fire?. I hope that NATO is not pinpointing his location. This is scary.

      NATO has already threatened to turn that area in the Southern Desert into Green Glass!

      Taurig women

      Taureg Green Fighters

      Tauregs in a Salt Caravan:
      salt caravan

  7. Libya, propaganda and imperialism

    Libya, propaganda and imperialism
    Posted: 2011/09/09
    From: Mathaba http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628587?rss

    The sick trivia of the banker media of the west and its omission of the incredible achievements of one man who is still leading most of Libya and soon most of Africa
    playing with Hanna (Stephanie)
    A shot of Libyan hero Muammar al-Gaddafi playing lovingly with his grandchildren [SAADI’s little daughter]on a sofa.

    Muammar playing with Saadi's little girl
    An idiotic comment on SKY News, that this seemingly normal behaviour from a grandfather shows just how close the ties of clan can be in this part of the world. The question is, to what extent to westerners actually believe this nonsense?
    Gadhafi and grandschildren
    Has anyone heard a more ridiculous example of propagandistic imperialism, where common affectionate human and universal values are warped and corrupted by some western pig, who corrupts a loving family scene of Grandpa playing with his grandkids into some kind of a freak show, where “Wow, the monster has feelings” and where “Wow, those clan bonds must be strong”. One wonders whether the sickening and slobbering piles of lard sitting at home on their sofas with their newly acquired plasma TV screens are nodding obediently, snorting and cooing and saying “Cor!”

    One can be sure that those who manipulate them know very well what they are doing. I am referring to those who acquired their plasma TV screens by fiddling the House of Commons expenses, then claiming, as someone we all know so well said, “If I have to pay anything back, then I shall”.

    The only doubt remains as to what extent the political leaders like Cameron, Hague, Sarkozy, Berlusconi and Obama are aware of the details, or exactly what or how many details they are fed. It is hard to imagine Berlusconi researching on the Net – he probably has far more pressing bunga-bunga needs to address. Thank heavens for little girls. As for the others, well, here is a group of…people?…whose cowardly air force pilots have targeted children, in some cases purposefully, to “take out” targets, who have targeted water supplies and electricity grids to “break the population”. So with war criminals like this in charge, no degree of underlying cruelty discovered in their personal lives would come as much of a surprise.

    In fact, if you put Muammar al-Qathafi, a hamster, some seeds and a microwave together with David Cameron, it is not very hard to imagine which one would feed the animal and care for it (Muammar al-Qathafi it is said is far more likely to be found outside feeding the animals than inside a building, as indeed was the case when NATO’s cowards massacred some of his grandchildren in a home, in one of the most shocking terrorist attacks in recent years), and which one of the two would place it in the microwave for a ride and sit there tight-lipped taking notes, with a massive hard-on and satanic images lunging somewhere behind his eyes, muttering “You shall be punished for what you have done, you will pay for it…You have to go”. Which of the two would set his Rottweilers on the neighbour’s kitten, singing “Onward, Christian soldiers”?

    So for warped and deviant and perverted minds such as these, what to expect when a scene with a grandfather lovingly playing with his grandchildren on a sofa is labelled as “surprisingly normal behaviour” or words to that effect, and when the scene is compared with “tribal bonds” or some such nonsense by one of the west’s leading media outlets?

    The media has failed to inform its readers and viewers, and the political leaders such as Cameron, Hague, Sarkozy, Clinton and Obama, the one who insulted the Nobel Peace Prize by becoming Obomber, have failed to make any reference in their war-mongering speeches about the nature of the Jamahiriya system of governance, that it is far more democratic than their systems where someone with a minority of votes can lead a country.

    They have failed to mention Colonel Gaddafi’s humanitarian record, his public works, his housing projects, the dignity he brought to Libyans, the dignity he is bringing to Africa, his tremendous development projects across the continent and the fact that in his private life he is an open, pleasant, very nice, kind, animal-loving family man.

    Well, between Gaddafi and those who take pleasure in bombing and murdering kids from 30,000 feet, what a difference! Perhaps a few media outlets should begin to tell the truth of the hidden secrets lying behind Camoron, Sarko the Psycho, Obomber Obama, Hague the Plague and Hillary War Zone Clinton, the last two having been exposed as barefaced liars, the first two plain evil and the guy in the middle, well, the guy in the middle, as inconsequential and vapid a waste of time and space as ever existed.

    What the western media and political class have done is, so true to form, imposed their own gooey-eyed values of western imperialism on Libya and on Africa. This is a prelude to what comes next, and here it is in plain English in black and white: If the Libyan Jamahiriya goes down, then the African Union is condemned and AFRICOM will recolonise the continent. Africans will again become slaves, the dignity which the Union brought to these brothers and sisters will be lost, their ruling class will become corrupted cliques which direct Africa’s resources outwards while handfuls of peanuts are through at Africans, like the masters feeding the monkeys.

    Oh yes, mark my words. It will happen. Africans are about to become slaves once again. NATO does not represent freedom, it is a murderous terrorist organization which thinks nothing of slaughtering kids in their homes and using helicopter gunships to strafe civilians. Talk about “protecting” them is risible. You protect them by bombing their homes, water supply and electricity grids?

    And NATO’s instruments at this moment are the rats inside Libya – controlled by foreigners and in many cases themselves foreign mercenaries, these are the spawn of Satan which will stab Africa in the back. That is why it is so pleasing to see African nations such as Zimbabwe and Tanzania expel Libyan ambassadors who go over to the dark side – the side of opportunists who will sell their country to foreigners, destroy the Jamahiriya so that Libya’s communities never again have any say in their government or get to have a channel for their needs to be heard and who eventually will hand Africa over to westerners again. The TNC is the Terrorist NATO Cabal.

    The Libyan Jamahiriya is Africa’s last line of defence! Do not say you were not warned. Africa for Africans! African solutions to Africa’s problems! Solutions by Africans for Africans! Africa’s resources should bring dignity to Africans! And who was the MAN behind this project? It sure as hell was not David Cameron, Nicolas Sarkozy or Barack Obama, now was it? So, do Africa’s leaders who recognise these NATO/terrorists as a legitimate government represent the African people? I think not. So…

    If you allow the candle to go out brothers, you will be in eternal darkness.candle

    Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey


  8. http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628566?rss

    La vie en Libye avant l’agression de l’OTAN
    Posted: 2011/09/08

    La Libye du Colonel: Voici un aperçu des conditions dans lesquelles “Le Guide” a mis ses concitoyens depuis son accession au pouvoir.

    Tripoli before NATO bombs
    Par Tahirou Al-madi

    L’électricité à usage domestique est gratuite, l’eau à usage domestique est gratuite, le prix d’un litre d’essence est de 0,08 Euros. Les banques libyennes accordent des prêts sans intérêts.

    Les citoyens n’ont pas d’impôts à payer, et la TVA n’existe pas. La Libye est le dernier pays dans la liste des pays endetté! La dette publique est à 3,3% du PIB! En France, elle est à 84,5%! Aux US, 88,9%! Aux Japon à 225,8%. Le prix pour l’achat d’une voiture (Chevrolet, Toyota, Nissan, Mitsubishi, Peugeot, Renault…) est au prix d’usine (voitures importées du Japon, Corée du sud, Chine, Etats-Unis…).

    Pour chaque étudiant voulant faire ses études à l’étranger, le “gouvernement” attribue une bourse de 1 627, 11 Euros par mois. Tout étudiant diplômé reçoit le salaire moyen de la profession du cursus choisi s’il ne trouve pas d’emploi.

    Lorsqu’un couple se marie, “l’État” paie le premier appartement ou maison (150 mètres carrés). Chaque famille libyenne, sur présentation du livret de famille, reçoit une aide de 300 EUROS par mois.

    Pour tout employé dans la fonction publique, en cas de mobilité nécessaire à travers la Libye, l’État fournit une voiture et une maison gratuitement. Et quelque temps après, ces biens sont à lui.

    Ma question est celle-ci, qu’est ce que la “Communauté Internationale” appelle dictature si la reine d’Angleterre, le roi de Belgique, l’empereur du Japon… doivent mourir au pouvoir avant d’être remplacé? Celui qui peut jeter un comprimé efferalgan dans la mer et le retrouver après dix minutes, pourra me convaincre que Kadhafi est un dictateur. Vous pouvez toujours essayer.

    On ne tue pas une idée en coupant la tête de celui qui la porte. Kadhafi est un révolutionnaire. La lutte ne fait que commencer.

  9. http://www.malikounda.com/Afrique/la-libye-du-colonel-voici-un-apercu-des-conditions-dans-lesquelles-qle-guideq-a-mis-ses-concitoyens-depuis-son-accession-au-pouvoir.html
    MARDI, 06 SEPTEMBRE 2011 11:27 Envoyer
    La Libye du Colonel : Voici un aperçu des conditions dans lesquelles “Le Guide” a mis ses concitoyens depuis son accession au pouvoir
    L’Indépendant – L’électricité à usage domestique est gratuite, l’eau à usage domestique est gratuite, le prix d’un litre d’essence est de 0, 08 EUROS. Les banques libyennes accordent des prêts sans intérêts. Les citoyens n’ont pas d’impôts à payer, et la TVA n’existe pas. La Libye est le dernier pays dans la liste des pays endetté ! La dette publique est à 3,3% du PIB ! En France, elle est à 84,5% ! Aux US, 88, 9% ! Aux Japon à 225, 8%. Le prix pour l’achat d’une voiture (Chevrolet, Toyota, Nissan, Mitsubishi, Peugeot, Renault…) est au prix d’usine (voitures importées du Japon, Corée du sud, Chine, Etats-Unis…)

    Pour chaque étudiant voulant faire ses études à l’étranger, le “gouvernement” attribue une bourse de 1 627, 11 Euros par mois. Tout étudiant diplômé reçoit le salaire moyen de la profession du cursus choisi s’il ne trouve pas d’emploi.

    Lorsqu’un couple se marie, “l’État” paie le premier appartement ou maison (150 mètres carrés). Chaque famille libyenne, sur présentation du livret de famille, reçoit une aide de 300 EUROS par mois.

    Pour tout employé dans la fonction publique, en cas de mobilité nécessaire à travers la Libye, l’État fournit une voiture et une maison gratuitement. Et quelque temps après, ces biens sont à lui.

    Ma question est celle-ci, qu’est ce que la “Communauté Internationale” appelle dictature si la reine d’Angleterre, le roi de Belgique, l’empereur du Japon… doivent mourir au pouvoir avant d’être remplacé ? Celui qui peut jeter un comprimé efferalgan dans la mer et le retrouver après dix minutes, pourra me convaincre que Kadhafi est un dictateur. Vous pouvez toujours essayer. On ne tue pas une idée en coupant la tête de celui qui la porte. Kadhafi est un révolutionnaire.
    La lutte ne fait que commencer».

    Tahirou Almadi

  10. It is time to establish, on paper, The Great Socialist North African Jamahiria.
    ref.: “Al Qaeda sets its sights on Algeria too.” (DEBKA-Net-Weekly #506 26August 2011) .
    By Dennis South
    Gadhafi in Algeria

    In my previous contribution, entitled, “Algeria is next,” I offered my opinion that Algeria must now unite with Libya. As you will see from the below excerpt, Al-Qaeda in the Maghrib has been rated by Western and Russian intelligence as being the best-armed military power in the region….

    Algeria now has no choice but to unite with the forces of the Jamahiriya to rid Algeria, which is now, at this moment, engaged in a vicious battle with AQIM, of all of the CIA-financed and backed groups in the area, including AQIM. There is no choice. To fight AQIM, which is heavily armed, will take unity. Algeria must not underestimate the conveniance of the northern countries, and their willingness and ability to disrupt the Algerian state….

    In the area under consideration, only Libya and Algeria know how to run a modern state, and how to coordinate their militaries, and fight in a professional military manner. Everybody knows that Gaddafi won the war months ago. The “rebels” were in disarray, as they are untrained as a military. It is only NATO that’s keeping this war going. Even if NATO left and Al-Qaeda remained, the Libyan Army would crush all Al-Qaeda forces in Libya within days.

    Algeria and Libya simply have no choice but to combine forces and quickly for the purpose of re-establishing order in both states, and then, in my opinion, carrying on the Al-Fateh Revolution until all North Africa is united, under the Jamahiriya system. Unity is the only thing that will save North Africa from the northern countries.

    Al-Qaeda in all its forms must be eradicated in Algeria and Libya. AQIM would not be able to stand up to the combined forces of Algeria and Libya. Algeria has an air force that “presently maintains an inventory of 440 aircraft, including 104 jet combat aircraft, 73 transport and patrol aircraft, 31 trainers, and 191 helicopters.” (Wikipedia)

    The northern countries, along with their Al-Qaeda terrorist friends, are working together, although each of them have seperate, ultimate agendas. Remember the saying of Prophet Muhammad: “All disbelief forms one community.” Both the northern countries, as well as Al-Qaeda and the so-called “Islamists,” form the same destructive community, as is now out for all to see.

    They sew disorder in this world, one for the purpose of greed, and the other for the purpose of creating modern Muslim “countries” as oppressive states, that bar their women from attaining education, from driving the streets, from marrying whom they please, and whose understanding of Islam goes no further than their superficial ideas about wearing beards, walking into the mosque with your right foot first, and defining anyone who doesn’t believe exactly as they do as “kafiroon,” that is, “disbelievers.” They must be stopped.

    Algeria and the Libyan Jamahiriya must unite, without fanfare, without announcement. Then they must create a deep, comprehensive military plan, using all of the force at their disposal, including Algeria’s air force, to unleash a devastating, tactical, precise and final blow against the forces of disorder that seek to take Libya, Algeria, and all of North Africa. Algeria and Libya are governments.

    It is time to establish, on paper, The Great Socialist North African Jamahiria, or the NAJ (North African Jamahiriya). This is a matter of survival, not ideology, at this point. The ideology is important, and has been worked out for 42 years by the Libyan Jamahiriya. But what is more fundamentally important, at this point, is survival. In unity there is strength! Now to the DEBKAfile excerpt.

    Al Qaeda sets its sights on Algeria too

    AQIM leaders will be guided not just by internal Libyan considerations but the broader picture which would also include their chances of attaining power in next door Algeria. Since Saturday, August 20, Algerian President Abdelaziz Bouteflika has been holding emergency consultations with his armed forces and intelligence chiefs on ways of preventing the spillover of the Libyan insurgency and of stopping Al Qaeda incursions into Algeria.

    His forces have failed to stem the flow of weapons from the Libyan rebel center of Benghazi to AQIM which began five months ago. Western and Russian intelligence sources report AQIM is now the best-armed military power in the region, having accumulated an arsenal bigger than the regular armies of Chad, Niger and Mali.

    Sunday 21.8, the day Western-backed rebel forces marched into Tripoli, Algeria’s high command placed its ground units on the Libyan border on the highest alert and increased the number of flyovers and air reconnaissance operations. This was in response to unusual movements of quasi-military 4 x 4 vehicles in the Bezai and Ouaker regions of southern Algerian in the vicinity of the Libyan border.
    Qaddafi’s downfall has in other words given AQIM a strong edge in the competition among rival Arab-Muslim groups and organizations vying for control of North Africa countries.


  11. Dennis South:

    70 to 80% of Libyan territory controlled by the Libyan Defense Forces and the tribes. Al-Hamdulillah! All praise is due to God!

    May Almighty God, the Forces of Nature, and all forces visible and invisible, bring total victory to the good Libyan people, the Libyan Jamahiriya, the Libyan Defense Forces, and to Brother Leader Colonel Muammar “Omo Ju Omo Lo” Gaddafi! Ameen.

    Only God knows the total unfolding of His Plan. But, I pray that God will allow Libya to be protected, WITHIN that plan, from all outside aggression. I pray that Libya is liberated by Gaddafi and the LDF. And I pray–and this is just my particular prayer–that the next phase of the Al-Fateh Revolution become the complete unification of all of North Africa into one Great Socialist North African Jamahiriya. I pray that all Al-Qaeda and so-called “Islamist” forces are wiped out of North Africa, never to return again!

    I pray that all the tribes of the Sahara will join the fight to rid North Africa of all forms of rats, and of NATO. I pray that Libya and North Africa will have at least 1,000 years of peace. I especially pray that for Libya.

    Oh, God! Please, please, please accept this prayer, and make my wishes come true! Ameen

  12. https://www.facebook.com/notes/bodhibrian-souter/my-letter-to-amnesty-after-it-calls-on-regional-african-govts-to-arrest-gadffiev/121855527914812

    My letter to Amnesty after it calls on regional african govts to arrest Gadffi…eveyone must write to Amnesty and condemn them
    par Bodhibrian Souter, jeudi 08 septembre 2011, 20:05
    Hi Amnesty…

    what an absolute disgrace you are. Your org should be shunned by all people interested in justice…and can tell who is the war criminal,
    I just read this tweet:

    YokOkeage1 Yok Okeage
    by PoshBirdGabi
    BREAKING: Please check the NAZI-AMNESTY INTERNATIONAL: amnestyusa.org/news/news-item…. Libya’s neighbours must not shield al-Gaddafi from prosecution
    1 hour ago
    here is the outrageous article:

    Libya’s neighbours must arrest Colonel Mu’ammar al-Gaddafi and others wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) if the former Libyan leader crosses the border, Amnesty International said today.

    Former officials from al-Gaddafi’s government have reportedly fled to neighbouring Niger and authorities in Burkina Faso have denied claims that al-Gaddafi was offered safe haven in the country.

    “No country should provide a safe haven to Colonel al-Gaddafi or others suspected of committing crimes under international law,” said Claudio Cordone, Senior Director at Amnesty International. http://www.amnestyusa.org/news/news-item/libya-s-neighbours-must-not-shield-al-gaddafi-from-prosecution

    What a bloody disgrace Amnesty has become!

    So what is Gadafi being charged with? attacking europe? Youd have arrested Churchil for defending Britain.
    Dont you know the ICC has NEVER charged US or NATO with war crimes? They ignore war crimes in Iraq afghanistan pakistan and now Libya…What the hell do you about the war on Libya?
    1. Insurgents armed by NATO trash govt buildings in Benghazi, attack an army depot and killed the soldiers: this is what you calla peaceful protest.
    2. Libyas govt responds..but only attacks armed insurgents:
    3. Media lies that Libyas airforce attack civilians…no evidence provided…Russian high command says their satellites show no such attacks.
    4.,Libyan insurgents racist tweets get picked up by media and serve to launch the UN war on Libya:
    3 Bernard Henri Levy persuades Sarcozy to attack Libya…and away we go…
    4. The insurgents who Amnesty is supporting are racists committing genocide…even you cant miss that!

    After NATO bombed Zliten murdering 85 civilians, you had the gall to plead with NATO to investigate its own crimes….Can the mafia investigate its crimes?

    im sending this letter viral on the interneet
    What a bloody disgrace you are..This is Yugoslavia all over again, complete with NATO backing racists murderers, human traffickers and jihadis

    regards in disgust

    PS who you CLAIM to be:
    Who we are
    We are a diverse and democratic movement of people who share fundamental global values – dignity, freedom, justice, equality and a fair go for all.
    We are outraged by human rights abuses and create change by inspiring people around the world to take action.
    We demand, and hold to account, governments and other decision-makers to protect and respect human rights.
    We are an international movement that speaks out with one voice without compromise or fear to help protect human rights.
    We are a grass-roots organisation founded in 1961 – truly independent of government, business, religion or political groups.
    We work for and with individuals – to give voice, to stand along side and to secure fundamental human rights for all.
    We work collaboratively and in partnership with others to achieve our shared human rights outcomes.
    based on your support for NATOs war on Libya, you are none of then above. Did you know NATO is aiding Alqaeda in its warr on Libya? So are you.

  13. logo

    News from Libya, from the heart of the events.
    The rats are carrying everywhere big refrigarator tractors, like those that are used to carry the slaughtered animal meat , in order to put there dead people and move them from area to area where they abandoned the dead in order to present them to media some hours after and say Gaddafi loyalists killed them. This operation from the rats (Misuratians and Zintani mostly ) is madein areas that there is no problem and there is steadfast in order to create false news.
    In Al-jalat the green soldiers and the moujaheeds of te tribes carried out a special ambush operation. More than 150 rats found death.
    In the stronghold if the Warshafana tribe , Al-Aziziya , the tribe moujaheeds have killed the remnants of the Zintani-NATO rats, 21 in number and now the area is purged for the moment.Any rat that will come near the area will face the same fate.

  14. Al-Qaeda arrive in Libya through NATO, to replace European and American Special Forces now stationed in Libya:
    Gradually replace NATO troops arrive in Libya to the Mujahideen
    08 September 2011, 18:38 [“Argumenty.ru,” Alexander Grigoriev ]

    Photos from http://www.sfgate.com
    Almost all foreign troops to be withdrawn in Libya places of permanent deployment this month. SAS Soldiers leave the country before the end of the week. There will also be revoked by the Foreign Legion and the Special Forces of Qatar and Saudi Arabia. The catalyst for the end of the intervention were the events in Benghazi. This is stated in the information “Argumenty.ru” received from the assistant Gaddafi, a former officer in the Soviet, then Russian special forces retired lieutenant colonel Elias Koreneva.
    “The withdrawal of foreign regular special forces recently compensated for a constant influx of militias, mainly from Afghanistan and Pakistan. According to our estimates, during the last week in Libya came about 3 thousand mujahideen, who received arms and military equipment in place. Mainly in Benghazi. There is the headquarters and stores of arms and military equipment jihadists. Then they fall under the operational command of the military governor of Tripoli, Abdel Hakim, Belhadj, who coordinates the work of “Al-Qaeda” in Libya. And replace regular army rebels on operational issues “- said in a statement Koreneva.
    “However, in the Benghazi, there are constant conflicts between regular armed units of NATO and the Mujahideen. According to information received from the city over the past few days during such collisions have been killed and executed about 27 soldiers of the coalition forces. In particular, four staff trainers U.S. Central Intelligence Agency. According to our data, the Italian Prime Minister Berlusconi has refused to send a few dozen soldiers Libya 9th Parachute Regiment «COL MOSCHIN» as instructors, “- said a lieutenant colonel.

  15. Ursula Riches, in The National, on 09 Sept. 2011 writes:

    In a world of lies adn fiction only is there a dictator in Libya. The truth is the people have elections 5 times a year, four times for the smaller govt and once for the larger. The people may get rid of the government and the elected ones by any one of them calling for a meeting of the party. The party IS the people as they were all able to join the Jamahiriya save those in prison. This is the best system of democracy in the world, a true democracy, direct democracy. The people of Libya themselves are in control of the country, the elected ones are managers for the people and accountable t them. Such a new and innovatory system should be left alone, It is a bright shining light to guide humans in the world. The western system, because of our big corporations swallowing the smaller person and our ridiculous enslaving banking system and our unregulated money markets with short selling, speculations and gambling rather than investment, do nothing for our society. Our society is decaying crumbling and rotten. We have become as morally bankrupt as we are financially. Let us look to Libya for lessons on how to rebuild our society rather than destroy theirs and eat it up in a vain attempt to fix our world which is based on a non sustainable system. »

    • Absolutely, this is right that actually all the western countries and their corrupt system which is based on barbarism, are against the Libyan ruling system. The great Brother Leader Col Qaddafi May Allah protect him and his country against barbarically governed states in Europe and America, is actually the true leader.
      Capitalization is a worse economic system and Democracy is a foolish one. The great Jamahiriya in the world now a day Libya is true Democracy and Islamic Socialist Country.

  16. Slavko Milovanovic writes 09 Sept 2011, in from telephone interceptions/ and news through Walky-talki, by THE Libyan Avenger :

    Today the brave Libyan soldiers and volunteers lit up the sky with missiles targetting the rebels who are attacking bin-ooleed killing dozens.
    M3eeteega Airport in Tasura is being bombed by our brave soldiers!
    And the resistance continues 3 brave women in Gergarish killed 12 rats and 7 rats killed in M3eeteega Airport.
    The brave elders of Tarhoona sent more then 500 volunteers to Bin-ooleed with supplies swearing to fight till the end!!
    Sirte: We have turned our city into a fortress, and our scools and homes into training grounds all for the sake of Libya!
    Bani Walid:we are training thousands and welcoming hundreds of volunteers everyday. We will not surrender never give up victory or martyrdom!
    Good news! SIRTE and Bin-ooled now have electricity and telephone coverage thanks to the hard working volunteers!
    I praise those brave groups of libyans making tripoli a living hell for the rebels.
    Picked up on the rebels frequency, apparently there have been many reports of people dressing up as them killing small groups of rebels.
    The rebels are securing a safe root outside of tripoli incase of a surprise attack from the army. Source: overheard them on the radio.
    The reason why the #Rebels in #Tripoli are on high alert is due to the recent attacks on Zawiya.
    After bombing Libya’s tv stations, they r now trying to close down Arrai channel. Are they that scared of Gaddafis voice being heard.
    Group of rats in Tripoli: “we are being heavily shot at we don’t know from where, send help” is what I overheard thm say on the Walky.

  17. Gaddafi in full control — has support of Tuareg and Saharan Tribes
    Posted: 2011/09/09
    From: Mathaba http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628592?rss

    (Taken from DEBKAfile-Net-Weekly #508 September 9, 2011)

    A large Libyan military convoy of dozens of vehicles crossed the southern border into Niger Tuesday, Sept. 6, escorted by hundreds of well-armed Touareg tribal fighters. It started a fresh round of rumors about the whereabouts of the deposed Libyan ruler.

    The convoy reportedly carried high-placed loyalists from Muammar Qaddafi’s camp, including Gen. Mansour Daw, head of the Revolutionary Guard with responsibility for the security of Qaddafi and his family.

    Qaddafi mocked those rumors by declaring in a phone call to a Syrian television station that he was still in Libya. He acted surprised at the interest in this convoy, saying, “How many times do convoys transporting smugglers, traders and people cross the border every day for Sudan, Chad, Mali and Algeria? As if this was the first time a convoy was headed towards Niger.” He promised more convoys would be crossing Libyan borders into African countries.

    DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s intelligence sources say that Qaddafi was clearly aware of the three problems preying on the efforts of NATO and the Libyan rebels to extend their rule outside Tripoli, the capital, and Benghazi, the rebel center, for as long as Qaddafi and his sons are alive and at large.

    Outside Tripoli and Benghazi, Qaddafi has free rein

    1. In his phone call Wednesday, Qaddafi sarcastically highlighted the implications of his ability to send more than a hundred trucks in convoy, accompanied by a large number of guards, drivers, technicians and passengers, along 900 kilometers of Libyan highways all the way to the Niger border without interference. Their journey called for precise planning and logistics, if only to keep the vehicles fueled all the way.

    This was Qaddafi’s way of demonstrating that he and his sons, though driven out of Tripoli, still command military resources and terrain in extensive regions of the country.

    2. The presence in the convoy of Gen. Mansour Daw, the Qaddafi clan’s head of security would, if confirmed, offer some answers to the two-week mystery surrounding the whereabouts of Qaddafi’s top political, military and intelligence officials after they vanished ahead of the NATO-led rebel capture of Tripoli on August 21.

    Aside from two or three defectors to the rebel side, most of the regime heads followed Qaddafi into hiding. Our military sources note that 7,000-9,000 members of the army brigades commanded by Qaddafi’s sons have also vanished without a trace – especially Moatassem-Billah Qaddafi’s outfit.

    Wednesday, Sept. 7, debkafile’s intelligence sources reported in an exclusive scoop that Muammar Qaddafi and his sons, along with several thousand fighters, had gone to ground at the Targan oasis in the Sahara desert, several hundred kilometers southwest of the Libyan oasis city of Jiffra, which lies 1,500 kilometers from Tripoli. This information was still true Thursday.

    Qaddafi wins over the Tuareg tribes as a valuable tactical asset

    By demonstrating Qaddafi’s freedom of movement across Libya, the convoy to Niger indicates that his loyal officials and troops have resumed operations from scattered hiding places. Finding them in a country of 679,358 square miles is an impossible mission especially when they are sheltered by hundreds of Libyan tribes and sub-tribes.

    3. The fact that Tuareq tribal fighters guarded the convoy to Niger presents NATO and Libyan rebels with a formidable problem. Qaddafi was obviously able to buy the allegiance and services of this mysterious people quite early on in the rebellion, thereby gaining two important tactical advantages over NATO and the rebels.


    In the first place, this nomadic Berber tribe – whose numbers can only be estimated as 2.5-3 million – roam freely through the Sahara between the five African countries bordering on Libya. Their territory covers southwestern Libya, all of eastern Algeria, eastern Mali, where they command more than half of the country, western Niger and northern Burkina Faso.

    No army in any of these countries has ever been able to control or influence the Tuareg. These tribesmen guard their independence fiercely and take pride in their prowess as warriors, boasting the attributes of the finest special operations combatants in the world of desert warfare.

    They subsist on a handful of dates a day while covering 60 miles

    At an earlier stage of their history, as Berbers in the Atlas Mountains, the Tuaregs practiced Animism. After the Arab conquest of North Africa, they integrated Islamic elements into their indigenous creed.
    (Animism holds there is no separation between the spiritual and physical worlds, and souls or spirits exist, not only in humans, but also in all other animals, plants, rocks, natural phenomena such as thunder, and geographic features such as mountains and rivers.)

    A Tuareg fighter can subsist for 24 hours on 100 grams of dried dates and a half-liter of water while covering 60 miles a day on foot. He doesn’t need to carry water because he is familiar with every deeply hidden water source in the Sahara.

    With the Touareg on their side, Qaddafi and his top supporters have gained the freedom to move around vast territories in five African states. In the second place, DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s counterterrorism sources report that six years ago, in late 2005, Western intelligence, especially the American CIA and British MI6, tried to establish ties with the Tuaregs, but failed.

    This attempt happened right after the Al Qaida suicide attacks on the London transit system in July 2005, in which 53 people were killed and more than 700 injured. That was when Western undercover agencies learned that Al Qaida had planted its Zone No. 9 among the Tuareg tribes as a logistical base from which to smuggle explosives into Europe. (See DEBKA-Net-Weekly 214 of July 15, 2005: Al Qaida’s Zone 9: The Blue-Faced Men of the Sahara). Since then, the Tuareg have spurned every Western effort to cultivate them – most recently by the US Africa Command-AFRICOM.

    The Libyan War has made the entire region into a powder keg

    Through the operational relationship he established with the skittish Tuareg, Qaddafi has gained a strategic advantage over NATO and the rebels. His forces are not only enabled to pounce on his enemies without warning, but he also has easy access to hidden arms caches.

