The Fall of OBAMA and the Puppet GNC

Priestly Mu

A new image of the artist Mohamed Hassan revolution, we wish him continued good health and wellness:

(The main Administrator)

al-Fateh 1969:

Muammar al-Qathafi’s address to the London School of Economics 

“Muammar Gaddafi address to the ‘London School of Economics and Political Science’ (LSE), 21 December 2010

21 December 2010 – only months before the war on Libya – Muammar al-Qathafi was invited by the ‘London School of Economics and Political Science’ (LSE) – one of the foremost Social Science Universities in the world – to answer questions in a free context posed by the Students and Faculty, pertaining to the legendary Leader’s thoughts, ideas and visions on the solutions to the issues of today’s world.

Questions are raised pertaining to Libya, Wikileaks, Colonization, Liberation movements, Terrorism, the Lockerbie case, World Peace, the Warsaw Pact, Arab disunity, Africa, Brazil, Pakistan and more.

Brother Leader Muammar al-Qathafi reveals himself to be that rare Leader, who possesses an immense knowledge, insight of the problems of humanity and visions of their possible solution.”

  • This speech was made before Obama showed his “true colors” and Muammar thought at that time very well of him!!!
  • Prior this was available as a 6 part series:
  • LSE University of London

    U.S. Counterterror Policy Brought to You by Our Sponsor, Israel

    Returning to Washington’s considerations, what do you gain from a national policy toward the Arab world that is almost solely anchored in counterterror?

    I think we’re producing the Nasrallahs and Yassins of the next generation with every militant and innocent civilian we kill.

    To the extent that our own national security policy begins to resemble Israel’s, we come to resemble everything Israel has become.

    We become exemplars of the moral shortcuts and the sophistries used to justify the indefensible.

    We start down the slippery slope that has led Israel to 45 years of occupation and to a deadening corruption of values.

    Israel is not something we want to become.

    the time of a great global war begun, in part, by Israel…Commentaries are by various authors and researchers – as well as articles by Michael McClellan
    – on the general subject of Prophecy….composed on
    Thursday, 15 September 2011 5:20 PM, Completed and Posted 28 September 2011 1:40 AMbefore the Second Coming of Jesus Christ, the MAHDI shall descend…And we shall hear His cry and roaring in the heavens before He appears….
    Also, we must ask WHAT is the nature of the war that is currently shaping up? WHO prepared the War with the Great Jamahiriya, and who has done so  to Palestine? and who is preparing the coming conflict with Egypt,  Iran and Syria and any nation foolish enough to ally with them? At this very moment ISRAEL, THE UNITED STATES, and at this time, to somewhat lesser degree, FRANCE and GREAT BRITAIN.THE WEST in other words.I believe the Iranians are sincere in their thanks for the recent rescuing of their seamen from Somali pirates by the United States Navy. Nor do I truly believe Iran wants a war, but feel they are being forced into one. It is, in fact, the Western powers … and especially “the powers that be” that are backing them … who are setting up this war. 

    The horrible war that in the West is prepared, the year ensuing will come the pestilence, so very
    horrible that young, old, nor beast [will survive], blood, fire, Mercury, Mars, Jupiter in France.

    Iran declares war on European Union and Nato

    Nostradamus took from a Cistercian monk, Yves de Lessines, prior of the abbey of Cambron, on the border between France and Belgium, these words

    composed between 1323 and 1328  and are now found in Quatrain 1.19 ~

    The Gods will make it appear to mankind that they are the authors of a great conflict: Before heaven
    seen serene of sword and lance, so that upon the left hand will be the greater affliction.

    The year of war preparation began on St Minerva’s Day (Goddess of War) in March/April/May 2011 according to the astrological dating above in Quatrain 9.55. This included the Nato war on Libya, the covert Western support of their contrived ‘Arab Spring’ “protests” (including the rise of the ‘Muslim’ Brotherhood within Egypt), the Western support for the Syrian rebels being formed in Turkey, the UN sanctions against Iran, and the mobilisation of US forces in the Persian Gulf and now the push for by Israel. This all officially began in 2011 (although conceived in 2010 and prior).

    The actual devastation and death occurs during “the year ensuing” (the following year) which happens to be this year: 2012.


    It has long been planned by TPTB for a “phony Armageddon” in the Middle East to be waged for the purpose of setting up a phony Saviour/Messiah (being Barak Husein OBAMA) to rule the world. It is this person whom they will say fulfills the return of the Mayan god, Bolon Yokte. (read what Richard Hoagland wrote about the  modern day Mayans and the ritual they performed for OBAMA’s visit–whom they saw as the return of their “god”!!)



    Emperor Obama

    Mayan Indian Prophecy ~

    “The 13th Bak’tun will be finished on Four Ajaw, the Third of Uniiw (K’ank’in). It will occur.
    It will be the descent
     of Bolon Yokte K’uh to the (earth).”

    However, if it is a god indeed who “descends from the sky,” it strikes me as being very possible that their orchestrated conflict may provoke Allah/Yahweh’s wrath and things will go drastically wrong for this New World Order of the Zionista, and the so-called ‘Muslim’ Brotherhood.

    ALLAH / YAHWEH will muster the armies of the world into a terrible conflict, and will personally destroy both the enemy NATO nations and Satanic Yankee imperialist-led nations (as QATAR and Saudi ARABIA) with fire:
    “… and all his bands: and many people with thee. And thou shalt come from thy place out of the north parts, thou, and many people with thee, all of them riding upon horses, a great company, and a mighty army:
    “—and I will bring thee against my land, that the heathen may know me, when I shall be sanctified in thee, O Gog, before their eyes….”
    In other words, God shall use the conflict concocted by Israel, the US, and Western Europe against LIBYA and Syria  to drag the other two powerful nuclear nations of Russia and China into the war. He shall “put hooks into (their) jaws” and pull them into a great conflagration! They (Gog-Russia, Magog-China, Iran, Sudan, Ethiopia, Libya, Tunisia, Algeria, Morocco, Mauritania, Turkey, the five Central Asian republics, Afghanistan, and others) shall go to war along with Israel and her Western allies…God is telling us this is going to get very personal. This is not figurative or symbolic. ALLAH / Yahweh shall, as in ancient times, personally command His armies in war and shall DEMONSTRATE HIS POWER so as to magnify and sanctify Himself. He shall use fire and the elements of Nature…
    This is why the kingdoms of the world have built underground cities and networks of tunnels to connect them. TPTB and the NATIONS OF EARTH KNOW HE IS COMING … AND WHAT HE IS BRINGING WITH HIM …
    Therefore I will shake the heavens, and the earth shall remove out of her place, in the wrath of the LORD of hosts, and in the day of his fierce anger … Thou shalt be visited of the LORD of hosts with thunder, and with earthquake, and great noise, with storm and tempest, and the flame of devouring fire. And the multitude of all the nations that fight against THE GREAT JAMAHIRIYA !
    The great nation in the ocean (GREAT BRITAIN) that is inhabited by people of different tribes and descent will be devastated by earthquake, storms and tidal wave. It will be divided and, in great part, submerged. This nation will also have many misfortunes at sea and lose its colonies.
     The great Empire of the West , across the Sea, who are a different Folk stock and origin (The United States of America), will be devastated by Earthquake, Storm and Flood. This Empire will suffer much Misfortune from the Sea. It will be divided into two islands and part of it will sink. The distant possession in the East (North Africa and the Middle east) will be lost through a Tiger (Saif) and a Lion (Mu’ammar al-Qathafi).”
    Forward to victory Saif the white Tiger

    Michael Gordon Scallion writes: “In my own dream of the future United States no other way could I find to describe it but as TWO LARGE ISLANDS seperated by a huge expanse of water dotted by a small number of tiny islands. I doubt there were more than twenty of the forty-eight mainland states remaining….”

    NOW, MY OWN COMMENT this day of 16 OCTOBER 2013:

    Wait as this week  all the green Forces have gathered upon the Plateau by Tripoli; 

    and, under General Khamis the golden, will soon descend upon Tripoli as a  triumphant conquering hoarde as never witnessed before in modern history!

    The Lord of Hosts
    32nd  Brigade of KhamisThe Armed People
    Mu terrific Mu the Lion
    Priestly Mu
    Muammar al-Qathafi returns openly soon:


Muammar al-Qathafi speech at Islamic Summit Conference in Lahore
02 FEBRUARY 1974, pt.1



SOME RELIGION as professed by ‘MUSLIM’ BROTHERHOOD  !!!!!!:

# “Pain you will see” !_ religion???

Claim that they are applying the law  (misguided Sharia)!!!! —BUT AS YOU CAN WITNESS, they are the farthest people from anything religious!!


THIS whole scene is absurd…as the “Border patrols” are al-Qaeda and ‘Muslim’ Brotherhood (as hired by the Rat GNC Government and the ARMOR SHIELDS of Misurata)!!!

Brussels – News
European Union decided to strengthen the work of the security mission in Libya ( Iobam – Libya) , which began its work in April last year.

A source at the Department of Crisis Management of the European External Action Service that the European mission , which includes forty element will receive early next month of December at the official headquarters and body for leadership in Tripoli, after remaining elements yet resident in a hotel in the Libyan capital.

The European Union believes that the frequency of the sinking of ships in the eyeball European shores of illegal immigrants to the continent via the Libyan territory , pushing European officials to intensify efforts to coordinate with the Libyan authorities to contain this phenomenon.

The source said European Union decided to intensify coordination driven with Libya in the field of management of external borders and control of land, sea and repel the flow of illegal immigration, he said, adding that by next March will reach the number of elements of the mission ( Iobam – Libya ), which now stands at 40 employees to 80 employees down to 111 employees at the end of next year , with a budget of about thirty million euros .

The source confirmed that the Union experts will rehabilitation of Libya elements and help the customs and border police and internal security services in that task.

The source said the European site ( Io – Abussrfer ) to the European Agency for external borders ( Frontex ) plans in turn to provide support to the task of European security in Libya and provide the necessary skills to her, he said, adding that the collapse of the situation makes the task execution ( Iobam – Libya) European very difficult.

The European Union has prepared a report on the security situation in Libya warned of the strong possibility of escalating cases of crime and kidnapping clashes between armed factions.

Prime Aljkumh Zaidane Demonstrator in his hometown and Dan:

The now defunct “ISLAMIC CALL SOCIETY” CENTER, founded by Mu’ammar al-Qathafi, is now the new “home” for ALI ZAIDANE!!!

Private sources confirmed to us that Zaidane will move to the Islamic Call Society  Center to stay there after the bitter experience which he lived in the Corinthia Hotel.

Especially after several battalions of them claim the Corners and deterrence, shields and militias Gargour ability to secure through the coast.

and the city box. Will move and it will be under the protection of lightning special forces battalion.

Depression forum


A picture of special forces Ajnah the inside one of the houses NATO rats!.
NATO fear to your home Matkadir says not uttered by Mr. Leader.

Western-style of Democracy

Western Democracy

YANKS ready to Intervene for Zaidane!

TV news channel

London-based Arab newspaper: #

Libya brothers are stepping up their efforts to isolate the government on Zaidane # # after the feast.



Newsflash now clashes between anti-crime committee Airport Road and militias Mzrath the Chiefs of Staff.

Starting the series blackouts on most parts of Tripoli 3 days ago

Spokesman denied the operations room of the capital Tripoli Khaled Tmazina, what some of the media about the use of the zoo in the capital as a refuge for illegal immigration.

Tmazina said that there is no prison zoo regard to illegal immigration and added that the zoo in the capital Tripoli, there is the Office of specialized data only on illegal immigration.

It is noteworthy that the Libyan authorities stopped a day hundreds of people trying to enter Libya on illegal immigration

Comment …

Learned that the park dominant gang Gneoh Alkkla and has its own prison.

(Valley girl)

(Green blood)


احرار الجماهيرية على الفيس بوك

خبر عاجل الأن أشتباكات بين لجنة مكافحة الجريمة طريق المطار ومليشيات مزراطة رئاسة الأركان

دمي اخضر



For the clashes in the city of Surman was between two tribes, and by the grace of God this problem has been resolved.



Youth a Rishvana area and secure the road link between Tripoli and the western mountain areas and Gharyan for the second day in a row.




You have learned that WAC gas pipeline knead oil Mazla the locked yen, to this day, I mean the pipe coming

from the field to meet to Mellitah Complex stations to generate electricity:

God used it I have a headband Amazigh?!!