    Wednesday, Sept. 7, the Niger foreign minister, Mahomed Bazoum, said glumly that the entire region had become a powder keg as a result of the Libyan conflict and its feet were set on the path to war. Too many stolen weapons are in circulation and Al Qaeda’s influence is on the rise.

    NATO and the rebels have major woes to overcome before they are free to grapple with the countless tribes of western, southern and central Libya who deny them access to their lands. Because they are all loaded with weapons which Qaddafi’s forces left behind, NATO and the rebel administration have only two options for gaining control of the country outside Tripoli and Benghazi:

    One is to divert the country’s multiple armed groups into a new conflict against the last chain of Qaddafi garrisons running from Sirte on the coast to Sabha and up to the Niger and Chad borders in the south. That way, the pro- and anti-Qaddafi forces would kill each other off and use up the mountains of ammo left by the war.
    The other option would be to start laying out good cash for buying off one tribal chief after another.

    However, neither America, Britain, France nor any other NATO country are exactly awash with surplus funds or the time to spare for pursuing this lengthy and agonizing process.

    Dennis South

    In the September 2011 issue of National Geographic, Peter Gwin accompanies Tuareg rebels on a walk through a remote corner of the world. For years, the Sahara Desert nomads have had ties with Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi, who aided many of their uprisings and recruited thousands of them as mercenaries in the Libyan army. Ethnically Tuareg rebels also fight in the Movement of Nigeriens for Justice (MNJ), seeking a share of the uranium deposits mined from their grazing lands by the government of Niger. As Gwin reports:

    The rebel commander, his face hidden behind a dark turban, leads the way over the soft sand, scorched black in places by exploded mortar shells and littered with detritus from a series of battles waged here, on a children’s soccer field.
    With nearly every stride, our feet crunch spent rifle cartridges. “Step in my steps,” he cautions, noting that the Niger army had mined the area, where there had been a school for Tuareg. His men removed some of the devices; others remained lost in the shifting sands. “Maybe they are buried too deep to explode if you step on one.”
    It is late afternoon in the dry season, and the temperature has finally slipped below 100°F. The beige dunes stretching to the north begin to take on a pink hue, and the shadows from the steep ridges to the southwest are spreading across the valley floor. In this lonely valley called Tazerzaït, where the Aïr Massif meets the great sand seas of the Sahara, the commander’s men had won the greatest victory of their two-year rebellion against the Niger government.
    The rebels, all ethnic Tuareg, descend from the fierce nomads who for several centuries dominated the lucrative caravan trade in gold, spices, and slaves that crisscrossed this desolate region of North Africa. Fighting under the banner of the Movement of Nigeriens for Justice (MNJ) and supported in part by Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, they had captured 72 government soldiers at Tazerzaït and renewed their demands that the government share revenue derived from another source of treasure: uranium mined on Tuareg lands. In a show of goodwill the Tuareg released all of their prisoners—except one. “He is a war criminal,” the commander says.
    See the full gallery by photographer Brent Stirton here. http://ngm.nationalgeographic.com/2011/09/sahara-tuareg/stirton-photography

  18. Pingback: Libyen-länkar «


    Summary for September 8, 2011

    Thu, 08.09.2011 – 11:57 | admin
    Tripoli: the fighting in the city, in north-western suburbs with artillery. Thus, in the Salah Edden destroyed three rebel jeeps with 6. There is information about the progress of a heavily armed team of Khamis al-Gaddafi in Tripoli, the southern suburbs area Az zawiya.

    Bani Walid: sheikhs and tribal elders Rafla decided not to take the city, the defenders are confident in their abilities and are determined to fight against the colonial coalition to end. There have been conflicting reports about the number of bands, the besiegers Bani Walid (7-fold difference). Yesterday also was informed of the unsuccessful attack coalition forces in the city, in which the defenders were destroyed hundreds of tribes of the attackers.

    In the area of coalition convoy Tarragon ambushed – 14 rebels killed. Do not stop the bombing of Sirte. Fighting in Az zawiya, ITAR-TASS reported on the atrocities the rebels in this city. Against colonial factions of the coalition, based in the area of ​​tactical missiles used Misurata “Scud” (big explosions September 5).

    It is worth to highlight what is happening in Benghazi: social entropy in the relations between the four centers of power Cyrenaica (Obeid tribe and Haruba, Islamist gangs of Benghazi and Middle Eastern mercenaries), it seems, has reached critical mass. There have been reports of clashes between different factions of rebels, and even the use of NATO air power against the rebels of Benghazi. Perhaps, the tribes of Cyrenaica, hlebnuv full freedom and the wind of change, decided to join the union of tribes that support the government Jamahiriya. Information about this already started to arrive and now verified.

    Algeria is going to send humanitarian aid to Libya. The Syrian and Algerian hackers made a DDoS attack on the website of Al-Jazeera television. Confirmed by information from previous reports on the spread of guerrilla warfare in parts of Central Africa: Governments of Mali and Niger do not hide the concern in connection with the appearance of armed men that would destabilize the country’s Saharan inside in case of supporting the rebels by the authorities of the PNS.

    In the last 72 hours loyalists killed at least 128 rebels, 25 vehicles, including 2 tanks. According to various estimates, from 70 to 80 percent of Libya Libyan territory controlled by the army and the tribes loyal to Colonel Qaddafi.

    Eugene Gajvoronsky





    Russian Report confirms 70-80% of Libya remains under Jamahiriya control
    Posted: 2011/09/09
    From: Mathaba http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628591?rss

    The Libyan people, gathered in their popular congresses and committees, are the Jamahiriya founded by Muammar Qaddafi, and are the legal de jure and de facto government of Libya. They still control the vast majority of Libya unlike what the Hilary Clinton media and NATO would have you believe

    There are no longer any independent journalists in Libya other than those working for and reporting to Mathaba under difficult conditions with communications being monitored by NATO which is seeking via its ground forces to eliminate those reporting the truth.

    The popular masses, endured 6 months of non-stop bombing by NATO and now also ground invasion forces of Al-Qaida along side British SAS with water supplies cut off, super markets in Sirte bombed along with the Friday prayers on Eid, massacres with thousands dead, all unreported in the world media.

    In spite of these most cowardly forms of trying to enforce an entire population of over 6 million to surrender and accept the NATO-led heretics of Al-Qaida and other extremists as the “new government” of Libya, directed by Hilary Clinton and the U.S. State Department, the popular masses still control the vast majority of Libya with the foreign forces and puppets limited to Benghazi and some parts of Tripoli.

    Where NATO has not shut down communications the citizens are terrorized by the vicious armed thugs who help themselves to peoples homes and plunder, rape and steal. Now, information comes in in bits and pieces, occasionally. Before, when there were a wide variety of sources of information coming from inside Libya, we had heavy corroboration. That is not the case now but little has changed: the enemy forces control not even Tripoli which is why meetings of the foreign puppet masters still take place in Paris.

    Reports from Mathaba, Syrian radio, the Leader himself, Dr. Ibrahim, are the most reliable. There is much that will be coming to light in the coming weeks and months which will shock the world, or those who care, and the scale of the suffering caused by the NATO and its rebels to a population which enjoyed the purest form of democracy in the world, which allowed them to assign themselves all the benefits that control of national resources allows: free health care, free education, free housing, free electricity and more besides.

    Ownership of government by the people, by the people themselves being the government by way of legislative people’s conferences and executive elected people’s committees, allowed Libyans to attain the highest standard of living in all Africa and higher than Russia, Brazil and Saudi Arabia. They even had enough to spare $32 billion for a $42 billion project to free the entire continent of Africa from the World Bank and International Monetary Fund, with that money now stolen by the U.S.

    And additional over $100 billion from the Libyan Sovereign Wealth fund has also been stolen, and Libya had 144 tons of gold reserves and was calling for payments for oil in gold and not worthless debt-printed U.S. dollar bank notes, as well as sponsoring the creation of an Africa-wide gold dinar and “Afro” currency.

    These, argue analysts, are some of the real reasons for the war against Libya, with Sarkozy having said that Muammar Qaddafi and Libya’s plans created a threat to the “financial security” of the international community — the international community being the phrase used as always for the banking elite, not the world community of people of all nations.

    However, precisely because of the strength of Libya and her people who carry defensive arms — at least one million are armed with AK-47 kalashnikovs for the event of any invasion — it has taken NATO 6 months of non-stop bombing and ongoing, in what will go down in military history as the most heroic and under reported war of all time, in which the world’s largest armies have failed to achieve their objectives.

    Prime objective of NATO and her ground troop rebels and mercenaries, has been and remains, the elimination of Muammar Qaddafi — a rare visionary who has lived to see his dream come true of empowering the people so that they control government, wealth and arms. Another vision he has is of the United States of Africa, free from want, hunger, need and the plunder and meddling of outsiders.

    That dream looks set to be achieved, with the inevitable collapse of the bankrupt west which is leading the grab for African wealth by attempting to control its strongest point of defense — Libya — and the rise to popularity not only within Africa where Qaddafi was already a legend in every remote village, but throughout the world, where people are discovering the truth about Libya and sharing it.

    The Qaddafi’s ideology and movement, has given birth to people’s conferences worldwide, and new initiatives to bring to account those who have committed crimes against humanity. The media war being waged by showing a few thousand rebels in often faked settings, may fool many people, but those with intelligence have seen through the obvious lies and cannot be fooled again.

    A report by Eugene Gajvoronsky which appeared in Russian confirms what we have been reporting all along, that the Libyan Jamahiriya remains and controls the majority of Libya, and that the Libyan army and defense forces too remain intact as well as the resistance led by Muammar Qaddafi and some of his sons, and notable his daughter Aisha, who is a soldier leading committed to destroying Al-Qaida.

    Below follows a very rough rushed translation of the Russian report:

    Tripoli: There is fighting, using artillary, in the northwestern suburbs. In Salah Edden, three NATO-rebel jeeps were destroyed with 6 artillery shells. Progress is being made in the southern suburb area of Azzawiya by the heavily armed soliders of Khamis al-Gaddafi.

    Bani Walid: After failing to convince sheikhs and tribal elders of Bani Walid to surrender, the rats decided to not attack the city at this time. The defenders of Bani Walid are confident in their abilities, and are determined to fight against the colonial coalition [NATO] to the end.

    There have been as many as 7 different conflicting reports about the number of NATO-rebel that have attempted to besiege Bani Walid. It has also been learned that yesterday, there was an unsuccessful attack on the city by the NATO-rebel alliance, which resulted in the destruction of hundreds of NATO-rebel by the defenders of Bani Walid.

    A NATO-rebel convoy called was ambushed, and 14 NATO-rebels were killed.

    Sirte: The bombing of Sirte is non-stop. The sources of food in the city have been bombed by NATO. The remote city is besieged with only men being allowed out who are then shot or imprisoned, with women and families forced back. This is an incredible war crime taking place to starve and thirst and entire town and bomb it from the air along with missiles and sound bombs. Where is the international outcry, and where is the media coverage of this siege. It is also reported that hundreds of people were massacred in bombing of the Eid prayers at the end of Ramadan. The entire city is being made to pay the price of slow painful death for refusing to give up their democracy as well as their loyalty to Muammar Qaddafi who originates from this place.

    There is fighting in Azzawiya. ITAR-TASS gave a report on the atrocities that are being committed by the NATO-rebels in this city. It is claimed that the Libyan Defense Forces used tactical SCUD missiles against NATO-rebel forces in Misrata.

    Benghazi: It is worthy to highlight what is going on in Benghazi. Social chaos exists between four centers of power in Cyrenaica (the east of Libya): The Obeid tribe, the Haruba tribe, the Islamist gangs and the Middle Eastern mercenaries (from Qatar, Jordan, Tunisia, Egypt, etc). It appears that this chaos has reached a critical mass. There are reports of clashes between different factions of the NATO-rebels there, and even the use of NATO air power against the NATO-rebels of Benghazi.

    It is possible that the tribes of Cyrenaica have decided that it is time to liberate all of Libya, and to join the union of tribes that support the Libyan Jamahiriya. The wind of change is thus blowing in favor of Muammar Qaddafi and the Jamahiriya.

    Algeria: Algeria is going to send humanitarian aid to Libya. Syrian and Algerian computer hackers attacked the website of the Al-Jazeera television station which has been subservient to the Emir of Qatar where it is based, the Emir being a rent-boy prostitute of Hilary Clinton according to detractors of the dictator. The governments of Mali and Niger are concerned about the appearance of armed men who might destablizie their areas, while Africa gears up to send support for Libya to repulse the NATO-led Al-Qaida.

    In the last 72 hours, the Libyan Armed Forces killed at least 128 rebels and 25 vehicles, including 2 tanks, the report said. According to various estimates, from 70 to 80 percent of Libyan territory is under the control of the Libyan Armed Forces and the tribes that are loyal to Colonel Gaddafi, the report concluded.

  20. Mathaba Publication Bridge (MPB) Publish your items here for Mathaba.net
    Mathaba.Net | Mathaba.org | Mathaba.info

    Walter Fauntroy

    ← Политики Нигерии призывают правительство отменить признание ПНСStop NATO: Day 175 of War Against Libya, Crown of Africa →
    Walter Fauntroy, Feared Dead in Libya, Returns Home—Guess Who He Saw Doing the Killing
    Posted on 2011/09/09 by Karen Marlow


    It wasn’t the Libyans!

    by Valencia Mohammed

    Former U.S. Congressman Walter Fauntroy, who recently returned from a self-sanctioned peace mission to Libya, said he went into hiding for about a month in Libya after witnessing horrifying events in Libya’s bloody civil war — a war that Fauntroy claims is backed by European forces.

    Fauntroy’s sudden disappearance prompted rumors and news reports that he had been killed.

    In an interview inside his Northwest D.C. home last week, the noted civil rights leader, told the Afro that he watched French and Danish troops storm small villages late at night beheading, maiming and killing rebels and loyalists to show them who was in control.

    “‘What the hell’ I’m thinking to myself. I’m getting out of here. So I went in hiding,” Fauntroy said.

    The rebels told Fauntroy they had been told by the European forces to stay inside. According to Fauntroy, the European forces would tell the rebels, “‘Look at what you did.’ In other words, the French and Danish were ordering the bombings and killings, and giving credit to the rebels.

    “The truth about all this will come out later,” Fauntroy said.

    While in Libya, The former congressman also said he sat down with Libyan leader Moammar Gaddafi for a one-on-one conversation. Gaddafi has ruled Libya since 1969, when he seized power in a military coup.

    Fauntroy said he spoke with Gaddafi in person and that Gaddafi assured him that if he survived these attacks, the mission to unite African countries would continue.

    “Contrary to what is being reported in the press, from what I heard and observed, more than 90 percent of the Libyan people love Gaddafi,” Fauntroy said. “We believe the true mission of the attacks on Gaddafi is to prevent all efforts by African leaders to stop the recolonization of Africa.”

    Several months ago, Gaddafi’s leadership faced its biggest challenge. In February, a radical protest movement called the Arab Spring spread across Libya. When Gaddafi responded by dispatching military and plainclothes paramilitary to the streets to attack demonstrators, it turned into a civil war with the assistance of NATO and the United Nations.

    Fauntroy’s account could not be immediately verified by the Afro and the U.S. State Department has not substantiated Fauntroy’s version of events. Fauntroy was not acting as an official representative of the U.S. in Libya. He returned to Washington, D.C. on Aug. 31.

    When rumors spread about Fauntroy being killed he went underground, he told the Afro in an interview. Fauntroy said for more than a month he decided not to contact his family but to continue the mission to speak with African spiritual leaders about a movement to unify Africa despite the Arab uprisings.

    “I’m still here,” Fauntroy said, pointing to several parts of his body. “I’ve got all my fingers and toes. I’m extremely lucky to be here.”

    After blogs and rumors reported Fauntroy had been killed, the congressional office of Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton (D-DC) announced on Aug. 24, that she had been in touch with authorities who confirmed Fauntroy was safely in the care of the International Committee of the Red Cross.

    Inside his home, Fauntroy pulled out several memoirs and notebooks to explain why he traveled to Libya at a time when it was going through civil unrest.

    “This recent trip to Libya was part of a continuous mission that started under Dr. Martin Luther King Jr. when he gave me orders to join four African countries on the continent with four in the African Diaspora to restore the continent to its pre-colonial status,” Fauntroy said.

    “We want Africa to be the breadbasket of the world,” he said. “Currently, all the major roads in every country throughout Africa lead to ports that take its natural resources and wealth outside the continent to be sold to the European markets.”

    Meanwhile reports from Tripoli are coming in.

    It seems in the last two weeks, rebel fighters have fired more bullets into the air to express their excitement than were shot during the assault on Tripoli earlier in August. But away from “jubilant” crowds we meet those who are not so pleased.

    Abdulrakham lives in Tripoli’s Abu Slim district, which has historically been pro-Gaddafi. When the rebels arrived, his sister was badly injured. She is still in hospital in Tunisia.

    Abdulrakham does not want to show his face on camera and insists on a hidden location for the interview. He says the revolution has brought much fear in its wake.

    “There is no peace. There is no safety in the city. We do not let our children outside when it’s dark. We are afraid. We always wait for something bad,” he tells RT. “When Gaddafi was here, at least we didn’t have to sleep awake, like we do now.”

    Abdulrakham says he also wanted change and a brighter future for his country, but not this way.

    “People are dying on both sides,” he continues. “The city’s been destroyed – and no one cares! Do they seriously think they changed it for the better? Don’t lie to yourself – just look around! Is this what you wanted?”

    And what is around is a scene of widespread destruction and social chaos. The badly damaged buildings matched by the rising stench of garbage and decomposing bodies. Armed youngsters roam the streets, barely old enough to understand that what they carry are weapons, not toys.

    Many shops, schools, and hospitals are closed, while the city’s cemeteries are growing bigger.

    This entry was posted in Africa, Analysis, Democracy, Europe, Libya, NATO, Opinion, Peace, Qadhafi, UK, USA and tagged Gaddafi, Libya War, media propaganda, NATO, rebels, Tripoli, UK, US, US terrorism, War, Western hypocricy. Bookmark the permalink.
    ← Политики Нигерии призывают правительство отменить признание ПНС

  21. North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) bombed (well, not much of what the Pentagon bombed in 2003 was reconstructed in Iraq …)

    Anyway – from oil to rebuilding – in thesis juicy business opportunities loom. France’s neo-Napoleonic Nicolas Sarkozy and Britain’s David of Arabia Cameron believe they will be especially well positioned to profit from NATO’s victory. Yet there’s no guarantee the new Libyan bonanza will be enough to lift both former colonial powers (neo-colonials?) out of recession.

    President Sarkozy in particular will milk the business opportunities for French companies for all they’re worth – part of his ambitious agenda of “strategic redeployment” of France in the Arab world. A compliant French media are gloating that this was “his” war – spinning that he decided to arm the rebels on the ground with French weaponry, in close cooperation with Qatar, including a key rebel commando unit that went by sea from Misrata to Tripoli last Saturday, at the start of “Operation Siren”.

    Well, he certainly saw the opening when Muammar Gaddafi’s chief of protocol defected to Paris in October 2010. That’s when the whole regime change drama started to be incubated.

    Bombs for oil
    As previously noted (see Welcome to Libya’s ‘democracy’, Asia Times Online, August 24) the vultures are already circling Tripoli to grab (and monopolize) the spoils. And yes – most of the action has to do with oil deals, as in this stark assertion by Abdeljalil Mayouf, information manager at the “rebel” Arabian Gulf Oil Company; “We don’t have a problem with Western countries like the Italians, French and UK companies. But we may have some political issues with Russia, China and Brazil.”

    These three happen to be crucial members of the BRICS group of emerging economies (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa), which are actually growing while the Atlanticist, NATO-bombing economies are either stuck in stagnation or recession. The top four BRICs also happen to have abstained from approving UN Security Council resolution 1973, the no-fly zone scam that metamorphosed into NATO bringing regime change from above. They saw right through it from the beginning.

    To make matters worse (for them), only three days before the Pentagon’s Africom launched its first 150-plus Tomahawks over Libya, Colonel Gaddafi gave an interview to German TV stressing that if the country were attacked, all energy contracts would be transferred to Russian, Indian and Chinese companies.

    So the winners in the oil bonanza are already designated: NATO members plus Arab monarchies. Among the companies involved, British Petroleum (BP), France’s Total and the Qatar national oil company. For Qatar – which dispatched jet fighters and recruiters to the front lines, trained “rebels” in exhaustive combat techniques, and is already managing oil sales in eastern Libya – the war will reveal itself to be a very wise investment decision.

    Prior to the months-long crisis that is in its end game now with the rebels in the capital, Tripoli, Libya was producing 1.6 million barrels per day. Once resumed, this could reap Tripoli’s new rulers some US$50 billion annually. Most estimates place oil reserves at 46.4 billion barrels.

    The “rebels” of new Libya better not mess with China. Five months ago, China’s official policy was already to call for a ceasefire; if that had happened, Gaddafi would still control more than half of Libya. Yet Beijing – never a fan of violent regime change – for the moment is exercising extreme restraint.

    Wen Zhongliang, the deputy head of the Ministry of Trade, willfully observed, “Libya will continue to protect the interests and rights of Chinese investors and we hope to continue investment and economic cooperation.” Official statements are piling up emphasizing “mutual economic cooperation”.

    Last week, Abdel Hafiz Ghoga, vice president of the dodgy Transitional National Council (TNC), told Xinhua that all deals and contracts agreed with the Gaddafi regime would be honored – but Beijing is taking no chances.

    Libya supplied no more than 3% of China’s oil imports in 2010. Angola is a much more crucial supplier. But China is still Libya’s top oil customer in Asia. Moreover, China could be very helpful in the infrastructure rebuilding front, or in the technology export – no less than 75 Chinese companies with 36,000 employees were already on the ground before the outbreak of the tribal/civil war, swiftly evacuated in less than three days.

    The Russians – from Gazprom to Tafnet – had billions of dollars invested in Libyan projects; Brazilian oil giant Petrobras and the construction company Odebrecht also had intrests there. It’s still unclear what will happen to them. The director general of the Russia-Libya Business Council, Aram Shegunts, is extremely worried: “Our companies will lose everything because NATO will prevent them from doing business in Libya.”

    Italy seems to have passed the “rebel” version of “you’re either with us or without us”. Energy giant ENI apparently won’t be affected, as Premier Silvio “Bunga Bunga” Berlusconi pragmatically dumped his previous very close pal Gaddafi at the start of the Africom/NATO bombing spree.

    ENI’s directors are confident Libya’s oil and gas flows to southern Italy will resume before winter. And the Libyan ambassador in Italy, Hafed Gaddur, reassured Rome that all Gaddafi-era contracts will be honored. Just in case, Berlusconi will meet the TNC’s prime minister, Mahmoud Jibril, this Thursday in Milan.

    Bin Laden to the rescue
    Turkey’s Foreign Minister Ahmet Davutoglu – of the famed “zero problems with our neighbors” policy – has also been gushing praise on the former “rebels” turned powers-that-be. Eyeing the post-Gaddafi business bonanza as well, Ankara – as NATO’s eastern flank – ended up helping to impose a naval blockade on the Gaddafi regime, carefully cultivated the TNC, and in July formally recognized it as the government of Libya. Business “rewards” loom.

    Then there’s the crucial plot; how the House of Saud is going to profit from having been instrumental in setting up a friendly regime in Libya, possibly peppered with Salafi notables; one of the key reasons for the Saudi onslaught – which included a fabricated vote at the Arab League – was the extreme bad blood between Gaddafi and King Abdullah since the run-up towards the war on Iraq in 2002.

    It’s never enough to stress the cosmic hypocrisy of an ultra-regressive absolute monarchy/medieval theocracy – which invaded Bahrain and repressed its native Shi’ites – saluting what could be construed as a pro-democracy movement in Northern Africa.

    Anyway, it’s time to party. Expect the Saudi Bin Laden Group to reconstruct like mad all over Libya – eventually turning the (looted) Bab al-Aziziyah into a monster, luxury Mall of Tripolitania.

    Pepe Escobar is the author of Globalistan: How the Globalized World is Dissolving into Liquid War (Nimble Books, 2007) and Red Zone Blues: a snapshot of Baghdad during the surge. His new book, just out, is Obama does Globalistan (Nimble Books, 2009).

    He may be reached at pepeasia@yahoo.com.

    1:59 AM OZYISM http://ozyism.blogspot.com/2011/08/nato-militia-torture-family-nanny.html
    Nanny tortured by NATO

    Recently the same proven NATO liars have been forcing an innocent captive Nanny to say that she has been tortured by Qaddafi’s family saying it was Hannibal’s wife!!!.

    This is obviously a forced confession, firstly she was a captive in the hands of NATO militia, secondly NATO is desperately trying to murder Qaddafi, so it wouldn’t be shocking, nor surprising for NATO militia to torture the family’s nanny to try to gain information about Qaddafi and his family’s where about.

    NATO militia is known for torture, and brutal killings. For example in Benghazi supporters of the government were tortured to death, and people were burned alive.

    This is clearly a forced confession, similarly many people were forced to confess at gun point when foreign journalists were giving these terrorists a PR campaign. In one attempted forced confession, one individual had the courage to tell the truth when even facing death, they claimed he was a Mercenary and that he would confess, but when it came to it, he said that he is just a migrant worker who was taken by his home, the story of thousands of other Black NATO captives. He also claimed that NATO militia raped his wife in front of him. When he said that, quickly a NATO militiamen grabbed his arm and took him towards the cells, closed the door behind, and no one knows what happened to him.
    Posted in: Libyan Crisis,News

  22. http://ozyism.blogspot.com/

    1:16 PM OZYISM

    The Misrata militias have detached themselves from NTC and are refusing to take orders from traitors. These agents of NATO have stated clearly that they will not take order from those who have served under the Libyan Jamahariya government after the war started.

    This has deepened the division, and frustrations over heavy casualties in Sirte and Bani Walid has driven many agents and traitors against each other. The blaming game has started, suspicion and paranoia has spread throughout NATO Militias.

    Posted in: Libyan Crisis,News

    10:50 PM OZYISM


    Saadi Qaddafi, a businessman and an ex professional soccer player has crossed in to Niger and is in Good health. Reports suggests that the Niger government has no intention of arresting him, and he will not be arrested unlike false claim made by US government and NATO propaganda machine.

    Rumours were first spread by US regime spokesperson then spread through Al-Jazeera and social networks. The rumours turned out to be false.

    Posted in: Libyan Crisis,News
    Video: Gadhafi’s son believed to be in Niger
    AP Video http://www.theglobeandmail.com/news/video/video-gadhafis-son-believed-to-be-in-niger/article2163877/

    Published Tuesday, 13 Sept.2011 10:24AM EDT
    Although the location of former Libyan leader Moammar Gadhafi remains a mystery, his 37-year old son, Al-Saadi, is believed to be part of a convoy[HAH! SOME CONVOY! consisting of 4 older cars!] that reached the city of Niamey in neighboring Niger on Monday night.

    Steffen Seidel 13 septembre 12:16
    NATO using chemical weapons in Bani Walid

    Reports that NATO has used Mustard Gas in Bani Walid have been coming from eye witnesses from within the beseiged town. For the first time a gruesome image of a victim of the terrorism has come out in social networks.

    Most argue that this terrorism is implemented to force Libyans in to submissions, they have refused to surrender and give the country to NATO, so NATO has resorted to terrorism, and a slow genocide.

    The media has been banned in Bani Walid to hide such atrocities, and the Main Stream Media continues towing the line with NATO.

    Marinella Correggia Anti-War campaigner – explains some things we can do to try and change the merciless offensive by NATO. Her email address is mari.liberazioni@yahoo.it

    Some of Marinella’s articles in French, English and Spanish on Libya are on: pravda.ru, aporrea.org, mondialisation.ca
    NATO using chemical weapons in Bani Walid
    Amnesty International is silent, United Nations is silent,
    Amnesty Int
    NATO using chemical weapons in Bani Walid
    Posted: 2011/09/12
    From: http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628629

    Amnesty International is silent, United Nations is silent, people of the world must support worldcrimes.org – globalpeacenow.com – peoplesconference.org – mathaba.net – as people-based popular grass roots initiatives and STOP giving funds to gate-keeper organizations. Get ACTIVE.

    Residents of Bani Walid testified that Chemical Weapons are being used by NATO in their town, some witnesses claimed that Mustard Gas was being used (viewed in Al-Rai Satellite station). NATO is known for its use of Chemical Weapons, and previous reports have also concluded that NATO used DU and NDU Chemical Weapons at the start of the terror operations.

    This report has been confirmed today 1oth September 2011 , at 5:00 P.M. NATO has used mustard gas against the people of Bani Walid. Journalists are not allowed to go inside the town. NATO is trying to control the flow of information, to create false perceptions and realities based on one sided propaganda. Many argue that a slow genocide is being attempted by NATO in Libya, whether the intention of NATO is genocide or merely a client states yet to be seen. First images of mustard gas victims have emerged.

    The Libyan city of Bani Walid remains under the control of Warfala tribe, rebels are trying to negotiate their surrender to no avail. Gaddafi’s son Saif al-Islam is inside the city along with a strong military contingent to resist the invasion .

    Most argue that this terrorism is implemented to force Libyans in to submissions, they have refused to surrender and give the country to NATO, so NATO has resorted to terrorism, and a slow genocide.

    Marinella Correggia Anti-War campaigner – explains some things we can do to try and change the merciless offensive by NATO. Her email address is mari.liberazioni@yahoo.it.

    Mathaba Editing


    http://www.globalpeacenow.com + http://www.peoplesconference.org + http://www.greencharter.com + http://www.worldcrimes.org + http://www.mathaba.net/support = what are you waiting for?!

    Konstantyn Scheglikov
    Today, the rats of the media will be lying about the taking of the city Bani-Walid, and about deaths of Muammar Gaddafi, his son Saif al Islam and Musa Ibrahim. To do this, they made a photomontage. “Al-Jazeera”, which has already started to lie about the fighting in the streets of Bani-Walid, is ready to release the pre-assembled for the occasion and premade in the cities of eastern Libya videos of jubilant militants allegedly seized Bani Walid. Do not believe this news, they aim to hide the armed resistance to the invaders of Libya, to hide the failure of NATO and the rebels to seize and hold the city. The main thing is they are trying to lower the morale and resistance, do not listen to the news. Kill the invaders!