(Daily News Mellita company for oil and gas)




Pain mesmerize Ghariyani and the cross-local Channel Friday Market  ::

What exposed him Benghazi now is the result of accidents abandonment and expulsion of armor

They protect and provide security for the citizens , who were expelled shields are gangs

Theft and kidnapping and not residents of Benghazi and what is happening now in Benghazi is an act:

The hands of those who claim protection after the expulsion of the Order of bin Humaid and the occupation of camping ,

Must that recoils street in Benghazi and calls for re – entry shields and delivery tasks

City forces them with supporters of Islamic Sharia Council and form

The leadership of the city from the leaders of armor ….and get away on the regular army and police.

Traditional that you can not protect the GREAT JAMAHIRIYA in front crawl



# Assassinations _ ..

Reported killed Colonel Embarak Saeed Faitouri after being found slaughtered in his car in ((Benghazi)),

Ahola, to the one and the only God …

News of the assassination of Colonel Juma Saleh Attia Alabbar .. !!!!! No details yet!

Aotaial Islam Farag Alsossaa to an explosive adhesive in his car near the bridge Nasrbmntqh Club Baraka Benghazi ..

This passenger-truck was roaming in front of the hospital minutes before the blast elite!!!:

Director Fahmi Shaeri in edema of God .. I am God and to Him we return ..

(Valley girl)

Zakaria F house burning Belhassen cabled tar by the people of their son who was killed in Leithy

Cast about the problem .. ” Burning houses one of the families in the Cast – Benghazi because of a problem between two families because of the death of one of the members of those families ” ..

Cause of the problem :

Aerkh was in a tent pleasures of razors and coal, to one owned by and Rafael Z. recently slain by Alzoyy came to them ( young ) and scuffle with them beat him
Great km protection money Zakaria , one of the Ansar al – Sharia after Jahm Pklash and threw the whole tent
Matt and one named Abdullah tar
الورفله burned cabled monsters … but cabled still conclude them once time speeding cars and thrown them
Now Saaa the than Almajory all Mobeian Cast invited advocates short
Blew up monsters to kill ( cabled ) him by burning, and now semi – Hua Fady

Quoting / Logic

Image of the security official in Benghazi Arab Boca talking about the security challenges!!!:


The death of a Libyan pilgrims to Arafat today from Prairie City Haj Mohammed Saad al-Hasi.

God and to Him we shall return
O Allah, ask good epilogue


Unity Bank branch exposure Ajeelat dawn today to burglary and theft of more than one million Libyan dinars.
According to informed sources, the process has easily as it seems has entered the perpetrators of the back door without bothering

Mstahedmin the key to the door, which did not find Investigators him any effects or sabotage the show to enter it by force,

in addition to the absence of guards bank six Alve under investigation to date with all of the bears a copy of the key to the back door of the bank.


Targeting Freedom Martyrs Brigade headquarters city of Casablanca, after
That the establishment of two cars by the unknown persons identity, b Shooting
Intensive and targeted Dana “RPG” and security alert
Now large green mountain bride.

(Urgent Salem al-Obeidi)


News of the outbreak of the fire to the White city (CASABLANCA)
On the ring road ..
To turn the force but from God

(Salem al-Obeidi)

A huge fire is now on the ring road in white (CASABLANCA) eats up part of the surrounding forest road .. Lord Lester, God willing ..



Urgent …

Burning of the local council and the police station city Rkdalin after killing Wines vendor in the city.



Heard a huge explosion in Sabha and the flight of NATO drones above the sky Sabha.


سماع دوي أنفجار ضخم في سبها وتحليق لطائرات الناتو بدون طيار فوق سماء سبها. 2

Flight hours before NATO drone above the sky Sabha:

Airline NATO drone above the skies Sabha now.


The arrest of vehicle tracking security committee in the city of Supreme Jufrah citizens are stealing and robbery them:


The West:

The West’s endless war on humanity : after Libya – Syria, Iran

Enviado por tortilla en Lun, 01/30/2012 – 07:56
Versión para impresiónSend by email

toni solo, 29 de enero 2012

After Libya, the wealthy oligarchies of Europe and North America continue their centuries-old war on humanity, now attacking Syria and Iran. They and their regional allies will never concede an equitable share of the world’s economic resources to the impoverished global majority. The inevitable consequence of that strategic global reality is endless aggression by NATO countries and their allies against any foreign government or political movement that resists their will.

The experience of Libya demonstrates that whenever conditions permit, the anti-democratic Western oligarchies will always destroy independent countries whose governments try to compromise or negotiate. Like Libya, Iran and Syria have long historical experience of imperialist perfidy by the major Western imperial powers, the United States, Britain and France. So these countries are unlikely to give way to NATO country demands.

The Iranians took back control of their country after their Islamic revolution in 1979. In Syria, that fierce nationalism took a secular form under a socialist government. Iran and Syria have both sought to promote strong economic development while managing complex religious, cultural and ethnic diversity.

Syria – historical context

Syria, now with a population of over 23 million, became independent from France in 1946. The first two decades of independence for the new republic were marked by a succession of unstable governments. An experimental political union with Egypt in the late 1950s proved unsuccessful. In the end, the socialist Ba’ath party took power in 1963. Later, in 1970, Hafez al Assad became President, after an internal power struggle within the government.

Under the government of Hafez al Assad, Syria consolidated its transformation through strong economic growth based mainly on agriculture and oil. After 2000, when his son Bashar al Assad, became President, Syria continued to sustain strong economic performance. But recent attempts to implement liberal reforms in response to both internal opposition criticism and foreign pressure have had limited success. The United States and its allies have sought to exploit aggressively the very opportunities created by the Syrian government’s attempts at reform.

Syria has constantly been menaced by Zionist military aggression since Israel was founded in 1948 and has suffered air strikes from Israel at various times over the last decade. Israel’s invasion and occupation of neighbouring Lebanon in 1982, seriously threatened Syria’s interests. The Syrian government countered with a military intervention of its own. Israel’s occupation of south Lebanon only ended in 2000, after decades of bitter resistance largely organized by the Islamic political-military movement Hezbollah. Hezbollah is a key ally both of Syria and of Iran.

Parallel with the threat posed by Israel’s occupation of Lebanon, Syria has also constantly been threatened by Israel’s continued occupation of the Golan Heights, a Syrian territory captured by Israel in 1967 and held illegally ever since. That occupation was condemned in UN Resolution 497, one of numerous UN Resolutions contemptuously violated by Israel’s Zionist government under the protection of its main military allies, the United States, France and Britain. For all practical purposes, Israel has long been a de facto member of NATO. It was in this historical context that Syria maintained a significant military presence in Lebanon until 2005.

In February of that year a massive car bomb was used to murder leading Lebanese politician Rafik Hariri, a noted critic of Syria. The Western powers on the UN Security Council pushed for a Special Tribunal to investigate the murder. Hariri’s assassination was exploited by the NATO countries’ political allies in Lebanon and in the region to force Syria’s withdrawal from Lebanon. Ever since then, the NATO countries and their regional allies, including Saudi Arabia and its fellow feudal monarchies in the Gulf States, have used the UN Special Tribunal to intimidate and threaten Syria and its regional allies, principally Lebanon’s Hezbollah.

The UN Special Tribunal, after initially levelling suspicion against Syria, has recently shifted its aim to target Hezbollah. It has never considered very serious evidence that plausibly suggests Israeli involvement in Hariri’s murder. This behaviour by the UN Special Tribunal on Lebanon parallels very closely what happened with the dishonest politically motivated manipulation of the Lockerbie terrorist bombing investigation in the case of Libya.

Unlike Libya, but like Iran, Syria has found quite strong diplomatic support from Russia and China, as well as from Latin American countries including, Brazil, Cuba, Nicaragua and Venezuela. While the NATO countries and their allies apply sanctions, Russia has recently signed arms deals with Syria in a clear practical sign that it rejects NATO country policy towards its regional allies, Syria and Iran. Russian diplomats have publicly condemned as counterproductive the sanctions applied to Syria.

China’s position is less clear-cut, given its heavy dependence on reliable oil supplies. Persistent US and allied country provocations may lead Iran to retaliate against sanctions by closing the strategically important Hormuz Strait. In this way, the NATO powers create uncertainty about the security of China’s oil supply and the stability of the oil price in international markets. What happens in Syria is directly relevant in terms of how it may affect Iran’s policy.

The recent visit of Chinese Prime Minister Wen Jiabao to Saudi Arabia, Qatar y the Arab Emirates was directly related to that dilemma. Clearly, it is the NATO powers and these local NATO allies who are provoking serious instability in the international oil markets. That instability may well hurt the US and Europe as much as their Asian rivals should Iran itself retaliate economically.

Syria’s Muslim neighbour, Turkey, has played a more complex double game over the years than the region’s feudal Arab tyrannies antagonistic to socialist Syria. It has tried to balance its regional interests as a major Central Asian Muslim power against its long standing aspirations to join the European Union and its status as a member of NATO. For some years, prior to the war against Libya, Turkey seemed to be interested in developing a strategic relationship with both Syria and Iran.

The Israeli 2010 attack on the Mavi Marmara vessel carrying peace activists to Palestine seemed to exacerbate Turkey’s differences with its NATO partners. But during the current crisis in Syria, Turkey has decisively supported NATO’s aggression against its neighbour. The government of Prime Minister Erdogan has permitted the establishment of terrorist groups attacking Syria from Turkish territory.

The Turkish government has also advocated and implemented damaging sanctions against Syria and its people as part of the increasingly sinister campaign to bring down the Syrian Ba’ath party government led by Bashar al Assad. But Turkey also has a strong interest in a stable relationship with Iran. Its complicated regional interests may ultimately force Prime Minister Erdogan to moderate Turkey’s current policy on Syria.

The Syrian crisis now

Disturbances began in Syria in January 2011 as part of a region-wide attempt by the NATO powers and their local allies to exploit popular pressure for political change. In March of that same year, events in the city of Deraa provoked dubious allegations of government forces shooting on unarmed protestors, just as happened in Libya. Terrorists encouraged, trained and supplied by Saudi Arabia and allies like Qatar and protected by Turkey, have attacked government security forces in Baniyas, Homs, and Hama, among other cities.

But popular support for the Syrian government and for President Assad remains over 50% despite a massive international disinformation campaign led by NATO country corporate media and human rights organization. The NATO powers and their regional allies have long sought to destabilize Syria’s independent socialist government. The pattern of their intervention is similar to that used to destroy Libya. They have encouraged, trained and supplied subversive terrorist groups, using a comprehensive psy-warfare campaign to both conceal and justify the extent of their aggressive intervention.

UN Secretary General Ban Ki Moon has again demonstrated beyond any doubt that he is an abject servant of the United States and its allies. He has dragged his office and the UN itself deep into disrepute as a blatant tool of colonial intervention around the world in the service of Western corporate elites. Under Ban Ki Moon, the UN organization is currently violating its own Charter, as it did in Libya, by working in complicity with NATO and the Arab League, dominated by Saudi Arabia, to guarantee the conditions necessary for military aggression against Syria, perhaps led by Turkey.

Imperial repression

The crisis in Syria results mainly not from popular calls for reform but from foreign pressure and intervention. The techniques used against Syria by the Western powers and their regional allies are far from new. They have been used over the last fifty years to brutalize and dehumanize the Palestinians, to demonize Cuba and North Korea and to justify an interminable programme of aggression around the world.

Now the NATO powers, with their long and shameful history of colonial conquest, have updated and refined that tool kit of imperial repression. Prior to Syria, they have used it against Iraq, Afghanistan, Somalia, Sudan, Haiti, Honduras, Ivory Coast and, most recently, Libya. The campaign always begins with extensive psychological warfare by the Western machinery of corporate media and non-governmental organizations to justify aggressive government measures against the target country.

The propaganda war always consists of exaggerated and distorted accusations of human rights violations, corruption and lack of democracy. These accusations usually escalate to include claims that the target country’s government provokes regional destabilization. When the conditions prepared by this psychological warfare permit, the aggression moves into the economic sphere with calls for sanctions, either legal or illegal.

After that phase of economic warfare, the next stage is one of armed subversion through local proxies. The loss of life provoked by that terrorist subversion can then be used to activate measures through the international legal system, if possible via the International Criminal Court, self-evidently a tool of Western imperialism. This whole process prepares the way for outright military intervention, proposed preferably to the UN Security Council by a regional body dominated by Western allies.

The Arab League served that purpose against Libya and is being used now in the NATO countries’ efforts to destroy Syria. It will almost certainly be used to complete preparations for the developing aggression against Iran. But Iran is a far more complex target than Syria because it is one of the biggest countries in the world both in territorial extension and with a population of over 70 million.


Iran’s history in the last century, common to most of the region, was one of colonial oppression and foreign exploitation. After the anti-democratic coup in 1953, the country endured over 25 years of neocolonial dependency, abetted by the dictatorship of Mohammed Reza Pahlavi. Pahlavi was an unconditional NATO country ally in the mould of dictators like Anastasio Somoza, Sese Mobutu or Ferdinand Marcos. Nicaragua’s President Daniel Ortega often refers to the twin revolutions of 1979 to recall that both the Iranian and the Nicaraguan peoples liberated their countries from cruel dictatorship that same year.

Following the Islamic Revolution in Iran, the NATO powers supported Iraqi President Saddam Hussein’s long war against Iran which lasted from 1980 to 1988. It is commonly forgotten that Syria was one of the only Arab countries to support Iran during that war. NATO’s regional allies, Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Gulf tyrannies, all fear Iran because it has a powerful government committed to regional change based on the ideals of its own Islamic revolution.

Despite Iran’s moderation of its revolutionary regional policy after the war with Iraq, it defends its sovereignty uncompromisingly. The cynical foreign policy of the NATO countries towards Iran has gone through various phases of uneasy accommodation, opportunism and hostility culminating in the current phase of outright aggression just short of armed conflict. The United States in particular has exploited Iran’s development of nuclear power as a cause for war.

Iran has sought to develop nuclear power since the 1950s. But the United States and Israel first began to exploit Iran’s nuclear power programme as pretext for aggressive sanctions in 2003, the same year as the NATO powers and their allies invaded Iraq on the false pretext that they feared Iraqi weapons of mass destruction. The United States and its allies have consistently exploited the UN’s International Atomic Energy Authority politically against Iran, using its procedures to create pretexts for economic and military aggression.

The current IAEA Director General is Yukiya Amano, regarded as even more susceptible to pressure from the NATO country governments than his predecessor Mohamed al Baradei. Possible ways of attacking Iran’s nuclear program are openly discussed in the corporate Western media as part of the constant psychological warfare against Iran. Armed attacks have included terrorist assassinations of Iranian nuclear scientists as well as other terrorist attacks facilitated by NATO’s de facto member Israel.

The notorious extreme hypocrisy of NATO country governments is has reached unprecedented extremes in the case of Iran. The NATO powers protect Israel’s illegal nuclear weapons program but attack Iran for developing peaceful nuclear power. They and their allies wage blatant terrorist war against Iran using terrorist organizations they themselves condemn such as the Mojahedin-e Khalq, just as they have used Al Qaeda in Lebanon, Libya and now Syria.

Similarly, the US and Israel have used their highly developed cyber-warfare capacity to sabotage Iran’s industrial and research capacity, using the Stuxnet worm malware to damage Iranian computer systems. This pattern of psychological warfare, bogus pretexts for aggression, economic sanctions and outright terrorism is used against every government targeted by the NATO country corporate elites and their allies. In the 1930s, similar behaviour by Germany and Italy was called by its true name – fascism.

However, Iran enjoys many advantages over Syria in terms of its ability to defend itself. The most obvious of those advantages is its size, both in terms of its territory and its population. It’s role as a major international provider of oil and gas to China and many other countries, complicates NATO country plans for a military attack. Over 30% of international oil supplies pass through the Hormuz Strait, controlled by Iran. Iran’s geography also works in its favour because, again, the narrow Hormuz Strait is a potentially dangerous trap for any attacking NATO naval forces.

Iran’s missile technology and capability is formidable. Its mastery of electronic warfare was evident in the 2006 war between Israel and Lebanon. There, Iran’s ally Hezbollah effectively neutralized Israeli electronic warfare and constantly monitored Israeli military communications. For all these reasons, any attack on Iran will certainly be far more complex in its planning and execution and far more costly in financial terms and in terms of casualties for the aggressors than the wars against Afghanistan,Iraq or Libya.

Also, several powerful countries strongly reject NATO’s clear preparations for military aggression. Of those countries, Russia and China are the most forthright, but Brazil and India too have expressed their rejection of armed aggression. All these countries, in particular Russia and China understand very well that the aggression against Syria and Iran is how the Western powers of North America and Europe hope to arrest their relative decline in global power and influence, especially in relation to Asia.

For its part, India has a very strong trading relationship with Iran which supplies around 14% of India’s current total oil needs. India is also partnering Iran in a major gas pipeline project carrying Iranian gas as far as Pakistan. Although it has recently complied with US pressure to vote against Iran in the International Atomic Energy Authority over the matter of Iran’s nuclear programme, India supports Iran’s right to develop nuclear power.

India would be unlikely to take sides in any potential armed conflict between Iran and the NATO countries and their local allies. Likewise, Brazil has strongly supported Iran’s right to develop nuclear power and Dilma Rousseff is likely to maintain that position. In an interesting recent twist to regional complications, Turkey has refused to support new NATO country sanctions against Iran unauthorized by the UN.

This is emphatic confirmation that Iran is far from the caricature isolated pariah presented in the Western corporate media. It is easy to forget that Iran is a likely candidate to join the Shanghai Cooperation Organization. Iran is engaged in major railway construction projects with SCO members Turkmenistan and Kazakhstan.

The SCO is made up of China, Russia, Kazakhstan, Kyrgyzstan, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan, countries comprising almost a quarter of the world’s total population. Any attack on Iran, a large, influential regional power, will have extremely volatile and unpredictable effects on the world economy and devastating repercussions in the region. This reality may well lead more sober minds in the NATO countries to resist pressure from local allies like Israel and Saudi Arabia to unleash a military assault on Iran

Lessons from Libya

For their part, Iran and Syria may well be regretting the support they gave to NATO’s counter-revolutionary putsch and colonial war of aggression in Libya. NATO’s puppet NTC regime in Libya repaid Iran and Syria by closing the Syrian government embassy in Tripoli and recognising Syria’s own opposition SNC as Syria’s legitimate government. CEPRID’s Alberto Cruz has noted that British special forces even boast on their web site that they have armed and trained Libyan Al Qaeda fighters on Turkish territory to attack the Syrian people.

Libya’s recent experience has reinforced the long standing lesson that the North American and European oligarchs will always destroy independent countries who resist their will. The Libyan war also demonstrated that, paradoxically, Iran shares the NATO powers’ abandonment of the UN’s basic principles of non-aggression and self-determination of peoples. That abandonment permitted the disingenuous application of the ill-conceived principle of the Responsibility to Protect.

It led directly to the destruction of Libya, the current aggression against Syria and the developing military assault on Iran. Like Russia and China, Iran is now in part suffering the fallout from its support for the destruction of Libya. It is fair to argue that if Russia, China and Iran had defended the principle of non-aggression in the case of Libya, the NATO powers would never have been able to destabilize Syria so readily.

Iran’s failure to defend the UN’s founding principles was matched by the complete collapse of what is commonly referred to as the international Left. With very few exceptions, radical, progressive, anarchist and socialist opinion either openly supported NATO’s colonial war on Libya or washed their hands of it. Figures as diverse as Noam Chomsky, Ignacio Ramonet, Gilbert Achcar, Ramsy Baroud and Al Giordano, among many others, supported the pretext for the war against the Libyan government even though it clearly enjoyed majority support in the country.

The failure of the international Left was twofold, both moral and intellectual. The intellectual failure was one of Garbage In-Garbage Out. In their different ways, Chomsky, Ramonet, Giordano and the rest have in large part made their reputations by criticising the mechanisms that create mainstream opinion. On Libya, they uncritically accepted information produced in total consonance with the style and content of the major international corporate psy-warfare outlets.

That deep intellectual inauthenticity was matched by the international Left’s utter moral collapse in failing to defend Libya and its people against vicious colonial military aggression. In general, the international Left adopted a range of neocolonial positions. Those positions all shared the neocolonial assumption that their own culture and their own societies offered better models for people in Libya than the system most Libyans supported and which they had worked out for themselves.

No serious effort was made to support peaceful negotiations as proposed by the African Union and the ALBA countries. In North America, the Black Left’s support for the Libyan government was ignored. In Europe, prestigious left-wing media outlets like Rebelión censored opinion arguing against the Libyan CNT counter-revolutionary putsch.

The demonization of Muammar Ghaddafi and censorship by omission on the Left was indistinguishable from that in the corporate media. Anyone declaring solidarity with the Libyan government and its people was smeared as supporting dictatorship. Libya demonstrated that the systemic function of the intellectual-managerial class of the international Left is to camouflage their accommodation, complicity and ultimate legitimation of the very system they ostensibly reject.

They accepted false information totally in line with imperialist propaganda. They collaborated in the abandonment of the founding principles of the UN. They effectively accepted the aggressive introduction of the imperialist principle of Responsibility to Protect. Arguments about NATO’s conquest of Libya demonstrated that in North America and Europe. the international Left is essentially an agglomeration of fictions of varying effectiveness and relevance.

The utility of the fictions purveyed by the networks around individuals like Ramonet, Chomsky and the rest is that they serve as intermediaries with liberal progressive networks loyal to corporate capitalism and with the centres of imperial power itself. Measured by their ability to achieve significant political power, the North American and European varieties of Left fictions have lived with failure for decades. Their moral and intellectual collapse on Libya should have come as no surprise.

What has been and remains so striking is the extent of the international Left’s identification with the false rhetoric of the very structures they purport to criticize. For people in Nicaragua, that goes a long way in explaining the grudging recognition of the marked progress on behalf of the impoverished majority achieved under President Daniel Ortega’s government. Like Libya, Nicaragua too has been the victim of the class/cultural prejudices of the internacional neocolonial Left.

Implications for Latin America

Those prejudices have made it impossible for most of what passes for the Left in North America and Europe to remake themselves convincingly enough to win majority support despite the chronic economic crisis in their countries. The West’s systemic crisis threatens the future ability of the United States and its allies to project their power globally and put a brake on their relative decline against Asian countries like China and India. That is why NATO and its allies have destroyed Libya and now menace Syria and Iran .

Such a volatile international context presents enormous challenges to the peoples of Latin America and to their leaders. It demonstrates the strategic wisdom and tactical acumen of the political leadership of the ALBA countries in rapidly developing solidarity-based trade and development cooperation and in strengthening longer term regional integration. Clearly, Central America and the Caribbean are vulnerable targets of future aggression from the United States.

The United States and their allies supported the successful coups in Haiti and Honduras and were active in the attempted coups in Venezuela, Bolivia and Ecuador. They may well fail to overthrow the government in Syria and decide the odds are against them in the case of a military attack on Iran. Whether or not they attack Iran, the United States and its European allies are very likely to sharpen their aggressive stance against independent governments in Latin America.



Stop the interrogation of Abu Anas al – Libi , a hunger strike and drink

16/10/2013 , 09:15

He said U.S. officials familiar with a team of elite American investigators stopped questioning suspected militant linked to al -Qaeda arrested in Libya after he hit from food, drink , causing worsening health problems afflicting precedent .

A U.S. official said that U.S. investigators have not achieved little success in getting intelligence information from the suspect known as Abu Anas Libyan before they stop questioning when he was detained on board a ship for the U.S. Navy .

He denied Abu Anas al – Libi , whose original name impartial Alriqiei in federal court in New York on Tuesday charged with involvement in the bombings of U.S. embassies in Kenya and Tanzania that killed more than 200 people in 1998.

(This is such bull, as Algeria intelligence proved to us that al-LIBI is a double agent working for  CIA...They needed an excuse to “stop interrogating him”!!)

The United-States abduct one of their ex-agents in Libya


President Obama gave the order to abduct Abu Anas al-Libi (whose real name is Nazih Abd al-Hamid al-Ruqhay), on October 6th 2013 in Libya. A Delta Force force succeeded without making any victims.

Even supposing that al-Libi were a legitimate target for the US, as claimed by Secretary of State John Kerry, this kidnapping constitutes a violation of international law and of Libyan sovereignty.

In 1995, this jihadist, who had joined Osama Bin Laden in the Sudan, participated in a failed attempt to assassinate Egyptian president Hosni Mubarack. He then found refuge in Doha (Qatar).