    From Beni-Walid: “Our sources inside Libya tells us that the second wave of attack from rats in bani walid that occured some hours earlier was repeled by the Libyan army.
    The rats left behind them many dead, the phone call was in a location that is holded by rats away from bani walid. ( as you can understand we cant call this moment bani walid cause people need to focus on this night fighting.)”
    12:18 AM OZYISM

    brave BANI WALID members of the Warfalla Tribe

    Wadii Hadad writes:

    … Look at the heroes of Sirte and Ben Walid! Look to the example of heroism and loyalty and sacrifice! They are trapped and lacking everything except courage; we see them attacking not defending. Look at those people who rejected all the false promises of a presumed democracy! Look at those who refused to betray the past, present and future! Look at those who order history to register that Libya did not give up and that Libya is still fighting! It is not sufficient for Gaddafi to have created such heroes of whom Libya will remain proud forever? Not enough that he blew within every Libyan the values of honor and pride?

    At least 27 NATO militiamen have been killed outside Bani Walid in a counter assault by the Libyan government yesterday, witnesses report that the bodies were taken to a hospital in Alkhumes.

    This comes as Abdul Jibril gave a speech to its militiamen in occupied Green Square, claiming victory while fighting continued inside and outside Tripoli. Within a week at least 70 militiamen were killed inside Tripoli alone by Libyan Army.
    Posted in: Libyan Crisis,News

    Konstantyn Scheglikov writes:
    [ALERT] | Phosphor bombs very brighght explosions with tracers of white smoke seenin the south of #BaniWalid #Libya #Tripoli
    Rebels #Tripoli are on way to #BaniWalid ! We have to get this info to the people of #BaniWalid they are preparing to attack.

    Today, the rats of the media will be lying about the taking of the city Bani-Walid, and about deaths of Muammar Gaddafi, his son Saif al Islam and Musa Ibrahim. To do this, they made a photomontage. “Al-Jazeera”, which has already started to lie about the fighting in the streets of Bani-Walid, is ready to release the pre-assembled for the occasion and premade in the cities of eastern Libya videos of jubilant militants allegedly seized Bani Walid. Do not believe this news, they aim to hide the armed resistance to the invaders of Libya, to hide the failure of NATO and the rebels to seize and hold the city. The main thing is they are trying to lower the morale and resistance, do not listen to the news. Kill the invaders!

    From Beni-Walid: “Our sources inside Libya tells us that the second wave of attack from rats in bani walid that occured some hours earlier was repeled by the Libyan army.
    The rats left behind them many dead, the phone call was in a location that is holded by rats away from bani walid. ( as you can understand we cant call this moment bani walid cause people need to focus on this night fighting.)”

    21h/ NATO again dropped leaflets onto the city of Bani Walid. The flyers called for every family to surrender. They also said that if they surrender their weapons, they would be granted the huge sum of 500,000 dinars per family. On the other side of the leaflet it was written that if they do not surrender, they would be bombed with white phosphorous.
    The answer of the tribes of Bani Walid was, “We will not surrender or betray the nation, and we are ready to serve God and destiny.”
    ————COMMENT: These 500,000 dinars NATO offered as a bribe to any family of Bani Uayd forward to ….. these 500,000 dinars no value! These papers are printed in the UK and Libyan everyone should know that if NATO and establish their terrorists in Libya – the first thing that will make the world Mafia is to make the hyper-inflation! Then these pieces of paper – 500,000 dinars will have a value of 50 euro ![ Niakoi Niakakav] [[AND HE IS RIGHT -> 10.Sept.2011. article –> Moreover, even this amount was delivered to the “new” authorities of Libya not in the currency (the accounts were in dollars, euro, pounds and, in theory, were supposed to be returned in cash ) but they came in boxes with newly printed Libyan dinars. From London – as much as 40 tons!
    That is, instead of real money entrusted to Western banks by the legitimate Government of Libya and meant for financing the projects of international cooperation in the interests of the Libyan people, blessed by the Western democracy, the people received coloured paper with water marks! – > http://libyasos.blogspot.com/2011/09/rape-of-libya-i-can-not-be-silent.html ]——–

    2:41 AM OZYISM

    Reports that NATO has used Mustard Gas in Bani Walid have been coming from eye witnesses from within the beseiged town. For the first time a gruesome image of a victim of the terrorism has come out in social networks.

    Most argue that this terrorism is implemented to force Libyans in to submissions, they have refused to surrender and give the country to NATO, so NATO has resorted to terrorism, and a slow genocide.

    The media has been banned in Bani Walid to hide such atrocities, and the Main Stream Media continues towing the line with NATO.
    man hit by NATOs Mustard Gas

    Alrai TV also confirms the use of mustard gas against Libyans in Bani Walid.
    Posted in: Libyan Crisis,News


    1:23 PM OZYISM
    Residents of Bani Walid testified that Chemical Weapons are being used by NATO in their town, some witnesses claimed that Mustard Gas was being used (viewed in Al-Rai Satellite station). NATO is known for its use of Chemical Weapons, and previous reports have also concluded that NATO used DU and NDU Chemical Weapons at the start of the terror operations.

    These latest reports cannot be confirmed because Journalists are not allowed to go inside the town. There is a complete information black out. NATO is trying to control the flow of information, to create false perceptions and realities based on one sided propaganda. Many argue that a slow genocide is being attempted by NATO in Libya, whether the intention of NATO is genocide or merely a client state is yet to be seen.

    Posted in: Libyan Crisis,News


    Fridrich Hláva
    on Slobica Kandic, Freitag, 9. September 2011 um 20:45
    There are no longer any independent journalists in Libya other than those working for and reporting to Mathaba under difficult conditions with communications being monitored by NATO which is seeking via its ground forces to eliminate those reporting the truth.
    Where NATO has not shut down communications the citizens are terrorized by the vicious armed thugs who help themselves to peoples homes and plunder, rape and steal. Now, information comes in in bits and pieces, occasionally. Before, when there were a wide variety of sources of information coming from inside Libya, we had heavy corroboration. That is not the case now but little has changed: the enemy forces control not even Tripoli which is why meetings of the foreign puppet masters still take place in Paris.

    Tripoli: There is fighting, using artillary, in the northwestern suburbs. In Salah Edden, three NATO-rebel jeeps were destroyed with 6 artillery shells. Progress is being made in the southern suburb area of Azzawiya by the heavily armed soliders of Khamis al-Gaddafi.
    Bani Walid: After failing to convince sheikhs and tribal elders of Bani Walid to surrender, the rats decided to not attack the city at this time. The defenders of Bani Walid are confident in their abilities, and are determined to fight against the colonial coalition [NATO] to the end. There have been as many as 7 different conflicting reports about the number of NATO-rebel that have attempted to besiege Bani Walid. It has also been learned that yesterday, there was an unsuccessful attack on the city by the NATO-rebel alliance, which resulted in the destruction of hundreds of NATO-rebel by the defenders of Bani Walid. A NATO-rebel convoy called was ambushed, and 14 NATO-rebels were killed.
    Sirte: The bombing of Sirte is non-stop. The sources of food in the city have been bombed by NATO. The remote city is besieged with only men being allowed out who are then shot or imprisoned, with women and families forced back. This is an incredible war crime taking place to starve and thirst and entire town and bomb it from the air along with missiles and sound bombs. Where is the international outcry, and where is the media coverage of this siege. It is also reported that hundreds of people were massacred in bombing of the Eid prayers at the end of Ramadan. The entire city is being made to pay the price of slow painful death for refusing to give up their democracy as well as their loyalty to Muammar Qaddafi who originates from this place. There is fighting in Azzawiya. ITAR-TASS gave a report on the atrocities that are being committed by the NATO-rebels in this city. It is claimed that the Libyan Defense Forces used tactical SCUD missiles against NATO-rebel forces in Misrata.
    Benghazi: It is worthy to highlight what is going on in Benghazi. Social chaos exists between four centers of power in Cyrenaica (the east of Libya): The Obeid tribe, the Haruba tribe, the Islamist gangs and the Middle Eastern mercenaries (from Qatar, Jordan, Tunisia, Egypt, etc). It appears that this chaos has reached a critical mass. There are reports of clashes between different factions of the NATO-rebels there, and even the use of NATO air power against the NATO-rebels of Benghazi. It is possible that the tribes of Cyrenaica have decided that it is time to liberate all of Libya, and to join the union of tribes that support the Libyan Jamahiriya. The wind of change is thus blowing in favor of Muammar Qaddafi and the Jamahiriya.
    Algeria: Algeria is going to send humanitarian aid to Libya. Syrian and Algerian computer hackers attacked the website of the Al-Jazeera television station which has been subservient to the Emir of Qatar where it is based, the Emir being a rent-boy prostitute of Hilary Clinton according to detractors of the dictator. The governments of Mali and Niger are concerned about the appearance of armed men who might destablizie their areas, while Africa gears up to send support for Libya to repulse the NATO-led Al-Qaida.
    In the last 72 hours, the Libyan Armed Forces killed at least 128 rebels and 25 vehicles, including 2 tanks, the report said. According to various estimates, from 70 to 80 percent of Libyan territory is under the control of the Libyan Armed Forces and the tribes that are loyal to Colonel Gaddafi, the report concluded.


    So everything you heard was made-up story. Their movie… When thay found out that no one was inside the compound they accted like they are fighting against Gaddafi’s soldiers. But the truth is that they were fighting each other. They basically put some soldiers in the compound to act like they were Gaddafi’s soldiers.
    Then you heard that the rebels are controling 80% of Tripoli. Wich is also a lie. The rebels have control of nothing in Tripoli. They are going around, looking for Gaddafi’s soldiers. They can’t find them.
    What I believe is that something big will happen. Big suprise will happen for those rebels.


    1:59 PM OZYISM

    The TNC Council has been attacked and dozens have been killed in Benghazi as reported by Mathaba. No more detail is available, but early signs suggests that inner fighting is raging in Benghazi as we speak.

    Previously I suggested that the division is very clear to see, there is two sides within NATO militia.

    1. NATO agents (hence Haftari fighters, trained, armed and financed by CIA since 1990s)
    2. Traitors who joined NATO agents for greed, power etc..

    These two forces are clashing now as we speak in Benghazi according to Mathaba. This was deemed to happen because the next phase of this war will determine who controls Libya.
    Posted in: Libyan Crisis,News

    7:05 AM OZYISM

    LJBC reported that over 350 NATO militia has been killed as they attempted to storm Sirte, while NATO militia begs for NATO to continue terror operations.

    NATO militia has failed to hold on to territories, also have failed to advance, continually needing NATO air force and special ops, mainly because they have no support in Libya. This comes as NATO militia offered France 35% of Libyan oil wealth in exchange for the the continuation of terror operations, angering the Libyan population even more, as the country is given away to looters and Imperialist invaders.

    Posted in: Libyan Crisis,News

  23. IBYA 360° SITE MAP
    LIBYA 360°
    Sep 2011
    Posted by Alexandra in LIBYA
    Death for Libyans = billions for the West

    Garikai Chengu. The Citizen (Tanzania)

    From oil to water, water-boarding to arms and from gas to reconstruction the war in Libya will rake in billions of dollars for the West. Just how much will trickle down to the people of Libya remains to be seen.

    People who think that the West’s intervention in Libya is just another oil grab are mistaken. Broadly speaking, for Britain military intervention is mainly about arms, Italy its natural gas, France its water and for the US its counter-terrorism and reconstruction contracts. Spreading democracy and saving the people of Benghazi form merely tangential benefits used to justify these ends.

    Lest we forget, Nato’s bombardment began because Mr Gaddafi threatened to do to Benghazi what Mr Bashar al-Assad’s forces are doing to various Syrian cities and Nato itself is poised to do in Sirte.

    ”History is a set of lies agreed upon” once remarked Napoleon Bonaparte. If left unchallenged the true motives behind what the French mainstream media have coined ”Sarkozy’s War” may be lost in the fog of war.

    So what makes Libya so important to the West? Any real estate agent could tell you: location. Given that Libya sits atop the strategic intersection of the Mediterranean, African, and Arab worlds, control of the nation, has always been a remarkably effective way to project power into these three regions and beyond.

    Ever since time immemorial Western control over Libya has been of great importance. After Libyan independence in 1951, US, British and French payments for military basing rights formed the single-largest element of Libyan GDP until oil exports began to flow in 1961.

    Nowadays, Mr Sarkozy’s interest in Libya lies in a commodity more precious than oil, namely water. It is becoming increasingly accepted that water promises to be to the 21st century what oil was to the 20th century: the precious commodity that determines the wealth of nations.

    Unlike oil, there are no substitutes, alternatives or stopgaps for water. Nature has decreed that the supply of water is fixed. Meanwhile demand rises inexorably as the world’s population increases and enriches itself. Population growth, climate change, pollution, urbanization and the rapid development of manufacturing industries are relentlessly combining such that demand for fresh water will outstrip supply by 40 per cent by 2040.

    Libya sits on a resource more valuable than oil, the Nubian Sandstone Aquifer, which is an immensely vast underground sea of fresh water. Colonel Gaddafi had cleverly invested $25 billion in the Great Man-made River Project, a complex 4,000-km long water pipeline buried beneath the desert that could transport two million cubic metres of water a day. Such a monumental water distribution scheme could turn Libya – a nation that is 95 per cent desert – into a food self-sufficient arable oasis.

    Today France’s global mega-water companies like Suez, Ondeo and Saur, control more than 45 per cent of the world’s water market and are rushing to privatize water, already a $400 billion global business. For these French companies, Libya will be a bonanza. No wonder Le Monde coined it ”Sarkozy’s War” and had a ”Victoire” front page splash when Mr Gaddafi’s compound was stormed.

    Late last year, the Central Intelligence Agency suspiciously raised the spectre of ”future ‘hydrological warfare’ in which rivers, lakes and aquifers become national security assets to be fought over,” or controlled through proxy armies and client states. Regime change in Libya is the first major instance of hydrological warfare.

    With the spoils of war from Libya’s water market largely reserved for the French, Mr. Cameron is eyeing another market, that of arms.

    The subject of the West selling arms to regimes suppressing uprisings remains as wilfully overlooked as an American war crime. Even as The Times of London has just reported that Britain enjoyed a 30 per cent spike in arms sales to regimes in the Middle East during the Arab Spring. Arms sold between February and July jumped to $101 million, the Times’ report says, noting that these include weapons that could be used to suppress domestic protests.

    Mr Obama’s administration is even more steeped in the controversial arms trade. The US accepts no rival on this front. Over the past decade the US has averaged a staggering $5.8 billion per year in arms sales with the Middle East.

    The very Libyan military hardware that Nato boastfully claims to have downgraded by 90 per cent will need to be rebuilt. US arms companies will gleefully be on hand to arm their proxy regime to the teeth. Libya will be a bonanza for American arms dealers.

    American infrastructure contractors will also reap the windfalls of post-war reconstruction. The grim reality is that every bridge, road, rail-link and building that US war-planes bomb will have to be rebuilt and paid for by the Libyan taxpayer.

    Even grimmer still is the fact that the approximately $1.1billion spent by the US government on bombarding Libya is a drop in the ocean compared to the profit that American contractors stand to make. Many of whom have strong ties to the upper echelons of the military and the Obama administration.

    In-fact, more than 70 American companies and individuals have won up to $8 billion in contracts for work in post-war Iraq and Afghanistan over the last two years, according to a new study by the Center for Public Integrity.

    According to the study, nearly 70 per cent of these companies had employees or board members who either served in or had close ties to the executive branch for Republican and Democratic administrations, for members of Congress of both parties, or at the highest levels of the military.

    Therefore, those in the military tasked with minimising ‘collateral damage’ to property stand to directly profit from less than pinpoint precision. In short, dropping bombs can be profitable.

    The recent bombshell revelations of correspondence between the CIA and Libya’s security apparatus prove that the US has been outsourcing its torture or ”enhanced interrogation” of terror suspects to Libya through the internationally illegal rendition process. These revelations are embarrassing but hardly surprising. Nevertheless, there is little doubt a pliant proxy regime will continue to do America’s dirty work.

    Last but not least there is oil. Much as the self-righteous West might pretend otherwise, oil is unquestionably a key part of the equation. Libya has the largest oil reserves in Africa and 85 per cent of its exports are to Europe.

    Archival footage of Italian Premier Silvio Berlusconi surrounded by Mr Gaddafi’s female bodyguards, kissing the Libyan strongman’s hand at Leonardo Da Vinci airport is indicative of just how important Libya is to Italy.

    Libya’s oil is especially important to Italy because of its proximity, the ease of its extraction, and the sweetness of its crude. Most refineries in Italy and elsewhere are built to deal with sweet Libyan crude, they cannot easily process the heavier Saudi crude that has recently replaced the Libyan production shortfall.

    Libyan natural gas reserves are estimated to be over 52.7 trillion cubic feet and large areas of the country are still to be surveyed. With assured supplies available from Libya, Italy will become less dependent on supplies from Russia, which on the energy front is increasingly flexing its muscles and thumbing its nose at mainland Europe.

    Libya has a 1,800km coastline just miles from Italy and porous southern borders with three poor African nations. Therefore, a pliant regime that will stem the flow of asylum seekers and keep the oil and gas flowing is vital for Rome.

    From oil to water, water-boarding to arms and from gas to reconstruction the war in Libya will rake in billions of dollars for the West. Just how much will trickle down to the people of Libya remains to be seen.

    The author is a research scholar at Harvard University’s Faculty of Arts and Sciences.

  24. al-Gadhafi prays with his young family:

    praying w family


    Muammar Qaddafi Letter on 12 Sept. 2011, English subtitles

    Leader Muammar Qaddafi Letter on 12 September 2011
    Posted: 2011/09/12
    From: Mathaba

    “It is not acceptable for us to hand over our oil to the people of France to enjoy…”

    Muammar Al-Qaddafi letter – 12th September, 2011 read on his behalf by Misha’an al-Jabouri (Al-Rai TV) :-

    The reality of the situation has started to become clear; it is a revolt against the Al-Fatah revolution and the power of the People’s Committees. This is a renewed effort to return Libya to what it was before the revolution (Al-Fatah revolution) a property of Western companies and not the Libyan people, in order to enslave the Libyan people after they were rulers.

    To return Libya to its colonial days after it was free; post Al-Fatah revolution. It isn’t rocket science that the motives behind this uprising that is backed by the flag of humiliation and dishonour, that there is no other choice for the Libyan people but to defeat this uprising that goes against the grain of the Al-Fatah revolution. It is not acceptable for us to hand over our oil to the people of France to enjoy, and we will not allow ourselves to become slaves when we used to be masters in the People’s Congresses and People’s Committees. We will not surrender Libya to colonial rule as the traitors would like. Now there is no choice but to fight until victory and this uprising is crushed and God is above all those whom aggress.

    Note: Mathaba has some doubts over the authenticity of this communication.


    Update on the war – 13 September 2011
    Posted: 2011/09/14
    From: Mathaba

    Gaddafi’s surprise attack, on 13 September 2011

    Russian site za-kaddafi.ru gives a report, concerning the war in Libya. There are Russians and other foreign citizens some with military experience, in Libya who are offering solidarity with the African nation which has faced many massacres, and non-stop bombing by the US-European “NATO” alliance.

    Libya has held out single-handed and entered the ranks of world military history by its resistance under clear skies, with no air defenses and six months on non-stop cruise missiles, bombs, and now also chemical weapons and the cutting of water and food to entire cities by NATO-rebels.

    The Russian site reports that a detachment of seventy thousand (70,000) volunteers have come from Niger to help defend Libya, and that they are at the disposal of Colonel Gaddafi. In the towns of Bani Walid and Sirte, NATO used mustard gas and cluster bombs during the past week, with horrific injuries evident.

    Sirte and Bani Walid have been subjected to constant bombing, and wide spread use of sound bombs to prevent the population from sleeping as well as cause disorientation and now also the use of chemical weapons.

    All human rights and media organizations of the world, as well as “NGOs” and the “United Nations” have been silent on this matter, with only those governments that are not in the hands of the banking elite (including Cuba, Venezuela, Bolivia, Ecuador, Zimbabwe) speaking out and demanding that an international tribunal examine NATO war crimes.

    To this end some initiatives are now under way but seeking popular support as they are genuine and not motivated by money or funds, as is evidently the case with Amnesty International (which recently earned the name “Amnesia International” for its complete lack of mention of Libya in its 3-months publication June-August entitled “Human Rights Defender”) and other such organizations.

    The noteworthy initiatives which are deserving of support are the World Peoples Conference on Crimes Against Humanity,

    which is slated for March 2012, and which is setting up a repository at http://www.worldcrimes.org as well as the Global Peace Initiative

    being led by Dr K A Paul,

    which is seeking one million email signups, twitter followers, facebook likes, and feed subscribers to demand peace.

    The Russian site also said that in the suburbs of Tripoli, a “pro-Gaddafi army of volunteers from Algeria” killed more than 200 mercenaries.
    It said that a fierce counter-attack came on three fronts: at the refinery at Ras Lanuf, near Muammar Gaddafi’s hometown of Sirte, and Bani Walid.

    “It is not permissible to make Libya a colony again, and all that remains for us to do is fight until victory is won,” said Colonel Gaddafi in a statement read out via Syrian Arrai TV recently, although Mathaba has not been able to confirm the authenticity of the communication and is seeking contact with the TV station regarding this matter.

    Adam King of the Green Book Center which was destroyed in NATO bombing near the outset of the war against Libya, even though it is a peaceful academic institute with absolutely no military connections, said that the words used and the message itself, did not appear to have come from the Leader but could have been an attempt by NATO-rebels to find a way to post messages via Arrai.

    Although he could not confirm one way or another, he said that the things that were not mentioned in the short communication, and some things that were mentioned, did not appear to fit the reality, but he would not elaborate further so as not to disclose information helpful to the NATO-rebels in the event that this was not a communication from Qaddafi.

    However, the Libyan leaders has given several other authentic communications which show that the Jamahiriya still controls the vas t majority of Libya, and even the majority of Tripoli, with the NATO-rebels controlling mainly the media and communications, as well as the air space. The Libyan leader and the vast majority of the Libyan population are continuing strong resistance.

    It is expected that the Jamahiriya will regain control of its territory from the foreign mercenaries, or otherwise that people’s power will spread to other states throughout Africa and the Arab region as well as parts of Europe, the latter being in economic free-fall.

    Forces loyal to Gaddafi sprung a surprise operation yesterday, za-kaddafi.ru reports, “deep behind enemy lines, killing at least 12 rats [Ed: NATO-rebels] of the TNC [Ed: so-called NATO-rebel Transitional National Council] during a raid near Ras Lanuf on the central coast.”

    The report quoted Libyan Defense Forces military spokesman Mohamed Zawawi as saying “At this point, we have a figure of 12 dead in the ranks of the rats who were guarding the plant.”


  25. Vol. 11, Issue 506, 26 August 2011
    The War in Libya
    How the CIA Stripped Qaddafi of His Tripoli Divisions by the “Waqil Massiri” Maneuver

    By Saturday, Aug. 20, when Lt. Gen. Charles Bouchard, NATO’s Canadian commander in Libya, gave the signal for the advance on Tripoli, all the operation’s working components had been in position for a week.
    British, French, Jordanian and Qatari Special Operations units had been standing by in safe-houses around the city; weapons, ammunition, food and water had been cached at dozens of points close to the action, at the international airport at Ben Ghashir 34 kilometers south of the city center and around Tripoli port.
    Electronic jamming blacked the entire capital shutting down the communications links between Qaddafi and his political, military and intelligence chiefs and supporters in the city, as well as the outside world.
    Our military sources report the foreign contingents were made up of British SAS commandos, French 2REP (Groupe des commando parachutiste) – which is similar to the US Navy DELTA unit, as well as DINOP commandos; Jordan’s Royal Special Forces – specialists in combat in built-up areas and capturing fortified installations like the Qaddafi compound in Tripoli, and the Qatari Special Forces, which were transferred from Benghazi where they had been guarding rebel leaders.
    Rebel forces were carted in by sea and truck.
    The hundreds ferried in by unmarked landing craft from Misrata and Benghazi, untrained in these maneuvers, were easy game for Qaddafi’s forces which picked them off as they came ashore. But the two columns of rebels trucked in from Zawiya in the west and Garyan in the south encountered no resistance before or after they entered the city behind the vanguards of British and French special units.
    All the roads to Tripoli and inside the city were clear. Two days later, Tuesday, Aug. 23, Muammar Qaddafi’s Bab al-Aziziya fortress and residential compound was overrun amid scenes of jubilant celebratory gunfire.

    Qaddafi missed a key trick

    Col. Qaddafi had known what was afoot.
    In the middle of last week, he and his aides got in touch with the US ambassador to Libya Gene Cretz and Gerry Feltman, the US Assistant Secretary of State for Near East Affairs, who was standing by for developments, and proposed an immediate ceasefire.
    But it was too late. The American diplomats turned him down
    Nevertheless, the Libyan ruler, in the last days of his 42 years in power, failed to defend his capital or even secure his last bastion in the city against the oncoming NATO-rebel assault.
    Where were the 15,000 members of the six armored brigades tasked with defending Tripoli? Why did its defensive belt suddenly fold?
    DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s intelligence sources reveal the answer to this enigma: The only Arab ruler who had for four decades prepared himself against the day that some Western or other foreign nation would turn around and try and topple him, Qaddafi nevertheless missed his most acute peril: a sellout by his generals to the Americans – or more precisely, the CIA. He made the same mistake as Iraq’s Saddam Hussein in not taking into account that the Americans would bribe the officers commanding his army brigades in Tripoli to melt away in the face of the rebel forces led by a Western-Arab spearhead which entered his capital from the east and the south.
    Elements of the 32nd tank brigade led by his son Khamis Qaddafi held out and tried to cut off the rebel advance but were outmaneuvered. Thursday night, Aug. 25, Qaddafi spokesman Moussa Ibrahim claimed that the Khamis brigade had mounted a counter-attack on Tripoli. This is not confirmed. He spoke from the Syrian-based Al Orouba station.

    Tripoli left unguarded by the same device as Baghdad in 2003

    The operation was handled by the new CIA chief Gen. David Petraeus, architect of the Bush administration’s 2006-2007 plan to lay out cold cash to buy the cooperation of Iraq’s Sunni tribal chiefs for wiping out Al Qaida. The same tactic worked again this year for weaning Afghan Pashtun chiefs away from their support for the Taliban in 2010 and the first months of 2011.
    Although our sources have not yet discovered which general close to Qaddafi US agents bought first from among the commanders in charge of defending Tripoli and his compound, they confirm that the method used replicated the tactic the CIA employed shortly before the US swooped down on Baghdad in April 2001.
    Then, too, US-led troops encountered no resistance after the CIA bribed Gen. Waqil Massiri, a favorite of Saddam Hussein and his sons and popular among the commanders of the Republic Guards and other elite units.
    Gen. Massiri moved freely in the highest Iraqi circles having married the daughter of Saddam’s cousin Gen. Ali Majid – better known as Chemical Ali, who was head of the southern front during the war.
    Yet it was Waqil Massiri who betrayed Saddam and brokered the connection between the Americans and the heads of the Republican Guard’s Al Medina, Hammurabi, Nida and Nebuchadnezzar divisions responsible for Baghdad’s outer defenses. The US 3rd Marines Division and the 1st Marines Task Force were thus able to march into Baghdad without firing a shot.

    Tripoli commanders scrambled for dollars

    One of Qaddafi’s top generals performed the same task in Tripoli as did Gen. Massiri in Baghdad.
    “The result was stunning – to say the least,” said a Western intelligence source close to the operation who demanded anonymity.
    It also released a steady stream of data from Libyan field officers to the British and French Special Operations commanders from early August.
    Each officer brought a friend, vying among themselves who would bring along the highest-ranking volunteers for deals with the Americans and win a larger reward for himself.
    So eager were Tripoli-based officers to join the cash-for-surrender rush that the British and French commanders could hardly cope with the mountain of logistic detail necessitated by the deals.
    In addition to money, the units deserting the defense of Tripoli were awarded US guarantees of immunity from NATO air and ground attacks; their commanders and troops were promised security and freedom from prosecution during and after the war and permission to return to their families after the conflict was over.
    For their part, the Libyan commanders in Tripoli pledged to refrain from attacking NATO and rebel forces. They also undertook not to sabotage infrastructure such as bridges, road junctions, dams, and oil, gas, water and electricity facilities, and promised not to destroy, mine or booby-trap military camps, bases, defense lines or other military complexes.

    Qaddafi vanishes but the fighting goes on

    The Libyan officers and troops covered by the secret deal agreed to stand up at a pre-arranged signal from US agents, remove their uniforms, desert their posts, drop their weapons and go home.
    DEBKA-Net-Weekly’s military and intelligence sources confirm that the military chiefs of Tripoli and their units kept to their side of the bargain so faithfully that some didn’t bother to wait for the signal; they just got up and walked away when the advancing NATO and rebel forces came into view.
    This CIA tactic would explain the mystery of Qaddafi’s six vanishing brigades. It also accounts for the dearth of Libyan military casualties in hospitals. Not a single bridge or road leading to Tripoli was blown up. Although explosives had been planted at focal points on the orders of Qaddafi and his sons, no one detonated them.
    And Tripoli, capital of Libya and its ruler Muammar Qaddafi, were destined to fall with lightening speed due to internal betrayal.
    The deposed ruler dropped out of sight, but pro-Qaddafi troops outside the capital quickly went into resistance mode, seizing pockets inside Tripoli and launching heavy bombardments in other parts of the country.

    Special report: The secret plan to take Tripoli exposed
    Posted: 2011/09/09
    From: Mathaba
    Following is a summary of a western agency report again showing western forces on the ground in Tripoli in violation of the laws of their own resolutions in the now-defunct UN

    Abdel Majid Mlegta

    Colonel Muammar Gaddafi’s government was delivered by a caterer, on a memory stick. A story of how Libyan people were sold for money to NATO and their mercenaries by greedy businessmen.

    Abdel Majid Mlegta (in the photo above) ran the companies that supplied meals to Libyan government departments including the interior ministry. The job was “easy,” he told Reuters last week. “I built good relations with officers. I wanted to “serve” my country.”

    Mlegta was promised millions in return for his “services” by US and France from the frozen Libyan people’s funds. In the first few weeks of the uprising, he secretly began to work for the rebels. He recruited sympathizers at the nerve center of the Gaddafi government, pinpointed its weak links and its command-and-control strength in Tripoli, and passed that information onto the rebel leadership on a series of flash memory cards.

    The first was handed to him, he says, by Gaddafi military intelligence and security officers. It contained information about seven key operations rooms in the capital, including internal security, the Gaddafi revolutionary committees, the popular guards — as Gaddafi’s voluntary armed militia was known — and military intelligence.

    The data included names of the commanders of those units, how many people worked in each center and how they worked, as well as crucial details like the number plates of their cars, and how each unit communicated with the central command led by intelligence chief Abdullah al-Senussi and Gaddafi’s second son Saif al-Islam.

    That memory card — which Mlegta later handed to officials at the North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO) — provided the basis of a sophisticated plan to topple the Libyan leader and seize Tripoli. The operation, which took months of planning, involved secretly arming rebel units inside the capital. Those units would help NATO destroy strategic targets in the city — operation rooms, safe houses, military barracks, police stations, armored cars, radars and telephone centers. At an agreed time, the units would then rise up as rebels attacked from all sides.

    The rebels called the plan Operation Dawn Mermaid. This is the inside story — much of it never before told — of how that plan unfolded.

    The rebels were not alone. British operatives infiltrated Tripoli and planted radio equipment to help target air strikes and avoid killing civilians, according to U.S. and allied sources. The French supplied training and transport for new weapons. Washington helped at a critical late point by adding two extra Predator drones to the skies over Tripoli, improving NATO’s ability to strike. Also vital, say western and rebel officials, was the covert support of Arab states such as the United Arab Emirates and Qatar. Doha gave weapons, military training and money to the rebels.

    By the time the rebels were ready for the final assault, they were so confident of success that they openly named the date and time of the attack: Saturday, August 20, at 8 p.m., just after most people in Tripoli broke their Ramadan fast.

    “We didn’t make it a secret,” said Mohammed Gula, who led a pro-rebel political cell in central Tripoli and spoke to Reuters as rebels first entered Gaddafi’s Bab al-Aziziyah compound. “We said it out on the street. People didn’t believe us. They believe us now.”


    Planning began in April, two months into the uprising. Rebel leader Mahmoud Jibril and three other senior insurgents met in the Tunisian city of Djerba, according to both Mlegta and another senior official from the National Transitional Council (NTC), as the alternative rebel government calls itself.

    The three were Mlegta, who by then had fled Tripoli and joined the rebels as the head of a brigade; Ahmed Mustafa al-Majbary, who was head of logistics and supplies; and Othman Abdel-Jalil, a scientist who became coordinator of the Tripoli plan.

    Before he fled, Mlegta had spent just under two months working inside the regime, building up a network of sympathizers. At first, 14 of Gaddafi’s officers were prepared to help. By the end there were 72, Mlegta says. “We used to meet at my house and sometimes at the houses of two other officers… We preserved the secrecy of our work and it was in coordination with the NTC executive committee.”

    Brigadier General Abdulsalam Alhasi, commander of the rebels’ main operation center in Benghazi, said those secretly helping the rebels were “police, security, military, even some people from the cabinet; many, many people. They gave us information and gave instructions to the people working with them, somehow to support the “revolution.”

    One of those was al-Barani Ashkal, commander-in-chief of the guard at Gaddafi’s military compound in the suburbs of Tripoli. Ashkal wanted to defect, but was asked by the NTC to remain in his post where, Alhasi says, he would become instrumental in helping the rebels enter the city.

    The rebel planning committee — another four men would join later, making seven in all — knew that the targets on the memory sticks were the key to crippling Gaddafi’s forces. The men included Hisham abu Hajar, chief commander of the Tripoli Brigade, Usama Abu Ras, who liaised with some cells inside Tripoli, and Rashed Suwan, who helped financially and coordinated with the tribes of Tripoli to ease the rebels’ entry.

    According to Mlegta and to Hisham Buhagiar, a rebel colonel and the committee’s seventh member, the group initially drew up a list of 120 sites for NATO to target in the days leading up to their attack.

    Rebel leaders discussed their idea with French President Nicolas Sarkozy at a meeting at the Elysee Palace on April 20.

    That meeting was one of five in Paris in April and May, according to Mlegta. Most were attended by the chiefs of staff of NATO countries involved in the bombing campaign, which had begun in March, as well as military officials from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates.

    After presenting the rebels’ plan “from A to Z”, Mlegta handed NATO officials three memory cards: the one packed with information about regime strongholds in Tripoli; another with updated information on regime sites as well as details of 65 Gaddafi officers sympathetic to the rebels who had been secretly supplied with NATO radiophones; and a third which contained the plot to take Tripoli.

    Sarkozy expressed enthusiasm for the plan, according to Mlegta and the senior NTC official, who spoke on condition of anonymity.

    The leaders slimmed the 120 targets down to 82 and “assigned 2,000 armed men to go into Tripoli and 6,000 unarmed to go out (onto the streets) in the staged uprising,” according to rebel colonel Buhagiar. He joined the opposition National Front for the Salvation of Libya in 1981 and has lived in the United States and trained as a special forces operative in both Sudan and Iraq.

    There were already anti-Gaddafi cells in the capital that the rebels knew they could activate. “The problem was that we needed time,” the senior NTC official said. “We feared that some units may go out into the streets in a spontaneous way and they would be quashed. We also needed time to smuggle weapons, fighters and boats.”

    In the early months of the uprising, pro-rebel fighters had slipped out of Tripoli and made their way to the north-western city of Misrata, where they were trained for the uprising, rebels in Misrata told Reuters in June. The leaders of two rebel units said “hundreds” of Tripoli residents had begun slipping back into the city by mid-July. Commander Alhasi and other rebel officers in Benghazi said the number of infiltrators sent into Tripoli was dozens, not hundreds.

    “This was not D-Day,” Alhasi told Reuters in his office.


    Most of the infiltrators traveled to Tripoli by fishing trawler via Malta, according to Alhasi. They were equipped with light weapons — rifles and sub-machineguns — hand grenades, demolition charges and radios.

    “We could call them and they could call each other,” Alhasi said. “Most of them were volunteers, from all parts of Libya, and Libyans from overseas. Everybody wants to do something for the success of the revolution.”

    Although Tripoli was ostensibly under the control of Gaddafi loyalists, rebels said the security system was porous: bribery or other ruses could be used to get in and out. Small groups of men also began probing the government’s security system with nighttime attacks on checkpoints, according to one operative who talked to Reuters in June.

    It was possible to smuggle weapons into Tripoli, but it was easier and less risky — if far more expensive — to buy them from Gaddafi loyalists looking to make a profit before the regime collapsed. The going rate for a Kalashnikov in Tripoli was $5,000 over the summer; in Misrata the same weapon cost $3,000.

    Morale got a boost when rebels broke into government communication channels and recorded 2,000 calls between the regime’s top leadership, including a few with Gaddafi’s sons, on everything from military orders to sex. The NTC mined the taped calls for information and broadcast some of them on rebel TV, a move that frightened the regime, according to the senior NTC source. “They knew then that we had infiltrated and broken into their ranks.”

    Several allied and U.S. officials, as well as a source close to the Libyan rebels, said that around the beginning of May, foreign military trainers including British, French and Italian operatives, as well as representatives from Qatar and the United Arab Emirates, began to organize serious efforts to hone the rebels into a more effective fighting force.

    Most of the training happened in the rebel-held Western Mountains. But Eric Denece, a former French intelligence operative and now Director of the French Center for Research on Intelligence, says an elite rebel force of fighters from the east was trained both inside and outside Libya, at NATO bases and those of other allies. This “overseas brigade” was then dropped back into the country. In all, estimated Denece, some 100-200 foreign operatives were sent to Libya, where they focused on training and military coordination. Mlegta confirms that number.


    Rebel commander Alhasi insists western special forces were not involved in combat; the main help they gave was with the bombing campaign and training. London, Paris and Washington also say their troops were not involved in combat.

    “They complied with our (bombing) requirements, immediately sometimes, sometimes we had a delay,” said Alhasi, who has a big satellite photograph of Tripoli on one of his walls. “We had the information on the ground about the targets and relayed it to them.”

    A European official knowledgeable about such operations said “dozens” of plain-clothes French military advisers were sent to Libya. A French official said between 30 and 40 “military advisers” helped organize the rebels and trained them on basic weapons and more high-tech hardware.

    In May, the French began smuggling weapons into western Libya. French military spokesmen later confirmed these arms drops, saying they were justified as “humanitarian support”, but also briefing that the aim was to prepare for an advance on Tripoli.

    British undercover personnel carried out some of the most important on-the-ground missions by allied forces before the fall of Tripoli, U.S. and allied officials told Reuters.

    One of their key tasks, according to allied officials, was planting radio equipment to help allied forces target Gaddafi’s military forces and command-and-control centers. This involved dangerous missions to infiltrate the capital, locate specific potential targets and then plant equipment so bomber planes could precisely target munitions, destroying sensitive targets without killing bystanders.


    In mid-March, a month after violent resistance to Gaddafi’s rule first erupted, President Obama had signed a sweeping top secret order, known as a covert operations “finding”, which gave broad authorization to the CIA to support the rebels.

    But while the general authorization encompassed a wide variety of possible measures, the presidential finding required the CIA to come back to the White House for specific permissions to move ahead and help them. Several U.S. officials said that, because of concerns about the rebels’ disorganization, internal politics, and limited paramilitary capabilities, clandestine U.S. support on the ground never went much beyond intelligence collection.

    U.S. officials acknowledge that as rebel forces closed in on Tripoli, such intelligence “collection” efforts by the CIA and other American agencies in Libya became very extensive and included efforts to help the rebels and other NATO allies track down Gaddafi and his entourage. But the Obama administration’s intention, the officials indicated, was that if any such intelligence fell into American hands it would be passed onto others.

    A senior U.S. defense official disclosed to Reuters details of a legal opinion showing the Pentagon would not be able to supply lethal aid to the rebels — even with the U.S. recognition of the NTC.

    “It was a legal judgment that the quasi-recognition that we gave to the NTC as the legitimate representative of the Libyan people didn’t check the legal box to authorize us to be providing lethal assistance under the Arms Export Control Act,” the senior official said.


    In some ways the rebels’ most unlikely ally was Qatar.

    The Gulf Arab state is keen to downplay its role, perhaps understandably given that it is ruled by an absolute monarch. But on the ground, signs abounded of the emirate’s support. The weapons and equipment the French brought in were mostly supplied by Qatar, according to rebel sources. In May, a Reuters reporter saw equipment in boxes clearly stamped “Qatar.” It included mortar kits, military fatigues, radios and binoculars. At another location, Reuters saw new anti-tank missiles.

    Qatar’s decision to supply arms to the rebellion, one source close to the NTC told Reuters, was instigated by influential Libyan Islamist scholar Ali Salabi, who sought refuge in Qatar after fleeing Libya in the late 1990s. He had previously worked with Gaddafi’s son Saif, to help rehabilitate Libyans who had fought in Afghanistan. Salabi’s brother Ismael is also a leader of a rebel militia in Libya.

    Salabi “is the link to the influential figures in Qatar, and convinced the Qataris to get involved,” said the source close to the NTC.


    By early June, Libya seemed locked in a stalemate.

    After three months of civil war, rebels had seized huge swathes of territory, but NATO bombing had failed to dislodge Gaddafi. The African Union said the only way forward was a ceasefire and negotiated peace. London joined Paris in suggesting that while Gaddafi must step down, perhaps he could stay in Libya.

    But hidden away from view, the plan to seize Tripoli was moving into action.

    The rebels began making swift advances in the Western Mountains, out of Misrata and around the town of Zintan. Newly arrived Apache attack helicopters operating from Britain’s HMS Ocean, an amphibious assault ship, were destroying armored vehicles. NATO aircraft dropped leaflets to dispirit Gaddafi forces and improve rebel morale.

    “The game-changer has been the attack helicopters which have given the NTC more protection from Gaddafi’s heavy weapons,” a French Defense Ministry official said.

    The rebels’ foreign backers were eager to hasten the war. For one thing, a U. N. mandate for bombing ran only to the end of September; agreement on an extension was not guaranteed. One U.S. official, speaking on condition of anonymity, told Reuters the main U.S. concern was “breaking the rough stalemate before the end of the NATO mandate”.

    The Europeans were also burning through costly munitions and Washington was concerned about wear and tear on NATO allies’ aircraft. “Some of the countries… basically every deployable F-16 they had in the inventory was deployed,” a senior U.S. defense official told Reuters.

    But the momentum was shifting in the rebels’ favor.

    On July 28, the assassination of rebel military commander Abdel Fatah Younes proved a surprise turning-point. The former Interior Minister had defected to the rebels in February. Some believe he had held back their advance from the east, for reasons that remain unclear. Younes’ death at the hands of his own men raised questions about the NTC and added impetus to NATO’s desire to push things along in case the anti-Gaddafi forces imploded.

    The West forced NTC head Mahmoud Jibril to change his cabinet. NATO then took more of the lead in preparations, according to Denece, who said he has contacts within both French and Libyan intelligence.

    There was another boon to the rebels. Regional heavyweight Turkey came out in support of the NTC in July, and then held a conference at which 30 countries backed them. “The Turks actually were very helpful throughout this in a very quiet kind of way,” said the senior U.S. defense official.

    After the uprising began, NTC claimed that Gaddafi recruited several thousand mercenaries; some formed the core of his best-organised forces. Most of the hired guns came from countries to Libya’s south such as Chad, Mali, and Niger, but some were from further afield, including South Africa and the Balkans. This claim has never been proven.


    Foreign agents, meanwhile, were circulating far and wide. At the Tunisia-Libya border in early August, a Reuters reporter ran into a Libyan with an American accent who identified himself as the head of the rebel command center in the Western Mountains. He was accompanied by two muscular blond western men. He said he spent a lot of time in the United States and Canada, but would not elaborate.

    As the rebels advanced on Zawiyah, the Reuters reporter also saw western-looking men inside the Western Mountain region traveling in simple, old pickup trucks. Not far away, rebels in Nalut said they were being aided by CIA agents, though this was impossible to verify.

    Operation Dawn Mermaid was initially meant to begin on August 10, according to Mohammed Gula, the political cell leader in central Tripoli. But “other cities were not yet ready”, the leadership decided, and it was put off for a few days.

    A debate flared inside the Pentagon about whether to send extra Predator drones to Libya. “It was a controversial issue even as to whether it made sense to pull (drones) from other places to boost this up to try to bring this to a quicker conclusion,” the U.S. defense official said.

    Those who backed the use of extra drones won, and the last two Predators were taken from a training base in the United States and sent to north Africa, arriving on August 16.

    In the meantime, the rebels had captured several cities. By August 17 or 18, recalls Gula, “when we heard that Zawiyah had fallen, and Zlitan looked like it was about to fall, and Garyan had fallen, we decided now is the time.”

    Those successes had a knock-on effect, U.S. and NATO officials told Reuters. With much of the country now conquered, Predator drones and other surveillance and strike planes could finally be focused on the capital. Data released by the Pentagon showed a substantial increase in the pace of U.S. air strikes in Libya between August 10 and August 22.

    “We didn’t have to scan the entire country any longer,” a NATO official said. “We were able to focus on where the concentrations of regime forces were.”


    Days before the attack on Tripoli, the White House began leaking stories to TV networks saying Gaddafi was near the end. But U.S. intelligence officials — who are supposed to give an objective view of the situation on the ground — were pushing back, telling journalists they were not so sure of immediate victory and the fighting could go on for months.

    Then, on August 19, a breakthrough: Abdel Salam Jalloud, one of the most public faces of Gaddafi’s regime, defected. Jalloud had been trying to get out for the previous three months, according to the senior NTC official. “He asked for our help but because he wanted his whole family, not only his immediate one, to flee with him it was a logistical problem. His whole family was around 35.”

    By now, the mountain roads were under rebel control. They took him and his family from Tripoli to Zintan and across the border into Tunisia. From there, he flew to Italy and on to Qatar.

    The rebel leadership was ready. But now NATO wanted more time. “Once they got control of Zawiyah, we were sort of expecting that they would make a strategic pause, regroup and then make the push on into Tripoli,” the senior U.S. defense official said.

    “We told NATO we’re going to go anyway,” said a senior NTC official.

    The western alliance quickly scaled back its number of bombing targets to 32 from 82, while rebel special forces hit some of the control rooms that were not visible, like those in schools and hospitals.

    The signal to attack came soon after sunset on August 20, in a speech by NTC Chairman Mustafa Abdel Jalil. “The noose is tightening,” he said. A “veritable bloodbath” was about to occur.

    Within 10 minutes of his speech, rebel cells in neighborhoods across Tripoli started moving. Some units were directly linked to the operation; many others were not but had learned about the plan.

    “We didn’t choose it, the circumstances and the operations led us to this date,” Alhasi told Reuters when asked why the uprising in Tripoli began then. “There was a public plan in Tripoli that they would rise up on that day, by calling from the mosques. ”

    In the first few hours, rebel cells attacked installations and command posts. Others simply secured neighborhoods, setting up roadblocks and impeding movement.

    Ships laden with food and ammunition set off from rebel-held Misrata. Rebel forces began pushing toward the capital from the Western Mountains and from the east. According to French newspapers, NATO cleared a path on the water by destroying pro-Gaddafi speed boats equipped with explosives.

    The first rebel soldiers reached the city within a few hours. The rag-tag army didn’t look like much: some warriors wore football kit bearing the name of English soccer players. But they encountered little resistance.

    One rebel source said Gaddafi had made a fatal error by sending his important brigades and military leaders, including his son Mu’atassem, to secure the oil town of Brega. The Libyan leader apparently feared the loss of the oil area would empower the rebels. But it meant he left Tripoli without strong defences, allowing the rebels easy entry.

    The air war was also overwhelming the regime. Under attack, Gaddafi forces brought whatever heavy equipment they still had out of hiding. In the final 24 hours, a western military official said, NATO “could see remnants of Gaddafi forces trying to reconstitute weapons systems, specifically surface-to-air missiles”. NATO pounded with them with air strikes.


    By Sunday August 21, the rebels controlled large parts of Tripoli. In the “confusion”, the NTC announced it had captured Saif al-Islam, yet another deliberate lie. Late the following evening, though, he turned up at the Rixos, the Tripoli hotel where foreign reporters were staying. “I am here to disperse the rumors…,” he declared.

    U.S. and European officials now say they believe Saif was never in custody. NTC chief Mahmoud Jibril attributes the fiasco to conflicting reports within the rebel forces. But, he says, the bumbling turned into a bonanza: “The news of his arrest gave us political gains. Some countries recognized us, some brigades surrendered … and more than 30 officers defected. So misinformation paid off”

    As the hunt for Gaddafi got underway, the NTC began implementing a 70-page plan, drawn up in consultation with its foreign military backers, aimed at establishing security in the capital.

    Officials in London, Paris and Washington are at pains to say the plan is not based on the experience of Iraq or any other country, but the lessons of their mistakes in Baghdad are obvious.

    Mathaba Editing


  26. Ivan Jovanovic
    I have just heard that the rebel leader god killed on his way to Tripoli by Gadafi soldiers.Do you have any informations about that?
    van Jovanovic
    I found one more news about thatBREACKING: Abdul Jalil – leader of NTC was killed near #Tripoli airport by #Hamis troops!!! #Libya (The #news has notyet #confirmed ) #SEP17
    Je n’aime plus · · dimanche, à 18:19
    Vous et 6 autres personnes aimez ça.

    Ratko Stevanovic
    Resident of Bani Walid states on Al-Rai satellite station that Nato is using Mustard Gas in the town. We need to publish this everywhere!!!!

    Adil Naji writes on 12 septembre 11:17
    I had a beautiful dream last night.. Abdujalil is dead and rebels started killing each other.. Green Libya Lighting candles for Mujahed.. Children started going to school.. Libya was once again Green.. Guys we need to get rid of TNC for this dream to come true.. We want our free Green Libya back.. Libya without Alqaeda..
    J’aime · · dimanche, à 00:35

    Ivan Jovanovic
    Mustafa Abdel Jalil got killed near Tripoli airport by Khamis brigade

  27. The spiritual CANNOT be ignored. It is just as real as the physical self. To ignore it, not only means spiritual death but DEATH TO ALL LIFE

    15 SEPT 2011:
    NATO has supplied the rats with two trucks of mustard gas. Now the GREEN have captured them. BUT WHO NOW IS GOING TO BELIEVE the Jamahiriya that this was not the product of the holy Jamahiriya? The Jamahiriya will never use this mustard gas, or any chemical weapon or WMD even in defence. It is totally against all the principles of the JAMAHIRIYA and everything our brother leader has ever said (or even will say).

  28. ebels on the Run and Remembrance of 9/11 Lies
    Posted: 2011/09/13
    From: Mathaba http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628638?rss

    Libyan military continues to defeat NATO and its mercenaries even without water, food and with chemical bombings by NATO, but for how much longer is Libya supposed to fight alone in such circumstances against terrorists and kleptomaniacs for all of Africa and the free world?

    The Libyan military has defeated rebels and NATO who attempted to take the city of Bani Walid. The rebels were forced to retreat and there are indications that NATO special forces are trapped inside Bani Walid. This videos also experimentally expose some lies about the 9/11 attacks.



    the following submission which summarizes ground operations in Bani Walid, Sirte, and Tripoli on September 10, 2011: Russian report

    : Libyan Defense Forces control Bin Walid, Sirte, and 75% of Tripoli. This article mentions a battle between Algerian forces and Islamist forces in the Libyan city of Ghadames, where the Algerian forces crushed the Islamist forces. Ghadames is a Libyan city that Algeria entered on, I think, August 25th, to help Gaddafi protect that city from the Islamists.
    Mahdi believes that France has been “co-opted” into the United States.
    http://www.voltairenet.org/Operation-Sarkozy-comment-la-CIA-a and
    The French have long known that there is a lot of uranium in North Africa. Many corporations, of various European countries, have made an “amalgamation,” joining together in anticipation of working together to obtain North African resources. “Rivalry has turned into cooperation,” is how Mahdi puts it. The long term goal is to change North African societies and redefine the boundaries.

    Mahdi notes that the Al-Qaeda presence in North Africa is the result of a project that the French and Americans spent many years working to create and control. Dr. Webster Tarpley has been telling people for years that Al-Qaeda is an invention of the CIA, and is used as the CIA’s army.

    I posted an article at Mathaba, calling on the formation of a North African entity. I then re-examined that idea, as I thought about the importance of tribal life, such as the life of the Tuareg’s, and the importance of maintaining and respecting tribal life–something the West certainly does not do–rather than incorporating it into some big entity.

    But now, after watching events (as best I can, anyway) over the last few days, I am now wondering, again, about the importance of a North African federation. I called it, The Great Socialist North African Jamahiriya.

    What I see happening now is precisely what I’d speculated: There isn’t any choice. Not really. Somehow, the various tribes and subtribes, and all other people in North Africa, have to begin the process of uniting, and fast, in order to save itself, and all of Africa, from the designs of the U.S. to colonize all of Africa. This is the big, bold, and long-range project for the U.S. They will rob their citizens of every penny in order to effect their plans.

    I submit, again, that Libya, under Colonel Gaddafi, has strongly proven, through its Jamahiriya system of government, that a North African political ideology can come from the sands of the Maghreb. And that system is the Jamahiriya.

    There is the expression, “Don’t re-invent the wheel?” For 42 years, the Jamahiriya system has proven itself to be powerful. And during this last 7 months, in particular, it has demonstrated, before the entire world, its strength and resilience. For, it has stood up to the most powerful military alliance in human history, NATO, and is still fighting.

    And do not fool yourself: It is not the Libyan Defense Forces that is the most powerful force fighting for Libya. It is the Jamahiriya that is the most powerful force, with the Libyan Defense Forces being one extension of the Jamahiriya.

    Military analysts, political theorists, and intelligence specialists are standing aghast, wondering how could a tiny–almost microscopic–country of 6,000,000 people, one-million of whom are refugees in Tunisia, withstand the power of the strongest military alliance in human history.

    This last 7 months should be a big wake-up call for Algeria, as well as for the other countries of North Africa. You have your system of government that will elevate you to the position of one of the strongest entities of the world–but only if you unite.

    I call on Algeria, Egypt, Morroco, Western Sahara, Libya, and Tunisia to begin the process of unifying. When it comes to Africa, the northern countries are united: They want to make slaves out of Africans, whether Arab or black. In unity there is strength! Maybe one day we can all shout, “Long live The Great Socialist North African Jamahiriya!”

    About Dennis South
    I have been serving, for 43 years, the cause of helping to create a new, balanced and peaceful world.

  30. Fridrich Hláva
    Fridrich Hlàva
    writes on 9 septembre 23:21
    [ALERT] | Phosphor bombs very brighght explosions with tracers of white smoke seenin the south of #BaniWalid #Libya #Tripoli
    Rebels #Tripoli are on way to #BaniWalid ! We have to get this info to the people of #BaniWalid they are preparing to attack.

    Today, the rats of the media will be lying about the taking of the city Bani-Walid, and about deaths of Muammar Gaddafi, his son Saif al Islam and Musa Ibrahim. To do this, the… Alle anzeigen

    Sunday: Beni Walid holds strong; Green flags wave in Benghazi; “Rebels-Nato” killed in Tripoli: Residents shout, “God is Great!”
    Posted: 2011/09/12
    From: Mathaba


    by Dennis South
    The reports below go from the “oldest” to the most recent. All of them are for 11 September 2011.

    Sunday, 11.09.2011 – 08:44
    A Libyan Army brigade, under the command of Colonel Khamis Qaddafi, launched an attack in Zauli. Zauli [or a plant inside Zauli] is now under the control of the army, as well as volunteers and patriots. An August 20th attack on the airport and military base, Maitiga, which is 8 kilometers from Tripoli and its main airport, led to the capture of 20 NATO rebels. Ten members of British intelligence were killed. The London Independent reported that the Libyan army fired at the front line, to the south of Tripoli.

    Sunday, 11.09.2011 – 15:30
    (In the previous report from Russia, you saw that the cities of Bin Walid and Sirte remained under the firm control of the popular resistance, even after sustaining a fierce attack during the daytime on September 10th.) That night, NATO returned and used mustard gas against the defenders and civilians of Bin Walid, a violation of war conventions.

    The report speculates that NATO will now blame Gaddafi for using mustard gas. Of course, NATO has already violated conventions of war by using white phosphoros and bombs made of depleted uranium. The Russian source did not mention what was the outcome, in Bin Walid, after the use of the mustard gas.

    NATO has used the mustard gas as a desperate act, realizing that it has totally failed to subdue Libya, and also realizing that NATO’s mandate soon runs out. And NATO wants to be able to announce that it has captured a number of towns. NATO may use more illegal techniques as the September 19th date of 6 months of bombing Libya approaches.

    Contrary to predictions by NATO, the resistance by Libyans against NATO aggression is increasing. Libyans will avenge the invaders for the torture and deaths of family members.

    Sunday, 11.09.2011 – 16:35

    Tripoli. Residents were chanting Allah-u-Akbar (God is Great) after the destruction of “NATO rebels” as they call them, in several ambushes throughout the city.

    Beni Walid. The NATO rebels were not able to surround Beni Walid because a large number of volunteers came armed with small arms and RPGs. They were supported by the Warfala Tribe. The Libyan Army captured three rebels and killed their leader.

    Benghazi. The brave supporters of Muammar Gaddafi and the Libyan Jamahiriya held a demonstration, waving green flags. The demonstrations took place in several areas: Kovifiya, Ras Abid Al Slimane, and Juliana. The NATO-rebels have no power to stop these demonstrations, but tried to do so by opening fire, and killing several people.

    — The report is published in Russian at http://www.za-kaddafi.ru

    About Dennis South
    I have been serving, for 43 years, the cause of helping to create a new, balanced and peaceful world.

  31. Human rights investigations
    evidence-based, independent and rigorous investigation of human rights abuses
    The fate of the Tawarghans – soon to be shared by Sabha
    Posted on 07 September 2011
    by HRI Mark 3






    We have been following the fate of the people of Tawargha since one of the Misratan rebel commanders threatened to wipe Tawargha off the map. The same commander then turned up on camera with Orla Guerin of the BBC, as Tawargha was taken by the rebels with NATO support and the inhabitants fled. There can be no doubt that NATO commanders were fully complicit in this ethnic cleansing.
    Al Jazeera reported that the inhabitants had been handed over ot the Red Cross but the ICRC were unable to confirm this and there have been rumours of a mass grave. The fate of the prisoners shown loaded into a shipping container is unknown.
    Now Amnesty International’s Diana Elthaway reports that the 10,000s of Tawarghans who have fled to Tripoli (and other dark-skinned-Libyans) are facing continuing persecution from the Misratan rebels who have now caught up with them in the capital.
    One lady from Tawargha describes how the townsfolk fled:
    “When the thuwwar entered our town in mid-Ramadan [mid-August] and shelled it, we fled just carrying the clothes on our backs. I don’t know what happened to our homes and belongings. Now I am here in this camp, my son is ill and I am too afraid to go to the hospital in town. I don’t know what will happen to us now.”
    The evidence suggests that Tawarghas are fearful of going outside, cannot return home and have been abused, detained (even whilst in hospital) and gone missing:
    Some Tawarghas who have been detained in Tripoli are said to have been made to kneel facing the wall, and then been beaten with sticks and whips. Others have simply vanished after being arrested at checkpoints and taken from hospitals by armed revolutionaries (thuwwar).
    On 29 August, Amnesty International delegates saw a Tawargha patient at the Tripoli Central Hospital being taken by three men for “questioning in Misratah” and were told about at least two other Tawargha men had vanished after being taken for questioning from Tripoli hospitals. A 45-year-old flight dispatcher and his uncle were arrested by armed rebels while out shopping in the al-Firnaj area of Tripoli on 28 August.
    Even in the refugee camps, the Tawarghas are not safe. Towards the end of last month, a group of armed men drove into the camp and arrested about 14 men – and their relatives do not know of their fate.
    Amnesty also report that “in addition to Tawarghas, other black Libyans including from the central Sabha district as well as sub-Saharan Africans continue to be at particular risk of reprisals and arbitrary arrests, on account of their skin colour and widespread reports that al-Gaddafi forces used “African mercenaries” to repress supporters of the NTC.”
    Sabha is a city in south-central Libya, formerly capital of Fezzan which was historically one of the three provinces of Libya and fully became part of the Kingdom of Libya in 1951 when the French left. In 2006, the population of Fezzan was 442,090 constituting 7.8% of the Libyan population.