In 1996, the British secret services (MI5 and MI6) financed an Al-Qaïda cell to assassinate Libyan leader Muammar al-Gaddafi [1]. Anas Al-Libi brokered the deal thereby receiving political asylum in the UK. He lived in Manchester until 2000 when he was charged by the US.

That same year, he was accused by the New York Southern District Court of having undertaken in 1993 the photographic reconnoitering that supposedly enabled, five years later, the 7 August 1988 attacks on the US embassies of Daar es-Salam and Nairobi, killing 12 Americans (and incidentally 214 other persons, in a total number of 5 000 non-American injured). When the “FBI’s Most Wanted Suspects” list was created in 2001, a 5 million dollar reward was offered for his capture.

Various sources maintain that he was detained in Iran from 2003 to 2012, upon which he returned to Libya. However, on the 6th of June 2007, Amnesty International claimed that he was actually held in a secret CIA prison [2].

In December 2010, the Libyan representative at the UN indicated that Al-Libi and his family had returned to their country, as part of a peace treaty negotiated by Saif el-Islam Kadhafi, under US control. With other Al-Qaeda members and under Abdelhakim Belhaj’s authority [3], he took part as of February 2011 (three months later) in NATO’s operations in Libya, leading to the overthrow of the Jamahiriya and to Muammar al-Gaddafi’s lynching. One of al-Libi’s son’s was killed in retaliation by the nationalists in October 2011.

Kidnapped by the US Secretary of Defence in Tripoli (Libya) on 6 October 2013, Abu Anas al-Libi was, according to the New York Times, transferred aboard the USS San Antonio, in theMediterranean sea, to be interrogated [4] outside of the US legal system [5], to be eventually be handed over to US justice authorities in a few weeks or months.

The USS San Antonio is a landing ship, and it’s holds have been transformed into a secret prison by the US Navy. The detainees are interrogated following a program based on Dr. Martin Seligman’s techniques [6]. The goal is not to extract information, but to condition the victims. Officially, President Barack Obama was supposed to have shut down these secret prisons and forbidden torture.

The United-States had not claimed responsibility for an abduction contravening international law since that of Ahmed Abdulkadir Warsame on April 19th 2011 (which was made public two months later).

Alizée Ville

[1] « David Shayler: “I quit the British secret service when the MI6 decided to fund Osama bin Laden’s partners” », Voltaire Network, November 18th 2005.

[2] He appears as n°37 on the « USA : Off the Record. U.S. Responsibility for Enforced Disappearances in the “War on Terror” », Amnesty International, June 6th 2007.

[3] Abdelhakim Belhaj, Al-Qaïda’s number two during the wars against Libya and Syria, is a important collaborator of NATO. Cf. our dossier.

[4] “U.S. Said to Hold Qaeda Suspect on Navy Ship”, by Benjamin Wiser and Eric Schmitt, The New York Times, October 6th 2013.

[5] “How the U.S. Is Interrogating a Qaeda Suspect”, by Charlie Savage and Benjamin Weiser, The New York Times, October 7th 2013.

[6] « The secret behind Guantánamo », by Thierry Meyssan,Odnako/Voltaire Network, October 8th 2009.

Following President Obama’s lunch meeting with Senate Republicans on
Capitol Hill, Maine Republican Senator Susan Collins described the food
served and said the president was not able to eat since his “taster” was
not present.

OBAMA says he cannot eat without his food-taster

See, like the emperor’s of old, he thinks he will be poisoned and will kill his “servants” first!!!

Drones: More in Africa;

Drones and Proxies: The Expanding War Plans for North Africa

Drones and Proxies: The Expanding War Plans for North Africa

John Glaser, 02   October  2012

One of the biggest problems (and there are many) with the Obama administration’s drone program is that it targets unidentified individuals,

the vast majority of whom have not been shown to present any real threat to Americans. According to the recent academic study, Living Under Drones,

the number of ”high-level” targets killed as a percentage of total casualties is extremely low — about 2 percent. Much of the rest were deemed worthy

to be bombed because, according to the unaccountable drone war operatives, they demonstrated a certain “pattern of life,” which drone operators

could tell from a remote-control camera up in the sky is worth dying for.

That’s what makes the administration’s new war plans for North Africa so troubling. The WashingtonPost:

The White House has held a series of secret meetings in recent months to examine the threat posed by al-Qaeda’s franchise in North Africa and consider for the first time whether to prepare for unilateral strikes, U.S. officials said.

The deliberations reflect concern that al-Qaeda’s African affiliate has become more dangerous since gaining control of large pockets of territory in Mali and acquiring weapons from post-revolution Libya. The discussions predate the Sept. 11 attacks on U.S. compounds in Libya but gained urgency after the assaults there were linked to al-Qaeda in the Islamic Maghreb, or AQIM.

How much did we hear about the AQIM threat prior to the discretionary air war on Libya that started in March of last year? The instability and flood of Islamic extremists in Mali, apparently a focal point of the supposed AQIM threat, is itself a direct consequence of US interventionism in Libya. As the Post even explains, “the overthrow of dictator Moammar Gaddafi in Libya triggered a migration of African mercenaries and their weapons back to countries where al-Qaeda elements are based.”

Other “threats” in Africa, like the Nigerian Boko Haram or the al-Shabab network in Somalia are inflated threats that don’t seem to be able to make an impact in their own countries, never mind attack this one. The current policies are apt to come back to bite us, given the US-sponsored invasion of Somalia by Ethiopia in 2006 that helped give rise to the militant group al-Shabaab – now ironically justifying current interventions. Oddly, even the Obama administration has quietly acknowledged the fact that their military involvement in Somalia may create more problems than it solves, with one administration official telling the Washington Post in December there is a “concern that a broader campaign could turn al-Shabab from a regional menace into an adversary determined to carry out attacks on U.S. soil.”

So the Obama administration is currently debating whether to dramatically expand the drone war, or to use African proxy forces to do our fighting for us:

U.S. officials said the discussions have focused on ways to help regional militaries confront al-Qaeda but have also explored the possibility of direct U.S. intervention if the terrorist group continues unchecked…officials have begun to consider contingencies, including the question of “do we or don’t we” deploy drones.

Through the Pentagon’s Africa Command, the US is training and equipping militaries in countries including Algeria, Burkina Faso, Chad, Mali, Mauritania, Morocco, Niger, Nigeria, Senegal and Tunisia in the name of preventing “terrorists from establishing sanctuaries.” The strategy appears irreconcilable with recent history, however, given the US-sponsored invasion of Somalia by Ethiopia in 2006 gave rise to the militant group al-Shabaab – now ironically justifying current interventions.

The strategy, which is beginning to span an entire continent, indicates a desire on the part of the national security establishment to avoid the high costs of thousands of occupation forces and lengthy nation building projects. Instead, military support to undemocratic regimes, dangerous proxy wars, drones, and covert military missions with a light footprint rule the day in America’s approach to Africa.

In other words, it is a strategy outside the jurisdiction of Congress and without the knowledge of the American people. Such strategies have led to tyranny, death, and blowback in the past. And there isn’t much indication it will be any different this time.

Attacks on U.S. Drones Shutter Benghazi Airport

The Benghazi Airport was closed overnight and remained closed for much of the day because of heavy anti-aircraft fire around the city by various factions

targeting the U.S drones that have been looming overhead.

One of the biggest problems (and there are many) with the Obama administration’s drone program is that it targets unidentified individuals,

the vast majority of whom have not been shown to present any real threat to Americans. According to the recent academic study,

Living Under Drones, the number of ”high-level” targets killed as a percentage of total casualties is extremely low — about 2 percent.

Much of the rest were deemed worthy to be bombed because, according to the unaccountable drone war operatives, they demonstrated a certain “pattern of life,”

which drone operators could tell from a remote-control camera up in the sky is worth dying for.

Obama Sends More Drones, Marines to Libya, But Did They Ever Leave?

The Obama administration has ordered military reinforcements to Libya following the attack on the U.S. consulate building this week,

but the truth is drones had never left Libya’s skies and U.S. Marines have been carrying out missions on the ground since the end of NATO’s war there last year.

Obama Sends More Drones, Marines to Libya, But Did They Ever Leave?

Apparently, there is nothing so permanent as a temporary US war

by John Glaser, September 13, 2012

The US suspects al-Qaeda affiliates were involved in starting the attack on the US consulate in Libya, which killed the American ambassador and three others, and has not only started an FBI investigation into the incident, but has ordered more drones to surveil Libya, as well as up to 50 additional US Marines and US warships equipped with Tomahawk missiles off the northern coast.

But the Defense Department toldWired‘s Danger Room that the drones never left, despite the fact that the NATO air war in Libya came to an end almost a year ago.

“Yes, we have been flying CAPs [combat air patrols] since the war ended,” said Army Lt. Col. Steve Warren, a Pentagon spokesman.

These have apparently been done for surveillance purposes with the consent of the new Libyan government.

Similarly, the 50 additional US Marines being sent to Libya won’t exactly be new. One of the four Americans killed in this week’s consulate attack told ABC News last month

he was working with the State Department on an intelligence mission to find  some of the hoards of weapons strewn about the country following the forceful overthrow of the Great Jamahiriya.

The late economist Milton Friedman was famous for saying that there is nothing so permanent as a government temporary program.

He was referring to domestic policies and bureaucracies, but the same principle applies here. When the US government engages in military action abroad,

the tendency is for such military engagements to remain open-ended, in keeping with America’s long history of spreading its military across the entire globe.

That’s what makes the administration’s new war plans for North Africa so troubling.

Will Track Gun Owners, Cellphones in U.S.

At home and abroad, the scope of the drone war is expanding and liberty is contracting.…

As the drone war expands in Africa, the DHS orders domestically deployed drones that can track gun owners and follow cellphone signals. by Joe Wolverton, II, J.D.

Obama Gives Himself Permission to Kill

Obama has argued that he can kill Americans whose deaths he believes will keep us all safer, without any due process whatsoever.

No law authorizes that. His attorney general has argued that the president’s careful consideration of each target and the narrow use of deadly force are an adequate

and constitutional substitute for due process. No court has ever approved that. And his national security adviser has argued that the use of drones is humane

since they are “surgical” and only kill their targets. We know that is incorrect, as the folks who monitor all this say that 11 percent to 17 percent of the 2,300

drone-caused deaths have been those of innocent bystanders.

Archive for the ‘predator drones’ Category

Life as a U.S. Drone Operator: ‘It’s Like Playing a Video Game for Four Years’

“It is a lot like playing a video game,” a former Predator drone operator matter-of-factly admits to the artist Omer Fast.

“But playing the same video game four years straight on the same level.”

His bombs kill real people though and, he admits, often not the people he is aiming at.

Life as a US drone operator: ‘It’s like playing a video game for four years’

Artist Omer Fast looks at the military staff who fly drones from Nevada in a film being shown at the Imperial War Museum

Link to video: What the drone saw“It is a lot like playing a video game,” a former Predator drone operator matter-of-factly admits to the artist Omer Fast. “But playing the same video game four years straight on the same level.” His bombs kill real people though and, he admits, often not the people he is aiming at.The remarkable insight into the working life of one of the most modern of military operatives is provided in a 30-minute film that will be shown at theImperial War Museum in London from Monday, the first in a new programme of exhibitions under the title IWM Contemporary.The project is something of a departure for the museum in one way, although it has been commissioning and showing artists since the first world war. “The idea behind this strand is to present a consistent offer so people do identify us with contemporary art because it sometimes does get a bit lost,” said Sara Bevan, a curator in the art department. It will also allow the gallery to perhaps be more provocative and more reactive to contemporary events.The work by Fast, an Israel-born artist who lives and works in Berlin, is called 5,000 Feet is the Best, which takes its name from the optimum flight altitude of a Predator drone.Drones are pilotless aircraft operated remotely. According to data published by the Bureau of Investigative Journalism last December, there have been almost 1,200 drone strikes on suspected terrorists by US and British forces in the past five years on targets in Afghanistan, Libya, Iraq, Yemen and, by the CIA, in Pakistan.Estimates as to how many have died vary, although a Republican senator, Lindsey Graham, said in February: “We’ve killed 4,700. Sometimes you hit innocent people, and I hate that, but we’re at war, and we’ve taken out some very senior members of al-Qaida.”The subject engenders fierce debate and the artist attempts to capture its complexities.What Fast’s film does brilliantly is evoke the weirdness of people in Nevada endlessly trawling foreign countries for “bad guys”, whom they then get permission to fire on.Fast interviews a former US air force drone operator who admits to making mistakes. “You see a lot of death,” he says before pondering why he carries on – perhaps because if it was not him then it might be some “new kid doing it badly”.

Bevan said Fast’s film was “a visually stunning piece of work”, which she got more out of every time she watched it, as she hopes visitors will, too.

Fast advertised online for drone operators, although the ad was subsequently shut down by the FBI and rather fewer operators came forward.

One was willing. Some of his testimony in the film is the real man, blurred. Elsewhere, an actor plays the operator talking to a journalist in a Las Vegas hotel room.

Bevan said one reason the Fast piece was chosen as the first IWM Contemporary exhibition was because drone warfare was such a “pressing, current issue”. The plan is to have three shows a year with two documentary photographers scheduled next.

“Contemporary art is a really good way of dealing with lots of issues around contemporary conflict, such as issues to do with conflict not being confined to geographical boundaries,” she said. “Art can deal better with the more intangible issues.”

The opening of IWM Contemporary coincides with the partial reopening of the museum itself, which has been shut for six months for major internal works including the building of new first world war galleries.

Although the main display spaces and atrium remain closed, the art galleries will reopen on Monday along with a Horrible Histories show on spies, A Family in Wartime display, the Holocaust exhibition, and Lord Ashcroft’s Victoria Cross gallery. The IWM is scheduled to open fully in summer 2014, coinciding with the centenary events marking the outbreak of the first world war.

• This article was amended on 1 August 2013 to remove references to the IWM having commissioned the Omer Fast work. It was commissioned by the Hermès Foundation, the Kadist Foundation, Dublin Contemporary and The Model, and is the first work to be chosen for display in the IWM Contemporary programme.

Drones and Death Lists: The New Face of Warfare

Iraq, correctly described as the the worst foreign policy disaster in American history, forced a brief rethink and brought to the fore Senator Barack Obama,

who obtained his margin of victory after incorrectly being seen as a peace candidate. Obama really only objected to the “wrong kind” of war, referring to Iraq,

though he considered Afghanistan to be somehow better and fully embraced humanitarian interventionism. And he also completed the job begun by

George W. Bush through institutionalizing an America at war everywhere and all the time. He did that by winding down from wars requiring invasion and

regime change that produced body bags coming home with America’s sons and daughters. He instead opted for low intensity often clandestine engagement

using intelligence and special ops resources that that could be employed with minimal oversight, no transparency, and no accountability.

When challenged in the courts over its covert wars, the White House invariably claims the state secrets privilege, effectively cutting off any judicial review.

One has to think that Dick Cheney would be delighted with what President Obama has accomplished. Which brings one to the means used to fight the

new style warfare: drones and assassination lists. As is frequently the case, technology produces innovations that completely change the nature of what is doable.

The FBI and NSA would not be able to read your emails and listen to your phone calls in real time if computer speed and storage capacity had not increased to

such an extent so as to make it possible. Recent media coverage confirms what many readers of already know. The United States has the technical

ability to monitor phone calls and computer generated messages all over the world and uses the information to create individual files supplemented with biometrics.

It has satellites that can see in the dark and pick up images of people moving on the ground. It can then target individuals or groups without any due process and

kill them with a missile fired from twelve thousand miles away.

Land of the Sheeple Watch: Medals For Killing Women and Children: Majority of Americans Support Drone Strikes

The Pentagon is to reward drone operators with medals, despite the fact that strikes have killed thousands of innocent civilians in Yemen and Pakistan;

and the majority of Americans will support the action. AP reports that the DoD is creating a new ribbon, called the Distinguished Warfare Medal that will be

awarded for “extra achievement” related to a military operation. This will encompass sitting at a computer console and pressing a button to release Hellfire

missiles from Predator drones hundreds and thousands of miles away. The AP report notes that the medal would become the fourth-highest ranking combat

decoration, placing above the Bronze Star, but below the Silver Star. The medal will be the first combat-award created by the Armed Forces since World War II.

Obama’s Secret Kill List — The Disposition Matrix

When contemplating the euphemisms that have slipped into the lexicon since 9/11, the adjective Orwellian is difficult to avoid.

But while such terms as extraordinary rendition, targeted killing and enhanced interrogation are universally known, and their true meanings –

kidnap, assassination, torture – widely understood, the disposition matrix has not yet gained such traction.

May 12, 2011

Tribute to New World Order Emperor Barack Obama

Filed under: Commentary — Peter Hebert @ 2:22 AM

This installment of On The Money with host Peter Hebert is a two hour special that contains archival 9/11 news clips and statement excerpts from people that include George Herbert Walker Bush, Paul Wolfowitz, Milt Bearden of the Central Intelligence Agency, George W. Bush, Dick Cheney, Bill Clinton, assassinated Pakistani Prime Minister Benazir Bhutto, former US Marine and anti war activist Ken O’Keefe, writer Christopher Bollyn, Deborah Lauter of the Anti-Defamation League, Mark Potek of the Southern Poverty Law Center, constitutional lawyer Michael Gross (formerly with the American Civil Liberties Union), former Director of Studies at the US Army War College Dr. Alan Sabrosky, Aaron Russo, Alex Jones, “IBM and the Holocaust” author Edwin Black, U.S. foreign and domestic policy analyst Webster Tarpley, Barack Obama, the “fat aussie bastard” from down under, and Iranian President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. The topics include Project for a New American Century, 9/11, false flag operations, Osama Bin Laden, Al-Qaeda, the war on terror, anti-Semitism, the Israeli Mossad, RFID chips, the Council on Foreign Relations, media complicity in advancing state- and corporate-sponsored propaganda, and the New World Order. This survey of the events surrounding 9/11 and the war on terror rejects any one-sided narrative, but instead examines many of the dominant themes that drive the establishment’s and public’s diametrically opposed views concerning the many topics addressed.


“al-Qaeda” = CIA operatives to make caous & unstabilize governments (initialising “terror” to protract INTERVENTON and make “war”).
” ‘Muslim’ Brotherhood” works for the CIA.
Libya is a puppet state of the CIA & NATO.
Therefore, Obama is terrorist, who supports ‘Muslim’ Brotherhood and al-Qaeda as well as the GNC puppet Government he & witch-Queen Clinton installed upon Libya!

Wayne Madsen Bombshell: Barack Obama conclusively outed as CIA creation

The Story of Obama: All in The Company

The Story of Obama: All in The Company (In Three Parts)

Wayne Madsen
Wayne Madsen Report
August 18, 2010

PART 1: The Story of Obama: All in The Company (Part I)

Investigative journalist Wayne Madsen has discovered CIA files that document the agency’s connections to institutions and individuals figuring prominently in the lives of Barack Obama and his mother, father, grandmother, and stepfather. The first part of his report highlights the connections between Barack Obama, Sr. and the CIA-sponsored operations in Kenya to counter rising Soviet and Chinese influence among student circles and, beyond, to create conditions obstructing the emergence of independent African leaders.

JPEG - 26.4 kb
From 1983-84, Barack Obama worked as Editor at Business Internation Corporation, a Business International Corporation, a known CIA front company.

President Obama’s own work in 1983 for Business International Corporation, a CIA front that conducted seminars with the world’s most powerful leaders and used journalists as agents abroad, dovetails with CIA espionage activities conducted by his mother, Stanley Ann Dunham in 1960s post-coup Indonesia on behalf of a number of CIA front operations, including the East-West Center at the University of Hawaii, the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), and the Ford Foundation. Dunham met and married Lolo Soetoro, Obama’s stepfather, at the East-West Center in 1965. Soetoro was recalled to Indonesia in 1965 to serve as a senior army officer and assist General Suharto and the CIA in the bloody overthrow of President Sukarno.

Barack Obama, Sr., who met Dunham in 1959 in a Russian language class at the University of Hawaii, had been part of what was described as an airlift of 280 East African students to the United States to attend various colleges — merely “aided” by a grant from the Joseph P. Kennedy Foundation, according to a September 12, 1960, Reuters report from London. The airlift was a CIA operation to train and indoctrinate future agents of influence in Africa, which was becoming a battleground between the United States and the Soviet Union and China for influence among newly-independent and soon-to-be independent countries on the continent.

The airlift was condemned by the deputy leader of the opposition Kenyan African Democratic Union (KADU) as favoring certain tribes — the majority Kikuyus and minority Luos — over other tribes to favor the Kenyan African National Union (KANU), whose leader was Tom Mboya, the Kenyan nationalist and labor leader who selected Obama, Sr. for a scholarship at the University of Hawaii. Obama, Sr., who was already married with an infant son and pregnant wife in Kenya, married Dunham on Maui on February 2, 1961 and was also the university’s first African student. Dunham was three month’s pregnant with Barack Obama, Jr. at the time of her marriage to Obama, Sr.

JPEG - 26.7 kb
The CIA allegedly recruited Tom M’Boya in a heavily funded “selective liberation” programme to isolate Kenya’s founding President Jomo Kenyatta, who the American spy agency labelled as “unsafe.”

KADU deputy leader Masinda Muliro, according to Reuters, said KADU would send a delegation to the United States to investigate Kenyan students who received “gifts” from the Americans and “ensure that further gifts to Kenyan students are administered by people genuinely interested in Kenya’s development.’”

Mboya received a $100,000 grant for the airlift from the Kennedy Foundation after he turned down the same offer from the U.S. State Department, obviously concerned that direct U.S. assistance would look suspicious to pro-Communist Kenyan politicians who suspected Mboya of having CIA ties. The Airlift Africa project was underwritten by the Kennedy Foundation and the African-American Students Foundation. Obama, Sr. was not on the first airlift but a subsequent one. The airlift, organized by Mboya in 1959, included students from Kenya, Uganda, Tanganyika, Zanzibar, Northern Rhodesia, Southern Rhodesia, and Nyasaland.

Reuters also reported that Muliro charged that Africans were “disturbed and embittered” by the airlift of the selected students. Muliro “stated that “preferences were shown to two major tribes [Kikuyu and Luo] and many U.S.-bound students had failed preliminary and common entrance examinations, while some of those left behind held first-class certificates.”

Obama, Sr. was a friend of Mboya and a fellow Luo. After Mboya was assassinated in 1969, Obama, Sr. testified at the trial of his alleged assassin. Obama, Sr. claimed he was the target of a hit-and-run assassination attempt after his testimony.

JPEG - 70.7 kb
CIA-airlifted to Hawaii, Barack Obama Sr., with leis, stands with Stanley Dunham, President Obama’s grandfather, on his right.

Obama, Sr., who left Hawaii for Harvard in 1962, divorced Dunham in 1964. Obama, Sr. married a fellow Harvard student, Ruth Niedesand, a Jewish-American woman, who moved with him to Kenya and had two sons. They were later divorced. Obama, Sr. worked for the Kenyan Finance and Transport ministries as well as an oil firm. Obama, Sr. died in a 1982 car crash and his funeral was attended by leading Kenyan politicians, including future Foreign Minister Robert Ouko, who was murdered in 1990.

CIA files indicate that Mboya was an important agent-of-influence for the CIA, not only in Kenya but in all of Africa. A formerly Secret CIA Current Intelligence Weekly Summary, dated November 19, 1959, states that Mboya served as a check on extremists at the second All-African People’s Conference (AAPC) in Tunis. The report states that “serious friction developed between Ghana’s Prime Minister Kwame Nkrumah and Kenyan nationalist Tom Mboya who cooperated effectively last December to check extremists at the AAPC’s first meeting in Accra.” The term “cooperated effectively” appears to indicate that Mboya was cooperating with the CIA, which filed the report from field operatives in Accra and Tunis. While “cooperating” with the CIA in Accra and Tunis, Mboya selected the father of the president of the United States to receive a scholarship and be airlifted to the University of Hawaii where he met and married President Obama’s mother.

An earlier CIA Current Intelligence Weekly Summary, secret, and dated April 3, 1958, states that Mboya “still appears to be the most promising of the African leaders.” Another CIA weekly summary, secret and dated December 18, 1958, calls Mboya the Kenyan nationalist an “able and dynamic young chairman” of the People’s Convention party who was viewed as an opponent of “extremists” like Nkrumah, supported by “Sino-Soviet representatives.”