    View Larger Map
    Sabha is mainly inhabited by Libyans of mixed and black African descent and the population is temporarily safe from being massacred by the hostile rebels from Misrata or from the Western Mountains due to its geographical remoteness as the routes to Sabha traverse large expanses of barren and desert landscape, although there is a metalled road which the rebels will no doubt be travelling down once they have dealt with the conundrum of Bani Walid.
    As well as the native inhabitants, more than 1,200 African migrants are stranded in the towm according to the International Organization for Migration.
    In a statement, the IOM said “there is no longer any political infrastructure in Sabha” able to support the migrants until evacuation plans are organised.
    “With no electricity, fuel and little food and water, the situation for the migrants and those in the town is becoming increasingly difficult,”
    Moreover, Sabha is not safe from NATO bombing, as this tweet from UK Military Spokesman Maj Gen Nick Pope indicates:
    Maj Gen Nick Pope
    Tue pm: Tornados from RAF Marham flew long range precision strike mission at surface-to-air missile & former regime compound depot at Sebha.
    September 7, 2011 11:41 via Twitter for MacReplyRetweetFavorite
    This long-range mission would have required logistical support from the US and the consent of “son-of-Africa,” Barack Obama.
    Share this:

    ← NATO Media AdvisoryWhy did Barack Obama win the Nobel Peace Prize? →
    3 Responses “The fate of the Tawarghans – soon to be shared by Sabha” →

    13 September 2011
    geezzzzz is there anything left to bomb in that sovereign nation besides humans !
    they had water food homes jobs hospitals schools roads cars gas money and gold
    and now they have:
    no water
    no food
    no homes
    no hospitals
    no school
    no jobs
    no roads
    no cars
    no gas
    no money
    no gold
    but they have DU Clusterbombs mines mustard gas and many dead civilians…
    to bring Democracy and Freedom
    How HUMaiN is that !
    2 Trackbacks For This Post
    Leonor in Libyen, 06/07 September news #Libya update « Urs1798′s Weblog →
    September 7th, 2011 → 22:05
    […] The fate of the Tawarghans – soon to be shared by Sabha […]
    Please help stop the NATO bombing in Libya: email campaign « Human rights investigations →
    September 12th, 2011 → 11:35
    […] to stop the NATO bombing in Libya, to prevent massacres such as we have already seen in Zlitan and NATO supported ethnic cleansing in places such as Tawergha and to protect the people of Sabha, Zlitan and the south of Libya from further death and […]

  32. http://www.rense.com/general94/obamb.htm

    Obama-Backed Libyan Rebels
    INHUMAN War Crimes
    See What The Wonderful ‘West’ Is Supporting In Libya
    By Susan Lindauer
    Former CIA Asset Covering Libya

    NATO has been pumping propaganda out of Libya to justify its “humanitarian war” against the government of Moammar Gadhaffi. Until now, NATO has succeeded in large part because ordinary citizens around the world have no access to direct intelligence on which to base their own opinions. As the former CIA Asset who covered Libya at the United Nations from 1995 to 2003 during negotiations for the Lockerbie Trial, I am compelled to break past that propaganda to examine actual evidence.

    Responding to numerous requests, I am sharing primary evidence that I receive daily from sources inside Tripoli. Video documentation comes from Libyan refugees, collected by a fact finding commission called “Global Civilians for Peace in Libya.” The fact-finding team includes Europeans, Africans, Americans and international human rights attorneys, who are preparing allegations of War Crimes against NATO. Judging from these videos, financial damages that NATO will be required to pay Libya should be stupendous, indeed.

    Above all, it’s clear NATO has grossly misrepresented its arguments at the United Nations, in order to justify military action against Gadhaffi. Britain and France trusted bad intelligence from unreliable sources, trying to gain power from the conflict. A more careful investigation shows that it is the NATO Rebels who are guilty of serious war crimes-not Gadhaffi’s soldiers at all. Sanctions should be thrown out, and NATO should shift its military forces to back Gadhaffi in defending the Libyan people.

    Never play truth or dare with a spy

    The videos portray horrific atrocities. There are two important reasons why NATO Rebels would commit these acts. First, in committing war crimes, NATO Rebels have deployed a strategy for provoking panic and confusion at the street level, where they must control the people. They have frightened their opposition into silent submission. Ordinary Libyans can see with their own eyes that Libyan Rebels are all powerful, protected by NATO and CIA enforcers. Pro-Gadhaffi loyalists had better shut their mouths or face terrible consequences.

    At the same time, Libyan Rebels have discovered a way to punch NATO’s buttons, and fire up the engines for the “Humanitarian War–” For some reason, the world is supposed to believe that Gadhaffi’s government-which has no history of attacking its own people in 41 years of rule-is suddenly guilty of the most hideous offenses.

    Those of us who have studied Libya closely have opposite expectations. Historically, Gadhaffi has been so tenacious and protective of his people that he refused to hand over two Libyan men for the Lockerbie trial, despite years of U.N. sanctions. Gadhaffi knew the men were innocent, and would not get a fair shake in Court. To sum up, Lockerbie was a false flag operation to hide rogue CIA involvement in heroin trafficking out of the Bekaa Valley in Lebanon, during the Terry Anderson hostage crisis. A joint team of CIA, FBI and Defense Intelligence investigators were flying on Pan Am 103 that day, heading for Washington to expose the heroin ring, when the plane exploded over Lockerbie, Scotland. Libya got tagged as the fall guy, but like 9/11, the truth refused to die. And Gadhaffi refused to back down. He stood by his people, despite punishing international pressures.

    Gadhaffi’s guess proved correct, by the way. In one of the most shameful episodes of corruption ever at the International Courts, the U.S. bribed two witnesses at the Lockerbie Trial with $4 million pay offs. After both witnesses recanted and confessed to the payments, the only Libyan convicted in the Pan Am 103 bombing, Abdelbasset Megrahi, won a “compassionate release” from Scottish prison in August, 2009, ostensibly so he could go home to die of cancer.

    Gadhaffi’s actions reveal a great deal about his character. As a leader, does he throw his people to the wolves? Or abandon them for convenience? Notoriously not. He claims the Libyan people as his own. He protects them no matter the cost to himself.

    These videos are the reality check. Ironically, by claiming Gadhaffi’s forces have been responsible for rape crimes specifically, NATO has made a glaring admission that War Crimes are in fact occurring inside Libya. Headlines that Gadhaffi issued Viagra to fuel rape binges by his soldiers played very well on CNN. However former Congresswoman Cynthia McKinney has determined that the only major purchaser of Viagra bound for Libya was the U.S. Government itself, which handed out Little Blue Pills to older Rebel soldiers to energize them for battle.

    That strategy has backfired. Ordinary Libyans are fleeing Rebel strongholds, racing to the protection of Gadhaffi’s central authority for safety.

    The Bad Guys

    These videos look awfully like Al Qaeda to me. But don’t take my word for it. Look at the evidence and decide for yourself. (Editor’s Note – Extremely Graphic Content – Beware). They’re hosted at http://www.FederalJack.com on a special site, http://www.obamaslibya.com, because it’s got hefty security and rock solid courage to speak truth to power. FederalJack.com will not back down. More videos will be added in coming weeks.

    The first video shows a Libyan rebel beheading a Libyan soldier. If it looks like Iraq, well golly, the highest percentage of foreign fighters in Iraq (and Chechnya and Afghanistan) came from Eastern Libya. Unhappily for NATO, there’s no avoiding that this video was shot in Libya: The men are speaking a Libyan Arab dialect with its own distinct accent.

    The second video shows gruesome footage of a Libyan rebel cutting up the rotted flesh of a dead soldier and forcing it into the hands of Libyan Prisoners of War, who are lined up in a row so they must eat it.

    Another video shows a group of Rebels sodomizing a civilian with a pistol. Another shows a crowd of Rebels hanging and beheading a Libyan soldier.

    Another video shows CIA operatives working side by side Rebel forces, and driving around in trucks— proof that U.S. forces are already in Libya in violation of President Obama’s promise to Congress to keep boots off the ground.

    Another video shows several dead Libyan soldiers with their throats cut, lying in the back of a truck. The killings violate the Geneva Conventions of War, which protect enemy soldiers after capture. In the excitement, NATO Rebels encouraged a frightened on-looker to video the butchery and claim that Gadhaffi’s forces were responsible. Afterward, the man with the video grabbed his family and fled the Rebel stronghold. That’s how the video reached the fact-finding group in Tripoli.

    It’s all on http://www.obamaslibya.com, hosted by Federal Jack, with our greatest thanks for having the guts to show the truth, which corporate media lacks. It’s so barbaric that it defies understanding how NATO could have envisioned these Rebels as holding any leadership potential at all.

    Rape As a Weapon of War

    Worst than you thought, right? Most notoriously up to this point, it has become evident that Rebels are using rape as a war-time punishment of pro-Gadhaffi or “neutral” families. In Islamic culture, the whole family suffers stigmas after rape, a sort of communal punishment.

    Right now a team of female human rights attorneys are interviewing rape victims. Two rape testimonials and other eye witness reports are provided here. For the attorney affidavit on the larger problem, go to http://www.obamaslibya.com.

    However these are not the most graphic stories. The problem is traveling hundreds of miles through checkpoints and bombs. By explanation, as of June 22, non-governmental fact finders are traveling 200 miles to video a boy who got castrated and both eyes gouged out by NATO Rebels as punishment for refusing to join their paramilitary unit.

    Another video getting collected comes from a father, who describes the kidnapping of his virgin daughter from a pro-Gadhaffi family. After dragging her out of the house at gun-point and taking her to a rape party, NATO rebels cut off her breasts with a knife, and she bled to death.

    Human rights investigators are now interviewing a Libyan Woman from Zawia who survived a brutal gang rape that cut off her breasts. Miraculously, horrified on-lookers saved her from bleeding to death, when excited Rebels ran off, firing their guns in the air. She’s been hospitalized, but she’s too physically and mentally damaged to handle the interview at the moment. International human rights attorney are standing by.

    We urgently seek an American sponsor so this Libyan woman can undergo reconstructive surgery in the United States or Europe.

    On June 19, Gadhaffi soldiers entering Misurata rescued another rape survivor. The young woman had been kidnapped and held hostage for 20 days. Rebel forces gang raped her every single day, round the clock, until Gadhaffi’s forces broke through their lines and saved her life.

    So much for NATO’s humanitarian mission. Clearly NATO has been grossly deceived, and should cease at once from protecting these Rebels who are monstrously abusive to the Libyan people. U.S. tax dollars are training a New Taliban to intimidate the Libyan people into submission, while the West plunders Libya’s wealth.

    But NATO failed to take into account the spirit of the Libyan people. Libya has a powerful history and traditions of resilience in defending its sovereignty from foreign invaders. Libyan families and Tribal Leaders are determined to seek financial damages from every NATO and Arab country that supports the rebels. So long as NATO provides training, uniforms, military assault rifles, jeeps and transportation, ground advisers and air power—-NATO will be forced to take responsibility for these crimes. Financial damages will come out of funding for NATO’s own citizens-out of education, health care, government pensions, universities, roads, bridges, you name it.

    Patrick Haseldine, a British expert on Libya’s conflict with NATO, has calculated current British financial damages at $2.8 billion.

    All of it begs the question why NATO governments should want to support these Rebels in the first place? Indeed, all of us should ask some important questions.

    Should President Obama spend hard-earned U.S. tax dollars from the Middle Class to finance this War? Should America assume the role of training Al Qaeda forces and function as Al Qaeda enforcers? While our great nation bleeds red ink? While Americans struggle to find jobs and fight off foreclosures? Knowing that our soldiers are exhausted from two other failed Wars-fighting these same Al Qaeda Rebels in Iraq and Afghanistan?

    And why exactly should America prop up NATO, so that the British and French can relive their glory days of Empire? Is it worth risking our Empire and prosperity? Really?

    These videos reveal a whole different truth. The CIA will probably get mad that I have released them. But good Intelligence Assets are supposed to deliver brutal honesty. We’re not supposed to hide ugly truths. We’re supposed to get information that leaders-and communities- urgently need to make the most informed choices in policymaking. It happens to be very, very ugly intelligence. But it would be wrong for me to spare you.

    In my opinion as a former U.S. Asset, the United States should break ties with the Libyan rebels and cut off financing immediately.

    You can decide for yourself.

    Susan Lindauer worked in anti-terrorism covering Libya, Iraq, Egypt, Yemen, Syria and Malaysia at the United Nations. Her team gave advance warning about the 9/11 attack. She is the author of Extreme Prejudice: The Terrifying Story of the Patriot Act and the Cover Ups of 9/11 and Iraq.


  33. http://nocheinparteibuch.wordpress.com/2011/09/10/eu-and-nato-want-to-send-occuping-forces-in-un-garb-to-libya/

    EU and NATO want to send occupying forces in UN garb to Libya
    10. September 2011

    Two weeks ago, Innercitypress leaked a secret UN plan written by British NATO imperialist Ian Martin wrote, outlining that the criminals against peace want to send hundreds of UN employees to Libya as well as security personnel to guard them with the aim of establishing a colonial government in UN garb subserviant to the predatory aggressor states bombing Libya.

    Even the TNC, the puppet council for Libya installed by NATO, immediately turned against this obvious attempt to colonize Libya and outrightly rejected the secret UN plan. But of course the colonialists do not care about this rejection. Now it’s important for the war alliance to meet their aim and that is to quickly get lucrative long-term contracts signed by their puppets, so that the aggressors can fill their own pockets with the wealth of Libya. That’s what is was at the beginning and that’s what it is now. And they want to get rid of Muammar Gaddafi and the Green Committee Movement, because this resistance hinders them plundering Libya. Plundering Libya is the goal, this is the reason why they spread these blatant lies to justify waging a war of aggression against Libya based on fictitious facts, and this is the reason why they organized the murderous hunt on people with black skin in Libya. And, of course, now, where they have come this far, the colonialists have no desire to let their lackeys spit them in their soup.

    And so, the British colonialist Ian Martin, decorated with a well sounding UN title, nabbed the Finn Georg Charpentier, who seems to be recommendated by shameless lying on Sudan, as his assistant, and then immediately went to Tripoli to prepare for the establishment of a colonial government of NATO, U.S. and EU under the guise of the UN.

    As the colonialists are as unpopular as in Tripoli as their TNC puppet council and therefore neither NATO nor their puppets are able to rule over Tripoli let alone Libya, they quietly asked the EU-power Finland to help them out with occupation troops for Libya. From NATO-member state Germany it is known since months that this US-client state said they will constructively examine requests to send German occupation troops to Libya if that request had a UN coat. Now the plan to dispatch a UN occupying force to Libya is obviously ripe for decision.

    Voice of America, a government owned mouthpiece of the U.S. empire, announced triumphantly, that the secret British UN plan to send UN occupation forces to Libya was endorsed by their puppet Ban Ki-Moon and was forwarded to be approved by the UN security council. Under the name UNSMIL, the colonialists want to begin with a three month mandate for a small UN sanctioned occupation force, that shall bring the most important contracts to be signed by the colonists’ enterprises and their puppets on the way. After these three months will have passed, the small occupation force shall be replaced by a large UN administration able to subordinate Libya completely and a large military occupation force able to break the resistance of the Libyan people against the recolonization of Africa.

  34. The Media War Doesn’t Spare Libya’s Animals
    Posted: 2011/09/10
    From: Mathaba http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628598?rss

    Tripoli’s 110 acres large Zoo once was one of the city’s best-loved family destinations. Now, as a result of NATO’s war against their country, the animals are dying from lack water, food and medicines.

    Tripoli Zoo

    The Tripoli Zoo has been abandoned during the fighting in Libya’s capital last weeks after the zoo’s staff had to flee from the rebels. Left to fend for themselves — with nobody but the rebels entering the zoo in a bloodthirsty search for Libyan leader Gaddafi — the animals weren’t given food or water for seven days and they are still in crisis.

    In the sweltering summer heat of Northern Africa fresh water is a necessity for survival, so the little water that is left isn’t used for cleaning the animals’ cages. Therefore the indoor houses — the ones which aren’t destroyed by NATO — are very dirty, while the yards can’t be wet so they are very hot (during daytime often over 35°C).

    Above that, the animals are nervous and traumatized by the night after night bombing during the last five and a half months. At least two of the nearly 600 animals at the zoo died from the stress of living in a combat zone, a zookeeper said.

    To even worsen the situation: last week a group of CNN and AP journalists arrived at the Tripoli Zoo. In a feeble attempt to discredit the animals’ Benefactor, they used the picture of an ill-looking lion as a basis for their newest Hollywood script called “Gaddafi kills his own animals”:
    sick lion

    Describing what they came across — the body of a gazelle near an empty feeding bin with flies swarming around; an angrily growling lion leaping toward the front of his cage in the hope of some food; bears lying listless inside their dirty cage — the media team couldn’t wait to ridiculously conclude that “the Libyan government didn’t care about these animals at all”.

    They also blamed the Libyan government for the fact that the renovation of the zoo had been put to halt after the rebels and NATO started to destroy the country in mid-February. The renovation was planned to be finished on September 1 as a part of this year’s celebration of the Al Fatah Revolution.

    Now black grass shows where a rocket-propelled grenade hit and several cages are cracked by gunfire. Tripoli’s Zoo is located in the Gaddafi and Free Libya supporting neighbourhood Abu Salim which experienced some of the fiercest NATO bombing during the last months.

    In order to somewhat conceal these NATO war crimes, the above mentioned media have claimed that the situation at the zoo already was “very difficult” because there often was “no money”(!) to “simply keep the animals fed”, adding the zoo now hopes for “a rebel leader who is an animal lover”.

    The worlds largest travel guide book though describes the zoo as: “One of the definite highlights is the surprisingly good Tripoli Zoo, which you’ll find south of the city centre. Most of the enclosures are spacious and reasonably well kept and include elephants, lions, tigers, reptiles, monkeys, gazelle and waddan, among others.”

    Meanwhile the zoo animals still live — or die — in terrible conditions. It seems like the only good thing in their lives is they don’t watch CNN.

  35. Besieging and Terror Bombing Sirte
    Posted: 2011/09/09
    From: Mathaba http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628456?rss

    Amnesty International has been renamed Amnesia International for its complete failure to criticize NATO massacres, deliberate starving of cities, blockades, sieges, bombing of food supplies, hospitals, and cutting off of water. Why is the world silent?

    by Stephen Lendman

    In his latest article, Paul Craig Roberts calls America “utterly corrupt” and “certainly no ‘light unto the world.’ ”

    In her latest article, Diana Johnstone said “Western ‘democracy’ is in danger of being gradually reduced to a mere ideological excuse to attack, ravage and pillage other people’s countries.”

    It’s official policy, in fact, because the business of America is war, permanent war against humanity by military, financial, political and other means.

    As a result, terrorizing and destroying the Libya that was continues, focused heavily on what’s called Gaddafi loyalists’ last stronghold.

    No matter the death, destruction and human misery already caused.

    Or that Tripoli residents are now terrorized by a continuing bloodbath. Anyone believed to be pro-Gaddafi is under threat of death.

    No matter also that Sirte, a city of 100,000, is being terror bombed relentlessly, perhaps intending to turn it to rubble. It wouldn’t be the first time Washington and its Western allies did it. More on that below.

    Sirte is also surrounded. On August 30, The New York Times said rebels gave Gaddafi loyalists until Saturday to surrender “or face military action.”

    On September 1, Reuters said Libya’s National Transitional Council (NTC) extended the deadline one week.

    Earlier, NTC spokesman Col. Ahmed Omar Bani told a Benghazi press conference:

    “We have been given no indication of a peaceful surrender.” After months of conflict and unknown numbers of Sirte casualties, he shamelessly added:

    “We continue to seek a peaceful solution, but on Saturday we will use different methods against these criminals.”

    According to deputy TNC head Ali Tarhouni:

    “Sometimes to avoid bloodshed you must shed blood, and the faster we do this the less blood we will shed.”

    In other words, another possible bloodbath may ensue, besides the toll already exacted by NATO terror bombing and rebel-instigated slaughterhouse on the ground.

    Since winter, they were given license to murder, terrorize, and loot with impunity. They’ve taken full advantage. Sirte is their last major plum to pluck.

    A previous article warned of possible massacres, saying insurgents have the city surrounded, preparing for a final assault. Moreover, anyone attempting to leave is blocked. Women and children are forced back. Men are shot in cold blood.

    Information from inside the city indicates no way to bury corpses. Earlier bombing continued around the clock. Whether or not as intensive, it’s ongoing, preparing the city for a ground attack.

    It’s also being turned to rubble, massacring unknown numbers of residents, mostly civilians. It’s part of a longstanding NATO pattern, targeting noncombatants and nonmilitary related sites. Under international law, it’s a war crime.

    Under the 1907 Hague Regulations, Fourth Geneva, Geneva’s Common Article III, and various other international laws, civilians are protected persons. So is civilian property. Attacking them is prohibited. War crimes are clearly defined. The principles of distinction and proportionality also apply:

    — distinction between combatants and military targets v. civilians and non-military ones; attacking latter ones are war crimes except when civilians take direct part in hostilities; and

    — proportionality prohibits disproportionate, indiscriminate force likely to cause damage to or loss of lives and objects.

    In addition, precautions must be taken to avoid and minimize incidental loss of civilian lives, injuries to them, and damage to non-military sites. Under Fourth Geneva, they must be given “effective advance warning” and “neutralized zones” where they can be as protected as possible.

    Fourth Geneva also prohibits collective punishment; the use of human shields; private property destruction; torture, cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment; denying the population adequate amounts of food and medical supplies; and assuring free passage of all “consignments” intended for civilian purposes.

    Nonetheless, in all US/NATO wars, including Libya (besides earlier ones America waged), these provisions are systematically and willfully violated.

    Civilians and nonmilitary related sites are considered legitimate targets, while Western powers spuriously claim every effort is made to spare them.

    In fact, NATO, political Washington, and media scoundrels are serial liars, complicit in advancing America’s imperium by destroying countries one at a time or in multiples.

    No matter that international law permits war only in self-defense. Moreover, only Congress can declare it, not the president overtly, covertly or any other way for any reason unless America is attacked.

    In addition, the principle of non-intervention (a cornerstone of international law pertaining to national sovereignty) prohibits meddling in the internal affairs of other countries as stipulated in the UN Charter’s Article 2(7) stating:

    “Nothing contained in the present charter shall authorize the United Nations to intervene in matters which are essentially within the domestic jurisdiction of any state or shall require the Members to submit matters to settlement under the present Charter; but this principle shall not prejudice the application of enforcement measures under Chapter VII,” pertaining to threats to peace, its breaches, or acts of aggression.

    Before it ends (besides what was done to Tripoli and other Libyan cities), Sirte may become another of history’s most infamous terror bombing victims.

    A previous article discussed earlier ones, including:

    — Guernica – 1937;

    — the London Blitz – 1940 – 41;

    — Dresden – 1945;

    — Tokyo – 1945;

    — Hiroshima and Nagasaki – 1945;

    — North Korea – 1950 – 53;

    — Southeast Asia – 1964 – 73;

    — Iraq – 1991 to the present;

    — Serbia/Kosovo – 1999;

    — Afghanistan – 2001 to the present;

    — Lebanon – 1982 and 2006; and

    — Gaza – 2008 – 09.

    Strategic bombing involves destroying an adversary’s economic and military ability to wage war. It targets its war making capacity and related infrastructure.

    Terror bombing is another matter. Against civilians it’s to break their morale, cause panic, weaken their will to resist, and inflict mass casualties and punishment – no matter how lawless.

    The London Blitz

    Famed WW II war correspondent Ernie Pyle described a 1940 London night raid as follows:

    “It was a night when London was ringed and stabbed with fire. They came just after dark, and somehow you could sense from the quick, bitter firing of the guns that there was to be no monkey business this night.”

    “Shortly after the sirens wailed you could hear the Germans grinding overhead. In my room….you could feel the shake from the guns. You could hear (explosions) tearing buildings apart….You have all seen big fires, but I doubt if you have ever seen the whole horizon of a city lined with great fires – scores of them, perhaps hundreds….Every two minutes, a new wave of planes would be over….”

    “Later on, I went out among the fires….London stabbed with great fires, shaken by explosions….all of it roofed over with a ceiling of pink that held bursting shells, balloons, flares and the grind of vicious engines. (It was) the most hateful, most beautiful single scene I have ever known.”

    London wasn’t the only city attacked. Besides military sites, so were Dublin, Manchester, Liverpool, Belfast, Birmingham, Sheffield, Plymouth, Nottingham, Southhampton, Bristol, Cardiff, Clydebank, Coventry, Greencock, Swansea, and Hull.

    This happened, of course, before nukes, smart bombs, cruise missiles, and other hellish legal and illegal US and NATO weapons freely used lawlessly against nonbelligerent countries, including civilians and nonmilitary targets.

    Firebombing Tokyo

    Another example was America’s firebombing of Tokyo. The first raid came on February 24, 1945 when 174 planes destroyed one square mile of the city.

    The major attack came days later on March 9 when 279 Superforts demolished 16 square city miles, killed an estimated 100,000 in the firestorm, injured many more, and left over one million homeless.

    Around five dozen other Japanese cities were also firebombed at a time most structures there were wooden and easily consumed. And for what?

    Early in 1945, Japan extended peace feelers. Then, two days before the February Yalta Conference, Douglas MacArthur sent Roosevelt a 40-page summary of its terms.

    They were near-unconditional. Japan would accept an occupation, cease hostilities, surrender its arms, remove all troops from occupied territories, submit to criminal war trials, and allow its industries to be regulated. In return, they asked only that their Emperor be retained in an honorable capacity.

    Roosevelt spurned the offer. So did Truman. Tokyo was first firebombed. Then in August, atom bombs were used for the first time against Hiroshima and Nagasaki, gratuitously when Japan was largely destroyed and near collapse. Combined, they took a horrendous toll from immediate death and later radiation poisoning.

    It culminated the Pacific conflict John Dower called “War Without Mercy” in his book by that title.

    The Crime of Fallujah

    One chapter of America’s destruction of Iraq deserves highlighting – its shocking war crimes in Fallujah. They’re a snapshot of Washington’s ruthless quest to destroy human life for profit and dominance.

    In September 2010, the UN Human Rights Council (HRC) issued a report titled, “Testimonies of Crimes Against Humanity in Fallujah: Towards a Fair International Criminal Trial.” Citing the city’s deteriorating conditions, it said:

    “From the (2003) outset and at the start of the indiscriminate and merciless campaign of collective punishment and willful destruction, undertaken by the occupational troops of the United States of America,” innocent civilians endured an “inhumane siege and indiscriminate killing” during April and May 2004.

    “The genocidal massacres” included “sustained and targeted bombing(s), aimed directly at the homes of defenseless civilians,” killing and maiming hundreds on the bogus pretext of “pursuing the leaders of the resistance.”

    A November/December massacre followed, killing, wounding, and maiming thousands more, many others still missing or displaced.

    Between the two Fallujah battles, US forces kept bombing residential and industrial areas with 500 kg and cluster bombs. Negotiations to halt hostilities failed. Pentagon forces spurned peace. They chose mass slaughter and destruction instead, murdering innocent civilians maliciously.

    Thousands of others were arrested, kept in cages, some forced to clean up the city to erase evidence of US crimes. Hundreds of those detained went to Abu Ghraib and Basra’s Boukah Prison. Many died there from torture and ill treatment.

    It was willful, malevolent carnage. Innocent civilians were targeted in violation of fundamental international laws, ones America always flouts disdainfully.

    Witnesses confirmed mass slaughter of unarmed civilians inside houses and mosques. Some were shot after being handcuffed. Others were blown up inside their own homes.

    Many children saw their parents shot. Adults witnessed spouses and children killed. Both Iraqi National Guards and US Marines participated in looting homes and stores. Thousands of others were destroyed. A government committee found 26,000 houses damaged, another 3,000 completely demolished, including 70 mosques, 50 schools, the city’s power plant providing electricity, 50% of the drinking water distribution system, and 70% of the sewer system.

    Overall, indiscriminate slaughter and destruction occurred, followed by looting, mass arrests, torture, and deaths from ill treatment, as well as vast environmental contamination. As a result, a significant increase in cancer and congenital malformations followed.

    The crime of Fallujah and all Iraq continues. So does Afghanistan and all US imperial wars, including against Libya.

    Others one day will recount its full story, another merciless war like all others post-WW II against nonbelligerent countries.

    WW I was called “The war to end all wars.”

    The 1928 Kellogg-Briand Pact (also called the General Treaty for the Renunciation of War or the World Peace Act) renounced aggressive war as “an instrument of national policy,” except for self-defense.

    The UN Charter’s Preamble begins saying:

    “We the Peoples of the United Nations Determined to save succeeding generations from the scourge of war, which twice in our lifetime has brought untold sorrow to mankind….”

    America and its NATO allies renounced what’s codified in law, waging permanent wars against humanity for total imperial dominance.

    Libyans understand. Ask them. They’ll explain. Under planned NATO occupation, their liberating struggle just began.

    Stephen Lendman lives in Chicago and can be reached at lendmanstephen@sbcglobal.net.

    Also visit his blog site at sjlendman.blogspot.com and listen to cutting-edge discussions with distinguished guests on the Progressive Radio News Hour on the Progressive Radio Network Thursdays at 10AM US Central time and Saturdays and Sundays at noon. All programs are archived for easy listening.

  36. Gadhafi and K A Paul

    Global Peace Initiative Launches “Be One in a Million: Demand Global Peace Now”
    Dr K A Paul, photographed here with Libyan leader Muammar Qaddafi from whom he obtained a commitment to peace, has launched a campaign to stop the bombing of Libya and bring about global peace, today on the 10th anniversary of the terrorist attacks in 2001.


    The Problem With Anonymous
    Posted: 2011/06/12
    From: Mathaba
    Since the article below the line was published, we can salute Anonymous for having changed their stance on Libya after becoming informed of the facts of the Brother Leader Muammar Qaddafi and the Libyan Jamahiriya and its achievements. This shows a genuine good intent, our ideological criticisms aside, and the previous positions that had been taken.

    Gadhafi our leader for the Free World

    Edit: 1st September 2011: Since the article below the line was published, we can salute Anonymous for having changed their stance on Libya after becoming informed of the facts of the Brother Leader Muammar Qaddafi and the Libyan Jamahiriya and its achievements. This shows a genuine good intent, our ideological criticisms aside, and the previous positions that had been taken. Please therefore see this latest article, which is from Anonymous.

    We look forward to support from Anonymous and others who oppose censorship which the western banker elite are now heavily engaged in, in the event that the many attempts to censor Mathaba.Net are successful. In advance we request that the main thing we would like to be propagated in the event of censorship of this independent news agency, would be GreenCharter.Com and PeoplesConference.Org.

    Anonymous mask

    No people’s (r)evolutionary movement operates without a set of clear principles or a manifesto.