In a formerly Secret CIA report on the All-Africa Peoples Conference in 1961, dated November 1, 1961, Mboya’s conservatism, along with that of Taleb Slim of Tunisia, are contrasted to the leftist policies of Nkrumah and others. Pro-communists who were elected to the AAPC’s steering committee at the March 1961 Cairo conference, attended by Mboya, are identified in the report as Abdoulaye Diallo, AAPC Secretary General, of Senegal; Ahmed Bourmendjel of Algeria; Mario de Andrade of Angola; Ntau Mokhele of Basutoland; Kingue Abel of Cameroun; Antoine Kiwewa of Congo (Leopoldville); Kojo Botsio of Ghana; Ismail Toure of Guinea; T. O. Dosomu Johnson of Liberia; Modibo Diallo of Mali; Mahjoub Ben Seddik of Morocco; Djibo Bakari of Niger; Tunji Otegbeya of Nigeria; Kanyama Chiume of Nyasaland; Ali Abdullahi of Somalia; Tennyson Makiwane of South Africa, and Mohamed Fouad Galal of the United Arab Republic.

The only attendees in Cairo who were given a clean bill of health by the CIA were Mboya, who appears to have been a snitch for the agency, and Joshua Nkomo of Southern Rhodesia, B. Munanka of Tanganyika, Abdel Magid Shaker of Tunisia, and John Kakonge of Uganda.

Nkrumah would eventually be overthrown in a 1966 CIA-backed coup while he was on a state visit to China and North Vietnam. The CIA overthrow of Nkrumah followed by one year the agency’s overthrow of Sukarno, another coup that was connected to President Obama’s family on his mother’s side. There are suspicions that Mboya was assassinated in 1969 by Chinese agents working with anti-Mboya factions in the government of Kenyan President Jomo Kenyatta in order to eliminate a pro-U.S. leading political leader in Africa. Upon Mboya’s death, every embassy in Nairobi flew its flag at half-mast except for one, the embassy of the People’s Republic of China.

JPEG - 26.8 kb
Jomo Kenyatta, first President of Kenya.

Mboya’s influence in the Kenyatta government would continue long after his death and while Obama, Sr. was still alive. In 1975, after the assassination of KANU politician Josiah Kariuki, a socialist who helped start KANU, along with Mboya and Obama, Sr., Kenyatta dismissed three rebellious cabinet ministers who “all had personal ties to either Kariuki or Tom Mboya.” This information is contained in CIA Staff Notes on the Middle East, Africa, and South Asia, formerly Top Secret Umbra, Handle via COMINT Channels, dated June 24, 1975. The intelligence in the report, based on its classification, indicate the information was derived from National Security Agency intercepts in Kenya. No one was ever charged in the assassination of Kariuki.

The intecepts of Mboya’s and Kariuki’s associates are an indication that the NSA and CIA also maintain intercepts on Barack Obama, Sr., who, as a non-U.S. person, would have been lawfully subject at the time to intercepts carried out by NSA and Britain’s Government Communications Headquarters (GCHQ).

(Continued below)

PART 2: Special Report. The Story of Obama: All in The Company – Part II

In Part I of this WMR special report, we revealed the connections between Barack Obama, Sr. and the CIA-affiliated Airlift Africa project to provide college degrees to and gain influence over a group of 280 eastern and southern African students from soon-to-be independent African nations to counter similar programs established by the Soviet Union and China. Barack Obama Sr. was the first African student to attend the University of Hawaii. Obama Sr. and Obama’s mother Stanley Ann Dunham met in a Russian language class in 1959 and they married in 1961.

The African airlift program was administered by Kenyan nationalist leader Tom Mboya, a fellow Luo tribe mentor and friend of the senior Obama. According to CIA documents described in Part I, Mboya also served the CIA in ensuring that pro-Soviet and pro-Chinese African nationalists were stymied in their attempt to dominate pan-African nationalist political, student, and labor movements.

One of Mboya’s chief opponents was Ghana’s first president, Kwame Nkrumah, who was ousted in a CIA-inspired coup in 1966, one year before to Obama Sr’s son, Barack Obama, Jr. and his mother joined Lolo Soetoro, an Indonesian who Obama’s mother met at the University of Hawaii in 1965, when President Obama was four years old.

In 1967, Obama and his mother joined her husband in Jakarta. In 1965, Lolo Soetoro had been called back from Hawaii by General Suharto to serve as an officer in the Indonesian military to help launch a bloody CIA-backed genocide of Indonesian Communists and Indonesian Chinese throughout the expansive country. Suharto consolidated his power in 1966, the same year that Barack Obama, Sr.’s friend, Mboya, had helped to rally pro-U.S. pan-African support for the CIA’s overthrow of Nkrumah in Ghana in 1966.

East-West Center, University of Hawaii,  and CIA coup against Sukarno

Ann Dunham met Soetoro at the East-West Center at the University of Hawaii. The center had long been affiliated with CIA activities in the Asia-Pacific region. In 1965, the year that Dunham met and married Soetoro, the center saw a new chancellor take over. He was Howard P. Jones who served a record seven years, from 1958 to 1965, as U.S. ambassador to Indonesia. Jones was present in Jakarta as Suharto and his CIA-backed military officers planned the 1965 overthrow of Sukarno, who was seen, along with the Indonesian Communist Party (PKI), as allies of China.

When Jones was chancellor of the East-West Center, he wrote an article for the Washington Post, dated October 10, 1965, in which he defended Suharto’s overthrow of Sukarno. Jones was “invited” by the Post to comment on the Suharto coup, described as a “counter-coup” against the Communists. Jones charged that Suharto was merely responding to an earlier attempted Communist-led coup against Sukarno launched by Lt. Col. Untung, “a relatively unknown battalion commander in the palace guard.”

Jones’s article, which mirrored CIA situation reports from the U.S. embassy in Jakarta, continued by stating that the alleged leftist coup on September 30 ”came within an inch of succeeding through the assassination of six of the top military command. It might well have succeeded had not Defense Minister Nasution and a number of other senior generals also maked for assassination acted fast in a dramatic counter-coup.” Of course, what Jones did not inform the Post’s readers was that the Suharto “counter-coup” had been assisted with the strong help of the CIA.

Sukarno never blamed the Communists for the assassination of the army generals nor did the Indonesian Cabinet, where the second= and third-ranking leaders of the PKI were present. The possibility that the assassination of the generals was a CIA/Suharto “false flag” operation to affix blame on the PKI cannot be ruled out. Two days after Suharto’s coup, a CIA “rent-a-mob” burned down the PKI headquarters in Jakarta. As they marched past the U.S. Embassy, which was also the site of the CIA station, they yelled out, “Long live America!”

Untung later said that when he became aware that Suharto and the CIA were planning a coup on October 5, 1965 – Indonesian Armed Forces Day – forces loyal to him and Sukarno moved first. Jones described this as “typical Communist propaganda.” Suharto moved against Sukarno on October 1. Jones iterated that “there was not an iota of truth . . . in the accusation that the CIA was working against Sukarno.” History has proven otherwise. Jones accused the Communists of taking advantage of Sukarno’s failing health to beat out the other candidates to succeed him. The goal, according to Jones, was to have PKI boss D.N. Aidit succeed Sukarno. Sukarno did not die until 1970, while under house arrest.

A CIA paper, formerly classified Secret and undated, states “Sukarno would like to return to the status quo ante-coup. He has refused to condemn the PKI or the 30th September Movement [of Lt. Col. Untung]; instead, he calls for unity of Indonesia and asks that no vengeance be taken by one group against the other. But, he has not succeeded in forcing the Army to abandon its anti-PKI activities and, on the other hand, he has bowed to their demand by appointing its single candidate General Suharto as head of the Army.” Suharto and Barry Obama Soetoro’s step-father Lolo Soetoro would ignore Sukarno’s call for no vengeance, as hundreds of thousands of Indonesians would soon discover.

The mass murder by Suharto of Indonesian Chinese is seen in the CIA paper’s description of the Baperki Party: “the leftist Baperki Party, with its major strength in rural areas, is largely Chinese-Indonesian in membership.” A CIA Intelligence Memorandum, dated October 6, 1966 and formerly classified Secret, shows the extent of the CIA’s monitoring of the anti-Sukarno coup from various CIA agents assigned as liaisons to Suharto’s army units surrounding the Presidential Palace in Bogor and at various diplomatic posts around the country, including the U.S. Consulate in Medan, which was keeping track of leftists in that Sumatran city and, which, in an October 2, 1965, Intelligence Memo, reported to the CIA that the “Soviet consul-general in Medan has a plane standing by that could be used for evacuation of Soviet citizens from Sumatra.” The October 6 memo also warns against allowing Untung from developing a following in Central Java.

A CIA formerly Secret “Weekly Summary Special Report” on Indonesia, dated August 11, 1967, and titled “The New Order in Indonesia,” reports that in 1966, Indonesia re-aligned its economy in order to receive International Monetary Fund (IMF) assistance. The CIA reports its is happy with the new triumvirate ruling Indonesia in 1967: Suharto, Foreign Minister Adam Malik, and the Sultan of Jogjakarta, who served as minister for economics and finance. The report also rejoices in the outlawing of the PKI, but states it “retains a significant following in East and Central Java,” where Ann Dunham Soetoro would largely concentrate her later efforts on behalf of USAID, the World Bank, and the Ford Foundation, all front activities for the CIA to “win the hearts and minds” of the Javanese farmers and artisans.

A CIA Intelligence Memorandum, formerly Secret and dated July 23, 1966, clearly sees the Muslim Nahdatul Ulama party {NU), the largest party in Indonesia and Muslim, as a natural ally of the United States and the Suharto regime. The report states that helped Suharto put down the Communists in the post-coup time frame, especially where the NU was strongest: East Java, where Obama’s mother would concentrate her activities, and North Sumatra and parts of Borneo. An April 29, 1966, formerly Secret CIA Intelligence Memorandum on the PKI states: “Moslem extremists in many instances outdid the army in hunting down and murdering members of the party [PKI] and its front groups.”

Dunham and Barry Soetoro in Jakarta and USAID front activities

Having A Supply Of Healthy Foods That Last Just Makes Sense

Dunham dropped out of the University of Hawaii in 1960 while pregnant with Barack Obama. Barack Obama Sr. left Hawaii in 1962 to study at Harvard. Dunham and Obama divorced in 1964. In the fall of 1961, Dunham enrolled at the University of Washington while caring for her infant son. Dunham was re-enrolled at the University of Hawaii from 1963 to 1966. Lolo Soetoro, who Dunham married in March 1965, departed Hawaii for Indonesia on July 20, 1965, some three months prior to the CIA’s coup against Sukarno. Soetoro, who served Suharto as an Army colonel, was clearly called back from the CIA-connected East-West Center to assist in the coup against Sukarno, one that would eventually cost the lives of some one million Indonesian citizens. It is a history that President Obama would like the press to ignore, which it certainly did during the 2008 primary and general election.

In 1967, after arriving in Indonesia with Obama, Jr., Dunham began teaching English at the American embassy in Jakarta, which also housed one of the largest CIA stations in Asia and had significant satellite stations in Surabaya in eastern Java and Medan on Sumatra. Jones left as East-West Center chancellor in 1968.

In fact, Obama’s mother was teaching English for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID), which was a major cover for CIA activities in Indonesia and throughout Southeast Asia, especially in Laos, South Vietnam, and Thailand. The USAID program was known as Lembaga Pendidikan Pembinaan Manajemen. Obama’s mother, painted as a free spirit and a “sixties child” by President Obama and people who claimed they knew her in Hawaii and Indonesia, had a curriculum vitae in Indonesia that contradicts the perception that Ann Dunham Soetoro was a “hippy.”

Dunham Soetoro’s Russian language training at the University of Hawaii may have been useful to the CIA in Indonesia. An August 2, 1966, formerly Secret memorandum from the National Security Council’s Executive Secretary Bromley Smith states that, in addition to Japan, Western Europe, Australia, New Zealand, Malaysia, and the Philippines, the Suharto coup was welcomed by the Soviet Union and its Eastern European allies because its created a non-aligned Indonesia that “represents an Asian counterweight to Communist China.” Records indicate that a number of CIA agents posted in Jakarta before and after the 1965 coup were, like Dunham Soetoro, conversant in Russian.