    The Anonymous Problem (CONT’D):

    The Problem With ANONYMOUS: Conclusion?
    Posted: 2011/09/04
    From: Mathaba

    Mathaba is vindicated in its position on ANONYMOUS

    The Truth About Libya

    NATO handover of free Libyans to Bankers

    Libya: War Against Africa

    We can’t allow another Iraq.

    In the 1950’s, Libya was the poorest country in the world. Before the NATO invasion, Libya had become the country with the best quality of life in all Africa thanks to Gaddafi. The people of Libya support Gaddafi, they love his leader, but the media machine of NATO makes us believe this is a revolution similar to Egypt. “We are fighting the bad guy” That is all you hear in mainstream news, but is far from being the truth.

    A few months before this invasion, Gaddafi announced he was implementing a new currency, alongside most African countries. This would mean Africa would stop selling resources in Dollars and Euros, and would also mean a new powerful currency would get into the market, allowing progress for 3rd world countries in Africa. This of course, is not convenient for the powerful millionaires of the west. AND MOST IMPORTANT:

    Libya is the country in all Africa with the highest OIL reserves, and the cost of producing a barrel of oil is 100 times more cheap than in the rest of the world. Gaddafi did not permit oil companies to mess with Libyan oil. The Libyan oil was for the Libyan people. He also did not allowed world banks into his country. All loans were issued by the Libyan government at 0% interest.

    The rebels have already made a deal with oil companies to let them loot Libyan resources, and also made deals to allow a central bank run by Rothschild Family to be implemented in the country. Rothschild Family is a group of bankers that own all western banks, and are estimated to own over half the worlds wealth.

    Don’t believe me? All the information is on the videos and articles on this description. And that’s just a fragment, do your research, don’t let the government fool you with mainstream media. Whatever you hear on mainstream media about this war is complete lies.

    Spread the word, the Libyan people need you. We may have our differences but remember, we are all citizens of the same world.

    For the history, start by reading The Problem With Anonymous. That article shows the history of ANONYMOUS in trying to hack Libyan Jamahiriya websites.

    We clearly stated that the problem with “Anonymous” is exactly that: it has no ideology. It has no set of principles. It has no charter or platform. It has no points of reference.

    The only trademark slogans are:

    “We are anonymous. We are legion. We do not forgive. We do not forget. Expect us.”

    As Mathaba reader ImpulseRelay noted:

    God’s people don’t hide behind masks because they fear no evil. God’s people do not say things like “we do not forgive and we do not forget expect us”. If God decided today to stop forgiving us and forgetting our sins we are all doomed… Anonymous would have been righteous had they said we must bring all our brothers and sisters to the truth and let them decide. You do not fight the enemy by being just like them. It is also an old war tactic to infiltrate your enemy’s ranks by showing your enemy a false enemy of yours. If NATO says they are our enemy it will be easy for the people who NATO has attacked to believe that these people will be friends. Is the enemy of your enemy your friend or is the enemy of your enemy one of their greatest collaborators? Be very careful who you let sit at your table especially if your enemy know who they are.

    Yet ANONYMOUS then flip flop and side with the Truth on Libya and Muammar Qaddafi.

    Mathaba reader Rachel Baroni observes:

    “We are legion” I guess Anonymous is not so secret after all… hmmm an unforgiving legion… For He said to him. “Come out of the man, uncleaned spirit!” Then He asked “what is your name?” And he answered saying “My name is Legion; for we are many”. A Legion of unclean spirits whose logo is a zombie with the laurel leaves…


    And again underlining the entire problem with Anonymous not having adopted The Green Charter, Qaddafi4ever points out:

    They might “try” to piss off NATO, but that doesn’t change the fact they hacked many pro-Qaddafi websites. They have also hacked and taken offline pro-Syrian Ba’athist websites and they have no intention on stopping whatever it is they’re doing.

    There is no difference between a “Western” Anonymous or “Eastern” Anonymous! Since they have no command structure, leadership, goals, etc., they’re just a group that is open to literally anyone to join, which makes it easy for anyone to do stuff under their name.

    So, we are back to square one: The Problem With Anonymous.

    The way forward for the genuine and good hacktivists whether at Anonymous or not, and whether remaining anonymous or not, is clear. Adopt the clear set of rights and freedoms which were drafted by millions in the Libyan Jamahiriya in 1988 and adopted by the Green Charter Committees (the international movement of Muammar Qaddafi) in 1999: The Green Charter.

    Form yourselves into Green Charter Committees, anonymously in secret or in public, and reproduce the Operation Libya Truth video


    and claim it as your own — then at least people will know what you stand for. After all the web site of the Green Charter Committees — http://www.greencharter.com — belongs to everyone and can be copied, adapted, re-posted, circulated.

    If the real person or founder or coordinator or whoever behind ANONYMOUS is reading this and we are sure you are, then you too, embrace the Green Charter Movement and run with it — enter the NATO web sites and post links to http://www.greencharter.com


    Hamsa Goolbar
    writes on 14 septembre 06:25
    There is a rumor calling people Libyan loyal people to go out and fight the rats at 18 of the month in Tripoli. We as Libyan Liberal Youth , that are in constand contact with the Libyan goverment and all the loyalist people in Libya , decla…re that this is made up by RATS AND NATO , in order to kill the unorganized people that still support the Lbyan goverment in Tripoli and to justify some continuation of the NATO bombing that expires on 19 of the month together with the UN mandate. The resistance is organized and the day that we will come out in the day that we will crush the rats is not far, but for sure we will not announce it online. SO WE REPEAT. THERE IS NO CALL BY ANYONE TO GO OUT IN THE STREETS OF TRIPOLI IN 18 THE NIGHT. ITS A TRICK OF NATO AND RATS!!!!!! By: Libya Liberal Youth to publish the facts for Libya.

    @Konstantyn Scheglikov:
    “Attention, our Libyan friends!
    The enemy, in order to identify the Libyans, who support Jamahiriya, began to spread the message about the Big Green March, next Sunday at 5 pm, Tripoli time. The enemy, using silence of obedient media, is going to kill Libyans who will come to the square, and to find and kill those who were going to join the March. They aim to destroy the resistance no matter what price so do not fall for the hype.

    CAT SHER writes on 15 Septembre 16:50
    Every Libyan received a SMS something like this: “The Libyan government wants that you on the day of 18th September get out from your homes and fight the rebels”. Actually its a trap. This SMS is sent by NATO and not from Gaddafi.
    In the day 19 September, UN will decide about resolution 1973, and NATO need an other massacre (the NATO will do it faking to be the Libyan army), so UN will have the excuse to make NATO continue this illegal war.
    Only an online Libyan TV could say:
    There’s no Jamahiriya call : Libyans, stay at home on the 18th of September, 2011 !!


    par Wadii Hadad, mardi 13 septembre 2011, 20:28


    NATO has conceived a huge provocation to discredit the army of volunteers from Libya and African countries. For this purpose, they are buying Soviet weapons, like those the Libyan army is armed with. Today it was reported that NATO had bought Soviet weapons through Latvia, including several tanks and armored vehicles, from Moldova, and possibly from other countries. They use a heavy cargo aircraft IL-76. They are painted in Jamahiriya colors and will kill the Libyans, to make the army, the volunteers and the tribes enemies to each other. Aircraft from Moldova will arrive today, destroy it at the airport in Benghazi.
    أخبار خطيرة و شديدة الأهمية:
    لقد قام حلف شمال الأطلسي بالتخطيط لعملية كبرى لتشويه صورة جيش
    المتطوعين من ليبيا و من غيرها من الدول الافريقية٠ لهذا الغرض فقد قاموا بشراء أسلحة سوفياتية كتلك التي يستخدمها الجيش الليبي٠ اليوم وردت أنباء أن حلف شمال الأطلسي قام بشراء أسلحة سوفياتية من لاتفيا تتضمن الصفقة عديد الدبابات و العربات المصفحة من مولدافيا و ربما من دول أخرى كذلك٠ إنهم يستخدمون طائرات شحن عملاقة من نوع IL-76
    و التي يقومون بطلائها بألوان الجماهرية٠ سيقومون بقتل المواطنين الليبيين لإحداث الفرقة و الإقتتال الداخلي بين الجيش و المتطوعين و القبائل٠ هناك طائرة قادمة من مولدافيا ستصل

    early Gadhafi grouping of Jamahiriya

  38. The following “news” is all unnecessary LIES. As the JAMAHIRIYA already had the best health-care system in all Africa, free to all people. Also the JAMAHIRIYA was fully, a true direct-Democracy:
    Ottawa releases funds, sends diplomats to Libya
    written by: CAMPBELL CLARK
    OTTAWA— “Globe and Mail” Update
    Published Tuesday, 13 Sept. 2011 10:03AM EDT
    Last updated Wednesday, 14 Sept. 2011 12:27AM EDT

    “Canada has sent diplomats back to the capital and is preparing to transfer $2.2-billion in assets to the transitional government. But neither Ottawa nor NATO indicated when their military mission in that country will end.

    …The moves to re-establish a diplomatic mission and release funds were welcomed by Libya’s new ambassador, Abubaker Karmos. Libya’s National Transitional Council had placed the release of Gadhafi-regime funds at the top of its requests to Ottawa for months.

    The Opposition NDP applauded the moves, but said that the Canadian government should also be offering expertise in areas like democratic governance and health care. ‘The question now, once you open the embassy, is what are you going to do,’ NDP foreign affairs critic Paul Dewar said.

    It remains unclear when Canada and NATO allies will wrap up the military mission in Libya. NATO airstrikes continue to pound pro-Gadhafi forces in their handful of strongholds, but an official was coy about the duration of the mission, which has the stated aim of protecting civilians.

    NATO and the Canadian missions are scheduled to end by Sept. 27. NATO’s spokesman, Oana Lungescu, said no decision has been made on whether to extend them, though the alliance is “determined to get the job done for as long as it takes but no longer than it takes.”

    Mr. Baird did not say if the Canadian military mission – made up of six CF-18 fighters, surveillance and refuelling aircraft, and a warship with crew – will be extended. CTV News, however, reported Tuesday night that the mission would be extended by three months….”

  39. Gadhafi praying with grandsons

    Raw video: Footage shows different side of Gadhafi
    AP Video
    Published Tuesday, 13Sept. 2011 10:31AM EDT
    This was a side of Moammar Gadhafi only available behind closed doors [of his TENT]: Kneeling on a prayer mat in a white track suit and clowning around with two young boys, presumably his grandsons.



    Muammar al-Qadhafi: A family man
    Posted: 2011/09/14
    From: Source

    Home video footage of the Gaddafi family in the Bab al-Aziziya compound shows Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi’s relationship with his family and grandchildren.

    By Marie Edwards

    Muammar al-Qadhafi has always been a kind, wonderful, generous, loving and caring person, not only to Libya and to his family, but in general. This is a great video with him devotedly playing with his grandchildren. Muammar al-Qadhafi has more character and grace then anyone in the West and knows the true meaning of being a leader and a human being.

    Aisha al-Qadhafi says about her father: “My father gives me a lot of time, sometimes I feel that he is my compassionate friend. In any case, he is my remedy against pain and my fortress against grief.”

  40. Libya, the Lie
    Posted: 2011/09/14
    From: Source http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628641

    What we’re not being told about Gadhafi, and the real reason the US wanted him gone.

    By Murray Dobbin

    When the U.S. invaded Iraq riding a pack of lies and monstrous manipulation, the entire U.S. elite, including major news services, academics, and politicians from both “sides” of the spectrum, lined up to cheerlead and off they went to war. It was one of the most shameful chapters in the long history of shameful acts of U.S. imperial foreign policy.

    But it actually didn’t take too long for dissenting voices to come out of the woodwork. The lies were exposed, the liars identified, the manipulation denounced.

    Watching the sorry spectacle of media coverage of the tragic farce unfolding in Libya, one has to wonder if anyone will ever expose the lies and hubris that have run throughout this faux Arab spring.

    To be sure, as more journalists, aid workers and human rights representatives arrive in the country the more some of the obvious facts trickle out. The “freedom fighters” — more like soccer hooligans with guns — have looted dozens of arms depots of the Libyan military. According to Peter Bouckaert of Human Rights Watch, “Every time a city falls, they end up being looted… Every facility we go to where there were surface-to-air missiles, they’re gone.”

    Just what will these lovers of democracy do with these weapons? The U.S. and E.U. might just start to worry that no matter who buys them on the black market, they will eventually end up in the hands of al Qaeda or other militant groups. As NATO knows full well, some of the so-called rebels have ties to al Qaeda. Or perhaps the missiles will end up in the hands of the Taliban where they will be used to shoot down U.S. helicopters. Talk about blowback. Too bad the Americans have never quite grasped the meaning of irony.

    The photos of the revolutionaries give any thoughtful observer pause. Virtually every photo of the victorious rebels show aggressive, undisciplined, young men armed to the teeth holding their guns high in the air (often firing randomly). I haven’t seen a single photo or video clip with even one woman portrayed — and hardly any men over 25.

    And while the western media repeatedly imply that the Nation Transitional Council is in control of these dangerous thugs and thieves the truth lies elsewhere. Several rebel groups have denounced the NTC and said they don’t recognize its authority. So not only does the council not represent anyone, it doesn’t even control its own “army.” The NTC is little more than a group of greedy opportunists salivating at the thought of getting its hands on the billions in state funds that NATO is now handing over to them. Only with the constant disciplinary efforts of its NATO handlers does the council manage to maintain a semblance of decorum and credibility.

    Romantic notions of NATO

    No one in the media mentions that Gadhafi didn’t have billions of dollars stashed in vaults around the world for his personal use as others such as Mubarak did. To be sure, Gadhafi and his family and closest associates lived in luxury. But the tens of billions illegally seized by Western countries was money belonging to the Libyan state and its national bank. NATO has effectively destroyed the Libyan government — not just Gadhafi’s regime. Tens of thousands of foreign workers have left the country, many of whom were critical to the running of the country. Rebels have been accused of randomly executing blacks, many of them students and workers. The contributions of these foreign workers are likely gone forever.

    But none of this bothers the Canadian political elite and its intellectual hired guns. One of the most shameful examples — there are countless — is Lloyd Axworthy, the “highly respected” former foreign affairs minister under Jean Chretien. He penned an op-ed for the Globe and Mail which could have been written on contract for the cabal now in power in Tripoli. A more simplistic and deliberately obfuscating piece is hard to imagine. Axworthy’s article waxes on romantically about how the NATO bombing of Libya is a huge advance for the principle of Responsibility to Protect. This principle is NATO’s ideological weapon that permits it to do whatever it likes. Axworthy was a key figure in getting it established at the United Nations in 1999-2000.

    According to Axworthy, “We are seriously engaged in a resetting of the international order toward a more humane, just world.” I predict that NATO’s grotesque manipulation of the UN mandate to impose a “no fly” zone to protect “civilians” (a violation Axworthy doesn’t even mention) will in fact do more damage to the responsibility to protect principle than any similar action to date. It will tarnish the UN, too, which has allowed its mandate to be used for imperial gain. The unseemly rush by France, Britain and Italy in particular, to get their hands on Libyan oil will soon be too obvious to cover up. The revolutionaries are no doubt busy signing deals handing over that previously nationalized resource to the neo-colonialists who put them in power — robbing the real civilians of their birth right.

    Dealing with the new gang

    Who will take the “responsibility to protect” Libyans from this new gang? Who will protect the people of Libya so that they continue to enjoy a literacy rate above 90 per cent, the lowest infant mortality rate and highest

    life expectancy of all of Africa, free medical care and education and the highest Human Development Index of any country on the continent? Do the boys firing their guns in the air even have a clue that their living standards — subsidized by nationalized oil — were among the highest in Africa? Who will they blame when medical care disappears and their kids have to pay to go to school? Western, free-market democracy will come to Libya at a very high price when designed and delivered by the neo-colonial powers.

    It’s hard to know if the brain trust at NATO actually believed this whole thing would be over in a few weeks, but what they did know, and what the Canadian media refuses to tell us, is that Libya was the biggest obstacle to the continued super-exploitation of Africa and its vast resources. On a whole number of fronts, Libya was using its oil wealth to gradually close the doors to the International Monetary Fund, World Bank and the hegemony of the U.S. dollar in the economic domination of Africa.

    If you want to paint a picture of the back rooms of NATO before the genuine Arab spring burst forth, imagine the power brokers sitting around oak tables trying to figure out a way to stop Gadhafi from ruining their decades long — centuries, actually — bonanza. Then imagine the surprise arrival of the Arab spring. What a gift and delivered just in time.

    Removing an obstacle to neo-colonialism

    Africa’s role as a giant pool of cheap resources was being threatened just as the U.S. and E.U. faced economic catastrophe because of their own financial deregulation policies. China is investing billions in Africa — and not just in resource extraction. It is helping African countries industrialize, the surest way to economic independence.

    There’s nothing NATO can do about China. But the other side of the independence coin was Gadhafi’s determination to sever Africa’s oppressive ties with Western financial institutions. Gadhafi was not only in the process of creating the African Investment Bank (providing interest-free loans) and the African Monetary Fund (to be centred in Cameroon) eliminating the role of the IMF, it was also in the planning stages of creating a new, gold-backed African currency that would seriously weaken the U.S. by undermining the dollar. All the Libyan funds set aside for these Pan-African projects were frozen by NATO and will now be handed over — carefully, no doubt — to the neo-colonial puppets installed in Tripoli.

    Gadhafi was also instrumental in killing AFRICOM,

    a new U.S. military command and control base intended to add military intimidation to American economic domination. Look for that initiative to be revived.

    The implications of the conflict in Libya are thus just beginning to unfold. NATO will be mired in Libya for years to come to ensure its oil objectives are met and to manipulate “democratic elections” so its friends on the NTC can maintain control. While there has been a muted response so far from African countries and the African Union it will come sooner or later. They cannot fail to recognize that regime change in Libya was all about sabotaging pan-African unity.


  41. Steffen Seidel 14 septembre 11:51
    Do you know if this is true Fridrich?
    Libya Brega of NATO occupied by stratagem?

    John Schacher

    Has to be got rid of his after Mustafa Abdel Jalil, the hope is not fulfilled, unfortunately, the same as the next blow to the supporters of the Libyan Jamahiriya: On Leonore blog is among the 13 September reported:
    “The area around Al Brega by the Libyan army during the last six months, defended very well.
    Obviously, the NATO troops and mercenaries, etc. strategists now changed their tactics and try to fight misconceptions and misinformation put directly into the army.
    The NATO communications units succeeded in the communication link of the Libyan army to penetrate and has units stationed in Brega given the order to withdraw southward to Al YouFra. The command-giving person posing as Khamis al Khadafi.
    The Libyan army has succeeded to the command and retired. Meanwhile, NATO troops and rebels forced their way into the city.

    A downright miserable trick here is to have worked, but it all sounds like the epic, months-long defense of Brega in so absolutely incredible. If the situation but actually were available as described, it would be a tactical setback in XL. The Mega Brega port also offers large military ships enough water under the keel, so that a further NATO-led invasion to secure oil facilities would be more likely. To this oil installations turns everything. Money and gold are mostly checked off the Libyan and fresh water does not run. At least this bad message is not accompanied again by a report barbaric war crimes, but sounds more like “normal” war, if there is something …

    Resentment among Russian arms suppliers

    For RIA, there is an interesting article today about Russian arms sales to Libya is missing so catastrophic, above all a functioning air defense system. Since is of “Gaddafi” written debt, not debt of the Libyan state. And that Gaddafi should be transferred, as he “could not”. It speaks rather everything that Gaddafi has simply not used money from the Libyan people arbitrarily.
    That the arms shipment contract ultimately a debt forgiveness clause in the same amount and thus carries with it the same money can be moved “for nothing” would be, very ironic.
    Libya Brega of NATO occupied by stratagem? | Julius Hensel Blog
    After getting rid of John Schacher Mustafa Abdel Jalil hope not to be unfortunately erf

    Steffen Seidel 14 septembre 11:51
    ? TRUE?
    Libyen: Brega von NATO durch Kriegslist eingenommen?

    von John Schacher

    Nachdem sich die Hoffnung Mustafa Abdel Jalil losgeworden zu sein leider nicht erfüllt hat, kommt gleich der nächste Tiefschlag für die Anhänger der libyschen Jamahiriya: Auf Leonores Blog wird unter dem 13. September gemeldet:
    “Das Gebiet um al Brega wurde vom libyschen Heer während der letzten sechs Monate sehr gut verteidigt.
    Offensichtlich haben die NATO und ihre Söldnertruppen, Strategen usw. nun ihre Kampftaktik geändert und versuchen Missverständnisse und Falschinformationen direkt ins Heer zu bringen.
    Den NATO-Kommunikationseinheiten gelang es, in die Kommunikationsverbindung des libyschen Heeres einzudringen und hat den in Brega stationierten Einheiten den Befehl gegeben, sich südwärts nach Al Jufra zurückzuziehen. Die befehlsgebende Person gab sich als Khamis al Ghadafi aus.
    Das Libysche Heer hat dem Befehl gefolgt und sich zurückgezogen. Währenddessen drangen NATO-Truppen und Rebellen in die Stadt ein.

    Ein geradezu jämmerlicher Trick soll hier gewirkt zu haben, doch das alles hört sich nach der heldenhaften, monatelangen Verteidigung von Brega so absolut unglaublich an. Wenn die Lage aber tatsächlich vorläge wie beschrieben, wäre das ein taktischer Rückschlag in XL. Der Megahafen Brega bietet auch großen Militärschiffen ausreichend Wasser unterm Kiel, wodurch eine weitere NATO-Invasion zur Sicherung der Ölanlagen noch wahrscheinlicher würde. Um diese Ölanlagen dreht sich ja alles. Geld und Gold sind großteils abgehakt und das libysche Süsswasser läuft nicht davon. Wenigstens wird diese schlechte Meldung nicht schon wieder von einem Bericht barbarischer Kriegsverbrechen begleitet, sondern klingt eher nach “normalem” Krieg, falls es sowas gibt…

    Verstimmung bei russischen Waffenlieferanten

    Bei RIA gibt es heute einen interessanten Artikel über die russische Waffenlieferung, die Libyen so katastrophal fehlt, allem voran ein funktionierendes Luftabwehrsystem. Da wird von “Gaddafis” Schulden geschrieben, nicht über Schulden des libyschen Staates. Und dass Gaddafi hätte überweisen sollen, als er “noch konnte”. Es spricht eher alles dafür, dass Gaddafi einfach Geld des libyschen Volkes nicht eigenmächtig verwendet hat.
    Dass der Waffenlieferungsvertrag letztlich eine Schulden-Erlassklausel in gleicher Höhe mit sich trägt und somit das selbe Geld “für nichts” bewegt werden müsste, ist schon sehr ironisch.
    Libyen: Brega von NATO durch Kriegslist eingenommen? | Julius-Hensel-Blog
    von John Schacher Nachdem sich die Hoffnung Mustafa Abdel Jalil losgeworden zu sein leider nicht erf

  42. Opinion » Columnists
    What they don’t tell you about Libya

    We all saw Khamis al-Qathafi killed and resurrected five or six times by the “mainstream” media, we all saw William Hague, the British Foreign Secretary, lying through his teeth by affirming that Colonel Gaddafi had fled to Venezuela, then not even issuing an apology after such a blatant example of disinformation and slander. They are quick to tell you everything, it seems, except the truth.

    And what is the truth? We all know what they did tell you, now let’s see what they didn’t. For a start, let us see the reply from the British Ministry of Defence to a perfectly simple and straightforward question:


    Have French and British special forces been operating inside Libya at any time since the beginning of the conflict?


    “We do not normally comment on Special Forces matters and we see no reason to change that policy on this occasion.”

    So, no categorical denial. No vehement or indignant affirmation that such would be a violation on the United Nations Security Council Resolutions covering the case (1970 and 1973 – 2011) and so of course not. And why?

    Let us see the news coming out of Libya from sources either inside the country or linked to sources outside with credible information. Obviously, one cannot be everywhere and one does not have the gift of omniscience; however, the “credible” “mainstream” biased media sources which were in situ and have been reporting from Libya have been reporting what? Lies. Remember the “air strikes” by the Libyan Air Force against civilians? There weren’t any.

    They said nothing about the democratic nature of the Jamahiriya system of Government (a Google search will make interesting reading, as will Muammar al-Qathafi’s Green Book), they said nothing about the terrorist and foreign nature of this so-called rebellion, they said nothing about where these “rebel” flags suddenly came from, they did not explain why the “rebellion” started on the western and eastern frontiers and not among the youth in the capital Tripoli.

    They tried to play down the world’s largest demonstrations in support of their leader, 1.7 million residents of Tripoli coming out to support Colonel Gaddafi, which in comparative terms would be 20 million Britons or 100 million Americans. Would a fraction of these turn out to support Cameron or Obama? Probably to throw eggs and tomatoes, yes. To support, no.

    So what is the information coming out of Libya?

    There are reports that in recent days, NATO-backed Terrorist forces have been repelled in Bani Walid and Sirt – and that over a thousand terrorist elements have been liquidated (pending confirmation). There are reports that two NATO helicopters have been brought down over Sabah and that all the NATO mercenaries inside were destroyed. A group of terrorists heading towards Bani Walid to terrorise its citizens was intercepted by the Alassabaa tribe and 35 of these elements were destroyed.

    A ratfight (fight among terrorist groups) took place in Tripoli, today leaving 30 of this scourge dead.

    There are reports that 35 British SAS operationals were liquidated in a successful defence against this illegal aggression by the Libyan Armed Forces and in Abu Saleem district at the weekend, 7 British special force elements were destroyed. On Tuesday, a large number of terrorist forces were liquidated by the members of the Al Magarra tribe south of Tripoli as they headed south. In Ghadamis, there are reports of two French special forces captured.

    On the eastern front, 50 terrorists who tried to enter al-Brega were eliminated. The manipulated and biased press are saying nothing of NATO war crimes, violations of the UNSC Resolutions or the fact that the NATO/terrorist forces control around 30% of Libyan territory, at most.

    On the legal front, David Cameron and William Hague have been aiding and abetting the LIFG group inside Libya which is proscribed on the FCO lists as a terrorist group. Therefore under the UK’s own Terrorism Acts (2006), surely a crime has been committed by the British Prime Minister and Foreign Secretary?

    The biased media has said nothing of NATO’s continued war crimes and breaches of the Geneva Conventions, strafing civilians with helicopters, taking sides in an internal conflict, violation of the terms of the UNSC Resolution, attacking civilian structures and supplies with military hardware.

    The result is that NATO and its political and military leaders have lost all credibility, as they face the call from millions of people around the world to put them on trial for their war crimes.

    Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey

  43. Wednesday 14 September 2011

    Col Gaddafi ‘in Libya and readying forces’
    Muammar Gaddafi is still in Libya and in good spirits, with a powerful army behind him, says the lJAMAHIRIYA’s spokesman, Moussa Ibrahim.

    11:29AM BST 14 Sep 2011
    “The leader is in good health, in high morale … of course he is in Libya,” Moussa Ibrahim told Reuters via a crackling satellite telephone line.
    “The fight is as far away from the end as the world can imagine. We are still very powerful, our army is still powerful … we have huge areas of Libya under our control,” he said. “We are gathering our forces.”

    Ibrahim declined to say where he himself was or where Muammar al-Gadhafi was either..
    Gaddafi’s whereabouts is unknown. NTC officials have said he could be hiding in one of the outposts like Bani Walid, helping to rally a last stand against Nato-backed forces.

    Two of Gaddafi’s sons (Hannibal and Mouhamood, with their wives and children) and his only biological daughter (AICHA, who gave birth that very day entering Algeria with her children—whose husband was another casualty of the war in July)) have made their way to Algeria. One son, Saif al-Arab is reported to have died in NATO’s bombings (which also killed 3 of Gadhafi’s grandchildren). Gadhafi’s son, Saadi, is now in Nigeria. Three others, Khamis, Moustassim and Saif-al-Islam, are still “on the run”.

  44. 14 septembre 14:22
    Breaking News
    NATO is bombing Zala Area it’s far 160 Km from Aljoufra small area with less people , they are killing people .
    please if you have journalist let him share , NATO killed unaccounted number of people in Ben Walid and now they are bombing this area .

    NATO Planning New Terrorist Atrocity in Libya
    Posted: 2011/09/15
    From: Mathaba
    Already actively supporting terrorists listed on the U.S. government web sites such as the military commander installed by NATO in Tripoli, the U.S.-led NATO is now planning another terrorist atrocity in Libya according to reports received at a Russian web site

    NATO has conceived a huge provocation in order to discredit the army of volunteers from Libya where the general population are armed in order to defend themselves against invasions such as that currently underway and from other African states coming to the rescue of Libya, sources indicate.

    To this end, the NATO sources have bought Soviet weapons that armed Libyan in the past. On Tuesday 13th it became clear that NATO had purchased Soviet weapons in Latvia, including a few tanks and armored vehicles, also from Moldova and possibly from other countries. They are using a heavy cargo aircraft IL-76 to transport these weapons.

    This plot was hatched by NATO strategists in order to paint in the colors Jamahiriya mercenaries, posing as an army of volunteers, to create confusion by killing civilians in Libya.

    This will sow discord between the tribes and the army with their attachments of volunteers.

    The aircraft was reported arriving from Moldova around Wednesday. A first confirmation that the mechanism is already running is given at this Russian news site: http://www.gazeta.ru/news/lenta/2011/09/13/n_2007561.shtml

    Information for this report was taken from the Russian site “for Gaddafi and his people”: http://za-kaddafi.ru/node/3661 which is closely monitoring the situation in Libya and the illegal US-NATO-led war against Africa’s wealthiest state. #

  45. Chavez offers unwavering support for Moammar Gadhafi
    Posted: 2011/09/14
    From: Source http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628650?rss
    directed by Dennis South
    Venezuela’s President Hugo Chavez shows Libya’s Leader Muammar Gaddafi a replica of Venezuelan Independence hero Simon Bolivar’s sword after giving it as a gift to Gaddafi (2008).

    Chavez gives Gadhafi Simon Bolivar sword

    By Ian James

    When Moammar Gadhafi made his first and only visit to South America in 2009, President Hugo Chavez praised his longtime friend as “the liberator of Libya,” talked politics inside his Bedouin tent and presented him with Venezuela’s highest award.

    Now that Gadhafi has been ousted and is in hiding, Chavez is one of the few heads of state still openly supporting him, and probably his most strident and vocal defender among them.