Dunham Soetoro worked for the elitist Ford Foundation, World Bank, Asian Development Bank, Bank Rakyat (the majority government-owned People’s Bank of Indonesia), and the CIA-linked USAID while she lived in Indonesia and later, Pakistan.

USAID was involved in a number of CIA covert operations in Southeast Asia. The February 9, 1971, Washington Star reported that USAID officials in Laos were aware that rice supplied to the Laotian Army by USAID was being re-sold to North Vietnamese army divisions in the country. The report stated that the U.S. tolerated the USAID rice sales to the North Vietnamese since the Laotian Army units that sold the rice found themselves protected from Communist Pathet Lao and North Vietnamese attack. USAID and the CIA also used the supply of rice to force Laotian Meo tribesmen to support the United States in the war against the Communists. USAID funds programmed for civilians injured in the war in Laos and public health care were actually diverted for military purposes.

In 1971, the USAID-funded Center for Vietnamese Studies at Southern Illinois University in Carbondale was accused of being a CIA front. USAID-funded projects through the Midwest Universities Consortium for International Activities (MUCIA) — comprising the Universities of Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Indiana and Michigan State — were accused of being CIA front projects, including those for “agricultural education” in Indonesia, as well as other “projects” in Afghanistan, Mali, Nepal, Nigeria, Thailand, and South Vietnam. The charge was made in 1971, the same year that Ann Dunham was working for USAID in the country.

In a July 10, 1971, New York Times report, USAID and the CIA were accused of “losing” $1.7 billion appropriated for the Civil Operations and Revolutionary Development Support (CORDS) program in South Vietnam. CORDS was part of the CIA’s Operation Phoenix program, which involved CIA assassination and torture of South Vietnamese village elders and Buddhist clerics. USAID money was also directed to the CIA’s proprietary airline in Southeast Asia, Air America. In Thailand, USAID funds for the Accelerated Rural Development Program in Thailand were actually masking a CIA anti-Communist counter-insurgency operation. USAID funds programmed for public works projects in East Pakistan in 1971 were used for East Pakistan’s military fortifications on its border with India, in the months before the outbreak of war with India, in contravention of U.S. law that prohibited USAID money for military purposes.

In 1972, USAID administrator Dr. John Hannah admitted to Metromedia News that USAID was being used as a cover for CIA covert operations in Laos. Hannah only admitted to Laos as a USAID cover for the CIA. However, it was also reported that USAID was being used by the CIA in Indonesia, Philippines, South Vietnam, Thailand, and South Korea. USAID projects in Southeast Asia had to be approved by the Southeast Asian Development Advisory Group (SEADAG), an Asia Society group that was, in fact, answerable to the CIA.

The U.S. Food for Peace program, jointly administered by USAID and the Department of Agriculture, was found in 1972 to be used for military purposes in Cambodia, South Korea, Turkey, South Vietnam, Spain, Taiwan, and Greece. In 1972, USAID funneled aid money only to the southern part of North Yemen, in order to aid North Yemeni forces against the government of South Yemen, then ruled by a socialist government opposed to U.S. hegemony in the region.

One of the entities affiliated with the USAID work in Indonesia was the Asia Foundation, a 1950s creation formed with the help of the CIA to oppose the expansion of communism in Asia. The East-West Center guest house in Hawaii was funded by the Asia Foundation. The guest house is also where Barack Obama Sr. first stayed after his airlift from Kenya to Hawaii, arranged by the one of the CIA’s major agents of influence in Africa, Mboya.

Dunham would also travel to Ghana, Nepal, Bangladesh, India, and Thailand working on micro-financing projects. In 1965, Barack Obama Sr. returned to Kenya from Harvard, with another American wife. The senior Obama linked up with his old friend and the CIA’s “golden boy” Mboya and other fellow Luo politicians. The CIA station chief in Nairobi from 1964 to 1967 was Philip Cherry. In 1975, Cherry was the CIA station chief in Dacca, Bangladesh. Cherry was linked by the then-U.S. ambassador to Bangladesh, Eugene Booster, to the 1975 assassination of Bangladesh’s first president, Sheikh Mujibur Rahman, and members of his family.

The hit on “Sheikh Mujib” and his family was reportedly ordered by then-Secretary of State Henry Kissinger. Bangladesh was also on the micro- and macro-financing travel itinerary of CIA-linked Ann Dunham.

CIA banking and Hawaii

Meanwhile, Dunham Soetoro’s mother, Madelyn Dunham, who raised young Obama when he returned to Hawaii in 1971 while his mother stayed in Indonesia, was the first female vice president at the Bank of Hawaii in Honolulu. Various CIA front entities used the bank. Madelyn Dunham handled escrow accounts used to make CIA payments to U.S.-supported Asian dictators like Philippines President Ferdinand Marcos, South Vietnamese President Nguyen van Thieu, and President Suharto in Indonesia. In effect, the bank was engaged in money laundering for the CIA to covertly prop up its favored leaders in the Asia-Pacific region.

One of the CIA’s major money laundering fronts in Honolulu was the firm of Bishop, Baldwin, Rewald, Dillingham & Wong (BBRDW). After the CIA allowed the firm to collapse in 1983  amid charges that BBRDW was merely a Ponzi scheme, Senator Daniel Inouye of the US Senate Intelligence Committee said the CIA’s role in the firm “wasn’t significant.” It would later be revealed that Inouye, who was one of the late Alaska Senator Ted Stevens’s best friends in the Senate, was lying. In fact, BBRDW was involved heavily in funding covert CIA programs throughout Asia, including economic espionage against Japan, providing arms for Afghan mujaheddin guerrillas in their war against the Soviets and covertly supplying weapons to Taiwan. One of BBRDW’s principals was John C. “Jack” Kindschi, who, before he retired in 1981, was the CIA station chief in Honolulu. BBRDW’s chairman Ron Rewald had a counterfeit college degree certificate provided for the wall of his office by the CIA’s forgery experts and his name was inserted in university records as an alumnus.

A false history for BBRDW was concocted by the CIA claiming the firm had operated in Hawaii since it was a territory. President Obama is currently plagued by allegations that he has fake college and university transcripts, a phony social security number issued in Connecticut, and other padded resume items. Did Hawaii’s fake BBRDW documents portend today’s questions about Obama’s past?

BBRDW conducted its business in the heart of Honolulu’s business district, where the Bank of Hawaii was located and where Obama grandmother Madelyn Dunham ran the escrow accounts. The bank would handle much of BBRDW’s covert financial transactions.

Obama/Soetoro and the “years of living dangerously” in Jakarta

It is clear that Dunham Soetoro and her Indonesian husband, President Obama’s step-father, were closely involved in the CIA’s operations to steer Indonesia away from the Sino-Soviet orbit during the “years of living dangerously” after the overthrow of Sukarno. WMR has discovered that some of the CIA’s top case officers were assigned to various official and non-official cover assignments in Indonesia during this time frame, including under the cover of USAID, the Peace Corps, and the U.S. Information Agency (USIA).

One of the closest CIA contacts for Suharto was former CIA Jakarta embassy officer Kent B. Crane. Crane was so close to Suharto after “retiring” from the CIA, he was reportedly one of the only “private” businessmen given an Indonesian diplomatic passport by Suharto’s government. Crane’s company, the Crane Group, was involved in supplying small arms to the military forces of the United States, Indonesia, and other nations. A foreign policy adviser to Vice President Spiro Agnew, Crane was later nominated as U.S. ambassador to Indonesia by President Ronald Reagan but the nomination was dead-on-arrival because of Crane’s dubious links to Suharto. The ambassadorship would instead go to John Holdridge, a close colleague of Kissinger. Holdridge was succeeded in Jakarta by Paul Wolfowitz.

Suharto’s cronies, who included Mochtar and James Riady of the Lippo Group, would later stand accused of funneling over $1 million of illegal foreign contributions to Bill Clinton’s 1992 presidential campaign.

President Obama has twice postponed official state visits to Indonesia, perhaps fearful of the attention such a trip would bring to the CIA connections of his mother and Indonesian step-father.

In the 1970s and 80s, Dunham was active in micro-loan projects for the Ford Foundation,  the CIA-linked East-West Center, and USAID in Indonesia. One of the individuals assigned to the U.S. embassy and helped barricade the compound during a violent anti-U.S. student demonstration during the 1965 Suharto coup against Sukarno was Dr. Gordon Donald, Jr. Assigned to the embassy’s Economic Section, Donald was responsible for USAID micro-financing for Indonesian farmers, the same project that Dunham Soetoro would work on for USAID in the 1970s, after her USAID job of teaching English in Indonesia. In a 1968 book, “Who’s Who in the CIA,” published in West Berlin, Donald is identified as a CIA officer who was also assigned to Lahore, Pakistan, where Dunham would eventually live for five years in the Hilton International Hotel while working on microfinancing for the Asian Development Bank.

Another “Who’s Who in the CIA” Jakarta alumnus is Robert F. Grealy, who later became the director for international relations for the Asia-Pacific for J P Morgan Chase and a director for the American-Indonesian Chamber of Commerce. J P Morgan Chase’s CEO Jamie Dimon is being mentioned as a potential replacement for Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner, whose father, Peter Geithner, was the Ford Foundation’s Asia grant-selector who funneled the money to Ann Dunham’s Indonesian projects.

CIA Black Projects and Hawaii

While in Pakistan, Dunham’s son Barack visited her in 1980 and 1981. Obama visited Karachi, Lahore, and Hyderabad, India during his south Asia visits. It was during the time period that the CIA was beefing up its anti-Soviet operations in Afghanistan from Pakistan.

A January 31, 1958, heavily-redacted formerly Secret NOFORN [no foreign dissemination] memorandum for CIA Director Allen Dulles from the Deputy Assistant Director of the CIA for Research and Reports [name redacted] reports on a fact-finding mission to the Far East, Southeast Asia, and the Middle East from November 17 through December 21, 1957.

The CIA Office of Research and Reports (ORR) chief reports a meeting with the staff of retired Army General Jesmond Balmer, a senior CIA official in Hawaii, about requests by the Commander-in-Chief Pacific (CINCPAC) for “a number of detailed, time-consuming research studies.” The ORR chief then reports about a CIA “survey of students at the University of Hawaii who have both Chinese language and research ability.” The ORR chief also reports that at a South-East Asia Treaty Organization (SEATO) Counter Subversion Seminar at Baguio, Philippines held from November 26-29, 1957, the Economic Subcommittee discussed an “economic development fund” to combat “Sino-Soviet Bloc subversive activities in the area and a consideration of possible counter-measures which might be employed.”

The Thailand and Philippines delegations were pushing hard for U.S. funding for an economic development fund, which may have provided the impetus for later USAID projects in the region, including those with which Peter Geithner and Obama’s mother were intimately involved.

Although CIA geo-political covert operations at the University of Hawaii are well-documented, the agency’s darker side of research and MK-UKTRA type operations has not generally been associated with the University of Hawaii.

A series of formerly Confidential CIA memoranda, dated May 15, 1972, points to the involvement of both the Defense Department’s Advanced Research Projects Agency (ARPA), the CIA, and the University of Hawaii in the CIA’s behavioral science program. The memos are signed by then-Deputy Director of the CIA Bronson Tweedy, the chief of the Intelligence Community’s Program Review Group (PRG) [name redacted], and CIA Director Richard Helms. The subject of the memos is “ARPA Supported Research Relating to Intelligence Product,” The memo from the PRG chief discusses a conference held on May 11, 1972, attended by Lt. Col. Austin Kibler, ARPA’s Director of Behavioral Research. Kibler was the chief for ARPA research into behavior modification and remote viewing. Others mentioned in the PRG chief’s memo include CIA Deputy Director for Intelligence Edward Proctor, the CIA Deputy Director for Science and Technology Carl Duckett, and Director of the Office of National Estimates John Huizenga.

In 1973, after CIA Director James Schlesinger ordered a review of all CIA programs, the CIA developed a set of documents on various CIA programs collectively called the “Family Jewels.” Most of these documents were released in 2007 but it was also revealed that Dr. Sidney Gottlieb, the CIA’s director of MKULTRA, the agency’s behavior modification, brainwashing, and drug testing component, had been ordered by Helms, before he resigned as CIA director, to be destroyed. Duckett, in one memo from Ben Evans of the CIA to CIA Director William Colby, dated May 8, 1973, conveys that he “thinks the Director would be ill-advised to say he is acquainted with this program,” meaning Gottlieb’s drug testing program under MKULKTRA.

Senior Gerald Ford administration officials, including Chief of Staff Dick Cheney and Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld, ensured that after the production of the “Family Jewels” documents, no CIA revelations were made about CIA psychological behavior-altering programs, including MKULTRA and Project ARTICHOKE.

The May 15, 1972, set of memos appears to be related to the CIA’s initial research, code named SCANATE, in 1972 into psychic warfare, including the use of psychics for purposes of remote viewing espionage and mind control. The memo discussed Kibler from ARPA and “his contractor,” which was later discovered to be Stanford Research Institute (SRI) in Menlo Park, California.

In a memo from CIA Director Helms to, among others, Duckett, Huizenga, Proctor, and the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, which later inherited reote viewing from the CIA under the code name GRILL FLAME, Helms insists that ARPA had been supporting research into behavioral science and its potential for intelligence production ”for a number of years” at “M.I.T., Yale, the University of Michigan, U.C.L.A., andUniversity of Hawaii and other institutions as well as in corporate research facilities.”

The role of the University of Hawaii in CIA psych-war operations continues to this day.  The chief of research for DIA’s Defense Counterintelligence and Human Intelligence Center (DCHC) Behavioral Sciences Program, Dr. Susan Brandon, who was reportedly involved in a covert program run by the American Psychological Association (APA), Rand Corporation, and the CIA to employ “enhanced interrogation” techniques, including sleep and sensory deprivation, intense pain, and extreme isolation on prisoners held at Bagram airbase in Afghanistan and other “black prisons,” received her PhD in Psychology from the University of Hawaii. Brandon also served as assistant director of Social, Behavioral, and Educational Sciences for the Office of Science and Technology Policy in the George W. Bush White House.

The CIA’s close connections to the University of Hawaii continued to the late 1970s, when the former President of the University of Hawaii from 1969 to 1974, Harlan Cleveland, was a special invited speaker at CIA headquarters on May 10, 1977. Cleveland served as Assistant Secretary of State for International Organization Affairs from 1961 to 1965 and Lyndon Johnson’s ambassador to NATO from 1965 to 1969 before taking up his position at the University of Hawaii.

A CIA Director of Training memo dated May 21, 1971, reports on the active recruitment of a U.S. Marine officer who was entering graduate school at the University of Hawaii.

The Family of Obama and the CIA

There are volumes of written material on the CIA backgrounds of George H. W. Bush and CIA-related activities by his father and children, including former President George W. Bush. Barack Obama, on the other hand, cleverly masked his own CIA connections as well as those of his mother, father, step-father, and grandmother (there is very little known about Obama’s grandfather, Stanley Armour Dunham, who was supposedly in the furniture business in Hawaii after serving in Europe during World War II). Presidents and vice presidents do not require security background checks, unlike other members of the federal government, to hold office. That job is left up to the press. In 2008, the press failed miserably in its duty to vet the man who would win the White House. With the ties of Obama’s parents to the University of Hawaii and its links to MKULTRA and ARTICHOKE, a nagging question remains: Is Barack Obama a real-life “Manchurian Candidate?”

(Continued below)

PART 3: August 19, 2010 — SPECIAL REPORT. The Story of Obama: All in the Company — Add one more Obama family member to the CIA payroll. Part III

WMR previously reported on the CIA links of President Obama’s mother, father, step-father, grandmother to the CIA. Not much is known about Obama’s grandfather, Stanley Armour Dunham, who Obama mistakenly referred to as “his father” in two speeches, one recently to the Disabled American Veterans.

What is officially known about Stanley Armour Dunham is that he served with the 9th Air Force in Britain and France prior to and after the D-Day invasion. After the war, Dunham and his wife, Madelyn and his daughter Stanley Ann — Obama’s mother — moved to Berkeley, California; El Dorado, Kansas; Seattle; and Honolulu. Armour Dunham is said to have worked for a series of furniture stores.

Obama maintains that his mother and father first met in a Russian-language class at the University of Hawaii in 1959. However, a photograph has emerged of Stanley Armour welcoming Barack Obama, Sr., complete with traditional Hawaiian welcoming leis, from Kenya. Obama, Sr. was the only Kenyan student airlifted to Hawaii as part of the CIA-inspired Airlift Africa project that saw Obama and 279 other students from British eastern and southern African colonies brought to the United States for college degrees prior to their homelands gaining independence from Britain. The students were selected by Kenyan nationalist leader Tom Mboya who would later conduct surveillance for the CIA at pan-African nationalist meetings. Mboya was particularly focused on two African leaders who were seen as too close to the Sino-Soviet bloc, Kwame Nkrumah of Ghana and Sekout Toure of Guinea.

Stanley Armour Dunham with Barack Obama, Sr. at welcoming ceremony to Hawaii. The presence of two US Navy personnel indicates the plane may have landed at Hickam Air Force Base, an indication of the U.S. government’s and CIA’s role in the Airlift Africa project.

The photograph of Armour Dunham with Barack Obama, Sr., indicates that the “furniture salesman” in Hawaii was, in fact, working with a CIA-funded project to rapidly educate aspiring politicians to serve in post-independence African governments to counter Soviet- and Chinese-backed political leaders in the region.

There is a strong reason to believe that Armour Dunham worked in the 1950s for the CIA in the Middle East. An FBI file on Armour Dunham existed but the bureau claimed it destroyed the file on May 1, 1997. Considering the sour relations between the FBI and CIA during the Cold War, it is likely that Armour Dunham was being monitored by FBI director J. Edgar Hoover in the same manner as a number of other CIA officials and agents were being surveilled. Similarly, the pre-1968 passport records of Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham, were destroyed by the State Department.

There is a photographic clue that the Dunhams may have been assigned by the CIA to Beirut, Lebanon in the early 1950s. A photograph of Obama’s mother and grandparents has emerged that shows Stanley Ann Dunham wearing what may be a school uniform with the insignia of “NdJ,” which stands for the College Notre-Dame de Jamhour, a private Jesuit Catholic French language school in Beirut, Lebanon. Graduates of the school include three former presidents of Lebanon, Amine Gemayel, Bashir Gemayel, and Charles Helou, all of whom maintained close relations with Washington.

Did Obama’s mother [left] go to a private school in Lebanon in the early 1950s while her father [middle] worked for the CIA in Beirut?

There is also the curious nature of President Obama’s Social Security Number, issued in Connecticut, a state where there is no other evidence of his ever being a resident. Adding to the mystery is a New York City address for a “male” named Stanley Ann Dunham,  235 E. 40th St Apt 8F, New York NY 10016-1747. The address is a few blocks away from the address of the Ford Foundation. Ann Dunham did work briefly in New York for the Ford Foundation.

On August 9, 2010, WMR reported, “In a December 19, 1971, article in the Boston Globe by Dan Pinck, [a historian and former OSS officer] titled ‘Is everyone in the CIA?’ it is alleged that identifying US Agency for International Development (USAID) officers as CIA agents was a ‘reasonably accurate accounting of certain leading operatives and associates of the CIA.’ President Obama’s mother, Stanley Ann Dunham Soetoro worked for USAID in rural Java in Indonesia. Pinck’s article was a review of a 1968 book, ‘Who’s Who in the CIA’ published in Berlin.”

WMR has obtained a rare copy of “Who’s Who in the CIA,” from England. The book, published in West Berlin in 1968, lists some 3,000 CIA agents and agents-of-influence around the world.

The book also contains a reference to one CIA operative whose area of primary place of operation was Mercer Island, Washington. He was retired Air Force General Don Zabriskie Zimmermann, who was the Chief Engineer for the Boeing Company in Seattle. Before retiring from the Air Force, Zimmermann was the Air Force Assistant Deputy Chief of Staff for Development in Foreign Countries. Ann Stanley Dunham reportedly graduated from Mercer Island High School in 1960 and met Obama later that year in a Russian language class after  her parents moved to Hawaii. Stanley Ann’s mother, Madelyn Dunham, worked at a Boeing plant in Wichita, Kansas during World War II.

The book lists the number of CIA agents in countries during the 1950s and 60s where Obama’s father, mother, step-father Lolo Soetori, and allegedly, his grandmother and grandfather worked:


Jakarta   64

Surabaya  12

Medan  8

Hollandia  1


Nairobi  19

Mombassa  2


Beirut  61     (including one agent also assigned to Jakarta, Lahore, and Karachi and another assigned to Lahore)


Honolulu   6  (one agent also assigned to Canton Island and another was fluent in French, Stanley Ann Dunham spoke French, Urdu, Bahasa Indonesian, and she studied Javanese at the University of Hawaii, in addition to Russian).

COMMENTWe commend Wayne Madsen for his vast exposé of Barack Obama’s true background. Madsen will appear on the Alex Jones Show tomorrow THURSDAY AUGUST 19 at 1 PM EST / 12 NOON CST, to reveal even more bombshell details of his deep research into this matter. Tune in for this vital info andvisit the Wayne Madsen Report for further details.



Obama’s Impeachment And Trial For War Crimes

16 October  2013 by


On October 11, 2013, the 110-page Human Rights Watch report entitled “You Can Still See Their Blood” was published, in which it was found that Obama’s al-Qaeda-linked Syrian rebels have been engaged in nothing short of war crimes.

According to the report, in the Syrian province of Latakia,  Obama’s al-Qaeda rebels, accusing the residents in the surrounding villages of helping Syrian government forces, went on a murderous rampage beginning August 4, 2013. Over 200 civilians were slaughtered, including 57 women and 18 children. Entire families were decimated. Dozens of civilians were decapitated. In several villages, the residents were set on fire and burned alive. An eighty-year-old blind woman was shot dead in her bed. The victims were thrown into mass graves reminiscent of Hitler’s murderess SS traversing the countryside, leaving a wake of carnage.

The report rightly calls this “crimes against humanity”—“war crimes.” All under funding and with weapons supplied by Barack Hussein Obama.

We know that Obama has directed the CIA to not only fund and arm the al-Qaeda-linked  Syrian rebels, but is training them and has CIA agents embedded within their ranks. Obama therefore knew about the war crimes and covered it up and is therefore himself guilty of crimes against humanity.

After Obama is impeached for funding and arming terrorists, he should be brought before the International Criminal Court to answer for crimes against humanity and imprisoned for the rest of his life




16 Oct.   2013


Who were the ’Nazis’ who wrecked Libya and murdered vast numbers of Libyan woman and kids?

Britain deployed large numbers of soldiers to Libya, defence secretary Philip Hammond has revealed.

The British Forces Broadcasting Service said that 1 200 army officers took part in Operation Ellamy, the Ministry of Defence’s codename for the Libya conflict.

Previously, ministers claimed “a handful” of British Army officers would be sent to “advise” rebel commanders.

British soldiers were involved in Libya operations on the ground 

“At its peak, the UK had 2,300 personnel, 32 aircraft and four ships committed to the campaign in Libya.”

UK military starting Libya return

There have been reports of British troops being captured and killed in Libya.






A. Arabs

The so-called satellite news channel mobility news:

Algerian military operation that killed 9 terrorists gunmen southwest Libya.


ما يسمى قناة النبأ الفضائية تنقل خبر : عملية عسكرية جزائرية اسفرت عن مقتل 9 مسلحين ارهابيين جنوب غرب ليبيا.



Tunisian President issued a decree to pardon “17” prisoners Libya

Tunisian Presidency announced that the president, “Moncef Marzouki,”

issued a decree to pardon the “17” prisoners of Libya, on the occasion of Eid al-Adha.

According to the Libyan news agency, quoting a statement to the Consulate-General embassy in Libya in Tunisia,

Mohammed Ferjani and added that this amnesty for prisoners convicted in different cases prisons Tunisian was the result

of the efforts of the Department of Consular Affairs at the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation and consulates plenary meetings in Tunis and Sfax.

Gave a security unit in Ben Guerdane on Wednesday morning arrested a young Tunisian intends to cross the border to Libya after committed murder last night area train from the state of Gafsa claimed the lives of young people from the region and the news agency quoted a Tunisian security source said thanks to a security plan based on the closure of an arbitrator ports for the entire border area of Ben Guerdane security unit has been able to arrest the killer of 23 – year – old Ben Guerdane city center . The young man confessed to the killing after his arrest Tunisian young man said he stabbed neighbor because of the differences between them justified his crime situation of sugar (ESTASCY) , which was at the time of the crime , according to his statements .

Mu smile of being pleased


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s