    Chavez denounces Libya’s rebels-turned-rulers as “terrorists” and has spearheaded a group of Latin American allies in condemning NATO’s airstrikes. In Gadhafi’s fate, Chavez appears to see a cautionary tale and a dangerous precedent for potential U.S. and European military interventions in other oil-producing countries, such as Venezuela.

    “Gadhafi has said he’s not going to leave Libya, that he’s leading the resistance. And it’s what any leader would have to do,” Chavez said Friday night as he hosted a group of foreign ministers from allied countries. “I’m sure he’s very far from thinking in the least of leaving Libya.”

    Chavez has long admired Gadhafi and the political ideals in his Green Book, the manifesto that promotes “direct democracy” rather than traditional representative government and argues that public participation through “popular congresses” is key. Chavez has similarly set up neighborhood “communal councils” that aim to boost involvement in local decision-making, and both former military men have cast themselves as leaders with unshakable links to their public.

    The two have expressed beliefs that they’re destined to lead their nations for decades. Chavez in 2009 attended celebrations in Libya marking Gadhafi’s 40th anniversary in power, and the Venezuelan president now predicts that such a long-standing political movement won’t fade overnight. “This war will be long,” Chavez said recently, repeating the words of Gadhafi.

    “Chavez doesn’t hide anything. He defends Gadhafi because he feels like Gadhafi,” said Alberto Barrera Tyszka, a Venezuelan writer who co-authored a biography of the president.

    Barrera noted that Chavez recently said that while it’s unclear how much strength Gadhafi has to keep fighting back, the Libyan has longevity going for him after governing for four decades.

    “He considers that a virtue, a model to follow,” Barrera said. “It’s his ideal, what he wants. If Gadhafi falls, a successful version of the model of government that Chavez promotes also falls.”

    Chavez, a former army paratroop commander, has progressively amassed power during more than 12 years in office and vows to keep winning re-election for many years to come. Chavez has also been a strong promoter of the newly formed Union of South American Nations, or UNASUR, just as Gadhafi was active as a leader within the African Union before Libya’s conflict erupted.

    When Gadhafi pitched his tent outside a hotel on Margarita Island during a 2009 summit in Venezuela, Chavez presented him with the nation’s highest award and a replica of a sword that belonged to independence hero Simon Bolivar.

    “I’m not exaggerating at all: Moammar al-Gadhafi is for the Libyan people what Simon Bolivar is for Venezuelans,” Chavez said as he presented the medal. “He’s the liberator of Libya, the creator of the socialist people’s Arab republic.”

    During his visit, Gadhafi flaunted a rock-star-like image, shadowed by women bodyguards and surrounded by onlookers as he passed through the hotel in his flowing African robes.

    Chavez at the time praised Gadhafi’s proposal to create a “NATO for the south,” a defense alliance that would include African and South American nations. Both men talked of standing up to world powers and “imperialism.” Accepting his award, Gadhafi told Chavez: “We are in the same trenches.”

    Before the fighting in Libya, Chavez says he had warned Gadhafi about Libya’s billions of dollars in assets in the U.S. and Europe, which have since been frozen. Chavez accuses the U.S. and European countries of using Libya’s internal conflict as a pretext to seize control of its oil wealth as well as its freshwater supply in aquifers deep beneath the Sahara Desert.

    It’s a perspective that fits with Chavez’s accusations, long denied by U.S. officials, that Washington is plotting against him to seize Venezuela’s oil. He said on television last week: “We’re on that list, only in the background.”

    Throughout the conflict in Libya, Chavez has been demanding peace negotiations and praising the African Union’s calls for talks. Gadhafi at one point sent him a letter thanking him for his support.

    But last week, Chavez suggested they haven’t been in contact lately. “Nobody knows where Gadhafi is,” Chavez said. He said he’s sure Gadhafi will stay in Libya and “resist with the strength he has left.”

    From hiding, Gadhafi has vowed in audio messages never to “leave the land of his ancestors.” But news emerged Sunday that one of his sons, al-Saadi, had become the highest-profile former regime figure to flee to neighboring Niger. Since last week, several convoys carrying senior officials of the former government, including high-ranking military officers, have made their way to Niger, but Gadhafi’s whereabouts remain unknown.

    Criticizing NATO’s involvement in Libya seems to play well among many hard-line Chavez supporters who oppose the war.

    “He dares to tell the truth,” said Corina Rondon, a 57-year-old pro-Chavez activist. “All the other countries don’t dare to speak out because they’re afraid. … Not Chavez.”

    Top diplomats of countries ranging from Bolivia to Dominica agreed at Friday’s talks in Caracas to demand an immediate halt to the foreign military involvement in Libya. In a joint statement, the nations of the left-leaning ALBA bloc called for an investigation into NATO’s “crimes” and vowed to denounce before the U.N. General Assembly the “dangerous precedents” set in Libya.

    The president’s opponents, meanwhile, condemn what they view as support for an international pariah and note that Chavez has an affinity for other long-ruling leaders ranging from Cuba’s Fidel Castro to Zimbabwe’s Robert Mugabe.

    Chavez, who is up for re-election next year, has repeatedly warned of potential plots against him since he survived a 2002 coup. He now says some of his enemies are falsely trying to paint him as identical to Gadhafi in the hopes of laying the groundwork for a similar conflict in Venezuela one day.

    He told supporters in a Sept. 2 speech that any such attempts would fail and that “we have to be alert to guarantee that madness doesn’t take shape.”

    “They’re going around looking for a way for an invasion to occur here, and for that reason they’re insisting Chavez is the same as Gadhafi, well, ‘the tyrant,'” Chavez said. “They’re thinking about what they call the ‘Libya model.’ What a horrible thing!”

  46. Update on the war – 11 September 2011
    Posted: 2011/09/13
    From: Source http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628636?related

    By Dennis South

    Sunday, 11.09.2011 – 23:18

    Bani Walid: after the NATO bombing of Bani Walid last night, the NATO-rebels, with the help of terrorist and mercenary apostates from Islam from Afghanistan and Pakistan tried to enter Bani Walid, but they were repulsed, just as they were repulsed in the city of Sirte, where they have poisoned the water.

    Sirte: Sirte is in a very difficult situation. The roads in town are blocked. NATO airstrikes are constant. There are no drugs or dressings for the wounded, and there are no tools to perform operations. According to some sources, the water flowing into the city is poisoned. The NATO-rebels have not yet planned their attacks on Sirte. Apparently, NATO has decided to bomb Sirte relentlessly until all resistance stops. This is what was explained in the message that “Argumenty.ru” received from an assistant of Gaddafi’s, a former officer of the old Soviet Union and member of Russian Special Forces, Lieutenant Colonel Elias Koreneva (It appears that Lieutenant Koreneva is fighting right alongside the Libyan Armed Forces! he’s from the old Soviet school).

    Lieutenant Koreneva also confirms the information concerning Bani Walid that is in the first paragraph above.

    Lieutenant Koreneva reports:

    “Fighters of the brigade led by Khamis al-Gaddafi carried out a counter-attack on a base occupied by rats and NATO officials at the Mitiga airport. This is the headquarters of the Military commandant of Tripoli, Abdel Hakim Belhadj. Several of his guards were killed, and a British helicopter was shot down. We will now go to fight in the northwest of Tripoli.”

    Sunday 11.09.2011 – 23:53

    Foreign special forces have been moved to Bani Walid for an assault.

    Monday, 12.09.2011 – 02:51

    Major events in Libya are developing now in five operational areas:

    1. The central area (City limits of Tripoli),
    2. The Tunisian area (Southern suburbs of Tripoli, the route to Tunis, Az Zawiya, Ajelat, Zouara).
    3. East Tripolitana (Northern suburbs of Tripoli, Bani Walid, Misurata, Sirte).
    4. Fezzan (Khoums, Az Zintan, Garyan, Ghadames, Nalut, Sabha).
    5. Barga (Brega, Ras Lanuf, Benghazi, Tobruk).

    Strategically, and the most intense, is the East Tripolitana, Barga operational areas. The colonial coalitions [NATO-rebels] are trying to develop an offensive along the axis of Bani Walid-Sabha to divide the armed forces of the Jamahiriya into two parts, so that they can defeat each part individually. This will make it difficult for the loyalists to regain control of the Libyan coast. Then there’s something about the “main rebel group” that is not clear.

    Now more about the fighting in each of the operational areas:

    Central area: Two areas of Tripoli are controlled by apostates from Islam, as well as Qatari mercenaries: Legation Quarter and the business centre of the city). Mitiga, the district airport, is controlled by NATO Special Forces of. There are battles in other parts of the city. On the night of September 9th, as a result of urban combat, resistance fighters killed 23 NATO-rebels. The battalion brigade led by Khamis al-Gaddafi launched an attack at the Mitiga airport and killed 10 British commandoes and shot down a helicopter.

    East Tripolitana: Sirte is completely under the control of the supporters of Gaddafi and the Jamahiriya. NATO aircraft continue to cause massive strikes in the city, but, in general, the loyalist army air defence has not been suppressed. Over the last 4 days, not only have the loyalists withstood all of the attacks on Sirte, but they also took control of the village of Wadi al-Ahmar, located east of Sirte. The capture of Wadi al-Ahmar by loyalists of the Jamahiriya is a serious defeat for the colonial coalition aggressors. As a result of this fighting the rats have lost several artillery batteries, and 350 NATO-rebels were killed. In the area of Tawrga, a NATO-rebels column was ambushed.
    On September 9, to get ready for an attack on the town as a part of the colonial coalition (unit of British and Qatari forces, as well as gangs in supporting roles of the TNC) defenders of the city suffered an artillery counter-attack, the attacking provoked a premature attack. As a result of choking attack, 1000 NATO-rebels were killed, and others were wounded. This forced the remaining NATO-rebels to retreat.

    These big losses led NATO strategists into frenzy, resulting in their decision in the use of widespread cluster bombs, and most probably chemical weapons (mustard gas). The situation in Bani Walid, after the possible use of chemical warfare agents against city defenders, is not clear.

    Tunisian front: There is fighting along the entire route from Tripoli to Tunis. During 4 days of fighting, the colonial coalition lost more than 150 NATO-rebels. The bulk of the Khamis al-Gaddafi brigade took Az Zawiya together with the neighbouring refinery. In Ajelat, there were heavy losses amongst the rats as a result of a successful ambush. Counter-attack forces attacked the French Special Forces base in the city of Zouara, killing 21 NATO mercenaries. This base has been attacked by Jamahiriya soldiers several times during the past three days.

    Fezzan operational area:

    In the area of fighting between rebels in Gharyan (information from armed women in Al-Assaba who fought back from the gangs). Ghadames was liberated from NATO-rebel gangs by the Algerian army. The NATO-rebels retreated to 8 kilometres from the city. The colonial coalition, not being able to attack through Gharyan, Al-Assaba (the proximity effect of Bani-Walid), is trying to attack via Az Zintan. But the troops and air support is not enough. Over the past 4 days, Sabha shot down 2 helicopters and NATO destroyed some of its own NATO-rebel groups.

    Barga operational area: Fifty (50) NATO-rebels were killed in Brega. A powerful explosion occurred in Benghazi on Saturday, September 10th, presumably against a group of journalists of Al-Jazeera. The city held a demonstration with green flags in several areas of the city. The TNC does not have the strength to stop the demonstrations. There is evidence that they shot at protestors [see earlier report]. In Tobruk, there was also unconfirmed reports of an attack on a radio station building.

    The Leader, Muammar Gaddafi, said that the earth is burning under the feet of the colonizers and collaborators.

    Update on the war – September 12th
    Posted: 2011/09/13
    From: Source http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628637?rss

    By Dennis South

    Libyan Resistance: Summary for 12 September 2011
    (Tuesday, 13.09.2011 – 02:26)

    The fighting and resistance in the city of Bani Walid continues, despite NATO bombing. The local radio continues to encourage people to fight against the NATO led rebels, not sparing anyone: “We urge the residents of Bani Walid to protect the city from the NATO led rebels and armed gangs, no retreat! Fight to the death!, Allah is on our side!”.

    The residents of Sirte, which is now like a fortress, are still fighting, despite NATO bombing.

    Loyalist guerrillas are operating in Tripoli and other Libyan cities. Libyans are fighting day and night with the al-Qaeda terrorists.

    Somewhere in the west of Libya there was a clash between different factions of the NATO led rebels. They were fighting over control of heavy weapons, and at least 12 rebels were killed. A powerful explosion rocked the international airport at Tripoli. There were deaths and wounded [assumed to be rebels]. The Libyan resistance continues!

    Do not call The Leader, “former!”
    (Tuesday, 13.09.2011 – 02:39)

    [This is actually more of an article than a blow-by-blow report of on-the-ground activity, but there is information within the article that is important to share. Some of the information may have appeared in earlier reports]

    The people of Bani Walid won a brilliant victory at the entrance to the city, killing more than 1,000 NATO mercenaries. The mercenaries said that they turned back away from Bani Walid because they are “against bloodshed.”

    Gaddafi supporters still control a large part of most Libyan cities. The reorganization of Gaddafi forces against NATO and the mercenaries is moving along just fine. The man, who has grown five-fold, Khamis al-Gaddafi, surely controls a lot of territory.

    In order to get hold of the oil fields, NATO made an attempt to gain the support of the Tuaregs. But now it has become clear to NATO that the Tuaregs are not on NATO’s side. The Tuaregs are protecting Muammar Gaddafi personally.

    Muammar Gaddafi has become the worst nightmare for NATO! Sources say that it is likely that Gaddafi will speak to the world sometime this week.

    The war in Libya has been a complete failure for NATO, on all fronts. Gaddafi and his forces control 70-80% of the territory. NATO’s beat on the betrayal of the Berbers failed miserably.

    Because of the fact that NATO has failed in its mission, it has decided to let out its fury on the Libyan people by bombing them, as revenge for their loyalty to The Leader. If NATO leaves, the rats will run even faster.

    NATO leaflets scattered in the Bani Walid. Preparing another crime.
    (Tuesday, 13.09.2011 – 02:52)

    NATO dropped leaflets onto the city of Bani Walid. The flyers called for every family to surrender. They also said that if they surrender their weapons, they would be granted the huge sum of 500,000 dinars per family. On the other side of the leaflet it was written that if they do not surrender, they would be bombed with white phosphorous.

    The answer of the tribes of Bani Walid was, “We will not surrender or betray the nation, and we are ready to serve God and destiny.” This is the answer of the people that were born brave. Victory or martyrdom, steadfastness and glory.



  47. Konstantyn Scheglikov gives this warning:


    Bani Walid: NATO commits massacre in the name of “democracy”
    Posted: 2011/09/15
    From: Source http://mathaba.net/news/?x=628660

    Commentary from Thomas Mathew

    Thomas Mathew writes from London: “Pardon my French, but has NATO gone f..king nuts in Libya, whacking people in the name of democracy? We are now witnessing a massacre from the air in Bani Walid, with a population of 100,000 people.

    The rebels had given the people in Bani Walid an ultimatum some time ago: surrender, or we move in. Obviously, no one had surrendered, simply because for them it would be like committing suicide. And now the rebels have started their assault, and the city’s terrified population, the very one that NATO is supposed to protect, is now the target of bombings and shellings.

    This is about as far from what the UN Security Council resolution on Libya has sanctioned as it gets. (By the way, don’t you just love how that creep Ban Ki Moon and his sidekicks are keeping quiet about the mayhem in Libya?). Do you want me to remind you what UN resolution 1973 said? No, well I’ll still do it, for the sake of proving that trigger happy NATO generals have lost their marbles completely, along with their political masters.

    Here’s what the UN document says, in its most relevant parts:

    (The UN) Authorizes Member States that have notified the Secretary-General, acting nationally or through regional organizations or arrangements, and acting in cooperation with the Secretary-General, to take all necessary measures to protect civilians and civilian populated areas under threat of attack in the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, including Benghazi, while excluding a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory, and requests the Member States concerned to inform the Secretary-General immediately of the measures they take pursuant to the authorization conferred by this paragraph which shall be immediately reported to the Security Council.

    The part about ‘protecting civilians and civilian populated areas’ doesn’t mention any armed rebels or militias or anyone else involved in the fighting. And you probably also noticed the bit about ‘excluding a foreign occupation force of any form on any part of Libyan territory’.

    But there’s more. The resolution says in paragraph 13 that makes the current situation looking like it got out of control:

    Calls upon all Member States, in particular States of the region, acting nationally or through regional organisations or arrangements, in order to ensure strict implementation of the arms embargo established by paragraphs 9 and 10 of resolution 1970 (2011), to inspect in their territory, including seaports and airports, and on the high seas, vessels and aircraft bound to or from the Libyan Arab Jamahiriya, if the State concerned has information that provides reasonable grounds to believe that the cargo contains items the supply, sale, transfer or export of which is prohibited by paragraphs 9 or 10 of resolution 1970 (2011) as modified by this resolution, including the provision of armed mercenary personnel, calls upon all flag States of such vessels and aircraft to cooperate with such inspections and authorises Member States to use all measures commensurate to the specific circumstances to carry out such inspections.

    So there you have it: all arms shipments to Libya are banned by the UN and no foreign troops are allowed on its soil. And yet, we are told by NATO, that as the resolution states that all necessary measures can be taken to protect the civilians, the rest is not really all that important. So arms are delivered to the rebels and NATO’s special forces are operating on the ground in Libya. Not to mention that that the boys from CIA have been there for months.

    And you know what else is important in the UN resolution 1973? It contains no mention of so-called regime change. None at all. Not a hint. It does mention ‘facilitating dialogue to lead to the political reforms necessary to find a peaceful and sustainable solution’, yes. But not a word about ‘regime change’.

    So what we are seeing now is basically NATO doing whatever it pleases in Libya. So how’s it ‘better than Gaddafi’?”


    Gaddafi loyalists resist bloody NATO-procolonialistas attack on Bani Walid and Sirte

    Posted: 2011/09/13
    From: Mathaba http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628645?rss

    By Luis Chirino

    Luis Chinino

    Bloody attacks by NATO-procolonialistas on Bani Walid

    BANI WALID tweets

    and Sirte

    NATO bombing of Tripoli

    Forces loyal to leader Muammar Al Gaddafi maintain strong resistance in the cities of Sirte and Bani Walid, after the deadly bombings and attacks by groups of the procoloniales Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), which attempt to take control locations where supporters of the Libyan government persist.

    According to Prensa Latina on Sunday at night and early Saturday morning last NATO aircraft attacks raged Bani Walid, 150 kilometers southeast of Tripoli, capital of Libya, in an attempt to hasten the fall of that Strategic pro-government stronghold.

    Armed groups allied with the imperialist forces fighting in Bani Walid, where despite having advanced 500 meters Sunday at the center of the city after days of stalemate in the military, drove to allow incursions of the Atlantic alliance in last hours.

    NATO spokesman said that its planes destroyed a tank, two armored vehicles and several rocket launchers in Bani Walid, allowing armed groups to take control of parts of the town, including the university, said the note.

    Meanwhile, the self-styled leaders of the Transitional National Council (CNT) said its troops dominated the north exit, but were unable to take the central market square of the city lies the Warfalla tribe, one of the most powerful and loyal Qaddafi.

    With respect to attacks in Sirte, a city that also has a large following of leader Muammar Gaddafi, NATO destroyed platforms-to-air missiles, two tanks and two armored vehicles in the hands of soldiers and civilians loyal to the Libyan leader.

    Bani Walid, Sirte, Sabha and YouFra are cities where there is more resistance from government supporters procoloniales Libyan forces, which have disrupted the claims of these groups to form an interim government.

    About Luis Chirino:

    Luis Chirino is Editor-in-Chief of Mathaba-Latin America ( Spanish ) News

  48. Gadhafi bedoin


    14 septembre 16:13
    Elena Stamenkovic
    Vadim Gerasimenko
    Libya now. Short news 14 September 2011.

    There are plans to send aircraft
    Qatar and UAE with the mercenaries, disguised in the form
    Libyan government forces, and journalists
    different broadcasters.
    Their main goal:
    showing “atrocities” and killings “over the” rebels ”
    … And the show “questioning” allegedly captured
    “Officers Libyan army.”

    Source: “diplomat” RF,
    A military specialist in Algeria.
    ВНИМАНИЕ! РАСПРОСТРАНИТЬ! В ближайшее время планируется отправка самолётов из Катара и ОАЭ с наёмник


    Corageous Khamis al-Gadhafi
    Khamis amongst comrades in arms

  49. (The Free and the blessed vs the ungodly orcs/NATO)

    The Godly vs. the orcs of NATO

    al-Gathafi, Our brother-leader, will be shortly addressing the UN SECURITY COUNCIL LIVE !
    http://www.ustream.tv/channel/ilibya-tv-Gadhafi addresses the U.N. Security Council 14 SEPT. 2011

    123VivaDjazair le 14 sept. 2011
    Thanks to vsMRK for uploading the video/audio

    As with all message that do not contain the actual voice of Gaddafi, one has to exercise a degree of caution, but since it appears that Alrai TV is the source of the footage and because Dr Moussa Ibrahim said that Alrai tv can be trusted then it’s fair to assume that the message is authentic.
    This message only meant for he the Russians and the Chinese for obvious reasons, I hope China and the Russia do as Qaddafi asks and assume their responsibilities by stopping the bombing and allowing Libyans to sort out their problems.
    Russia and China will never be trusted again if they allow the carnage to continue, they must not give another mandate to NATO to continue the slaughter of civilians in Libya but instead they should insist on free elections with the participation of all sides.

    Gadhafi cameo
    Gaddafi urges the UN Security Council to protect the city of Sirte, “the atrocities of NATO”
    September 14, 2011, 22:44 [“AN-online»]

    The former leader of Libya, Colonel Muammar Gaddafi called on the UN Security Council – to protect his home town of Sirte on the “atrocities of NATO forces.”

    In his address, the Colonel said: “If the Sirte be abandoned to their fate, then you should take action and intervene to prevent crime.”

    A copy of the text messages Muammar Gaddafi was on the UN Security Council on a Syrian television channels.

    According to recent reports, in Sirte, fierce fighting in the area of ​​dried-up riverbed of Wadi El-Ahmar al. Representatives of the Transitional National Council of Libya (PNS) attack the city from the Haravy, located 50 kilometers from the Sirte. The offensive comes from the north, east and south, in the operations used tanks, artillery and rockets.

  50. Elena Stamenkovic
    Warning!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! In the coming days in several neighboring NATO countries will be combined with the special forces search in treacherous locations of arrest and order the liquidation of family members Gaddafi. attention. info. is given by angry fundamentalists who have worked together for a month on this plan


    Olivera Olja Ilić

    News from city of Surman ( central Libya)
    Violent clashes in the city hours before Surman and news about the escape of a number of NATO rats of the gates
    news is true Surman was bombed headquarters of the Council Besrman traitors were killed in the blast, 70 people, some of them fled, and God knows best and the largest
    ( source phoncall from Libya)

    Hadeel Al-Shalchi

    at night we can see bright flashes from phosphorus bombs, fighters feel they are outnumbered without privateers support #libya #baniwalid
    Il y a 10 heures via web

  51. International Investments 15 MARCH 2008:

    The Crash of Capitalism


    Africa’s Urgent Need of Stability 24 JUNE 2004:


    The UPRISING: The Truth revisited

  52. ingsoc2012 le 9 sept. 2011
    Friday, 9 September 2011
    The Truth About the NATO/NTC War on Libya!
    1. For 42 years Colonel Gaddafi used oil money to enrich Libya, to improve the lives of Libyans and to empower African states. This is why Gaddafi is alive, supported and continues to defy the West and speak the truth.

    2. Both the West and the Arab world hated these facts because it affected their quest for power and profit. They wanted to lead Gaddafi but Gaddafi did not want to be led and instead used them as a stepping stone to his achieve his own aspirations and those he had for Libya and Africa.

    3. 2011 – Foreign mercenaries pour into Libya via rebellions in Egypt and Tunisia, while Libyans and those in the capital support Gaddafi.

    4. NATO then finds a few leaders amongst traitors in Gaddafi’s military, Al-Qaeda and elsewhere who send mercenaries and gangs to instigate riots in Libya to create instability.

    5. The uprising is defeated by Gaddafi so NATO sends in advisers, then special forces and then it’s own special forces. NATO cuts off power and water supplies, destroys telecommunication centres and then bombs everything else including both military and civilian targets, including Gaddafi’s family.

    6. Further special forces are deployed and a media blackout is enforced and subsequent western media propaganda follows from the likes of the BBC and Al-Jazeera news.

    7. Criminals and racists are then armed by NATO and let loose in Libya, with NATO air support paving the way for unrestrained looting and bloodshed.

    8. August 2011 – The Western media spreads further propaganda that Gaddafi is defeated and it is all over.

    9. It is far from over. The truth is that the NTC/Rebels cannot finish the job as we’ve seen in Sirte, Bani Walid, Tripoli, etc and the NATO bombing campaign continues. However, the Libyan Armed Forces continue to control much of the country, fighting continues in Tripoli and major cities, and despite media propaganda, the people hate the rebels who are young reckless men with guns.

    10. We all know that as soon as NATO pulls out the entire country will fall into civil war. This is NATO’s fault for aiding terrorists, for taking sides in internal conflicts, for telling lies and for committing war and war crimes in Libya.

    The only person that can save Libya now is Gaddafi, which is why NATO and the West are trying their best to find and kill him before Libyans overthrow the NTC/Rebels, which will mean NATO and the West will have no choice but to leave Libya with their heads bowed low and their tails between their legs. History will show Gaddafi fought the most powerful enemy in the world and won! The NTC/Rebels will simultaneously be wiped out. The West will then feel Gaddafi’s wrath, not by war, but by him choosing to do business with the economies of Russia, India and China, rather than the failing economies of the West who now need Gaddafi’s oil more than ever.

    Viva Colonel Gaddafi – Leader of the Revolution!


  53. Dr. Moussa Ibrahim: Gaddafi is still in Libya and in good health
    Posted: 2011/09/15
    From: Source

    “This fight is as far away from the end as the world can imagine”

    The spokesman for Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi, Dr. Moussa Ibrahim, on September 14 said via satellite telephone that Gaddafi is still in Libya and in good health, and gathering his forces for a fightback.

    “The Leader is in good health, in high morale, of course he is in Libya,” Moussa Ibrahim told.

    “The fight is as far away from the end as the world can imagine. We are still very powerful, our army is still powerful, we have thousands upon thousands of volunteers,” he said.

    “We have huge areas of Libya under our control — on the northern coast, in the western areas of the country and the whole south belongs to us,” he said.

    “We are gathering our forces and we will liberate every single Libyan city even if we have to fight street-to-street, house-to-house, for years to come.”


  54. الى الامام يابطل نحن معك حتى النهاية ضد المستعمرين ضد العملاء والاغبياء أطلق لها السيف يامعمر لاخوف ولاوجل أمضي قدما لاتتهاون أعلم أن مصابك هو أبتلاء من رب الارباب يقيس فيه أخلاصك لوطنك لدينك لعروبتك
    وهاأنت أحسبك والله حسيبك قد أثبت أنك رجل شهم شجاع قادر على مقارعة الاخطار والسير على الدرب القويم حتى وان أستعانوا هؤلاء الشرذمة بمجموعة من العصابات الصليبية التدميرية الغوغائية الامسوؤلة التي سوف تهزم بقدرة جبار حكيم وفقك الله وسدد خطاك وجعل النصر حليفك من بعد أن كان مبتغاك اللهم أمين

    15937ALHARBI il y a 2 jours

    Forward Iabtal We are with you until the end against the colonists against customers and idiots called her sword Aamuammr to The thing but Ocal go forward to Ataathaon know that Massapk is a test from the Lord of lords measure the dedication to your country for your religion to Aropetk and Hant Ahspk God Hsepk has proven that you are a gentleman brave unable to fight the dangers and walk the straight path, even if they used the fragmentation range of destructive mob gang crusader Alamsoalh that will defeat the ability of a wise and powerful Allaah bless you and guide your steps and make you will attain victory after he was Secretary of the gools O

    15937ALHARBI il y a 2 jours

  55. http://www.mathaba.net/news/?x=628649?rss

    NATO on Libya
    By John Pilger

    The entirely predictable indictment of Gaddafi before the “international court” at The Hague evokes the charade of the dying Lockerbie bomber, Abdelbaset Ali Mohmed al-Megrahi, whose “heinous crime” has been deployed to promote the west’s ambitions in Libya.

    In 2009, Al-Megrahi was sent back to Libya by the Scottish authorities not for compassionate reasons, as reported, but because his long-awaited appeal would have confirmed his innocence and described how he was framed by the Thatcher government, as the late Paul Foot’s landmark expose revealed.

    As an antidote to the current propaganda, I urge you to read a forensic demolition of el-Melgrahi’s “guilt” and its political meaning in Dispatches from the Dark Side: on torture and the death of justice (Verso) by the distinguished human rights lawyer, Gareth Peirce….

    …Unlike his neighbours, Gaddafi had come to power by denying western control of his country’s natural wealth.

    For this, he was never forgiven, and the opportunity for his demise was seized in the usual manner, as history shows…..

  56. Silence and fear return to the streets of Tripoli
    permalink email story to a friend print version
    Published: 15 September, 2011, 10:02
    Edited: 15 September, 2011, 13:08

    Libyan youths [look more middle-aged to me] practice using rifles during training to join the fighting forces of the National Transitional Council (NTC) in the town of Tajura, Tripoli, on September 14, 2011. (AFP Photo / Mahmud Turkia)

    (33.2Mb)embed video


    A month on from Tripoli’s fall to rebel forces, the leaders of France and Britain are traveling to the city in a show of support for the regime their warplanes helped put in power, while those who backed Colonel Gaddafi remain defiant but fearful.
    On the eve of the visit of French President Nicholas Sarkozy and British PM David Cameron, the head of the National Transitional Council, Mustafa Abdul Jalil, has asked for more weapons to fight pockets of Colonel Gaddafi’s loyalists and remove them from their remaining strongholds.
    The rebel government thinks the ousted dictator is hiding in southern Libya and planning a fight-back.
    However, the new authority is asserting an increasing level of control over the country.
    For some, that is cause for celebration – but many others are reserved in their optimism.
    In parts of Tripoli it feels as if the rebels’ triumphant campaign never happened, or did so elsewhere, in some parallel version of the Libyan capital.
    “We will do anything for Muammar, only Muammar! Even if we give our life for that!” claims one street vendor, while hiding her face from RT’s camera.
    In today’s Tripoli, it is becoming a commonplace to meet people who are afraid of speaking openly to journalists as RT’s team discovered on the streets of the city. This is how one encounter went:
    “All people here love MuammarGaddafi.”
    “We are from television – could you tell us that on camera?”
    “No, no.”
    “This is dangerous…”
    And it was the same story with others who fervently support the ousted Libyan leader.
    “Gaddafi is 100 per cent good!”
    “We don’t want this revolution, we don’t know the rebels.”
    “We want them to go away.”
    “Could you talk on camera? We are from TV.”
    “No, no, no thanks, if I appear in front of the camera, they will send a bullet to my head…”
    “Who? Who?”
    “Who? The criminals! You don’t know them? You call them the rebels!”
    “Hey guys, do you remember Ehab, the black guy, he was arrested few days ago, after he appeared on TV… don’t do that!”
    Those calling themselves rebels are once again celebrating on Martyrs’ Square in downtown Tripoli. This time, they are welcoming Libya’s new government to the capital.
    The head of the National Transitional Council, Mustafa Abdul Jalil, spoke before large crowds, leaving Libyans in no doubt about who is now in charge.
    But while the NTC leader was giving his speech, most of Tripoli’s population preferred to stay close to their businesses and homes.
    Those who do not support Mustafa Abdul Jalil and could be seen all across the city proudly waving green flags just weeks ago backing Gaddafi, are now reluctant to leave their own backyards.
    “They are afraid because if they go out they will die instantly because there are many people with weapons and guns,” one man, who was afraid to speak on camera, told RT.
    With Gaddafi effectively gone, the new authorities have settled down here in the capital, Tripoli. People are chanting that Libya is now a new free country. But it seems there is at least one thing that still remains – fear.
    We finally found one young man – Ahmed – brave enough to talk to RT’s crew. This is what he had to say:
    “Tripoli is now under the control of the National Transitional Council and we don’t feel we have freedom to talk or to express our opinions. If we say something in favor of Gaddafi they can kill us or arrest us. Of course, many are in fear.”
    The 19-year-old says many of his friends have been arrested recently for making statements critical of the new regime. Ironically, we were talking just a kilometer away from Abu Sleem Prison.
    “The rebels, they only represent themselves – not the Libyan people. This revolution started with killings to intimidate through fear. Their hands are all covered in blood,” Ahmed said.
    Amnesty International has recently accused the TNC of committing war crimes, including killings and torture of soldiers, prisoners and civilians.
    Here in the Libyan capital, there is widespread fear that more is in store.

    Gaddafi’s Libya ‘threatened Africa’s subordinate role’
    permalink email story to a friend print version
    Published: 15 September, 2011, 02:25

    Analysts are warning that Africa may yet face echoes of its colonial past.

    Gaddafi’s Libya was the engine uniting Africa, argued Dan Glazebrook, a political analyst on the Middle East. And a united Africa, he noted, would have meant a final break from the centuries of Western colonial rule over the continent.

    “Gaddafi was the main driving force behind founding the African Union in 2002,” he told RT. “His country was the main financial contributor to the three major financial institutions of the African Union: the African Central Bank, the Investment Bank and the African Monetary Fund. Between them, they would have posed a huge challenge to the IMF hegemony in Africa.”
    Moreover, Libya’s dinar, which was proposed as the single currency of the union, would have posed a threat to the US dollar, British pound and French franc as the main currencies in Africa.
    “All of this is a threat to Africa’s subordinate role in the global economy,” claimed the political analyst.
    Glazebrook also played down Washington’s concerns about emerging sectarian violence in post-revolutionary Arab states, including Libya.
    Portraying “the US as some kind of champion of religious tolerance is part of an exercise in ideological confusion designed to obscure the fact that the US has been the biggest supporter of religious intolerance around the world,” he said. “It is a part of a divide-and-rule strategy to keep the Third World’s peoples from uniting.”



    New reports suggest that at least 25 NATO militiamen have been killed alongside a representative in the occupied town of Ajaylat. Many Tribes in the West have rejected NTC rule and have decided to take arms.

    Fighting have been reported all across Libya, including guerilla warfare in Tripoli. NATO militias have started panicking and divided against each other, fearing NATO might abandon them at Zero Hour. Many have been killed when NATO militias turned against each other like thieves fighting over stolen bounty.

  58. http://www.moscowtopnews.com/?area=postView&id=2345
    by Timothy Bancroft-Hinchey
    UN has no authority to pass Resolutions on Libya

    The United Nations Organization is no more or less than an umbrella for humanitarian intervention after disasters and catastrophes, a forum for discussion of issues pertaining to cultural heritage and a useful tool to channel developmental approaches. As a law-making body, the Libya Question has shown that the Organization has lost all legitimacy.

    The people of the world community are not stupid. Those who still believe the biased and controlled media (certainly very few after the Libya Question) may be duped but these days, despite draconian measures and sinister and criminal acts of cyber terrorism, hacking, blocking access to independent media resources and threats, people have the means at their disposal to get themselves informed.

    This is not a cause, it is a victory for those of us who have fought for an independent media over the last decade. Like all victories, it must be protected and its legacy cherished and the second we allow freedom of expression to slip, we have lost the battle and reactionary forces will sweep things back to where they used to be. There, is, however, another cause and that is an international justice system whereby the rules of international law apply and are enforced with the same set of weights and measures on all, and this means NATO as well as African countries or Serbia. This means respect for the law, it means respecting the terms of international agreements and conventions and it means accountability for all when such terms are violated.

    On September 15, 2011, this is not the case. For those in the world community who accept that laws are made to be broken and accept that the law of the jungle should be applied, where the strongest bullies the rest by force, then do not bother reading on, just scroll down to the note at the end. Others who want a civilised world where criminals are held accountable, please read on.

    In countries like David Cameron’s Britain, one can get a criminal record and a custodial sentence for stealing a pair of trainers; however, if one fiddles the accounts and steals the same pair of trainers using the taxpayers’ hard-earned cash in the House of Commons, you get off with a statement such as “If I have to pay anything back, then I shall” that is after you trash a restaurant after getting drunk with your chums in the Bullingdon Club. Oh, didn’t you hear? Google up Cameron and Bullingdon.

    However, David Cameron’s Britain no longer rules the waves and very soon, it appears, will not even rule north of the border, as Scotland prepares to secede. Therefore the fact that…persons?…like Cameron and Sarkozy can fly into Tripoli and, like a latter-day Berlin Conference, draw lines on maps and decide which part of Libya’s spoils they get, and the fact that the UNO is powerless to apply the terms of its own Resolutions and Constitution after these two have committed war crimes and broken every law and covenant in the book, spells out a clear message that the UNO has lost legitimacy as a law-making body.

    As it stands, and under the existing international legislation, the rightful Government of the people of Libya is the Jamahiriya Government advised by Brother Leader Muammar Abu Minyar al-Qathafi, his Prime Minister and Cabinet of Ministers, along with the network which is the People’s Councils (the Jamahiriya). Most people supported this Government before NATO armed terrorists, sent thousands of mercenaries and their own special forces into Libya, and bombed the Libyan authorities out of their physical positions.

    This does not mean, however, that the filth which NATO protects and the scum that Cameron and Sarkozy meet with, are under international law the Government of Libya. They are not and they never will be. This also does not mean that Cameron and Sarkozy are to get away with their criminal act of intervention with impunity.

    If the UNO is incapable, too afraid, inept or unwilling to apply international law, then there are members of the world community who are determined and willing to do so, myself included.

    The notion that Muammar al-Qathafi should just give up and quit because he has lost any possibility of regaining power is saying that when a burglar comes into your home, rapes your wife and murders your family, as the NATO forces did to Muammar al-Qathafi’s, then you should stand back and hand over your keys, shrug and walk away. Maybe that is the law in David Cameron’s Britain but it certainly is not the law in the hearts and minds of humankind, to which Cameron, Sarkozy and those who supported their criminal act of mass murder and terrorism no longer have the right to belong.

    When a burglar violates your home, you fight back and you continue fighting with every ounce of your flesh, every grain of determination, every fibre of your willpower and every vestige of energy and you inflict as much damage on your assailant as you can. If you die in the process, you die with honour and dignity. You leave a legacy.

    If Muammar al-Qathafi walked into Tripoli tomorrow, given that NATO did not murder him and continue to spend tens of millions of dollars per week in destroying civilian structures from 30,000 feet in the sky, he would be received with open arms and green flags. Imposing a cabal of terrorists may be cool for Cameron and his French pal but it is not and can never be how international policy is implemented.

    The near future will show what happens when international law is broken and the near future will show that with courage and determination, wrongs can be righted and the criminal elements responsible, whoever they are, will be brought to justice. Muammar al-Qathafi will continue to fight for what is rightful and just – against terrorists and the foreigners who want to steal the resources of the Libyan people – and the rest of us will fight outside Libya for international law to be applied and for international justice to be met.

    Image: fotolia


    Note: Once again, there are criminal attempts to disrupt my communications, there are puerile attempts at intimidation via death threats and yet more puerile attempts to pay me off and bribe me into silence. I am not, however, going to give up, I am not going to coward out, I am not going to sell my morals down the river for money. I would prefer to eat crusts of bread from the floor and drink rain water than accept one cent to violate my integrity in that way, God be my witness. Everything I do, and everything around me, starting at the frontiers of the country where I reside at any given moment, is carefully logged and the information is stored in multiple mediums in several locations. If my life has to be sacrificed to implement a world where international law applies equally to all, then so be it. Bring it on, for I will not bend…and will put up one hell of a fight.

  59. Africa: From Aggression to Terror

    Reason Wafawarova15 September 2011

    When France launched Operation Ody-ssey five months ago, which was immediately to be joined by Britain and the United States, the zeal to implement an ill-secured UN Resolution 1973 was seen by many peace-loving people as brazen aggression targeted at Libya’s Muammar Gaddafi, regardless of the mixed feelings about the man.

    Resolution 1973 was supposedly about protecting Libyan civilians from what the West said was a “pending genocide,” undoubtedly pending in the minds of Sarkozy, Cameron and Obama, but never as apparent in Libya itself.

    Surprisingly, the propaganda line that Gaddafi was about to carry out a gruesome genocide in Benghazi was bought by the likes of Noam Chomsky even, a veteran who should know better about what comes from the lips of US presidents, especially when they are pronouncing a war. Before long, Operation Odyssey was unsurprisingly taken over by NATO, and what many regarded as crude aggression by two rogue states was elevated to an outright terror campaign.

    With the help of NATO aerial firepower, the small group of Benghazi rebels began to gather courage and began capturing Libyan cities, coercing many civilians to join their cause or be shot dead; in fact killing as many as 50 000 they accused of either supporting Muammar Gaddafi or being his spies or mercenaries, especially the dark skinned citizens of Libya.

    The statistics are estimates from various independent sources.

    After the rebels entered and rampaged Tripoli, of course following in the footsteps of a devastating NATO team of murderous warplanes, the massive crowds that had earlier been seen turning out in their hundreds of thousands in support of Gaddafi, defiantly waving Libya’s green flag; were all but intimidated into silence by NATO’s indiscriminate terror bombings, strategically followed by a newly-assembled group of heavily armed rebels brandishing brand new high-tech military hardware fresh from American military warehouses. The rag tag rebels even masqueraded as trained soldiers in their brand new military fatigues.

    Talk of rebels who know no war. It no longer mattered that the majority of the rebels were untrained activists who hardly knew how to handle a gun.

    The fact that these untrained and over-excited goons were coming under the cover of marauding NATO warplanes was good enough a threat to make the Gaddafi forces and their legion of supporters flee Tripoli’s defence posts. Even Gaddafi’s residence was left unguarded; and NATO grazed the compound to smithereens ahead of the rebels.

    It would have been foolhardy to stand against the high-tech bombs.

    The rebels have had the temerity to brazenly demand the loyalty of people who clearly do not support their cause in Sirte, and we have Africans cheering as these innocent civilians are told to comply with NATO demands or be bombed to ashes.

    Other cities threatened with terror attacks include Zawiya and Bani Walid.

    This is so much for respecting the will of the Libyan people, as the rhetoric has been sounding from the cave mouth of Sarkozy.

    From the start of this Western coordinated armed insurgence the rebels have been intimidating Libyans into supporting their cause, forcing people to surrender to their will, all the way until they managed to intimidate the people of Tripoli into submission, proceeding to do the same in all other cities where civilians had publicly vowed to fight the Western backed aggression.

    Now NATO and the rebels are at the doorstep of Sirte, ready to commit a genocide bigger than what they said Gaddafi was about to carry out on Benghazi, the very pretext that allowed Western elite murderers to invite themselves into Libya. If it was Gaddafi at the doorstep of Benghazi, telling the people in the city to allow him to come in and arrest the leaders of the insurgence, there is no doubt the US, France and the UK would be bluntly opposed to such an eventuality arguing that “the will of the people of Libya must be respected.”

    Of course the will of the people of Sirte deserves no respect for its foolishness of opposing the Western position. But why is it that the will of the people of Sirte is not important to the murderous Westerners? Why is it that the people of Bani Walid and other cities to the South of Libya have no right to have their will respected? NATO bombs Tripolians to impose the will of Benghazi rebels and we are told that is victory for democracy. And the African Union watches like a kid robbed of his favourite toy by a tormenting bully.

    NATO is ready to continue with its war crimes and terror attacks on the people of Libya and our eyes are supposed to be glued to the fiction of a monstrous Gaddafi whose grip on Libyans we are told had become so much of an unbearable hell, a hell that provided free health care, free education, free housing and interest free loans for the Libyan folk.

    We hear the people of Libya want a new dispensation without Gaddafi and one would hope that the rebels would meet celebrating masses at the gates of Sirte, Tripoli and the other cities to the West and South of Libya. What we saw were marauding gun trotting goons and an entirely intimidated population.

    All we have seen are brutalising NATO terror planes and a legion of Western armed thugs waiting to destroy the civilians of the cities of the so-called “Gaddafi loyalists,” should they fail to denounce Gaddafi and support the Benghazi cause.

    On the sidelines of the terror attacks on Libya we saw France holding a summit it dubbed the “Friends of Libya” conference. The sole purpose of this summit was to legitimise the so-called National Transitional Council and to give the false impression that the war in Libya is over and done with, that the rebels are the new authority in that country.

    The hopelessly useless African Union temporarily woke up from its slumber and refused to be party to this sham conference, complaining that fighting had not ended, and that UN Resolution 1973 was about protecting civilians and not attacking them, as the case is with the situation in Sirte and other cities still controlled by supporters of Muammar Gaddafi. The AU argues that there should be a ceasefire to allow negotiations for a peaceful resolution of the crisis.

    Jacob Zuma, Goodluck Jonathan and Gabon’s Ali Bongo Ondimba are the triumvirate gang of traitors that first betrayed the African cause by rashly voting for Resolution 1973 without due consideration for possible ramifications, even ignoring the agreed position of the African Union.

    Zuma tells us that he and his sleepy colleagues thought Resolution 1973 was about protecting Libyan civilians from pending Gaddafi attacks, not about NATO or Western powers joining one side of the conflict while disarming the other. Well, foolishness is no defence, much as it is clearly Zuma’s trade mark.

    South Africans are demanding an explanation and many Nigerians are not happy with Jonathan’s choice of voting for war against Libya in their name. Bongo knows well how to silence dissent. He takes after his dad.

    We must however understand the doctrinal framework of Western elites tyrannising Libyans today. To do so it is important that we attend to the thinking that lie behind the policy choices of the Western Coalition.

    We may want to start by understanding Kennedy’s Indochina war and its aftermath. Kennedy adopted doctrines already established; the very way Obama is adopting the same well established doctrines in the US tradition.

    One important aspect of these doctrines is the unacceptability of too much independence, often described as “radical nationalism” – something Gaddafi was seen as an addict to.

    Gaddafi was seen as a buffer standing in the way of Western interests as targeted at the greater picture of Africa. His dramas at the EU-Africa summits held in recent years did not help matters.

    He was always outstanding, whether it was in calling for the United States of Africa, calling for the unifying of the African currency, calling for the establishment of an independent African Bank, campaigning for the abandoning of the US dollar in oil trade, or stating that African leaders would always attend these EU Summits with the Western-hated Robert Mugabe, or else they would not attend altogether, a threat he promised Africa would carry out just before the 2007 Lisbon EU-Africa Summit.

    Gaddafi became the proverbial “rotten apple” who enhanced the need to eliminate the “infection” before it spread. Just like Ho Chi Minh of Vietnam was eager to co-operate with the US and the West so was Muammar Gaddafi in the last decade of his reign; supposing the NATO terror attacks have successfully ousted the Libyan leader. Just like Ho, Gaddafi’s cooperation did not meet the required terms of subordination. It is no easy walk playing puppet politics to the West. Agreeing to torture alleged terror suspects from Britain and the United States was not good enough in terms of pleasing

    Gaddafi’s newly found friends from the West. Even granting generous oil contracts to the West was not good enough.

    Top policy makers in the West still feared Libyan independence might fan anti-West Pan-Africanistic tendencies; undermining the close association between Sub-Saharan African countries and the “powers which have been long responsible for their welfare,” to quote a Kennedy era US official in reference to the Indochina peoples.

    In Indochina the responsible authority was France, whose tender loving care left the countries devastated and starving. Ironically it is again France’s tender loving care for Libyan civilians that has today left the people of Libya devastated, intimidated, raped, and starved as supply lines are cut off to elicit compliance with the rebels and their Western masters – the brutal tactic being used on Sirte right now, as the leadership vow not to recognise the NTC.

    The West’s right to restore “a peaceful transition to democracy” in Libya is axiomatic. It follows that any problems and challenges that may arise can be attributed to the need to eliminate the alleged tyranny of Gaddafi. So the people of Sirte, Bani Walid or Tripoli can be bombed into submission in the name of eliminating Gaddafi’s “tyrannical rule.”

    According to Western thinking, it is independent nationalism that causes friction, not imperial concerns. The traditional “strategic economic interests” of the industrialised countries must always prevail when independent nationalism interferes with the West’s global plans. So it is the ambitious projects of Gaddafi that cause friction, not the West’s greed for the resources of other nations, those of Libya included.

    The African Union has unsuccessfully called for a negotiated diplomatic solution to the conflict in Libya, something the US, France and Britain have vehemently opposed. The only reason they are opposed to this proposal is they want to ensure that the outcome of this conflict produces a government that is pliant to Western powers.


    It is exactly the same logic that makes Western leaders vow never to recognise any winner of Zimbabwean elections who is not Morgan Tsvangirai and his MDC-T party – regardless of the fairness and freeness of the election.

    Libya has shown us who the actual terrorists in international affairs are. NATO is the biggest terrorist organisation on earth today, with its partnering Al-Qaeda standing as a pea next to a mountain.

    It is just as good that NATO and Al-Qaeda are operating side by side in Libya, like the Mafia Don and his runner. Africa we are one and together we shall overcome. It is homeland or death!!

    Reason Wafawarova is a political writer.

  60. Hamsa Goolbar
    As Zero Hour closes in – fighting intensifies – NATO militias panicking
    The revolutionary leader Qaddafi referred to Zero Hour in one of his latest speeches, referring to NATO deadline. As the Zero Hour reaches more fighting has been reported than ever, and reports came out that Ras Lanuf and Brega has been Liberated, also fighting erupts in Ajdabiyah. At the moment many different NATO militia factions are at brink of war amongst each other, one shooting incident has already been reported, one group of Mercenaries shot towards another group of NATO militia who did not take orders. Many NATO militiamen are refusing to take orders outside of Bani Walid, saying that Jibril does not represent them, he is just another dictator. A NATO militiaman Belhaj said that “Jibril represents no one. He is not welcome here. We have just fought to get rid of one dictator, we don’t want another one”. A clear panic and chaos is spreading as the Zero Hour approaches, and Tripoli is completely lawless, Mercenaries continually come from the sea, and NATO militiamen, groups of Gangs robbing homes, taking what they can, most aiming for Women’s Jewellery. The city is in chaos and the media is incredibly silent about this lawlessness and terrorism brought by NATO and its militias + Mercenaries.

    Deserts Lion
    Hasan Jaffri
    News from Sirte update.
    Great forces of mujaheed and of libyan army crushed the remnants of Misrata rats in an area 60 km away of sirte…( west front of sirte)
    In the east front of sirte rats retreated behind bin jawad after they were chased by the Libyan army and vollunteers of the tribes.
    We have no words to express our admiration about the brave people of Sirte that teach a huge lesson to all the world. Aftr 6 months of heavy bombing and after at least 1 month of cut of supplies they hold steady and defent their homelands.
    The same applies for the people of the Bani Walid and for all the honourable people that defent our beloved Libya from the western colonialist crusaders.
    Gadhafi avec Joli

  61. ______________________________________________

    AFRICA – 3 of 5 – The Masses and the African Congress:


    AFRICA – 2 of 5 – Habitat and Culture:

  62. Sukant Chandan on RT : Libyan rebels admit they attack women & children
    Veröffentlicht am 16 September 2011 von Daniele Puccio

    Rebel forces in Libya claim they are advancing in Muammar al-Gaddafi’s home town of Sirte – one of the last loyalist bastions. Several thousand opposition fighters, backed by tanks and heavy weapons, have reportedly launched an offensive on the city. Russia says it’s time to lift the UN-imposed no fly-zone in Libya, which was introduced “to save civilians”. Anti-war activists, though, maintain that NATO’s role has nothing to do with any humanitarian mission.

  63. For the past two weeks I too have been dreaming about Herbert’s “Dune”!

    There are amazing parallels.

    al-Gadhafi was making the desert bloom from the hidden ancient-pure waters beneath the Sahara desert sands—-
    Muj-a-Dib—OUR MUJJADID, Moammar al-Gadhafi. He will return and the JAMAHIRIYA will arise again, more beautiful and more glorious than ever.

  64. Yesterdays conference of Dr. Moussa Ibrahim:

    Dr. Moussa Ibrahim

    What comments do you have on the visit of Sarcozy, Cameron and Levy to Libya? _

    This visit have many meanings. First of all, it was carried out under tight security situation in Tripoli because they came in military planes and were surrounded by huge military defence, and they moved from M’eteega Airport to the hotel where they made their conference using helicopters because they know perfectly that the Libyan fighters and moujahidin are found everywhere in the city.

    As we said earlier, they came to collect the fruits of their seeds. They are afraid of the race of USA and other NATO nations toward the Libyan cake as they see it, so they hurried to Tripoli to make their deals with the traitors, and to guarantee their grasp over the Libyan oil first, then the Libyan rebuilding, and there they are talking about rebuilding the country they destroyed, with the infrastructure, the schools, the hospitals, the houses, the factories with the Libyan money,

    so they are gaining when they are destroying, and they are gaining when they are rebuilding…and they are certainly not rebuilding the country. Also, every colonial country has its men and agents. The role of these countries is to enforce the position of their agents, and to present political figures which are considered to turn in their orbit. For these reasons, I assure you and all the free people in Libya and the world, the war is far from finished, and we are still able to resist and win. I know what I am talking about, and I know why we will win.

    So I am asking all the honourable people of Tripoli to make a civil disobedience and stop going to their working places, in order to delay hugely this project whose goal is to remove the independence and identity of Libya for years. This negative resistance and civil disobedience will help our fighters, composed of young volunteers and the Libyan army in Zaiwya, Zliten, Sorman, Sibrata, Jufra and Ghat, to continue in their fight and to rearrange themselves, in preparation for the march very soon.

    So, this visit made by Sarkozy and Cameron is an announcement for the start of this colonial project. For this reason, the country sovereignty and freedom is in danger, and every Libyan citizen has a sacred role and a compulsory duty of carrying on his own duty on his personal level by not complying with the colonialists and the traitors.

    I would like to reassure the Libyans that the armed gangs are now weak, divided, large groups of them have given up fighting, large groups have left Libya with many spoils, and other groups have stopped fighting because of too much blood shed. We have many thousands who are fighting for the country. We have the ammunition, we have the money, we have the heart of the people, we have the national legitimacy, religious legitimacy, the moral legitimacy, the cultural legitimacy, and we have no other road but the victory, with the will of Allah. But the people have to stand for the honor, the jihad, and the civil disobedience and negative resistance, so they can help us to go on forward and bury this colonial project against the Arabism and Islam in Tripoli, so we can protect Algeria from falling, because I assure you, after Libya, they will come to Algeria, Syria, and finally Saudi Arabia.


    _ All those who are calling us wish you victory. Also, the Arabs from the other countries wonder how you are doing inside Libya and are wondering whether you need any help. Do you need any kind of humanitarian help from the Arab countries?:

    If you could see the wonderful sights I am having about the people here, you would feel very reassured both you and all the viewers. There are thousands of young volunteers, who are fighting on different fronts, and we welcome anyone who would like to stand by our side, and I can give you the information and the ways to contact us so you can inform those who want to contact us according to worked plan. However, I ask our Arab brothers to help us from their country by standing in front of their government and demand them to stand by the Libyan legitimate government and to bury this colonial project, to demand the sheikhs to stand by our sides…


  65. Al Jazeera slanders Kucinich in an effort to delegitimize his opposition to the unauthorized war in Libya
    By Madison Ruppert
    Editor of End the Lie

    Dennis Kucinich (Photo: Wikimedia Commons)
    The prolific propaganda house out of Qatar known as al Jazeera is at it again, this time claiming that an internal Libyan document offers proof of how Dennis Kucinich was attempting to build up a defense for Gaddafi’s second son, Saif al-Islam.
    Their coverage of this also emphasizes that Kucinich was looking for evidence of the rebels’ ties to al Qaeda.
    However, they paint this as if Kucinich was looking for “any possible links within rebel ranks to al-Qaeda” in order to defend Saif al-Islam and sue the United States, NATO and United Nations.
    One must question the legitimacy of anything presented by the rebels, as they are admitted liars who will happily deceive the international community so long as it serves their interests.
    I have previously covered just a few of the many examples of these lies and disinformation, and I think this most recent instance could very well be another example of how rebels and their apologists either misrepresent the facts or lie completely to benefit themselves.
    Kucinich has already proven the al Jazeera coverage to be misleading and illegitimate in a statement to the Atlantic Wire in which he said, “Al Jazeera found a document written by a Libyan bureaucrat to other Libyan bureaucrats. All it proves is that the Libyans were reading the Washington Post… I can’t help what the Libyans put in their files… Any implication I was doing anything other than trying to bring an end to an unauthorized war is fiction.”
    Of course the al Jazeera coverage made it appear that Kucinich had a close relationship with the Gaddafi regime and was attempting to work with them to provide a defense for Saif al-Islam in the ICC.
    Another interesting point brought up by the al Jazeera coverage is the claim that David Welch, the former Assistant Secretary of State under the George W. Bush administration, advised the Gaddafi regime to utilize foreign intelligence agencies to undermine the rebel movement.
    The alleged minutes claim that Welch advised the Gaddafi regime to use Israel to funnel intelligence that could impede the uprising.
    This is in complete opposition to the facts and basic logic.
    Why on Earth would Israel have any interest in setting back a group of rebels that openly supports them?
    Why would Israel help Gaddafi crush an uprising which is led by individuals who have already declared their support of Israel?
    The spokesperson for the Libyan rebels has already requested support from Israel and stated that if Israel supported them, they would support Israel.
    When confronted with the fact that al Qaeda operatives are among the rebel forces, the rebel spokesman Ahmad Shabani told Haaretz that “Al-Qaida activists have been working for Gadhafi, among them Libyans and, according to reliable intelligence reports, foreigners who infiltrated the country’s porous borders.”
    Who issued these reliable intelligence reports? Why have they not been made available if they are indeed reliable?
    Shabani pointing out “foreigners who infiltrated the country’s porous borders” is laughable as well, seeing as the rebels have been working side-by-side with foreign intelligence agencies and covert operatives before the United Nations Security Council Resolution was even put on the table.
    Shabani also said that the rebels are attempting to end the flow of arms from Libya into Gaza through Egypt.
    To put it simply: even if the minutes are accurate and Welch advised the Gaddafi regime to utilize Israel to weaken his opposition, Welch would have simply been misinformed and wrong in advising such.
    It must also be emphasized that Kucinich was never in direct contact with Gaddafi’s regime nor was he supporting their efforts nor was he attempting to help defend Saif al-Islam. While all of these facts are confirmed by Kucinich himself, al Jazeera and others will likely pretend that he was in league with Gaddafi when in reality he was attempting to support the rule of law and the truth and nothing else.

    Other Sources:
    Secret files: US officials aided Gaddafi – Al Jazeera
    Rebel spokesman to Haaretz: Libya needs world’s help, including Israel’s – Haaretz
    Report: Libyan rebels seek Israel’s support – YNet News

    More at EndtheLie.com – http://EndtheLie.com/2011/08/31/al-j…#ixzz1Y9ZGk22d

  66. 16.09.2011 NIGHT!!! Breaking news.
    Spokesman for the Libyan government Dr. Moussa Ibrahim some minutes ago.

    Key points of his phonecall:

    1) All attempts aimed at penetrating our front failed and we have the ability to continue for months and months, although the fierce attack and bombing by nato is unbelievable
    2) Qatar today wants to make its people not look extremists , they said they were liberals like Mahmoud Jibril, backed by France and Britain, the biggest ally of the groups that destroy and kill in the name of religion.(crusaders )
    3) Algeria is also targetted because its a major economical power in Africa and has vast resources and also follows the anti imperialistic and humanitarian way in politics and refuses to bow to the dogs of imperialism.
    4) We know that there are differences between the countries of NATO, Turkey, France and other demons, but they have found common ground to divide Libya for their economical profil.
    5)Is not a conspiracy against Libya alone, the conspiracy is against Egypt, Algeria, Libya, all the countries that have made a vast economy and that have a lot of natural resources.
    6)Arabs should know that this is the launch of the project of colonialism in North Africa, and we are targeted by the project because we are the owners (meaning the onews that have the knowledge and keep on holding) of Arabism and Islam and humanity.

    There is no demonstration on Sunday, this was confirmed by Dr. Musa Ibrahim and is only an ambush of rats of NATO , so spread the news to those that didnt hear
    And God is great

    * Finally, he said to not listen Internet news publication in order not to take advantage of the enemy to make you into a state of panic and muddle and when we want to give orders and instructions we will do it through Arrai channel.

    Thanks you brother Dr. Mousa Ibrahim for clarifiying to people that they dont need to fall in traps of NATO dogs.
    (We have to add here that the site of Libyan Liberal Youth
    was the first one to announce that the news of the so caled uprising where false and
    NATO trap.)
    Von: Libya Liberal Youth
    to publish the facts for Libya Tomorrow